Supreme Court Throws Out Bid To Restrict Abortion Medication

[skews13]

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a challenge to the abortion pill mifepristone, meaning the commonly used drug can remain widely available.

The court found unanimously that the group of anti-abortion doctors who questioned the Food and Drug Administration’s decisions making it easier to access the pill did not have legal standing to sue.

Supreme Court rejects bid to restrict access to abortion pill

The court found that anti-abortion doctors who questioned the FDA’s easing of access to the pill didn’t have legal standing to sue.

www.nbcnews.com

And that means by mail also. Bad day for the pro birth witch burners.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a challenge to the abortion pill mifepristone, meaning the commonly used drug can remain widely available.

The court found unanimously that the group of anti-abortion doctors who questioned the Food and Drug Administration’s decisions making it easier to access the pill did not have legal standing to sue.

Supreme Court rejects bid to restrict access to abortion pill

The court found that anti-abortion doctors who questioned the FDA’s easing of access to the pill didn’t have legal standing to sue.

www.nbcnews.com

And that means by mail also. Bad day for the pro birth witch burners.

.

Good. That means a lot of sluts who are not intelligent enough to know how dangerous that drug can be if used improperly will make themselves sterile.

Or dead.









.

 

[jbrownson0831]

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a challenge to the abortion pill mifepristone, meaning the commonly used drug can remain widely available.

The court found unanimously that the group of anti-abortion doctors who questioned the Food and Drug Administration’s decisions making it easier to access the pill did not have legal standing to sue.

Supreme Court rejects bid to restrict access to abortion pill

The court found that anti-abortion doctors who questioned the FDA’s easing of access to the pill didn’t have legal standing to sue.

www.nbcnews.com

And that means by mail also. Bad day for the pro birth witch burners.

Wait.....so skrewey the SCOTUS SLAMMER is now skrewey the SCOTUS SUPPORTER?
Make up your mind minion.....

 

[skews13]

Wait.....so skrewey the SCOTUS SLAMMER is now skrewey the SCOTUS SUPPORTER?
Make up your mind minion.....

Triggered?

 

[jbrownson0831]

Triggered?

Not at all...
Moron??

 

[skews13]

Not at all...
Moron??

Just a loser? Got it. Better luck next time.

Maybe you could wear some freak looking costume and join the other freaks protesting in front of the court now. Sounds like a giant loser party going on.

 

[TNHarley]

The conservative activist SC strikes again!

 

[JoeB131]

.

Good. That means a lot of sluts who are not intelligent enough to know how dangerous that drug can be if used improperly will make themselves sterile.

Or dead..

Scratch a "pro-Lifer", find a misogynist.... every time.

 

[JoeB131]

The conservative activist SC strikes again!

Or the Taliban Justices realized that outlawing it in an election year would be ballot box poison for Republicans.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

That's exactly right, JoeB.

 

[Marener]

The conservative activist SC strikes again!

This should have never gotten to the Supreme Court. Matthew Kacsmaryk and the 5th circuit are totally off their rockers and don’t give a damn about making rulings that follow binding precedent or even logic itself.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Sad day for Dimocrats, who were hoping the court would restrict the availability, so they could use the issue to further demonize the court, and the GOP.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a challenge to the abortion pill mifepristone, meaning the commonly used drug can remain widely available.

The court found unanimously that the group of anti-abortion doctors who questioned the Food and Drug Administration’s decisions making it easier to access the pill did not have legal standing to sue.

Supreme Court rejects bid to restrict access to abortion pill

The court found that anti-abortion doctors who questioned the FDA’s easing of access to the pill didn’t have legal standing to sue.

www.nbcnews.com

And that means by mail also. Bad day for the pro birth witch burners.

They punted the issue down the road by making it about standing.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Sad day for Dimocrats, who were hoping the court would restrict the availability, so they could use the issue to further demonize the court, and the GOP.

It was a good day for the Dems, as it was thrown out based on standing so the GOP will keep trying to make it happen.

 

[JoeB131]

Sad day for Dimocrats, who were hoping the court would restrict the availability, so they could use the issue to further demonize the court, and the GOP.

Demonize them for their attempts to limit women's choice?

You know the easy way to do that, right?

Stop trying to limit women's choices.

 

[skews13]

Sad day for Dimocrats, who were hoping the court would restrict the availability, so they could use the issue to further demonize the court, and the GOP.

Big loss for Jesus land. Don’t worry, women will be showing up in numbers you won’t be able to over come in November.

The court is a clear and present danger. Religion is a clear and present danger. The majority of American youth despise religion. It is a dying cult that is losing its grip in this country, and the day it no longer exists will be the day human beings are free from the only true tyranny that exists.

 

[blackhawk]

So for one brief moment the left will not be calling the court an extremist MAGA court.

 

[Dragonlady]

.

Good. That means a lot of sluts who are not intelligent enough to know how dangerous that drug can be if used improperly will make themselves sterile.

Or dead.

.

". . . . a lot of slut who are not intelligent enough". Tell us your raving misogynist without using those words.

How many women do you want to kill with your so called "pro-life" laws?????

 

[jbrownson0831]

Just a loser? Got it. Better luck next time.

Maybe you could wear some freak looking costume and join the other freaks protesting in front of the court now. Sounds like a giant loser party going on.

skrewey lecturing me on freaks protesting? I though you wackos invented that, like the stop all traffic process the Reich uses....
Where will you move skrewey???

 

[Dragonlady]

Sad day for Dimocrats, who were hoping the court would restrict the availability, so they could use the issue to further demonize the court, and the GOP.

This is in no way a "sad day for Democrats". This ruling will save thousands of women's lives and ensure that Red States can't further restrict women's access to reproductive health care.

The LAST thing that Democrats wanted was for more women to lose access to care.