Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That sort of thinking is going the way of the dinosaurs. Abortion for profit is frowned on. There is no statute of limitations on baby murder.Let me guess. You believe that doctors should be able to rip arms and legs and other body parts from a baby still in the womb? Am I rightterminally-ill man today died 'with a smile on his face'
A terminally-ill man today died 'with a smile on his face' and urged his loved-ones to 'seize the moment' as he ended his own life at the Dignitas suicide clinic.
Bob Cole, 68, who was battling an aggressive form of lung cancer, took a lethal cocktail of drugs just 18 months after he watched his wife Ann, 67, die in the same way in Switzerland.
In a text sent from his bedside at 2.25pm this afternoon a friend wrote: 'Dear friends, Bob died with smile on his face to Beethoven's Ode to Joy. He asked you all the seize the time'.
The former carpenter wanted to publicise his death because he wants MPs to 'have the guts' to decriminalise assisted suicide in Britain.
Read more: Bob Cole whose wife died at Dignitas 18 months ago ended own life today Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
What is your opinion of suicide or assisted suicide?
I think people should be allowed to die with dignity.
I think the subject of abortion is between a woman and her doctor.
It quickly becomes not what they wish, but what is wished for them. Then it's too late to change.Fuck safeguards. If a woman has a right to choose on what to carry in her body full term, man or woman have the right to choose how much suffering they are willing to take and die with dignity if that is what they wish.We treat our pets with more compassion than we do humans. If someone is in pain and it is terminal, they should be given the same compassion we give our pets.terminally-ill man today died 'with a smile on his face'
A terminally-ill man today died 'with a smile on his face' and urged his loved-ones to 'seize the moment' as he ended his own life at the Dignitas suicide clinic.
Bob Cole, 68, who was battling an aggressive form of lung cancer, took a lethal cocktail of drugs just 18 months after he watched his wife Ann, 67, die in the same way in Switzerland.
In a text sent from his bedside at 2.25pm this afternoon a friend wrote: 'Dear friends, Bob died with smile on his face to Beethoven's Ode to Joy. He asked you all the seize the time'.
The former carpenter wanted to publicise his death because he wants MPs to 'have the guts' to decriminalise assisted suicide in Britain.
Read more: Bob Cole whose wife died at Dignitas 18 months ago ended own life today Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
What is your opinion of suicide or assisted suicide?
We all become pets of the government. A cat with a boken leg can be put down because the owner chooses not to pay to get the leg set. The government chooses not to pay for cancer treatment, euthanize the "pet". If the pet chooses not to be euthanized, an expert will be paid to say the pet is incompetent to make that decision. It must be made for them and is always death.
Safeguards should be put into place so that doesn't happen. Assisted suicide should not be that prevelant.
We are just a few rightly placed Supreme Court justices away that will determine what your type believes is the "right to privacy" is. Hillary is hurting in the polls, Ruth bader Ginsberg is ready to die, with a surgical impeachment of SCOTUS traitors and every GOP candidate is against abortion, that unconstitutional Roe vs Wade decision will be reversed.Unless there is a problem with the mother surviving the delivery, it is between the mother, father and God.Let me guess. You believe that doctors should be able to rip arms and legs and other body parts from a baby still in the womb? Am I rightterminally-ill man today died 'with a smile on his face'
Read more: Bob Cole whose wife died at Dignitas 18 months ago ended own life today Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
What is your opinion of suicide or assisted suicide?
I think people should be allowed to die with dignity.
I think the subject of abortion is between a woman and her doctor.
Of course you have a right to your opinion, you just don't have the authority to decide who will or will not have his civil rights, or in this case the right to privacy.
That sort of thinking is going the way of the dinosaurs. Abortion for profit is frowned on. There is no statute of limitations on baby murder.Let me guess. You believe that doctors should be able to rip arms and legs and other body parts from a baby still in the womb? Am I rightterminally-ill man today died 'with a smile on his face'
A terminally-ill man today died 'with a smile on his face' and urged his loved-ones to 'seize the moment' as he ended his own life at the Dignitas suicide clinic.
Bob Cole, 68, who was battling an aggressive form of lung cancer, took a lethal cocktail of drugs just 18 months after he watched his wife Ann, 67, die in the same way in Switzerland.
In a text sent from his bedside at 2.25pm this afternoon a friend wrote: 'Dear friends, Bob died with smile on his face to Beethoven's Ode to Joy. He asked you all the seize the time'.
The former carpenter wanted to publicise his death because he wants MPs to 'have the guts' to decriminalise assisted suicide in Britain.
Read more: Bob Cole whose wife died at Dignitas 18 months ago ended own life today Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
What is your opinion of suicide or assisted suicide?
I think people should be allowed to die with dignity.
I think the subject of abortion is between a woman and her doctor.
When did babies lose their rights?This is unsurprisingly ignorant and wrong.
Rights are not subject to majority rule.
We are just a few rightly place Supreme Court justices that will determine what your type believe is the "right to privacy" is. Hillary is hurting in the polls, Ruth bader Ginsberg is ready to die and every GOP candidate is against abortion.Unless there is a problem with the mother surviving the delivery, it is between the mother, father and God.Let me guess. You believe that doctors should be able to rip arms and legs and other body parts from a baby still in the womb? Am I rightI think people should be allowed to die with dignity.
I think the subject of abortion is between a woman and her doctor.
Of course you have a right to your opinion, you just don't have the authority to decide who will or will not have his civil rights, or in this case the right to privacy.
You can tell Bob Cole how you agreed with him in a forum when you arrive there.Its your hell , you burn in itBob Cole is burning in Hell.Death with dignity
When did babies lose their rights?This is unsurprisingly ignorant and wrong.
Rights are not subject to majority rule.
Roe v Wade was bad law pulled out of the asses of majority on the court. Last I heard most Constitution scholars agree, it was a political decision.I recommend you read Roe vs Wade.When did babies lose their rights?This is unsurprisingly ignorant and wrong.
Rights are not subject to majority rule.
Prior to the birth the embryo/fetus is legally not a person and is not entitled to Constitutional protections.
21st Amendment 1933. Mistakes can be repealed.We are just a few rightly place Supreme Court justices that will determine what your type believe is the "right to privacy" is. Hillary is hurting in the polls, Ruth bader Ginsberg is ready to die and every GOP candidate is against abortion.Unless there is a problem with the mother surviving the delivery, it is between the mother, father and God.Let me guess. You believe that doctors should be able to rip arms and legs and other body parts from a baby still in the womb? Am I right
I think the subject of abortion is between a woman and her doctor.
Of course you have a right to your opinion, you just don't have the authority to decide who will or will not have his civil rights, or in this case the right to privacy.
Roe vs Wade, 1973. Good luck.
21st Amendment 1933. Mistakes can be repealed.We are just a few rightly place Supreme Court justices that will determine what your type believe is the "right to privacy" is. Hillary is hurting in the polls, Ruth bader Ginsberg is ready to die and every GOP candidate is against abortion.Unless there is a problem with the mother surviving the delivery, it is between the mother, father and God.I think the subject of abortion is between a woman and her doctor.
Of course you have a right to your opinion, you just don't have the authority to decide who will or will not have his civil rights, or in this case the right to privacy.
Roe vs Wade, 1973. Good luck.
Roe v Wade was bad law pulled out of the asses of majority on the court. Last I heard most Constitution scholars agree, it was a political decision.I recommend you read Roe vs Wade.When did babies lose their rights?This is unsurprisingly ignorant and wrong.
Rights are not subject to majority rule.
Prior to the birth the embryo/fetus is legally not a person and is not entitled to Constitutional protections.
So you believe it's a fetus one minute and a person the next when it exits? That isn't even rational.
That's an opinion? A fetus one minute, hocus pocus, a baby the next?You are entitled to your own opinion.Roe v Wade was bad law pulled out of the asses of majority on the court. Last I heard most Constitution scholars agree, it was a political decision.I recommend you read Roe vs Wade.When did babies lose their rights?This is unsurprisingly ignorant and wrong.
Rights are not subject to majority rule.
Prior to the birth the embryo/fetus is legally not a person and is not entitled to Constitutional protections.
So you believe it's a fetus one minute and a person the next when it exits? That isn't even rational.
That's an opinion? A fetus one minute, hocus pocus, a baby the next?You are entitled to your own opinion.Roe v Wade was bad law pulled out of the asses of majority on the court. Last I heard most Constitution scholars agree, it was a political decision.I recommend you read Roe vs Wade.When did babies lose their rights?This is unsurprisingly ignorant and wrong.
Rights are not subject to majority rule.
Prior to the birth the embryo/fetus is legally not a person and is not entitled to Constitutional protections.
So you believe it's a fetus one minute and a person the next when it exits? That isn't even rational.
We treat our pets with more compassion than we do humans. If someone is in pain and it is terminal, they should be given the same compassion we give our pets.terminally-ill man today died 'with a smile on his face'
A terminally-ill man today died 'with a smile on his face' and urged his loved-ones to 'seize the moment' as he ended his own life at the Dignitas suicide clinic.
Bob Cole, 68, who was battling an aggressive form of lung cancer, took a lethal cocktail of drugs just 18 months after he watched his wife Ann, 67, die in the same way in Switzerland.
In a text sent from his bedside at 2.25pm this afternoon a friend wrote: 'Dear friends, Bob died with smile on his face to Beethoven's Ode to Joy. He asked you all the seize the time'.
The former carpenter wanted to publicise his death because he wants MPs to 'have the guts' to decriminalise assisted suicide in Britain.
Read more: Bob Cole whose wife died at Dignitas 18 months ago ended own life today Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
What is your opinion of suicide or assisted suicide?
. I've been washed in the blood of Jesus. I'm saved by His grace. You can too. Repent, believe in Him. Ask the Lord to come in your life and we will be together in Heaven someday. John 3-16. Look it up. Goggle it if you don't have a Bible.Its your hell , you burn in itBob Cole is burning in Hell.Death with dignity
Wanna bet?Rights are not subject to majority rule.
Explain how people are convicted of a double homicide when they kill a pregnant woman? Oops!When did babies lose their rights?This is unsurprisingly ignorant and wrong.
Rights are not subject to majority rule.
I recommend you read Roe vs Wade.
Prior to the birth the embryo/fetus is legally not a person and is not entitled to Constitutional protections.