Sunni thinks his wife is property

[Si modo]

You mean like their dancing in the streets when it happened? Or a phone call from a passenger stating who had taken over and was in charge of the plane? Or the fact that bin Laden claimed responsibility for the attack?

Sunni, how is it that you are not on the watch list?

For what?

I am a patriotic and loyal American citizen who has worn our nations uniform during a time of war.

I break no laws, vote and pay taxes.

And do not support terrorism.

For what?

I am a patriotic and loyal American citizen who has worn our nations uniform during a time of war.

I break no laws, vote and pay taxes.

And do not support terrorism.

So you say.

You are a tacit supporter of Muslim terrorists.

That is a cold, hard, fact.

That's pretty clear and sometimes more than tacit.

Too true. Pretty cowardly, though he is a good little Muslim.

 

[Sunni Man]

You are a tacit supporter of Muslim terrorists.

That is a cold, hard, fact.

Nope

As not a single post of yours exists where you remotely even criticize a Muslim terrorist, you are a tacit supporter of Muslim terrorists.

Cold.

Hard.

Fact.

Incorrect

btw You lost this argument I couple of days ago.

 

[Si modo]

Nope

As not a single post of yours exists where you remotely even criticize a Muslim terrorist, you are a tacit supporter of Muslim terrorists.

Cold.

Hard.

Fact.

Incorrect

btw You lost this argument I couple of days ago.

Not a single post of yours exists where you remotely even criticize a Muslim terrorist.

What does that make you?

Oh, yeah...it makes you a tacit supporter of Muslim terrorists.

Those are irrefutable facts at this point.

 

[Sunshine]

For what?

I am a patriotic and loyal American citizen who has worn our nations uniform during a time of war.

I break no laws, vote and pay taxes.

And do not support terrorism.

You are a tacit supporter of Muslim terrorists.

That is a cold, hard, fact.

That's pretty clear and sometimes more than tacit.

Too true. Pretty cowardly, though he is a good little Muslim.

 

[Sunni Man]

Not a single post of yours exists where you remotely even criticize a Muslim terrorist.

There you go lying as usual.

Look at post #628 on this thread.

 

[Si modo]

Not a single post of yours exists where you remotely even criticize a Muslim terrorist.

There you go lying as usual.

Look at post #628 on this thread.

Au contraire, my mendacious one.
As you don't think Bin laden was involved, you did not criticize him.

Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzt.....try again.

 

[Sunshine]

Not a single post of yours exists where you remotely even criticize a Muslim terrorist.

There you go lying as usual.

Look at post #628 on this thread.

To mollify those who say I never speak against other Muslims or alleged terrorist attacks.

Here is one:

"If" Osama bin Laden was responsible for the attack on the World Trade Center.

Then he was in the wrong and should be denounced for his action.

Because it is against Islam to attack civilians or civilian targets.

No cigar!

 

[Sunni Man]

Not a single post of yours exists where you remotely even criticize a Muslim terrorist.

There you go lying as usual.

Look at post #628 on this thread.

To mollify those who say I never speak against other Muslims or alleged terrorist attacks.

Here is one:

"If" Osama bin Laden was responsible for the attack on the World Trade Center.

Then he was in the wrong and should be denounced for his action.

Because it is against Islam to attack civilians or civilian targets.

No cigar!

Her exact words that I have never even "remotely" criticized a muslim.

So my posting did qualify as a criticism of a fellow muslim.

 

[Sunshine]

There you go lying as usual.

Look at post #628 on this thread.

To mollify those who say I never speak against other Muslims or alleged terrorist attacks.

Here is one:

"If" Osama bin Laden was responsible for the attack on the World Trade Center.

Then he was in the wrong and should be denounced for his action.

Because it is against Islam to attack civilians or civilian targets.

No cigar!

Her exact words that I have never even "remotely" criticized a muslim.

So my posting did qualify as a criticism of a fellow muslim.

You didn't even remotely criticize a muslim in that post.

 

[Si modo]

There you go lying as usual.

Look at post #628 on this thread.

To mollify those who say I never speak against other Muslims or alleged terrorist attacks.

Here is one:

"If" Osama bin Laden was responsible for the attack on the World Trade Center.

Then he was in the wrong and should be denounced for his action.

Because it is against Islam to attack civilians or civilian targets.

No cigar!

Her exact words that I have never even "remotely" criticized a muslim.

So my posting did qualify as a criticism of a fellow muslim.

Accuracy is not your strong suit; I said "remotely even criticize a Muslim terrorist".

As that wasn't a criticism of Bin Laden, it fails.

 

[daveman]

There you go lying as usual.

Look at post #628 on this thread.

To mollify those who say I never speak against other Muslims or alleged terrorist attacks.

Here is one:

"If" Osama bin Laden was responsible for the attack on the World Trade Center.

Then he was in the wrong and should be denounced for his action.

Because it is against Islam to attack civilians or civilian targets.

No cigar!

Her exact words that I have never even "remotely" criticized a muslim.

So my posting did qualify as a criticism of a fellow muslim.

For doing something you don't think he did?

Really? You call that criticism?

 

[Sunni Man]

He was never tried or convicted in the 911 incident.

Thus, he was only "allegedly" involved.

Because nothing was ever proven in a court of law.

 

[Si modo]

He was never tried or convicted in the 911 incident.

Thus, he was only "allegedly" involved.

Because nothing was ever proven in a court of law.

That is irrelevant to the cold, hard, fact that you are a tacit supporter of Muslim terrorists.

 

[Sunni Man]

Is the word "tacit" like your new favorite word?

Because you seem to use it on just about every post.

Like a kid who just discovered a new toy.

 

[Si modo]

Is the word "tacit" like your new favorite word?

Because you seem to use it on just about every post.

Like a kid who just discovered a new toy.

Not a favorite word at all of mine because it is the epitome of passive-aggression and cowardice.

But, you ARE a tacit supporter of Muslim terrorists.

I can start to use 'coward', though, if you prefer.

 

[Sunni Man]

Use any word you like because it only makes you look like a loon.

 

[Si modo]

Use any word you like because it only makes you look like a loon.

No doubt it does in your mind. That's OK, because supporters of Muslim terrorists are not pals of mine.

 

[Sunni Man]

Use any word you like because it only makes you look like a loon.

No doubt it does in your mind. That's OK, because supporters of Muslim terrorists are not pals of mine.

They are not pals of mine either.

 

[Si modo]

Use any word you like because it only makes you look like a loon.

No doubt it does in your mind. That's OK, because supporters of Muslim terrorists are not pals of mine.

They are not pals of mine either.

You don't like yourself, then. You are a supporter of Muslim terrorists, demonstrated over and over here.

Now, my opinion of those who support Muslim terrorism is that they are pigs.

Apparently, I need to assume that you are dense as well.

 

[Sunshine]

Is the word "tacit" like your new favorite word?

Because you seem to use it on just about every post.

Like a kid who just discovered a new toy.

Not a favorite word at all of mine because it is the epitome of passive-aggression and cowardice.

But, you ARE a tacit supporter of Muslim terrorists.

I can start to use 'coward', though, if you prefer.

Or treacherous coward.