Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In my university, CCNY of the City University of New York, recording devices were used EVERY DAY by EVERY STUDENT, and since you didn't mention the name of your university, maybe we can just call itAt the university where I received my Master's degree, if you were caught with a cell phone or recording device in class, you would be summarily kicked out of the university.University, for depriving students of one of their best learning aids.
Nope..... no need to fight with anybody..... a nice chrome book and a quiet place to sit and the kid is golden IMO. It will require some parental supervision to make sure he does school work instead of video games but hey isn't that what it's all about?Yeah, the truth hurts don't it. You're making a decision to align yourself with an admitted pervert.now you are off topicThe 70 y/o OP says he dates 18 y/o women. This is who you're aligned with...perverts.
Tis issue is video monitoring of teachers in school
Cameras in classrooms are the dumbest idea since guns in the classroom. Both are conservative fantasies. Neither will ever happen.
Just out of curiosity, if a teacher says the "wrong thing", what then? Are you going to really fight the teaches unions if they are talking about slavery and happen to mention the truthful things that white people owned slaves, white people lynched blacks, white people codified discrimination against blacks, etc.... ?
WOW....you make too many assumptions....Home schooled all of em.....half of them are successful some of them are bums.....(had a paid tutor three days a week at times but not always ) that's about the same ratio I believe.Keep thinking. Your "IMO" disqualifies your response because you know nothing about this topic.
point One is fair and easily overcomeYou have not made the case for why children cannot be video’d on closed circuit tvWe would be primarily recording the teacher although students might occasionally be in the pictureI do not support CRT. Filming and BROADCASTING MINOR CHILDREN to heaven knows who is not the way to go about this.
Parents would be assigned a password for access and it would not be broadcast everywhere
Another one who has NO IDEA what an elementary classroom looks like
"Teacher stays in one spot so she can be videotaped"
SURE hahahahahahaha
For just one thing, in about every class there is at least one child whose parents have signed "no media" forms. They cannot be filmed or photographed in any circumstance, usually for custody issues. That's one.
Two, there would be A LOT of issues going on which a teacher would not want other parents to be privy to--and neither would you, if it were your kid. Discipline issues, sensitive personal matters, etc. So now, does the teacher turn off the camera and now Protectionist goes nuts because he's sure teacher is INDOCTRINATING CRT or does the teacher keep camera on and everybody knows that Johnny and Sam had ANOTHER fight at recess or that Ava wet her pants AGAIN?
Honestly...no one here really knows everything that teachers do in a day. And now you all want every single parent eye on all that stuff. It's a huge, huge privacy concern.
Point two is bullshit
As for point one software is advanced enough that the faces of the children can be blurred out
Parents only find out by accident? That is only the parents who don't pay attention to what is being taught to their children.
When my children were in school, their Mom and I used a radical approach to monitoring their education and their performance. We TALKED to our kids about what they learned in school. Every single day. It was a priority for us. And it worked.
Keep thinking. Your "IMO" disqualifies your response because you know nothing about this topic.
I think that adults - particularly libs- have lost control of the children and their classroomsWhat kind of a class are you running ? Calesthenics ?
I debunked that objection hours agoso that the teacher can stay in one spot while she is videotaped.
No one on this thread has admitted to being a pervertThe truth hurts don't it. You're making a decision to align yourself with an admitted pervert.
If the teacher has lost control of her classroom she is in no position to discipline anyonepoint One is fair and easily overcomeYou have not made the case for why children cannot be video’d on closed circuit tvWe would be primarily recording the teacher although students might occasionally be in the pictureI do not support CRT. Filming and BROADCASTING MINOR CHILDREN to heaven knows who is not the way to go about this.
Parents would be assigned a password for access and it would not be broadcast everywhere
Another one who has NO IDEA what an elementary classroom looks like
"Teacher stays in one spot so she can be videotaped"
SURE hahahahahahaha
For just one thing, in about every class there is at least one child whose parents have signed "no media" forms. They cannot be filmed or photographed in any circumstance, usually for custody issues. That's one.
Two, there would be A LOT of issues going on which a teacher would not want other parents to be privy to--and neither would you, if it were your kid. Discipline issues, sensitive personal matters, etc. So now, does the teacher turn off the camera and now Protectionist goes nuts because he's sure teacher is INDOCTRINATING CRT or does the teacher keep camera on and everybody knows that Johnny and Sam had ANOTHER fight at recess or that Ava wet her pants AGAIN?
Honestly...no one here really knows everything that teachers do in a day. And now you all want every single parent eye on all that stuff. It's a huge, huge privacy concern.
Point two is bullshit
As for point one software is advanced enough that the faces of the children can be blurred out
You realize that when Johnny and Jimmy get into trouble and the parents call the admin office the admin are not allowed to tell the parents of the other kid what discipline was meted out to the other kid....right?
Parents ALWAYS want to know "what about the other kid" and the school is not allowed to divulge. Privacy. So I would really love to know why you think it's "BS"
I think that adults - particularly libs- have lost control of the children and their classroomsWhat kind of a class are you running ? Calesthenics ?
That may be what the teachers are trying to hide
If the teacher has lost control of her classroom she is in no position to discipline anyonepoint One is fair and easily overcomeYou have not made the case for why children cannot be video’d on closed circuit tvWe would be primarily recording the teacher although students might occasionally be in the pictureI do not support CRT. Filming and BROADCASTING MINOR CHILDREN to heaven knows who is not the way to go about this.
Parents would be assigned a password for access and it would not be broadcast everywhere
Another one who has NO IDEA what an elementary classroom looks like
"Teacher stays in one spot so she can be videotaped"
SURE hahahahahahaha
For just one thing, in about every class there is at least one child whose parents have signed "no media" forms. They cannot be filmed or photographed in any circumstance, usually for custody issues. That's one.
Two, there would be A LOT of issues going on which a teacher would not want other parents to be privy to--and neither would you, if it were your kid. Discipline issues, sensitive personal matters, etc. So now, does the teacher turn off the camera and now Protectionist goes nuts because he's sure teacher is INDOCTRINATING CRT or does the teacher keep camera on and everybody knows that Johnny and Sam had ANOTHER fight at recess or that Ava wet her pants AGAIN?
Honestly...no one here really knows everything that teachers do in a day. And now you all want every single parent eye on all that stuff. It's a huge, huge privacy concern.
Point two is bullshit
As for point one software is advanced enough that the faces of the children can be blurred out
You realize that when Johnny and Jimmy get into trouble and the parents call the admin office the admin are not allowed to tell the parents of the other kid what discipline was meted out to the other kid....right?
Parents ALWAYS want to know "what about the other kid" and the school is not allowed to divulge. Privacy. So I would really love to know why you think it's "BS"
She might be lucky if the students dont discipline her
I am not wedded to 5-year oldsI think that adults - particularly libs- have lost control of the children and their classroomsWhat kind of a class are you running ? Calesthenics ?
That may be what the teachers are trying to hide
No. Wrong. Five year olds sitting in desks all day is horrid for their brains. It's not about "control". Why should we hold so tightly to 'control' at any rate? Do you endorse this as a matter of course for govt employees? As a conservative, I do not.
Yes, there has to be some level of controlWe must CONTROL them
WOW....you make too many assumptions....Home schooled all of em.....half of them are successful some of them are bums.....(had a paid tutor three days a week at times but not always ) that's about the same ratio I believe.Keep thinking. Your "IMO" disqualifies your response because you know nothing about this topic.
But all of them know the entire operatic out-lay of Peter and the Wolf....All of them can recite Poe's best poems..... I have one kid who is a millionaire and one who is a Hobo....
sooo.....where do you want to go from here big guy?
Such is the authoritarian, Orwellian right.Televise All School Classes
I am not wedded to 5-year oldsThat may be what the teachers are trying to hide
No. Wrong. Five year olds sitting in desks all day is horrid for their brains. It's not about "control". Why should we hold so tightly to 'control' at any rate? Do you endorse this as a matter of course for govt employees? As a conservative, I do not.
The cameras are for all age groups
Nor do young children have to set quietly all day
Cameras would expose many bad teachers with a variety of shortcomings
Lack of discipline being only one possible shock for the parents
Yes, there has to be some level of controlWe must CONTROL them
If you dont know that it it might explain teacher stabbings when the kids get older
Of rioting and burning on college campus today over conservative speakers that the snowflakes dont like
I think liberals are determined to brainwash children whether the parents like it or notI think that adults - particularly libs- have lost control of the children and their classrooms
I am not wedded to 5-year oldsThat may be what the teachers are trying to hide
No. Wrong. Five year olds sitting in desks all day is horrid for their brains. It's not about "control". Why should we hold so tightly to 'control' at any rate? Do you endorse this as a matter of course for govt employees? As a conservative, I do not.
The cameras are for all age groups
Nor do young children have to set quietly all day
Cameras would expose many bad teachers with a variety of shortcomings
Lack of discipline being only one possible shock for the parents
What do you think a camera would expose? What type of shortcomings are you imagining exist?
