Thank You, Founding Fathers, For the Electoral System

LOL, if you can get an Amendment through then so be it. That's the way it works. I'll bet you CHEERED the Messiah when he said "I have a phone, and a pen." Are you, with a straight face actually trying to say every amendment was a Republican Amendment?
No amendment needed in this case :itsok:

LOL, why do you always lie? It would be litigated all the way up. How do you think the SC would rule?
Told ya. He think an online petition can override the Constitution.

There ain't a goddam thing in the Constitution saying states have to vote unanimously.

Nada. Zero.

There ain't even anything in there that says we have to hold elections at all.

Go ahead peewee --- find it.
I wish California split their electoral votes. Trump would get 40% of them

Holy fuckin' shit, you're actually starting to get the idea.

Whatever you do, don't move.
 
No amendment needed in this case :itsok:

LOL, why do you always lie? It would be litigated all the way up. How do you think the SC would rule?
Told ya. He think an online petition can override the Constitution.

There ain't a goddam thing in the Constitution saying states have to vote unanimously.

Nada. Zero.

There ain't even anything in there that says we have to hold elections at all.

Go ahead peewee --- find it.

I know you think you're the smartest girl in the room, but you know full well it go all the way up the SC. Stop acting like a petulant damn child.

It go up to the SC, do it?

And what do it do when it go there?

I said "find it". You can't, because it doesn't exist. And there ain't nothing you can do about that. You can go wee wee wee all the way up the SC, and it still won't be there.

Calm down honey. You know full well it would be litigated all the way up. Put your big girl pants on and butch up.
 
No amendment needed in this case :itsok:

LOL, why do you always lie? It would be litigated all the way up. How do you think the SC would rule?
Told ya. He think an online petition can override the Constitution.

There ain't a goddam thing in the Constitution saying states have to vote unanimously.

Nada. Zero.

There ain't even anything in there that says we have to hold elections at all.

Go ahead peewee --- find it.
I wish California split their electoral votes. Trump would get 40% of them

Holy fuckin' shit, you're actually starting to get the idea.

Whatever you do, don't move.
Except unlike you I live in the real world, not the Matrix.
 
LOL, why do you always lie? It would be litigated all the way up. How do you think the SC would rule?
Told ya. He think an online petition can override the Constitution.

There ain't a goddam thing in the Constitution saying states have to vote unanimously.

Nada. Zero.

There ain't even anything in there that says we have to hold elections at all.

Go ahead peewee --- find it.

I know you think you're the smartest girl in the room, but you know full well it go all the way up the SC. Stop acting like a petulant damn child.

It go up to the SC, do it?

And what do it do when it go there?

I said "find it". You can't, because it doesn't exist. And there ain't nothing you can do about that. You can go wee wee wee all the way up the SC, and it still won't be there.

Calm down honey. You know full well it would be litigated all the way up. Put your big girl pants on and butch up.

I'm afraid I have no "girl pants" of any size, so you're gonna have to get your kink on somewhere else.

Meanwhile you're running away from the question because you can't answer it, and you can't answer it because no answer exists. There's nothing to "litigate".

Once AGAIN --- prove me wrong.
 
LOL, why do you always lie? It would be litigated all the way up. How do you think the SC would rule?
Told ya. He think an online petition can override the Constitution.

There ain't a goddam thing in the Constitution saying states have to vote unanimously.

Nada. Zero.

There ain't even anything in there that says we have to hold elections at all.

Go ahead peewee --- find it.
I wish California split their electoral votes. Trump would get 40% of them

Holy fuckin' shit, you're actually starting to get the idea.

Whatever you do, don't move.
Except unlike you I live in the real world, not the Matrix.

I ain't the one popping pills here. Check the names.

But for a moment there you actually started to get the point. Check your clocks and see if they all stopped.
 
Told ya. He think an online petition can override the Constitution.

There ain't a goddam thing in the Constitution saying states have to vote unanimously.

Nada. Zero.

There ain't even anything in there that says we have to hold elections at all.

Go ahead peewee --- find it.

I know you think you're the smartest girl in the room, but you know full well it go all the way up the SC. Stop acting like a petulant damn child.

It go up to the SC, do it?

And what do it do when it go there?

I said "find it". You can't, because it doesn't exist. And there ain't nothing you can do about that. You can go wee wee wee all the way up the SC, and it still won't be there.

Calm down honey. You know full well it would be litigated all the way up. Put your big girl pants on and butch up.

I'm afraid I have no "girl pants" of any size, so you're gonna have to get your kink on somewhere else.

Meanwhile you're running away from the question because you can't answer it, and you can't answer it because no answer exists. There's nothing to "litigate".

Once AGAIN --- prove me wrong.

I already did honey. The 12th Amendment spells it out, try reading it. Your ego is out of control sugar cheeks.
 
There ain't a goddam thing in the Constitution saying states have to vote unanimously.

Nada. Zero.

There ain't even anything in there that says we have to hold elections at all.

Go ahead peewee --- find it.

I know you think you're the smartest girl in the room, but you know full well it go all the way up the SC. Stop acting like a petulant damn child.

It go up to the SC, do it?

And what do it do when it go there?

I said "find it". You can't, because it doesn't exist. And there ain't nothing you can do about that. You can go wee wee wee all the way up the SC, and it still won't be there.

Calm down honey. You know full well it would be litigated all the way up. Put your big girl pants on and butch up.

I'm afraid I have no "girl pants" of any size, so you're gonna have to get your kink on somewhere else.

Meanwhile you're running away from the question because you can't answer it, and you can't answer it because no answer exists. There's nothing to "litigate".

Once AGAIN --- prove me wrong.

I already did honey. The 12th Amendment spells it out, try reading it. Your ego is out of control sugar cheeks.

I don't NEED to read it, kevlar tits. It says absolutely NOTHING about using a WTA system ----- Dumbass.
 
I know you think you're the smartest girl in the room, but you know full well it go all the way up the SC. Stop acting like a petulant damn child.

It go up to the SC, do it?

And what do it do when it go there?

I said "find it". You can't, because it doesn't exist. And there ain't nothing you can do about that. You can go wee wee wee all the way up the SC, and it still won't be there.

Calm down honey. You know full well it would be litigated all the way up. Put your big girl pants on and butch up.

I'm afraid I have no "girl pants" of any size, so you're gonna have to get your kink on somewhere else.

Meanwhile you're running away from the question because you can't answer it, and you can't answer it because no answer exists. There's nothing to "litigate".

Once AGAIN --- prove me wrong.

I already did honey. The 12th Amendment spells it out, try reading it. Your ego is out of control sugar cheeks.

I don't NEED to read it, kevlar tits. It says absolutely NOTHING about using a WTA system ----- Dumbass.

Yawn. You run with that, I'll watch the case as it moves up the chain.
 
It go up to the SC, do it?

And what do it do when it go there?

I said "find it". You can't, because it doesn't exist. And there ain't nothing you can do about that. You can go wee wee wee all the way up the SC, and it still won't be there.

Calm down honey. You know full well it would be litigated all the way up. Put your big girl pants on and butch up.

I'm afraid I have no "girl pants" of any size, so you're gonna have to get your kink on somewhere else.

Meanwhile you're running away from the question because you can't answer it, and you can't answer it because no answer exists. There's nothing to "litigate".

Once AGAIN --- prove me wrong.

I already did honey. The 12th Amendment spells it out, try reading it. Your ego is out of control sugar cheeks.

I don't NEED to read it, kevlar tits. It says absolutely NOTHING about using a WTA system ----- Dumbass.

Yawn. You run with that, I'll watch the case as it moves up the chain.

Once AGAIN you've been invited to prove me wrong. And you keep running away.
 
Told ya. He think an online petition can override the Constitution.

There ain't a goddam thing in the Constitution saying states have to vote unanimously.

Nada. Zero.

There ain't even anything in there that says we have to hold elections at all.

Go ahead peewee --- find it.
I wish California split their electoral votes. Trump would get 40% of them

Holy fuckin' shit, you're actually starting to get the idea.

Whatever you do, don't move.
Except unlike you I live in the real world, not the Matrix.

I ain't the one popping pills here. Check the names.

But for a moment there you actually started to get the point. Check your clocks and see if they all stopped.
Hypothetical Matrix scenarios bore me.

And yes, in California a Democrat determines final vote count.

So those 4,480,801 votes for Trump shows you’re lost in la-la land.
 
Not just no, but hell no! The Electoral College defends the country from the tyranny of the Mob. As the Founders intended.
When a civilization is ruled by the tyranny of a minority, that’s when it fails. The conditions under which the electoral college was negotiated no longer exist. Connecticut signed on to the NPV this year, bringing us a step closer to repairing our completely broken electoral system.

Won't happen, why are you people so intent on forcing us to do whatever you decide we should do?
Give it 1, maybe 2 more electoral breakdowns like last election, where a candidate suspected of conspiracy to sabotage the election became President with 3,000,000 less votes than his opponent, and it will happen :thup:

No it won't. I have always found it odd how losers always want to change the rules to suit their needs.
You mean like how republicans changed the rules to get Gorsuch? Or the 27 Constitutional amendments? Or Trump’s constant demands to change the rules so he can pass legislation by decree? :rolleyes:

No rules were changed to "get Gorsuch" or the 27 amendments. You should go back to the educational system that produced you and demand your money back. You were cheated.
 
Won't happen, why are you people so intent on forcing us to do whatever you decide we should do?
Give it 1, maybe 2 more electoral breakdowns like last election, where a candidate suspected of conspiracy to sabotage the election became President with 3,000,000 less votes than his opponent, and it will happen :thup:

No it won't. I have always found it odd how losers always want to change the rules to suit their needs.
You mean like how republicans changed the rules to get Gorsuch? Or the 27 Constitutional amendments? Or Trump’s constant demands to change the rules so he can pass legislation by decree? :rolleyes:

LOL, if you can get an Amendment through then so be it. That's the way it works. I'll bet you CHEERED the Messiah when he said "I have a phone, and a pen." Are you, with a straight face actually trying to say every amendment was a Republican Amendment?
No amendment needed in this case :itsok:

Wow. The Constitution can ONLY be changed by amendment. Constitutional Amendments - How is the Constitution amended?
 
Give it 1, maybe 2 more electoral breakdowns like last election, where a candidate suspected of conspiracy to sabotage the election became President with 3,000,000 less votes than his opponent, and it will happen :thup:

No it won't. I have always found it odd how losers always want to change the rules to suit their needs.
You mean like how republicans changed the rules to get Gorsuch? Or the 27 Constitutional amendments? Or Trump’s constant demands to change the rules so he can pass legislation by decree? :rolleyes:

LOL, if you can get an Amendment through then so be it. That's the way it works. I'll bet you CHEERED the Messiah when he said "I have a phone, and a pen." Are you, with a straight face actually trying to say every amendment was a Republican Amendment?
No amendment needed in this case :itsok:

Wow. The Constitution can ONLY be changed by amendment. Constitutional Amendments - How is the Constitution amended?

They are going to try an end run, it won't work.
 
You really don’t understand our country’s history do you? The states are soverign but united. The Founding Fathers understood this, which is why they set up a republic. The federal govt was designed to do the things the individual states could not (common defense, commerce, foreign policy, etc.), but that is why the Constitution states: those powers not spelled out for the federal government are reserved to the states. They wanted local rule so idiots from another state could not tell them how to live. This is the exact reason why they set it up this way.

Uh, I understand that just fine...

BUT IT DIDN'T WORK. And it became pretty clear pretty soon we needed a strong central government in a world of empires.

We shouldn't limit ourselves to the limited thinking of 18th century slave rapists.

A majority vote makes it easy to cheat. Bogus votes can be submitted anywhere in the Union. A thousand votes may decide an election.

It would seem it would be a lot easier to submit bogus votes in a couple of rust belt states (PA doesn't even use paper ballot backups, it's all electronic) than to hack the system for the whole country.

Just saying.

The thing is, the people got this right. Trump has no business being president, he proves that with every rant on Twitter.
 
Actually, the EC was designed to keep someone like your hero, the shrilary out of the White House.
Obviously this is absurd. For all her flaws, she is not as unqualified, as ignorant, and as unethical as is Trump. But thank you for the unoriginal,predictable response.
 
You really don’t understand our country’s history do you? The states are soverign but united. The Founding Fathers understood this, which is why they set up a republic. The federal govt was designed to do the things the individual states could not (common defense, commerce, foreign policy, etc.), but that is why the Constitution states: those powers not spelled out for the federal government are reserved to the states. They wanted local rule so idiots from another state could not tell them how to live. This is the exact reason why they set it up this way.

Uh, I understand that just fine...

BUT IT DIDN'T WORK. And it became pretty clear pretty soon we needed a strong central government in a world of empires.

We shouldn't limit ourselves to the limited thinking of 18th century slave rapists.

A majority vote makes it easy to cheat. Bogus votes can be submitted anywhere in the Union. A thousand votes may decide an election.

It would seem it would be a lot easier to submit bogus votes in a couple of rust belt states (PA doesn't even use paper ballot backups, it's all electronic) than to hack the system for the whole country.

Just saying.

The thing is, the people got this right. Trump has no business being president, he proves that with every rant on Twitter.

Pick up a weapon and meet real American's on the field. (shrugs)
 
Otherwise the votes in California, where it's legal to knowingly transmit HIV but you go to prison for handing out a straw, would have mattered.

You're fake news.
And a bald-faced liar.
There is no such law about straws in CA.
Post the statute or STFU.

Giving Out Plastic Straws In Santa Barbara May Land You In Jail For 6 Months
California city OKs jail time for defying plastic straw ban

View attachment 207990 View attachment 207991

If you actually read the articles you link to, no one is going to jail over a plastic straw.
You're fake news.
Ignoramus.

1.28.020 Penalty for Misdemeanor.
Unless otherwise specified in this Code, a misdemeanor is punishable by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), imprisonment for a term not exceeding six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. (Ord. 4408, 1986; Ord. 4067, 1980.)

Again, read your own links.
The authorities interviewed said they would not impose any jail time.
And your quoted statute doesn't say what the crime is, dickhead.
That's what the sign says in the park where I walk my dog, too, idiot.
Boilerplate.
LMAO.

YOU are fake news.
 

Forum List

Back
Top