Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You sound like a real low-life. Probably even do drugs, huh? Queer?Fucktard, post #1 contains more debating material than your lightweight gomer MAGA troll ass has posted during all of your worthless years on this board.
Now get back to sucking Trump's cock some more, MAGA pussy.
As I was saying -- No facts, no game, and no intellect.You sound like a real low-life. Probably even do drugs, huh?
Your OP is just the moronic democrat's feeble attempt to get mo money to bring mo migrants into the US.
I really don't give a shit, I'm only relaying a little reality, but maybe someone will be triggered by it. When have two parties ever reached a consensus? I haven't seen this happen for years, at least of significance. The problem with the Trumpian right is 100% allegiance to Mussolini.lt wasn't a crisis for three years, until you disingenuous douchebags needed a phony rubric under which to do another one of your famous pork filled cramdowns.
Y'all failed this time....Suck on it.
Facts?As I was saying -- No facts, no game, and no intellect.
You've probably never read the WaPo in your life, you lightweight uneducated gomer racist maggot.
My left ball has a higher IQ than your imbecile MAGA kleetus ass.
And you can't explain WHY, kleetus.Facts?
1. The senate Bill is DEAD.
Kleetus hate them lib reading materials!!! Fucking gomer MAGA bitch.2. Why would I read anything from a democrat urban plantation? Harvard already said FNC. is the least biased news source.
The bill does nothing to secure the US border. It just gives billions of dollars to Ukraine and Israel.Leave it to Catherine Rumpell with the Washington Post to keep it real regarding the current border protection bill. --
Welp, the dog caught the car again. After months — decades? — of running on tightening the border, House Republicans are suddenly paralyzed when offered the chance to do so.
A hard-won, bipartisan Senate deal dropped Sunday evening, with tons of items on conservatives’ border-policy bucket list, including many that former president Donald Trump had begged for. These include:
House Republicans should have been pinching themselves in disbelief. Yet within hours of this 370-page bill dropping, House GOP leaders ruled out letting their chamber vote on any of it.
- beefing up border security as a condition for giving any more aid to Ukraine (check!)
- a tougher and faster asylum-processing system so that those who don’t meet asylum criteria cannot stay and work for years while their cases crawl through the courts (check!)
- hiring more personnel for Customs and Border Protection as well as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (1,500 and 1,200, respectively — so, check, check!)
- huge investments in fentanyl detection technologies and other anti-trafficking enforcement (check!)
- reviving something like Title 42 restrictions, wherein the president can “shut down” most of the asylum system (though this version doesn’t require a public health pretext and has more severe consequences for border-crossers — so, check-plus, perhaps).
Maybe GOP lawmakers genuinely think they should hold out for the more draconian bill they put forward last year, known as H.R. 2. There are two major problems with this strategy: First, H.R. 2 would not supply funding for pretty much anything that could stop border crossings.
Second, it would almost certainly never become law — even if Republicans were to gain control of the White House and both chambers of Congress. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) himself has pointed this out. (For procedural reasons, the bill would need 60 votes, which it could not get.)
Nailed itLeave it to Catherine Rumpell with the Washington Post to keep it real regarding the current border protection bill. --
Welp, the dog caught the car again. After months — decades? — of running on tightening the border, House Republicans are suddenly paralyzed when offered the chance to do so.
A hard-won, bipartisan Senate deal dropped Sunday evening, with tons of items on conservatives’ border-policy bucket list, including many that former president Donald Trump had begged for. These include:
House Republicans should have been pinching themselves in disbelief. Yet within hours of this 370-page bill dropping, House GOP leaders ruled out letting their chamber vote on any of it.
- beefing up border security as a condition for giving any more aid to Ukraine (check!)
- a tougher and faster asylum-processing system so that those who don’t meet asylum criteria cannot stay and work for years while their cases crawl through the courts (check!)
- hiring more personnel for Customs and Border Protection as well as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (1,500 and 1,200, respectively — so, check, check!)
- huge investments in fentanyl detection technologies and other anti-trafficking enforcement (check!)
- reviving something like Title 42 restrictions, wherein the president can “shut down” most of the asylum system (though this version doesn’t require a public health pretext and has more severe consequences for border-crossers — so, check-plus, perhaps).
Maybe GOP lawmakers genuinely think they should hold out for the more draconian bill they put forward last year, known as H.R. 2. There are two major problems with this strategy: First, H.R. 2 would not supply funding for pretty much anything that could stop border crossings.
Second, it would almost certainly never become law — even if Republicans were to gain control of the White House and both chambers of Congress. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) himself has pointed this out. (For procedural reasons, the bill would need 60 votes, which it could not get.)
We have a full loaf in House bill 2Half a loaf is better than none and new legislation can always be crafted in the future. It’s not like this is some sort of last chance.
immigrationforum.org
Why the personal insults?There is no funding for your HR 2 bill, dumb ass. As I already explained to you.
In the real world, people have to COMPROMISE to pass legislation. But you live in your fantasy MAGA Trump dick-licker world.
Convoy-goer Misty Gregory told MSNBC: “It’s not what I expected, but then again I don’t know what I expected. I can tell you it’s not as bad as what I thought, so that’s kind of eye-opening in itself.”Leave it to Catherine Rumpell with the Washington Post to keep it real regarding the current border protection bill. --
Welp, the dog caught the car again. After months — decades? — of running on tightening the border, House Republicans are suddenly paralyzed when offered the chance to do so.
A hard-won, bipartisan Senate deal dropped Sunday evening, with tons of items on conservatives’ border-policy bucket list, including many that former president Donald Trump had begged for. These include:
House Republicans should have been pinching themselves in disbelief. Yet within hours of this 370-page bill dropping, House GOP leaders ruled out letting their chamber vote on any of it.
- beefing up border security as a condition for giving any more aid to Ukraine (check!)
- a tougher and faster asylum-processing system so that those who don’t meet asylum criteria cannot stay and work for years while their cases crawl through the courts (check!)
- hiring more personnel for Customs and Border Protection as well as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (1,500 and 1,200, respectively — so, check, check!)
- huge investments in fentanyl detection technologies and other anti-trafficking enforcement (check!)
- reviving something like Title 42 restrictions, wherein the president can “shut down” most of the asylum system (though this version doesn’t require a public health pretext and has more severe consequences for border-crossers — so, check-plus, perhaps).
Maybe GOP lawmakers genuinely think they should hold out for the more draconian bill they put forward last year, known as H.R. 2. There are two major problems with this strategy: First, H.R. 2 would not supply funding for pretty much anything that could stop border crossings.
Second, it would almost certainly never become law — even if Republicans were to gain control of the White House and both chambers of Congress. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) himself has pointed this out. (For procedural reasons, the bill would need 60 votes, which it could not get.)
There is no funding in either billThat bill is worthless. Almost zero funding, and it strips funding from the very avenues used to process, and detain, asylum seekers. That would make the situation worse, not improve it. It was nothing but political theater, and has always had a zero chance of passing. Try again.
You don’t know what you are talking aboutThere is no funding in either bill
Just an authorization that may or may not be funded in an appropriation bill
But I do like stripping funds from the programs that assist illegal migration
We need to tell the NGOs to go fly a kite
The biden bill funds nothingYou don’t know what you are talking about
Leave it to Catherine Rumpell with the Washington Post to keep it real regarding the current border protection bill. --
Welp, the dog caught the car again. After months — decades? — of running on tightening the border, House Republicans are suddenly paralyzed when offered the chance to do so.
A hard-won, bipartisan Senate deal dropped Sunday evening, with tons of items on conservatives’ border-policy bucket list, including many that former president Donald Trump had begged for. These include:
House Republicans should have been pinching themselves in disbelief. Yet within hours of this 370-page bill dropping, House GOP leaders ruled out letting their chamber vote on any of it.
- beefing up border security as a condition for giving any more aid to Ukraine (check!)
- a tougher and faster asylum-processing system so that those who don’t meet asylum criteria cannot stay and work for years while their cases crawl through the courts (check!)
- hiring more personnel for Customs and Border Protection as well as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (1,500 and 1,200, respectively — so, check, check!)
- huge investments in fentanyl detection technologies and other anti-trafficking enforcement (check!)
- reviving something like Title 42 restrictions, wherein the president can “shut down” most of the asylum system (though this version doesn’t require a public health pretext and has more severe consequences for border-crossers — so, check-plus, perhaps).
Maybe GOP lawmakers genuinely think they should hold out for the more draconian bill they put forward last year, known as H.R. 2. There are two major problems with this strategy: First, H.R. 2 would not supply funding for pretty much anything that could stop border crossings.
Second, it would almost certainly never become law — even if Republicans were to gain control of the White House and both chambers of Congress. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) himself has pointed this out. (For procedural reasons, the bill would need 60 votes, which it could not get.)
That’s a distinction without a differenceitho
The biden bill funds nothing
Its just an authorization for future spending that has to be funded in an actual spending bill
It makes all the differenceThat’s a distinction without a difference
Riiiiight. You twats have been bitching about the border since the day Biden took office. Now that no good fuck Trump sandbagged this bill all of a sudden it's no big deal, right Spook?Cheeto Jesus didn't do anything, cryass bitch.
The text of the bill got out, and nobody wants to commit career suicide by supporting that shit heap.
Cry some more, Karen.
That’s the mechanism for funding. It’s how it’s done. Are you saying that Republicans would fuck his up?It makes all the difference
Congress may or may not appropriate the money
