Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you are misreading my argument. i do believe in science. i am trying to show her the "evidence" for her side of the argument. (which there isnt any outside the bible) vs. what science has been able to prove about the age of the earth.
That site is not representative of Christian belief. There is no Christian doctrine on how old the earth is. You cant tar and feather us with that brush.
how many sites would you like me to point out that agree on the idea that the bible shows the earth is only 6,000 year old?
and im not tar and feathering you. i could care less what the bible says about how old the earth is. but im showing that the bible is not an accurate scientific document.
That site is not representative of Christian belief. There is no Christian doctrine on how old the earth is. You cant tar and feather us with that brush.
how many sites would you like me to point out that agree on the idea that the bible shows the earth is only 6,000 year old?
and im not tar and feathering you. i could care less what the bible says about how old the earth is. but im showing that the bible is not an accurate scientific document.
The number of internet sites means nothing. The idea of the earth being 6000 years old is not a doctrine of the Christian Church. It's not in the bible. Scripture is manipulated to say that. You're saying a PERSONAL belief held by a small minority is Christian Docrtine. That is a false and misleading.
you are misreading my argument. i do believe in science. i am trying to show her the "evidence" for her side of the argument. (which there isnt any outside the bible) vs. what science has been able to prove about the age of the earth.
That site is not representative of Christian belief. There is no Christian doctrine on how old the earth is. You cant tar and feather us with that brush.
how many sites would you like me to point out that agree on the idea that the bible shows the earth is only 6,000 year old?
and im not tar and feathering you. i could care less what the bible says about how old the earth is. but im showing that the bible is not an accurate scientific document.
That site is not representative of Christian belief. There is no Christian doctrine on how old the earth is. You cant tar and feather us with that brush.
how many sites would you like me to point out that agree on the idea that the bible shows the earth is only 6,000 year old?
and im not tar and feathering you. i could care less what the bible says about how old the earth is. but im showing that the bible is not an accurate scientific document.
The Bible is not about science, it's about believing in God and Jesus, how to live your life and how to become a better person.
And God knows science better than any human knows about it.
a question for creationists....
there have been quite a few people on here who talk about testing the theory of evolution through the scientific process, and that evolution has been observed in nature.
what is the test that can help prove creationism? or the test that has helped prove creationism? it seems to me that the only mention or supporting evidence is the bible. the same bible that says the earth is only 6000 year old.....
No the Bible does not teach that the earth is only 6,000 years old.
Some are teaching that and it is not right. If they read their bible they would get this correct.
The bible says that Gods years of one day is equivalent to 1,000 years of mankind.
It took God 6,000 years to create life of everything here on earth.
To him it was 6 days, to us it was 6,000 years.
And we have no real idea of how old the earth really was before he stared life here. And we have no idea of how long life has been since his creation.
I support that earth maybe billions of years old.
And science has proved that life had to come from something or someone who started it.
Life does not come from dead material.
how many sites would you like me to point out that agree on the idea that the bible shows the earth is only 6,000 year old?
and im not tar and feathering you. i could care less what the bible says about how old the earth is. but im showing that the bible is not an accurate scientific document.
The Bible is not about science, it's about believing in God and Jesus, how to live your life and how to become a better person.
And God knows science better than any human knows about it.
thank you for agreeing that bible not is not science nor fact. its about believing
The Bible is not about science, it's about believing in God and Jesus, how to live your life and how to become a better person.
And God knows science better than any human knows about it.
thank you for agreeing that bible not is not science nor fact. its about believing
Where did I say the Bible is not Fact? That is assumtion on your part.
I don't like it when the left does this all time,says that you say something when you don't
I said it is not about science, not that bible is about science.
how many sites would you like me to point out that agree on the idea that the bible shows the earth is only 6,000 year old?
and im not tar and feathering you. i could care less what the bible says about how old the earth is. but im showing that the bible is not an accurate scientific document.
The number of internet sites means nothing. The idea of the earth being 6000 years old is not a doctrine of the Christian Church. It's not in the bible. Scripture is manipulated to say that. You're saying a PERSONAL belief held by a small minority is Christian Docrtine. That is a false and misleading.
exactly and so it comes out!
"You're saying a PERSONAL belief held by a small minority is Christian Docrtine. "
now apply that exact thinking to creationism......
The Bible is not about science, it's about believing in God and Jesus, how to live your life and how to become a better person.
And God knows science better than any human knows about it.
thank you for agreeing that bible not is not science nor fact. its about believing
Where did I say the Bible is not Fact? That is assumtion on your part.
I don't like it when the left does this all time,says that you say something when you don't
I said it is not about science, not that bible is about science.
thank you for agreeing that bible not is not science nor fact. its about believing
Where did I say the Bible is not Fact? That is assumtion on your part.
I don't like it when the left does this all time,says that you say something when you don't
I said it is not about science, not that bible is about science.
Then why are you arguing with science? Why does it matter if the Bible and science don't agree with something? Why do aspects of the Bible have to be taught in science classes when you say "it's not about science"?
That's the whole point of the thread.
I would well imagine its because its not proven Science just as you are clinging to the assumption that evolution is a fact of ScienceThen why are you arguing with science
Where did I say the Bible is not Fact? That is assumtion on your part.
I don't like it when the left does this all time,says that you say something when you don't
I said it is not about science, not that bible is about science.
Then why are you arguing with science? Why does it matter if the Bible and science don't agree with something? Why do aspects of the Bible have to be taught in science classes when you say "it's not about science"?
That's the whole point of the thread.
I would well imagine its because its not proven Science just as you are clinging to the assumption that evolution is a fact of ScienceThen why are you arguing with science
Where did I say the Bible is not Fact? That is assumtion on your part.
I don't like it when the left does this all time,says that you say something when you don't
I said it is not about science, not that bible is about science.
Then why are you arguing with science? Why does it matter if the Bible and science don't agree with something? Why do aspects of the Bible have to be taught in science classes when you say "it's not about science"?
That's the whole point of the thread.
I would well imagine its because its not proven Science just as you are clinging to the assumption that evolution is a fact of ScienceThen why are you arguing with science
Then why are you arguing with science? Why does it matter if the Bible and science don't agree with something? Why do aspects of the Bible have to be taught in science classes when you say "it's not about science"?
That's the whole point of the thread.
I would well imagine its because its not proven Science just as you are clinging to the assumption that evolution is a fact of ScienceThen why are you arguing with science
how is evolution not a part of science? that makes no sense at all. its completely rooted in science.
Understanding Evolution
thank you for agreeing that bible not is not science nor fact. its about believing
Where did I say the Bible is not Fact? That is assumtion on your part.
I don't like it when the left does this all time,says that you say something when you don't
I said it is not about science, not that bible is about science.
Then why are you arguing with science? Why does it matter if the Bible and science don't agree with something? Why do aspects of the Bible have to be taught in science classes when you say "it's not about science"?
That's the whole point of the thread.
I would well imagine its because its not proven Science just as you are clinging to the assumption that evolution is a fact of Science
how is evolution not a part of science? that makes no sense at all. its completely rooted in science.
Understanding Evolution
Its rooted in Science as a possible Theory to answer the Ultimate question.
how is evolution not a part of science? that makes no sense at all. its completely rooted in science.
Understanding Evolution
Its rooted in Science as a possible Theory to answer the Ultimate question.
and creationism is rooted in "faith."which be definition can not be proven.
Faith - strong or unshakeable belief in something, esp without proof or evidence
Faith | Define Faith at Dictionary.com
Where did I say the Bible is not Fact? That is assumtion on your part.
I don't like it when the left does this all time,says that you say something when you don't
I said it is not about science, not that bible is about science.
Then why are you arguing with science? Why does it matter if the Bible and science don't agree with something? Why do aspects of the Bible have to be taught in science classes when you say "it's not about science"?
That's the whole point of the thread.
I also said that our Creator knows more about science that any human here on earth.
Our Creator created the first forms of life and science has proved that.
Louis Pasteur proved that life has to come from life. Science experiments have never proven life has come from something non living.
The bible and science go hand in hand.
Science has had more proof in the bible than the other way around.
I would well imagine its because its not proven Science just as you are clinging to the assumption that evolution is a fact of Science
how is evolution not a part of science? that makes no sense at all. its completely rooted in science.
Understanding Evolution
Its rooted in Science as a possible Theory to answer the Ultimate question.
Its rooted in Science as a possible Theory to answer the Ultimate question.
and creationism is rooted in "faith."which be definition can not be proven.
Faith - strong or unshakeable belief in something, esp without proof or evidence
Faith | Define Faith at Dictionary.com
Funny how you are showing just as much "faith" in assuming that the Science is fact when it hasn't been proven in any manner. Sort of makes you a hypocrite now doesn't it?
