Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This from the moron who thought that she wrote that diary passage the same year the events happened. You obviously have reading comprehension issues as shown again in that whacko interpretation of how you mischaracterized my point.And even if that were true (and it’s not)…none of that justifies sleazy Joe Biden showering with his daughter. It just doesn’t.
“It’s ok for Joe to shower with his daughter because children can find content inappropriate for them on the internet” is a horrible argument
It doesn’t really matter. What matters is that she remembers it, and that she felt it was inappropriate, and that she grew up to be a hot mess.This from the moron who thought that she wrote that diary passage the same year the events happened. You obviously have reading comprehension issues as shown again in that whacko interpretation of how you mischaracterized my point.
This from the moron who thought that she wrote that diary passage the same year the events happened.
You have no point. That’s the problem. That’s what you don’t understand. When you’re on the wrong side of the facts and the wrong side of decency, you back yourself into a corner and leave yourself nowhere to go. Thus, you have no point.You obviously have reading comprehension issues as shown again in that whacko interpretation of how you mischaracterized my point.
When children reach a certain age and become curious and aware of sexuality then I think it very approoate to be sensitive to what they are exposed to and how they learn. But when kids are young and have no idea what sexuality is then nudity doesn’t really mean much to them.So then you do agree that nudity is inappropriate for children? I mean, if a naked adult were no big deal, you wouldn’t label it as “over-sexualized”.
And it would be completely legal to walk down the street naked if it wasn’t a big deal.
Again, you don’t know anything about the situation. You have a very brief line on a page from a stolen diary. You don’t know how old she was, you don’t even know if Joe was naked, you don’t know anything about what she was referring to. You’re making assumptions and jumping to conclusions for political reasons and that’s what’s sick about itIt doesn’t really matter. What matters is that she remembers it, and that she felt it was inappropriate, and that she grew up to be a hot mess.
No father should shower with his young daughter, and toddlers take baths anyway.
Oh, please….of course Joe was naked.Again, you don’t know anything about the situation. You have a very brief line on a page from a stolen diary. You don’t know how old she was, you don’t even know if Joe was naked, you don’t know anything about what she was referring to. You’re making assumptions and jumping to conclusions for political reasons and that’s what’s sick about it
How sad that you will defend this disgusting and criminal act to the bitter end just because Joe has a little (D) behind his name.Again, you don’t know anything about the situation. You have a very brief line on a page from a stolen diary. You don’t know how old she was, you don’t even know if Joe was naked, you don’t know anything about what she was referring to. You’re making assumptions and jumping to conclusions for political reasons and that’s what’s sick about it
I love how you continue to try to hide behind that. Who gives a shit if the diary was “stolen”? What does that have to do with the horrific crimes exposed within it?You have a very brief line on a page from a stolen diary.
It’s the same concept as attack the messenger when you can’t defend the message.I love how you continue to try to hide behind that. Who gives a shit if the diary was “stolen”? What does that have to do with the horrific crimes exposed within it?
That right there illustrates your agenda. Protect Democrats at all costs. If they get caught in diary molesting children, focus on they diary being stolen instead of on the horrific crimes inside of it.
Read the passage moron. She is reflecting back on events from her childhood. A family member she can’t remember, not liking going over to somebody’s house but not remembering why. Reflection on how she was sexually active at a young age… that’s how people write when they are reflecting on their past. Not how little girls wrote in their diaries. Damn your an idiotProve it wasn’t from the same year. Prove it.
Again, this is an assumption of yours. Be honest and admit that. You weren't there and you have zero evidence otherwise so you assumeOh, please….of course Joe was naked.
People don’t get into showers with their clothes on. You’re flailing.Again, this is an assumption of yours. Be honest and admit that. You weren't there and you have zero evidence otherwise so you assume
Well something that wasn't stolen from a diary and maybe something with actually context and details regarding what she was talking about.And how many lines about showering with her father are required?
It doesn’t matter that the diary was stolen. And what she said was sufficient: about taking showers with Dad at an age that was probably inappropriate.Well something that wasn't stolen from a diary and maybe something with actually context and details regarding what she was talking about.
I don't know Joe nor do I know anything about his family life. I am not defending him, I am defending against prejudice and lies being made about people out of political spite.How sad that you will defend this disgusting and criminal act to the bitter end just because Joe has a little (D) behind his name.
I give a shit and you should give a shit. If this was a public statement or police report made by his daughter that is a completely different story. But when something is stolen and then given to the media with no context then that is just fucked up. You have no idea what kind of exercise she was doing when writing that, you have no idea what her memories or experience was, and yet you are here calling rape and molestation.I love how you continue to try to hide behind that. Who gives a shit if the diary was “stolen”?
There was zero molestation or rape accusation and the fact that you are claiming there is shows your agenda. An extremely invasive and fucked up one. Don't you dare pretend to be defending this "innocent girl" you are politicizing her privacy and making up lies about her father making her a victim. It is extremely fucked up.That right there illustrates your agenda. Protect Democrats at all costs. If they get caught in diary molesting children, focus on they diary being stolen instead of on the horrific crimes inside of it.
Its not even close to that. Did you read the diary page? Do you think she wrote it during the year the shower happened? Do you think she accused her father of raping and molesting her?It’s the same concept as attack the messenger when you can’t defend the message.
Again, you are making assumptionsPeople don’t get into showers with their clothes on. You’re flailing.
