Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
As opposed to running them over?
If you attempt to illegally imprison people by blocking their egress, then running you over is perfectly justified.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As opposed to running them over?
Maybe it is true or maybe not... it isn't important! My sense of justice is to protect innocent people from the murderous whims of people like you. I am a strong advocate of self defense.
Deadly force agains an aggressive equally deadly force.
[
No, I just write like a lawyer sometimes.... I get that comparison a lot from ex cons.
The "political agenda of the left" and "political agenda of the right" are one in the same; Wall Street, Goldman Sachs, et.al. above all.These people are not peaceably assembling Pogo.
The GOAL is to intimidate society so that we fear to oppose the political agenda of the left.
Peaceful assembly doesn't achieve that goal....
I honestly do not believe I would go into panic mode and come undone. I would feel bad about having to run them over but they would give me no choice and so it would be something I would have to accept as being their fault and not my own.The assembled liberals here would be pissing their pants if a group of people surrounded their car.
Can you write something worthy of reading? Please?Did he threaten to shoot you hon? Haven't been here with you for the whole thread and given the nature of what I've seen, it's not worth the time to go through. Still, if al you have is "bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbut he did it too!", that doesn't account for this shit being your standard MO.
Can you read cock breath?
So let me get this straight.
JQPubic endorses standing in the middle of the road with a handgun and trying to stop traffic..and you agree with him.
That'll damn sure guarantee you'll get your dumbass run over.
Go play on the highway.....please,and be sure and carry a gun.
I am not advocating that at all. Guns would not be visible nor would the security team for the protestors until needed. A speed indicator could be set up 1/2 mile from the protestors. It is fairly easy to construct one. When the speed of a vehicle hasn't slowed by the time the second indicator goes off and the driver has had ample time to see the protestors. The security team gets ready and moves into place.
So now you're endorsing setting up ambushes on public roadways while breaking the law by blocking traffic.
Thats weapons grade stupid right there.
Thank you. The hatred is palpable, isn't it? Really astonishing how these people think. Stop your car, unlock your doors so we can kill you and if you don't let us kill you, we'll shoot at you while you try to get away in your car! How sick is that?[
what left hand? A fusillade of OO buckshot and .357 magnum lead bullets(silver if you are a werewolf) wouldn't leave much room to do anything but slump forward on the horn with a silly look on your face.
I thought you Communists hated guns in private hands?
Assaulting drivers through the threat of restricting their ability to escape.[
I think North Dakota just did that too. About the pipeline.
Tell us, why does a blatant contravention of the First Amendment's guarantee of the Right to Assemble "make you happy"?
Even you aren't this dumb, Huffer. You are this partisan.
Peaceably assemble. When you block traffic, you are assaulting drivers through the threat of restricting their ability to escape.Same reason that anti-abortion protestors cannot block the entrance to abortion mills. I get that you have WAY different standards depending on which side is offending, but really...
Assaulting drivers through the threat of restricting their ability to escape.[
I think North Dakota just did that too. About the pipeline.
Tell us, why does a blatant contravention of the First Amendment's guarantee of the Right to Assemble "make you happy"?
Even you aren't this dumb, Huffer. You are this partisan.
Peaceably assemble. When you block traffic, you are assaulting drivers through the threat of restricting their ability to escape.Same reason that anti-abortion protestors cannot block the entrance to abortion mills. I get that you have WAY different standards depending on which side is offending, but really...
Sounds tortured, lol
Self defense is not murder.[
I am not advocating that at all. Guns would not be visible nor would the security team for the protestors until needed. A speed indicator could be set up 1/2 mile from the protestors. It is fairly easy to construct one. When the speed of a vehicle hasn't slowed by the time the second indicator goes off and the driver has had ample time to see the protestors. The security team gets ready and moves into place.
AND you wonder why people want to run you down rather than being arrested and imprisoned by you and your fellow thugs....
Impede traffic and then murder the drivers? You're a hell of a guy, Comrade.
I wouldn't expect a state prosecutor who sanctions vehicular homicide to be sympathetic to the protestors. A federal prosecutor armed with the US Constitution would be. But now that Jeff Sessions is AG and SCOTUS is top heavy with konservatives, The Nazification of America has begun.Maybe it is true or maybe not... it isn't important! My sense of justice is to protect innocent people from the murderous whims of people like you. I am a strong advocate of self defense.
Deadly force agains an aggressive equally deadly force.
It is not legal to protest on a highway or on a street without a proper permit. That makes the protestor NOT innocent. Further, these people can be considered threats to the driver with violence. Most prosecutors are going to consider that before deciding if charges are even filed.
Assaulting drivers through the threat of restricting their ability to escape.[
I think North Dakota just did that too. About the pipeline.
Tell us, why does a blatant contravention of the First Amendment's guarantee of the Right to Assemble "make you happy"?
Even you aren't this dumb, Huffer. You are this partisan.
Peaceably assemble. When you block traffic, you are assaulting drivers through the threat of restricting their ability to escape.Same reason that anti-abortion protestors cannot block the entrance to abortion mills. I get that you have WAY different standards depending on which side is offending, but really...
Sounds tortured, lol
I'm running your ass over if you a threat.
Assaulting drivers through the threat of restricting their ability to escape.[
I think North Dakota just did that too. About the pipeline.
Tell us, why does a blatant contravention of the First Amendment's guarantee of the Right to Assemble "make you happy"?
Even you aren't this dumb, Huffer. You are this partisan.
Peaceably assemble. When you block traffic, you are assaulting drivers through the threat of restricting their ability to escape.Same reason that anti-abortion protestors cannot block the entrance to abortion mills. I get that you have WAY different standards depending on which side is offending, but really...
Sounds tortured, lol
You surround my truck yelling and screaming profanities I'm gonna punch it.
I wouldn't expect a state prosecutor who sanctions vehicular homicide to be sympathetic to the protestors. A federal prosecutor armed with the US Constitution would be. But now that Jeff Sessions is AG and SCOTUS is top heavy with konservatives, The Nazification of America has begun.
Actually it sounds like a Muslim strategy. I hear the head of the New Black Panthers is a Muslim and the Muslims are joining the group now too. If this is their plan you can tell them there is a new president in the WH now. He's not black, he isn't a Muslim, and this isn't France. Pass the word.Assaulting drivers through the threat of restricting their ability to escape.[
I think North Dakota just did that too. About the pipeline.
Tell us, why does a blatant contravention of the First Amendment's guarantee of the Right to Assemble "make you happy"?
Even you aren't this dumb, Huffer. You are this partisan.
Peaceably assemble. When you block traffic, you are assaulting drivers through the threat of restricting their ability to escape.Same reason that anti-abortion protestors cannot block the entrance to abortion mills. I get that you have WAY different standards depending on which side is offending, but really...
Sounds tortured, lol
I agree
Self defense is not murder.
I cannot agree unless you show a precedent case history. How have the courts decided on similar cases in the past?//Assaulting drivers through the threat of restricting their ability to escape.[
I think North Dakota just did that too. About the pipeline.
Tell us, why does a blatant contravention of the First Amendment's guarantee of the Right to Assemble "make you happy"?
Even you aren't this dumb, Huffer. You are this partisan.
Peaceably assemble. When you block traffic, you are assaulting drivers through the threat of restricting their ability to escape.Same reason that anti-abortion protestors cannot block the entrance to abortion mills. I get that you have WAY different standards depending on which side is offending, but really...
Sounds tortured, lol
Meh, take a law class.
{
An assault is carried out by a threat of bodily harm coupled with an apparent, present ability to cause the harm. It is both a crime and a tort and, therefore, may result in either criminal or civil liability. Generally, the common law definition is the same in criminal and Tort Law. There is, however, an additional Criminal Law category of assault consisting of an attempted but unsuccessful Battery.
Statutory definitions of assault in the various jurisdictions throughout the United States are not substantially different from the common-law definition.}
A mob surrounding a car and impeding the ability to move, in a malicious manner such as those of the BLM and Soros Army (to the extent that they are not one and the same) is an apparent and present ability by the mob to cause great bodily harm.
It is legally and in fact assault.
Ah, it all makes sense now. You want to get carte blanche to kill ******* and muslims. FREEDOMActually it sounds like a Muslim strategy. I hear the head of the New Black Panthers is a Muslim and the Muslims are joining the group now too. If this is their plan you can tell them there is a new president in the WH now. He's not black, he isn't a Muslim, and this isn't France. Pass the word.Assaulting drivers through the threat of restricting their ability to escape.[
I think North Dakota just did that too. About the pipeline.
Tell us, why does a blatant contravention of the First Amendment's guarantee of the Right to Assemble "make you happy"?
Even you aren't this dumb, Huffer. You are this partisan.
Peaceably assemble. When you block traffic, you are assaulting drivers through the threat of restricting their ability to escape.Same reason that anti-abortion protestors cannot block the entrance to abortion mills. I get that you have WAY different standards depending on which side is offending, but really...
Sounds tortured, lol