Texans and their gun fetish!

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Without weapons we human beings would have not been able to defend ourselves from the wild animals that threatened us and, even worse, the mentally ill criminal humans that would have preyed on us given the chance.

And this is true of almost every human society up to WW1. In London you could carry a gun in public up to 1903. In Manchu China you could carry a pistol despite it being a regressive feudal society as even a townsman was expected to be able to defend themselves against criminals.

1903... Manchu China..... --- that's in the distant past, innit?

Why do you think that is?

Take your time. Take the whole weekend. Looks like you need it.

You want everyone to be dependent on the government to defend them, and that has NEVER worked.

Do I now.
Link?

You say you want to empower people, and that is horse shit when you wont agree to empower them to protect their very lives.

Won't I now.
Link?

Ah, the "link" tactic again. Have you learned nothing?

no that would be you
if a poster can't or won't produce a link any statement they make would be subjective .

Link?

Attachments & Links:

• A 15 Post Minimum is required before a member can "Link" or "Copy and Paste". After the 15 Post minimum is reached, each "Copy and Paste" needs to be linked to it's source. Only paste a portion of the piece, not the entire piece.
• Graphic Images, material or links to images, Videos, and or material, whether real, satirical or implied, depicting obscene, indecent, pornography, pornographic acts, or Morbid Images (at Moderator/Admin discretion) are not permitted. This includes Gifs and cartoons.
• Morbid Images may be Linked, not posted, when appropriate. A Clear Warning Sign Must precede the Link. "Warning Graphic Image" Or "Warning Morbid Image"
• You may not post images that show Human genitalia or Human Female aureola or nipples.
• Please Either Report or Ignore these Posts. Do Not Quote or Link to These Offending Posts.

A link to substantiate your claim. You're probably a little too dense to see where this is going.

 

[daws101]

1903... Manchu China..... --- that's in the distant past, innit?

Why do you think that is?

Take your time. Take the whole weekend. Looks like you need it.



Do I now.
Link?


Won't I now.
Link?

Ah, the "link" tactic again. Have you learned nothing?

no that would be you
if a poster can't or won't produce a link any statement they make would be subjective .

Link?

Attachments & Links:

• A 15 Post Minimum is required before a member can "Link" or "Copy and Paste". After the 15 Post minimum is reached, each "Copy and Paste" needs to be linked to it's source. Only paste a portion of the piece, not the entire piece.
• Graphic Images, material or links to images, Videos, and or material, whether real, satirical or implied, depicting obscene, indecent, pornography, pornographic acts, or Morbid Images (at Moderator/Admin discretion) are not permitted. This includes Gifs and cartoons.
• Morbid Images may be Linked, not posted, when appropriate. A Clear Warning Sign Must precede the Link. "Warning Graphic Image" Or "Warning Morbid Image"
• You may not post images that show Human genitalia or Human Female aureola or nipples.
• Please Either Report or Ignore these Posts. Do Not Quote or Link to These Offending Posts.

A link to substantiate your claim. You're probably a little too dense to see where this is going.

Subjective vs Objective - Difference and Comparison | Diffen

 

[Brynmr]

Observation of a measurable fact:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

AMENDMENT II

 

[daws101]

Observation of a measurable fact:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

AMENDMENT II

Are you making an objective statement or are you implying an emotional one ?
In the context of this thread and your stated position on the subject it has to be the latter.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Observation of a measurable fact:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

AMENDMENT II

Are you making an objective statement or are you implying an emotional one ?
In the context of this thread and your stated position on the subject it has to be the latter.

Perhaps you're confused again. It's you Leftards who think of sex organs every time guns are discussed. Your twisted sex fantasies have nothing to do with the 2nd Amendment.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Ah, the "link" tactic again. Have you learned nothing?

no that would be you
if a poster can't or won't produce a link any statement they make would be subjective .

Link?

Attachments & Links:

• A 15 Post Minimum is required before a member can "Link" or "Copy and Paste". After the 15 Post minimum is reached, each "Copy and Paste" needs to be linked to it's source. Only paste a portion of the piece, not the entire piece.
• Graphic Images, material or links to images, Videos, and or material, whether real, satirical or implied, depicting obscene, indecent, pornography, pornographic acts, or Morbid Images (at Moderator/Admin discretion) are not permitted. This includes Gifs and cartoons.
• Morbid Images may be Linked, not posted, when appropriate. A Clear Warning Sign Must precede the Link. "Warning Graphic Image" Or "Warning Morbid Image"
• You may not post images that show Human genitalia or Human Female aureola or nipples.
• Please Either Report or Ignore these Posts. Do Not Quote or Link to These Offending Posts.

A link to substantiate your claim. You're probably a little too dense to see where this is going.

Subjective vs Objective - Difference and Comparison | Diffen

As I said, too dense.

 

[daws101]

Observation of a measurable fact:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

AMENDMENT II

Are you making an objective statement or are you implying an emotional one ?
In the context of this thread and your stated position on the subject it has to be the latter.

Perhaps you're confused again. It's you Leftards who think of sex organs every time guns are discussed. Your twisted sex fantasies have nothing to do with the 2nd Amendment.

wtf are you talking about ?
emotion does not always equate to sex .
who's dense again?
your buddy brynmr made an emotional appeal about the second amendment which btw is an emotional piece of written just as the rest of the constitution .
may you should stfu up when words and ideas get to complicated for your empty head to understand,

 

[daws101]

no that would be you
if a poster can't or won't produce a link any statement they make would be subjective .

Link?

Attachments & Links:

• A 15 Post Minimum is required before a member can "Link" or "Copy and Paste". After the 15 Post minimum is reached, each "Copy and Paste" needs to be linked to it's source. Only paste a portion of the piece, not the entire piece.
• Graphic Images, material or links to images, Videos, and or material, whether real, satirical or implied, depicting obscene, indecent, pornography, pornographic acts, or Morbid Images (at Moderator/Admin discretion) are not permitted. This includes Gifs and cartoons.
• Morbid Images may be Linked, not posted, when appropriate. A Clear Warning Sign Must precede the Link. "Warning Graphic Image" Or "Warning Morbid Image"
• You may not post images that show Human genitalia or Human Female aureola or nipples.
• Please Either Report or Ignore these Posts. Do Not Quote or Link to These Offending Posts.

A link to substantiate your claim. You're probably a little too dense to see where this is going.

Subjective vs Objective - Difference and Comparison | Diffen

As I said, too dense.

yes you are dense..

 

[Brynmr]

Observation of a measurable fact:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

AMENDMENT II

Are you making an objective statement or are you implying an emotional one ?
In the context of this thread and your stated position on the subject it has to be the latter.

Your question (like your positions), is nonsensical.

 

[daws101]

Observation of a measurable fact:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

AMENDMENT II

Are you making an objective statement or are you implying an emotional one ?
In the context of this thread and your stated position on the subject it has to be the latter.

Your question (like your positions), is nonsensical.

meaning: you can't or won't answer the question.

 

[Brynmr]

This is what the new Liberal-think does to people. It sends them into utter nonsense.

 

[Brynmr]

Observation of a measurable fact:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

AMENDMENT II

Are you making an objective statement or are you implying an emotional one ?
In the context of this thread and your stated position on the subject it has to be the latter.

Your question (like your positions), is nonsensical.

meaning: you can't or won't answer the question.

I'll answer any question that makes sense. One cannot answer a nonsensical question

 

[Brynmr]

Refuge of the radical Left.

View attachment 86922

a variation on the I got jack shit disclaimer.

Nope. It means when the Liberals are losing the debate they head for obfuscation, aka, weeds.

 

[daws101]

Observation of a measurable fact:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

AMENDMENT II

Are you making an objective statement or are you implying an emotional one ?
In the context of this thread and your stated position on the subject it has to be the latter.

Your question (like your positions), is nonsensical.

meaning: you can't or won't answer the question.

I'll answer any question that makes sense. One cannot answer a nonsensical question

that the won't answer dodge.

 

[daws101]

Refuge of the radical Left.

View attachment 86922

a variation on the I got jack shit disclaimer.

Nope. It means when the Liberals are losing the debate they head for obfuscation, aka, weeds.

that's the using a word (obfuscation) that I really have no clue to it's meaning but the guys on my favorite right wing radio show use it ploy.

 

[Brynmr]

Observation of a measurable fact:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

AMENDMENT II

Are you making an objective statement or are you implying an emotional one ?
In the context of this thread and your stated position on the subject it has to be the latter.

Your question (like your positions), is nonsensical.

meaning: you can't or won't answer the question.

I'll answer any question that makes sense. One cannot answer a nonsensical question

that the won't answer dodge.

You're now incoherent.

 

[Brynmr]

Refuge of the radical Left.

View attachment 86922

a variation on the I got jack shit disclaimer.

Nope. It means when the Liberals are losing the debate they head for obfuscation, aka, weeds.

that's the using a word (obfuscation) that I really have no clue to it's meaning but the guys on my favorite right wing radio show use it ploy.

They have online dictionaries. English isn't your first language, is it?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

This just illustrates all too well how crazy this country has gotten with their guns and their Second Amendment rights and the abuse of that right.

Police raid bingo hall in Houston and find 100 guns stashed away

I don't see what these people did wrong based on that article

 

[daws101]

Refuge of the radical Left.

View attachment 86922

a variation on the I got jack shit disclaimer.

Nope. It means when the Liberals are losing the debate they head for obfuscation, aka, weeds.

that's the using a word (obfuscation) that I really have no clue to it's meaning but the guys on my favorite right wing radio show use it ploy.

They have online dictionaries. English isn't your first language, is it?

the last two posts are the oldest and worst dodges of all
the dual false accusations of mental illness and language problems.

 

[Brynmr]

Refuge of the radical Left.

View attachment 86922

a variation on the I got jack shit disclaimer.

Nope. It means when the Liberals are losing the debate they head for obfuscation, aka, weeds.

that's the using a word (obfuscation) that I really have no clue to it's meaning but the guys on my favorite right wing radio show use it ploy.

They have online dictionaries. English isn't your first language, is it?

the last two posts are the oldest and worst dodges of all
the dual false accusations of mental illness and language problems.

Did you find a dictionary?