Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No it's not the job of the jury to conduct further investigations for the prosecutorOf course it isNot his job to conduct further investigations.Bolton certainly has put the pressure on Moscow Mitch to allow witnesses...and that's not good for Trump
New evidence pertaining to the alleged crimes is always admitted in to the trial... a jury can not seek the truth and just verdict without it.
With an airtight case, you don't need the jury to do more investigating for the prosecutordidn't democrats say they had an airtight case?I'll be curious to see if Chief Justice Roberts has anything to say about witnesses and documents.
Not his call.
They do. They just don't have a fair and impartial jury.
No it's not the job of the jury to conduct further investigations for the prosecutorOf course it isNot his job to conduct further investigations.Bolton certainly has put the pressure on Moscow Mitch to allow witnesses...and that's not good for Trump
New evidence pertaining to the alleged crimes is always admitted in to the trial... a jury can not seek the truth and just verdict without it.
Was he called during the inquiry?Should have done it during the Schiff Shame inquiryNobody stopped Nadddler, Shiffft or Pelosi from supeanoeing Bolton before.Bolton needs to testify.
Nobodys stopping them now.
The trial just started. He should testify
He can testify in the trial too. No reason he can’t.
he should have been called during the inquiry you don't get a do over.No it's not the job of the jury to conduct further investigations for the prosecutorOf course it isNot his job to conduct further investigations.Bolton certainly has put the pressure on Moscow Mitch to allow witnesses...and that's not good for Trump
New evidence pertaining to the alleged crimes is always admitted in to the trial... a jury can not seek the truth and just verdict without it.
Really? Even after AG Barr refused to do the investigation?
Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.
WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.
NYT: Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says
John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation
How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? By Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt. They are two of the Times best and most credible reporters.
Yes. He was a no-show.Was he called during the inquiry?Should have done it during the Schiff Shame inquiryNobody stopped Nadddler, Shiffft or Pelosi from supeanoeing Bolton before.Bolton needs to testify.
Nobodys stopping them now.
The trial just started. He should testify
He can testify in the trial too. No reason he can’t.
ever heard of legal remedies to fix that? Why didn't he show up? he didn't work for the white house why the sudden change?Yes. He was a no-show.Was he called during the inquiry?Should have done it during the Schiff Shame inquiryNobody stopped Nadddler, Shiffft or Pelosi from supeanoeing Bolton before.
Nobodys stopping them now.
The trial just started. He should testify
He can testify in the trial too. No reason he can’t.
he should have been called during the inquiry you don't get a do over.No it's not the job of the jury to conduct further investigations for the prosecutorOf course it isNot his job to conduct further investigations.Bolton certainly has put the pressure on Moscow Mitch to allow witnesses...and that's not good for Trump
New evidence pertaining to the alleged crimes is always admitted in to the trial... a jury can not seek the truth and just verdict without it.
Really? Even after AG Barr refused to do the investigation?
ever heard of legal remedies to fix that? Why didn't he show up? he didn't work for the white house why the sudden change?Yes. He was a no-show.Was he called during the inquiry?Should have done it during the Schiff Shame inquiryThe trial just started. He should testify
He can testify in the trial too. No reason he can’t.
To sell books maybe?
Democrats must demand witnesses and documents. Polls show the majority of Americans stand with them.
He's got to sell books and these idiots are eating the hell out of it lolDrafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.
WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.
NYT: Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says
John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation
How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? By Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt. They are two of the Times best and most credible reporters.
Ha ha, it was an illegal leak, based on a book written by a proud man who makes unsupported claims, the person who is still angry at being fired. He was fired because he was a War Hark, while Trump wanted to pursue a very different Foreign Policy direction.
His word without back up evidence is my prediction.
It's not the job of the Juryever heard of legal remedies to fix that? Why didn't he show up? he didn't work for the white house why the sudden change?Yes. He was a no-show.Was he called during the inquiry?Should have done it during the Schiff Shame inquiry
He can testify in the trial too. No reason he can’t.
To sell books maybe?
Yes. The legal remedy is to call his as a witness during the Senate trial.
It's not the job of the Juryever heard of legal remedies to fix that? Why didn't he show up? he didn't work for the white house why the sudden change?Yes. He was a no-show.Was he called during the inquiry?He can testify in the trial too. No reason he can’t.
To sell books maybe?
Yes. The legal remedy is to call his as a witness during the Senate trial.
No whistleblower? Better tell the ICIG.
Who's ya'll? and as much as I detest hillary I do not believe we should be locking our leaders up, besides locking her up would only bring those too ashamed to be aligned with her right now out of hiding...trump just knew he could garner an ocean of votes from otherwise uninterested Americans by saying that, that's what happened to that.Here I thought y’all were going to lock Clinton up. Whatever happened to that?
Sorry you had your chanceever heard of legal remedies to fix that? Why didn't he show up? he didn't work for the white house why the sudden change?Yes. He was a no-show.Was he called during the inquiry?Should have done it during the Schiff Shame inquiry
He can testify in the trial too. No reason he can’t.
To sell books maybe?
Yes. The legal remedy is to call his as a witness during the Senate trial.