STATEMENT BY [500] FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS

[nat4900]

There was NEVER a clearer indication that Bill Barr is both a Trump stooge and should readily resign in shame..........When 500 leading former federal prosecutors basically call Barr a farce to the legal system, it is time to go spend" more quality time with your dog."

Total "exoneration"????? HARDLY......

Knowing that Trump acolytes have a strong antipathy to read FACTS, I offer just ONE paragraph from the letter submitted by these former prosecutors......YOU JUDGE what breaches have been made to the Principles of Federal Prosecution and what leading law officials state:

We emphasize that these are not matters of close professional judgment. Of course, there are potential defenses or arguments that could be raised in response to an indictment of the nature we describe here. In our system, every accused person is presumed innocent and it is always the government’s burden to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. But, to look at these facts and say that a prosecutor could not probably sustain a conviction for obstruction of justice — the standard set out in Principles of Federal Prosecution — runs counter to logic and our experience.

STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS

 

[sparky]

People don't care about facts Nat49

~S~

 

[deanrd]

And many, if not most of those former prosecutors are Republicans.

 

[deanrd]

People don't care about facts Nat49

~S~

PEOPLE do care about facts.

REPUBLICANS don't care about facts.

 

[toomuchtime_]

There was NEVER a clearer indication that Bill Barr is both a Trump stooge and should readily resign in shame..........When 500 leading former federal prosecutors basically call Barr a farce to the legal system, it is time to go spend" more quality time with your dog."

Total "exoneration"????? HARDLY......

Knowing that Trump acolytes have a strong antipathy to read FACTS, I offer just ONE paragraph from the letter submitted by these former prosecutors......YOU JUDGE what breaches have been made to the Principles of Federal Prosecution and what leading law officials state:

We emphasize that these are not matters of close professional judgment. Of course, there are potential defenses or arguments that could be raised in response to an indictment of the nature we describe here. In our system, every accused person is presumed innocent and it is always the government’s burden to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. But, to look at these facts and say that a prosecutor could not probably sustain a conviction for obstruction of justice — the standard set out in Principles of Federal Prosecution — runs counter to logic and our experience.

STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS

Now we know why they no longer have their jobs as prosecutors.

 

[Marion Morrison]

What's that smell? Eau de Desperación?

 

[sparky]

People don't care about facts Nat49

~S~

PEOPLE do care about facts.

REPUBLICANS don't care about facts.

Oh pUUUllease Dean.....~S~

 

[whitehall]

I saw 200 and then 300 and now it's 500 "former federal prosecutors" who are apparently unemployed and rattling around Washington D.C. advocating a political coup. Maybe the D.C. police need to gear up for anarchy.

 

[DGS49]

You read it here first: This is bullshit. A few days from now, some news outlet will begin to leak out the details that reveal how totally false this report is.

Where do you even FIND 500 former prosecutors? Bullshit on steroids.

It is analogous to the infamous "...97% of scientists agree..." then we find out the "scientists" are not really scientists, don't agree with the conclusion or whatever.

This is bullshit.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Funny stuff.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Irrelevant. What does it matter that the Democrats can find people - whatever their true status - who don't like Trump?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

You read it here first: This is bullshit. A few days from now, some news outlet will begin to leak out the details that reveal how totally false this report is.

Where do you even FIND 500 former prosecutors? Bullshit on steroids.

It is analogous to the infamous "...97% of scientists agree..." then we find out the "scientists" are not really scientists, don't agree with the conclusion or whatever.

This is bullshit.

Gnats just trying to keep an old worthless gasp relevant. He's like the flat earth crowd.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Ohhh puhlezze who are they? Where are they? This has every indication of being pulled out of democrat ass. Did they get tired of the 20,000 psychiatrists that diagnosed Trump?

 

[nat4900]

Now we know why they no longer have their jobs as prosecutors.

"Brilliant" defense of the orange buffoon and his stooges......Call Barr right away....LOL

 

[toomuchtime_]

Irrelevant. What does it matter that the Democrats can find people - whatever their true status - who don't like Trump?

Actually, most Democrats love Trump, but their feelings are hurt because he never goes to their parties.

 

[fncceo]

That explains why they're 'EX' prosecutors.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That explains why they're 'EX' prosecutors.

How so? Please, elaborate.

 

[nat4900]

You read it here first: This is bullshit. A few days from now, some news outlet will begin to leak out the details that reveal how totally false this report is.

Where do you even FIND 500 former prosecutors? Bullshit on steroids.

It is analogous to the infamous "...97% of scientists agree..." then we find out the "scientists" are not really scientists, don't agree with the conclusion or whatever.

This is bullshit.

Great......after repeating 2 or 3 times "bullshit" and stomping your feet....KIt may be time for you to go to bed.....

 

[Leo123]

There was NEVER a clearer indication that Bill Barr is both a Trump stooge and should readily resign in shame..........When 500 leading former federal prosecutors basically call Barr a farce to the legal system, it is time to go spend" more quality time with your dog."

Total "exoneration"????? HARDLY......

Knowing that Trump acolytes have a strong antipathy to read FACTS, I offer just ONE paragraph from the letter submitted by these former prosecutors......YOU JUDGE what breaches have been made to the Principles of Federal Prosecution and what leading law officials state:

We emphasize that these are not matters of close professional judgment. Of course, there are potential defenses or arguments that could be raised in response to an indictment of the nature we describe here. In our system, every accused person is presumed innocent and it is always the government’s burden to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. But, to look at these facts and say that a prosecutor could not probably sustain a conviction for obstruction of justice — the standard set out in Principles of Federal Prosecution — runs counter to logic and our experience.

STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS

Crazy lib-link....^^^^^^^

 

[Dr Grump]

You read it here first: This is bullshit. A few days from now, some news outlet will begin to leak out the details that reveal how totally false this report is.

Where do you even FIND 500 former prosecutors? Bullshit on steroids.

It is analogous to the infamous "...97% of scientists agree..." then we find out the "scientists" are not really scientists, don't agree with the conclusion or whatever.

This is bullshit.

Um..Stop drinking Kool Aid. Most scientists DO agree.