Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 15,116
- 12,698
- 2,400
- Thread starter
- #21
It has been posted many times I find it hard to believe you haven't seen it, I even posted the law the other day.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That SCOTUS survived into old age and maintained trust in their institution. This SCOTUS was installed by people who support secession and ending democracy. But maybe history won't repeat itself and republicans will succeed at creating a theocratic dictatorship here. Who knows.
Killing is not a human right.The supreme court stole a human right from people in an atmosphere where civil war was already brewing. They'll be lucky to survive the decade.
Libtards don't know how to discipline their children.You see, that's where they're going wrong. You don't "ask" them to stop harassing those Justices, like you need permission or something.
You tell them.
And then you back it up with some teeth: Law-enforcement officers, fire hoses, dogs, rubber bullets, sonic weapons, and arrests. You don't drop the charges, you make sure they are penalized to the farthest extent of the law, and you ruin their lives with hefty fines and prison time. You put them on no-fly lists because basically, they're terrorists.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
It was actually the democrat's fault this happened because the Roe vs Wade decision allowed just a First Trimester abortion which by todays CDC stats shows a 90% rate within the time fame. which democrats disliked so they pushed for all 9 months over the years generating a backlash that finally came now they have no abortion allowed at all in some states.
Are you suggesting the federal government should take over enforcement of state laws? Because that doesn't sound very conservative to me. Does that sound conservative to you? It doesn't sound conservative to me.
This decision was going to happen eventually.
The hard fact is, regardless of what you think about abortion itself, that the 1973 Supreme Court acted illegally, seizing for itself, a power that rightfully belonged to the legislative processes of the individual states.
Even without the backlash against the degree to which the pro-child-murder side has pushed the cause far beyond the ersatz “right” established in 1973, there remain enough of us, and will always remain enough of us, who believe that the murder of an innocent human being is never morally acceptable, and should never be legally acceptable, that sooner or later this case was going to have to find its way back to the Supreme Court, which, if it was honest, would have no choice but to admit to, and overturn, the error made by their predecessors.
Democrats are blatant hypocrites.
Supreme Court asks Maryland officials to stop people picketing at justices’ houses
That is true but the MARSHAL of SCOTUS is responsible for their safety has sent a letter requesting they observe their own state laws.
"Gail Curley, the Supreme Court’s marshal, has written to Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan and the top official in Montgomery County, just outside Washington, asking them both to enforce state and county laws that prohibit picketing at private homes. "
The court was asked to hold police officers accountable for violating people's civil rights. They said no but now they want people held accountable for what they see as a violation of their rights.
Screw them.
Isn't doing so already violation of federal law?
If I were a Justice, I'd just open a window and shoot the bastards. Then if charged, I'd appeal the decision all the way to the Supreme Court then just pardon myself.
Encouraging them to enforce the laws sounds pretty conservative to me.Are you suggesting the federal government should take over enforcement of state laws? Because that doesn't sound very conservative to me. Does that sound conservative to you? It doesn't sound conservative to me.
It is not at all clear what the fuck you're babbling about, but it does not appear to have anything whatsoever with the case I was discussing in the post to which you replied with this nonsense.
In that case, you'll get a real insurrection next timeTyranny comes with large numbers of disgruntled citizens milling around the castle walls. Get used to it
The court was asked to hold police officers accountable for violating people's civil rights. They said no but now they want people held accountable for what they see as a violation of their rights.
Screw them.
if I were a justice, I'd roll down the window, place the most powerful speaker in it I could find and play "You're Having My Baby" over and over at top volumeIsn't doing so already violation of federal law?
If I were a Justice, I'd just open a window and shoot the bastards. Then if charged, I'd appeal the decision all the way to the Supreme Court then just pardon myself.
Tough shit. Those aholes past & present think their gods, so it's time to term limit those primma donna entitled aristocrats & bring them down off their high horses.It is Federal that you cant picket supreme Court Justices.
You sound like a thug.The supreme court stole a human right from people in an atmosphere where civil war was already brewing. They'll be lucky to survive the decade.