Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the economy was growing but very weak (you guys said we couldn't get more tthan 2% growth any more)Great! How we supposed to run the country? On smiles and sunshine ?
Even the current tax code ain’t enough to pay the bills .
and you cared under Obama when?? oh never
show me the last time tax cuts didn't grow the economy over the next 5-10 years
1. The economy was already growing
2. “Tax cuts” aren’t bad , but devil is in the details . Who’s getting the cuts? How is the budget effected ?
Yes, taxes are keeping the poor trapped in poverty. They are currently paying 90 percent of their income in taxes, and they are required to pay in platinum. It's really hard to find platinum, so they keep getting their taxes compounded due to late fees. And that is how high federal income taxes on the poor is trapping them in poverty.Well if people werent taxed on low and middle incomes they would no longer need welfare benefits.
LOLOLOLOLThe brainwash is deep with this one.... Read something. Like my answers...Cant answer a question about your cliche talking points, ey?Why do you disagree with the tax policy of every successful country, super duper? And refuse to recognize history? You dupes are absolutely ridiculous...Why do you feel that discrimination against the ambitious is the right way to do things?American infrastructure and the middle and working class r ridiculously overdue for help. Any such thing should be accompanied with a new top rate of 50 or 60% on the richest.The American Resurgence can only be achieved through a revolutionary reform of the US Federal Tax Code.
It is time for wealth redistribution from the Federal Government to every single American Citizen through exempting every American Family from Income Tax if they earn less than $150,000 per annum.
The elimination of the Federal Gasoline Tax will end the War on The American Motorist because American Families have been over taxed by high spending - high spending administration for far too long.
The New American Revolution beats in the hearts and minds of the American People who want their taxes back, their jobs back and their country back.
Cutting Payroll Taxes will reduce the cost of employing American Workers and will reduce the cost differential between creating Jobs in America and creating Jobs outside of America.
Great! How we supposed to run the country? On smiles and sunshine ?
Even the current tax code ain’t enough to pay the bills .
and you cared under Obama when?? oh never
show me the last time tax cuts didn't grow the economy over the next 5-10 years
Original EU UK Canada Japan Australia New Zealand. American middle class and infrastructure have been slowly going to hell the last 35 years of the rich paying too little under GOP tax rates. Duh..m.LOLOLOLOLThe brainwash is deep with this one.... Read something. Like my answers...Cant answer a question about your cliche talking points, ey?Why do you disagree with the tax policy of every successful country, super duper? And refuse to recognize history? You dupes are absolutely ridiculous...Why do you feel that discrimination against the ambitious is the right way to do things?American infrastructure and the middle and working class r ridiculously overdue for help. Any such thing should be accompanied with a new top rate of 50 or 60% on the richest.
define success country...this will be good
the second oneGreat! How we supposed to run the country? On smiles and sunshine ?
Even the current tax code ain’t enough to pay the bills .
and you cared under Obama when?? oh never
show me the last time tax cuts didn't grow the economy over the next 5-10 years
That is easy.
Tax cuts always cost the country revenue.
The 10 years before the first Bush II tax cut tax revenue increased an average of 6.61% per year.
The 10 years after the first Bush II tax cut tax revenue increased by an average of 1.87%.
Which of those numbers seem better to you?
Original EU UK Canada Japan Australia New Zealand. American middle class and infrastructure have been slowly going to hell the last 35 years of the rich paying too little under GOP tax rates. Duh..m.LOLOLOLOLThe brainwash is deep with this one.... Read something. Like my answers...Cant answer a question about your cliche talking points, ey?Why do you disagree with the tax policy of every successful country, super duper? And refuse to recognize history? You dupes are absolutely ridiculous...Why do you feel that discrimination against the ambitious is the right way to do things?
define success country...this will be good
resurgence of what? bigotry and stupidity?The American Resurgence can only be achieved through a revolutionary reform of the US Federal Tax Code.
It is time for wealth redistribution from the Federal Government to every single American Citizen through exempting every American Family from Income Tax if they earn less than $150,000 per annum.
The elimination of the Federal Gasoline Tax will end the War on The American Motorist because American Families have been over taxed by high spending - high spending administration for far too long.
The New American Revolution beats in the hearts and minds of the American People who want their taxes back, their jobs back and their country back.
Cutting Payroll Taxes will reduce the cost of employing American Workers and will reduce the cost differential between creating Jobs in America and creating Jobs outside of America.
the second oneGreat! How we supposed to run the country? On smiles and sunshine ?
Even the current tax code ain’t enough to pay the bills .
and you cared under Obama when?? oh never
show me the last time tax cuts didn't grow the economy over the next 5-10 years
That is easy.
Tax cuts always cost the country revenue.
The 10 years before the first Bush II tax cut tax revenue increased an average of 6.61% per year.
The 10 years after the first Bush II tax cut tax revenue increased by an average of 1.87%.
Which of those numbers seem better to you?
I am surprised to see you vote "yes"
Why?
the second oneGreat! How we supposed to run the country? On smiles and sunshine ?
Even the current tax code ain’t enough to pay the bills .
and you cared under Obama when?? oh never
show me the last time tax cuts didn't grow the economy over the next 5-10 years
That is easy.
Tax cuts always cost the country revenue.
The 10 years before the first Bush II tax cut tax revenue increased an average of 6.61% per year.
The 10 years after the first Bush II tax cut tax revenue increased by an average of 1.87%.
Which of those numbers seem better to you?
Which explains why you are a Trump zealot.
Thanks for playing!
That doesnt tell me why you think they should only tax the ambitious.I am surprised to see you vote "yes"
Why?
Well. The problem with the income tax is that the assumption is made that the federal government owns us, controls us, controls 100% of our income, and sets the terms for which we may keep a certain percentage if we obey their rules and make ourselves vulnerable to everything it does.
you care to provide a link for those numbers?Great! How we supposed to run the country? On smiles and sunshine ?
Even the current tax code ain’t enough to pay the bills .
and you cared under Obama when?? oh never
show me the last time tax cuts didn't grow the economy over the next 5-10 years
That is easy.
Tax cuts always cost the country revenue.
The 10 years before the first Bush II tax cut tax revenue increased an average of 6.61% per year.
The 10 years after the first Bush II tax cut tax revenue increased by an average of 1.87%.
Which of those numbers seem better to you?
They always used to call them the fortunate... Reagan made it acceptable to blame the poor. Deplorable.That doesnt tell me why you think they should only tax the ambitious.I am surprised to see you vote "yes"
Why?
Well. The problem with the income tax is that the assumption is made that the federal government owns us, controls us, controls 100% of our income, and sets the terms for which we may keep a certain percentage if we obey their rules and make ourselves vulnerable to everything it does.
That doesnt tell me why you think they should only tax the ambitious.I am surprised to see you vote "yes"
Why?
Well. The problem with the income tax is that the assumption is made that the federal government owns us, controls us, controls 100% of our income, and sets the terms for which we may keep a certain percentage if we obey their rules and make ourselves vulnerable to everything it does.
I woudl think "fortunate" would be a good way to describe some. The ones that earn it? No way.They always used to call them the fortunate... Reagan made it acceptable to blame the poor. Deplorable.That doesnt tell me why you think they should only tax the ambitious.I am surprised to see you vote "yes"
Why?
Well. The problem with the income tax is that the assumption is made that the federal government owns us, controls us, controls 100% of our income, and sets the terms for which we may keep a certain percentage if we obey their rules and make ourselves vulnerable to everything it does.
you care to provide a link for those numbers?Great! How we supposed to run the country? On smiles and sunshine ?
Even the current tax code ain’t enough to pay the bills .
and you cared under Obama when?? oh never
show me the last time tax cuts didn't grow the economy over the next 5-10 years
That is easy.
Tax cuts always cost the country revenue.
The 10 years before the first Bush II tax cut tax revenue increased an average of 6.61% per year.
The 10 years after the first Bush II tax cut tax revenue increased by an average of 1.87%.
Which of those numbers seem better to you?
the second oneGreat! How we supposed to run the country? On smiles and sunshine ?
Even the current tax code ain’t enough to pay the bills .
and you cared under Obama when?? oh never
show me the last time tax cuts didn't grow the economy over the next 5-10 years
That is easy.
Tax cuts always cost the country revenue.
The 10 years before the first Bush II tax cut tax revenue increased an average of 6.61% per year.
The 10 years after the first Bush II tax cut tax revenue increased by an average of 1.87%.
Which of those numbers seem better to you?
Which explains why you are a Trump zealot.
Thanks for playing!
Jesus Christ. I cant even be against high taxation without some retarded mother fucker bringing up our dumb ass president.
Grow up, dipshit.
What would be a proper way to describe them? Since the most irrelevant part of my post is so important and allThat doesnt tell me why you think they should only tax the ambitious.I am surprised to see you vote "yes"
Why?
Well. The problem with the income tax is that the assumption is made that the federal government owns us, controls us, controls 100% of our income, and sets the terms for which we may keep a certain percentage if we obey their rules and make ourselves vulnerable to everything it does.
Why do you think only families making over 150,000 are ambitious?
Why do you assume a family making over 150,000 is ambitious?
the second oneand you cared under Obama when?? oh never
show me the last time tax cuts didn't grow the economy over the next 5-10 years
That is easy.
Tax cuts always cost the country revenue.
The 10 years before the first Bush II tax cut tax revenue increased an average of 6.61% per year.
The 10 years after the first Bush II tax cut tax revenue increased by an average of 1.87%.
Which of those numbers seem better to you?
Which explains why you are a Trump zealot.
Thanks for playing!
Jesus Christ. I cant even be against high taxation without some retarded mother fucker bringing up our dumb ass president.
Grow up, dipshit.
Sorry, but when you blow the Trump horn of tax cuts but no spending cuts, you get called what you are.
