Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 97,644
- 74,282
- 3,645
Your point refutes itself. It is a fallacy. But you don't know own what that means. Because you are of low intellectual capability.Idiot who can’t refute the point.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your point refutes itself. It is a fallacy. But you don't know own what that means. Because you are of low intellectual capability.Idiot who can’t refute the point.
You are the jackass trying to have both armed insurrectionists and say they were no threat to anyone.So you claim to have it both ways.
Coming from a liberal who relies on consensus to lend anything credence, I find that very ironic.They’re all reporting the same thing from the same anonymous “source”
No, but almost any idiocy spouted by morons like you is almost certainly fakeRight any information about politics you don’t like is fake. We already know.
Yes the do, you fucking dumb turd.They don’t , dope. Not at all.
Nobody but the police had any guns, you fucking moron.The thing about listening to those tapes of officers shouting back and forth reporting all the Trump fans with guns was scary, especially the cop recording saying they had people up in trees brandishing AR15S....
It makes sense that capitol police didn't use their guns to stop the riot break in to the capitol now, they likely were aware of all the guns from radio traffick, and didn't want to have a shootout massacre on their hands, at the Capitol of the United States.
We've already documented numerous guns you idiot...not to mention molotov cocktails, pipe bombs, bear spray, brass knuckles, spears, pipes, sharpened flag poles...Nobody but the police had any guns, you fucking moron.
Please list them.We've already documented numerous guns you idiot...not to mention molotov cocktails, pipe bombs, bear spray, brass knuckles, spears, pipes, sharpened flag poles...
It’s not unreasonable to conclude that those who stayed outside while armed did so as a back up if things took a more violent turn with law enforcement inside. Meaning shots exchanged.No, no one who was armed went inside. Possibly for the same reason many armed attendees wouldn't go to the Ellipse, because they didn't want to go through magnetometers. But there were some outside the Capitol who were armed. Again, a few of them were arrested. I see no reason to believe those 9 were the only ones carrying. They were the only ones who police spotted carrying a firearm.
I just did you fucking idiotPlease list them.
Since very very few of those thousands who entered the Capitol were searched or went through metal detectors...we have no idea how many of the ARMED people from the Elipse rally were armed inside the CapitolIt’s not unreasonable to conclude that those who stayed outside while armed did so as a back up if things took a more violent turn with law enforcement inside. Meaning shots exchanged.
It was not advantageous to do so. Meaning the police did not use theirs.Well since you maintain they did intend harm then why didn’t the armed use their arms?
Just as the police would kill them had they tried. It wasn’t that kind of fight. No doubt to the attackers chagrin.Michael Fanone testified to something along those lines. When they were beating him to within an inch of his life, he said he considered using his firearm; but decided to plead for his life instead because he feared that violent mob would have felt justified in murdering him.
Post the House rules.Yes the do, you fucking dumb turd.
Okay cite me some info that made democrats look good and republicans look bad. Give me an example.No, but almost any idiocy spouted by morons like you is almost certainly fake
Same reason they didn't testify against Nixon. The SSA doesn' permit its agents to take part in certain, more politicized investigations, especially when a former President is involved, since they still are charged with protecting them. The agency wants to be as impartial as possible in their duties. So, unless an agent has critical information that HAS to come out , like Trump literally confessing to plaaning the attack, the comittee will like respect the agency as a neutral party.why wouldn’t the committee call the secret service agents that were at the heart of the “bombshell” witness testimony?
Whatever, so longYou are completely missing the point here.
There. Is. ONLY. ONE. credible. "side!"
I cannot think of a simpler way to spell that out for you.
Nobody but the police had any guns, you fucking moron.
It’s not unreasonable to conclude that those who stayed outside while armed did so as a back up if things took a more violent turn with law enforcement inside. Meaning shots exchanged.