Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Again, raising your son has nothing to do with the fact that cons try to force poor women to have children they can't afford. You are only trying to deflect attention from the fact that cons are fascists.What I proved you wrong, I came up with the money to raise my son. Anyone can, I guess if you're not a liberal.Another adolescent response, because your hypocrisy was exposed. You lose.You dumb shit, I raised a son on my own. Couldn't really afford it, but we got by anyway.Now THAT'S deflection. You're still trying to force a poor woman to have a child she can't afford. You don't even know the meaning of the word fail...look in the mirror.Did I force her to have sex? I didn't demand her to have sex, but you want to demand me buy health insurance. Nice try, you fail again.But forcing a poor woman to have a child she can't afford, is con freedom. Why do cons hate the poor and women?
How about cons quit obstructing so that it gets written correctly?Another loss for conservatives trying to take away peoples healthcare
So basically if a law is big enough, and poorly written enough, it can't be overturned no matter how much the court realizes the wording was explicit to the States?
Four words
A petty attempt by Republicans to hurt Americans just so they can destroy Obamacare
How about the people who write a law pay attention when doing it?
Elections mean things.
This is what happens when a dictator threatens the lives of the justices.
It shouldn't even have been THAT close. Alito Scalia and Thomas voted on politics not law.6-3 decision.
It wasn't even that close.
So basically what we have been told is any bill that becomes law no matter how badly written or worded does not have to be obeyed and that going forward ANY future President can change a law to suit has and his parties agenda. Everyone regardless of party affiliation should really take some time sit back and think about this.
Another loss for conservatives trying to take away peoples healthcare
.
The republicans caused their own misery and once again the supreme court has to bail their butts out.
I wish the republicans would stop all these games and just let people be and have health insurance.
When the bush boy instituted his drug prescription program the democrats didn't do anything to harm it or anything to keep it from being implemented. Not so with republicans. They have been waging a war on the ACA since day one and they won't stop until they're forced to stop.
What's next from them?
I can't see Scalia and Thomas backing SSM. And Alito is questionable, imo.Obama:
Lily Ledbetter act - a DEM win
Auto Bailout - a DEM win
ACA - a DEM win
Got Osama bin Ladin - an AMERICAN win under a DEM president
ending DADT/gays in the military - a DEM win
Indian Trade Pact - a DEM win.
Renegotiated STARK treaty with Russia - a DEM win
Pacific Trade Agreement - a DEM win.
President Obama will indeed be able to claim that the vast majority of what he wanted to push through the US Congress indeed came to pass.
His record of successes will be greater than either Reagan's or Eisenhower's.
Congratulations, Mr. President.
He can add nationwide samesex marriage early next week
The court wants to go out on a high note
Yes, I am suspecting that it will be a majority decision for SSM.
And then the Right will be seeing black helicopters everywhere.
The best indicator of who benefits is the surging stock price of insurance companies. I don't give a fuck since I have tricare for life...but I feel bad for the poor folks.Another loss for conservatives trying to take away peoples healthcare
.
...and obstruction is the con ideology.How about cons quit obstructing so that it gets written correctly?Another loss for conservatives trying to take away peoples healthcare
So basically if a law is big enough, and poorly written enough, it can't be overturned no matter how much the court realizes the wording was explicit to the States?
Four words
A petty attempt by Republicans to hurt Americans just so they can destroy Obamacare
How about the people who write a law pay attention when doing it?
Elections mean things.
Another loss for conservatives trying to take away peoples healthcare
So basically if a law is big enough, and poorly written enough, it can't be overturned no matter how much the court realizes the wording was explicit to the States?
From the decision:
If the statutory language is plain, the Court must enforce it according to its terms. But oftentimes the meaning—or ambiguity—of certain words or phrases may only become evident when placed in context. So when deciding whether the language is plain, the Court must read the words “in their context and with a view to their place in the overall statutory scheme.”
So basically the Chief Justice stretched as much as he could to save the law, even though he knows they screwed up on the language.
Why do conservatives struggle so much with context?
Why do progressive struggle so much with being able to competently write laws?
Ah, the intellect of a con.[
Such an angry little thumper aren't you
Fuck off, Nazi.
Do you want a crying towel loser
Does a belief in have self responsibility make one sick?Yeah, and we how how some of them work.....I sure hope to hell all this negative news about ACA doesn't get back to the world's other industrialized countries! Although they have had universal health care for up to 100 years in some cases, it only exists because they don't know that it is impossible....
If Universal Health Care Is The Goal Don t Copy Canada - Forbes
I have zero deuductable right now. I would prefer watch someone that is not a contribution to society die than to see one of my family members die because of a suddenly high deductible.Actually, having health insurance with such high deductibles that you can't afford them is like having no insurance at all, since you can't afford to go to the doctor.... And you get to pay the premiums anyway!!!!Ok, I get it. having no health care at all is better than having health care with a 30% premium increase. Sounds like you could give economic lessons to Brownback!
Well, then, I guess whether ACA exists or not, makes no difference, does it?
As much as the left seems to love Darwin, I just dont understand why the keep trying to alter the normal course of survival of the fittest
Then you would have been in hog's heaven if you had had my job! My underwriting decisions over 50 years resulted in thousands of deaths.
Maryland Patriot is one very sick puppy.
Another loss for conservatives trying to take away peoples healthcare
So basically if a law is big enough, and poorly written enough, it can't be overturned no matter how much the court realizes the wording was explicit to the States?
From the decision:
If the statutory language is plain, the Court must enforce it according to its terms. But oftentimes the meaning—or ambiguity—of certain words or phrases may only become evident when placed in context. So when deciding whether the language is plain, the Court must read the words “in their context and with a view to their place in the overall statutory scheme.”
So basically the Chief Justice stretched as much as he could to save the law, even though he knows they screwed up on the language.
Why do conservatives struggle so much with context?
Why do progressive struggle so much with being able to competently write laws?
They did.
The only reason this is a problem is because the supreme court ruled a few years ago that the states didn't have to join the exchanges if they didn't want to. So something like 34 states didn't join.
If the supreme court had not ruled that way all the states would have an exchange. Thank goodness 2 of those 5 came to their senses and overruled the 3 who are still trying to do all they can to destroy health care for millions of Americans.
Ah, the intellect of a con.
So basically what we have been told is any bill that becomes law no matter how badly written or worded does not have to be obeyed and that going forward ANY future President can change a law to suit has and his parties agenda. Everyone regardless of party affiliation should really take some time sit back and think about this.
It is simply a declaration that we are not a nation of law.
Legislated and codified law is no more the Kabuki theater to placate the masses. We are in fact a dictatorship where the word of our rulers is law. Roberts didn't just piss on the law, he pissed on the concept that as a nation we be ruled by law.
