Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You asked me show the exact words that Trump used to incite the insurrection. I did so.
Now you're calling me a liar for EXACTLY quoting Trump.
Apparently you can't handle the truth and choose to live in your delusional world.
Just another lie from the liar. I never asked you to show exact words as if that was the point in question.
You know that politicians saying to fight for thinks (or any other American) is figurative, not literal. So you apply that standard to Democrats, right?
Trump well showed what he wanted his supporters to do by his behavior.
He wanted the break in and for his MAGA people to halt the certification and he got exactly that. Him sitting back and watching this unfold fully revealed his intent to anyone not totaly fucking stupid.
From the mind reader! Or are you using a secret decoder ring?
What you are doing is called confirmation bias. Look it up
You asked me show the exact words that Trump used to incite the insurrection. I did so.
Now you're calling me a liar for EXACTLY quoting Trump.
Apparently you can't handle the truth and choose to live in your delusional world.
Just another lie from the liar. I never asked you to show exact words as if that was the point in question.
You know that politicians saying to fight for thinks (or any other American) is figurative, not literal. So you apply that standard to Democrats, right?
Trump well showed what he wanted his supporters to do by his behavior.
He wanted the break in and for his MAGA people to halt the certification and he got exactly that. Him sitting back and watching this unfold fully revealed his intent to anyone not totaly fucking stupid.
From the mind reader! Or are you using a secret decoder ring?
What you are doing is called confirmation bias. Look it up
Dumbass, it's called using your damn head and inferring obvious intent from behavior.
This is a standard practice during investigations and prosecutions of criminals, all without any "mind readers" or "decoder rings".
You are playing stupid denial games to avoid admitting what you badly don't want to admit, but it just makes you look like a brain dead Trumpster tool.
You asked me show the exact words that Trump used to incite the insurrection. I did so.
Now you're calling me a liar for EXACTLY quoting Trump.
Apparently you can't handle the truth and choose to live in your delusional world.
Just another lie from the liar. I never asked you to show exact words as if that was the point in question.
You know that politicians saying to fight for thinks (or any other American) is figurative, not literal. So you apply that standard to Democrats, right?
Trump well showed what he wanted his supporters to do by his behavior.
He wanted the break in and for his MAGA people to halt the certification and he got exactly that. Him sitting back and watching this unfold fully revealed his intent to anyone not totaly fucking stupid.
From the mind reader! Or are you using a secret decoder ring?
What you are doing is called confirmation bias. Look it up
Dumbass, it's called using your damn head and inferring obvious intent from behavior.
This is a standard practice during investigations and prosecutions of criminals, all without any "mind readers" or "decoder rings".
You are playing stupid denial games to avoid admitting what you badly don't want to admit, but it just makes you look like a brain dead Trumpster tool.
So you're saying if you want to know what someone really thinks, then you should ask someone who hates them.
Dumbass, it's called using your damn head and inferring obvious intent from behavior.
This is a standard practice during investigations and prosecutions of criminals, all without any "mind readers" or "decoder rings".
The mob did kill an officer. If not for the mob, he would not be dead. The mob sent another into cardiac arrest.
Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?
Dumbass, it's called using your damn head and inferring obvious intent from behavior.
This is a standard practice during investigations and prosecutions of criminals, all without any "mind readers" or "decoder rings".
View attachment 498781
Detectives look at what words the criminal used in relationship to a crime or potential crime, not the words other people used.
You asked me show the exact words that Trump used to incite the insurrection. I did so.
Now you're calling me a liar for EXACTLY quoting Trump.
Apparently you can't handle the truth and choose to live in your delusional world.
Just another lie from the liar. I never asked you to show exact words as if that was the point in question.
You know that politicians saying to fight for thinks (or any other American) is figurative, not literal. So you apply that standard to Democrats, right?
Trump well showed what he wanted his supporters to do by his behavior.
He wanted the break in and for his MAGA people to halt the certification and he got exactly that. Him sitting back and watching this unfold fully revealed his intent to anyone not totaly fucking stupid.
From the mind reader! Or are you using a secret decoder ring?
What you are doing is called confirmation bias. Look it up
Dumbass, it's called using your damn head and inferring obvious intent from behavior.
This is a standard practice during investigations and prosecutions of criminals, all without any "mind readers" or "decoder rings".
You are playing stupid denial games to avoid admitting what you badly don't want to admit, but it just makes you look like a brain dead Trumpster tool.
So you're saying if you want to know what someone really thinks, then you should ask someone who hates them.
No moron, thats exactly wrong.
If you want to know what someone really thinks and wants you watch what they DO.
Trump stood by and watched his MAGA people break into Capitol after he has fed them a constant diet of "stolen election, I won in a landslide!!!" lies. Even Republicans were begging him to interfere and call them off.
It clearly infers that he had no problem with a violent break in that his rhetoric caused.
You asked me show the exact words that Trump used to incite the insurrection. I did so.
Now you're calling me a liar for EXACTLY quoting Trump.
Apparently you can't handle the truth and choose to live in your delusional world.
Just another lie from the liar. I never asked you to show exact words as if that was the point in question.
You know that politicians saying to fight for thinks (or any other American) is figurative, not literal. So you apply that standard to Democrats, right?
Trump well showed what he wanted his supporters to do by his behavior.
He wanted the break in and for his MAGA people to halt the certification and he got exactly that. Him sitting back and watching this unfold fully revealed his intent to anyone not totaly fucking stupid.
From the mind reader! Or are you using a secret decoder ring?
What you are doing is called confirmation bias. Look it up
Dumbass, it's called using your damn head and inferring obvious intent from behavior.
This is a standard practice during investigations and prosecutions of criminals, all without any "mind readers" or "decoder rings".
You are playing stupid denial games to avoid admitting what you badly don't want to admit, but it just makes you look like a brain dead Trumpster tool.
So you're saying if you want to know what someone really thinks, then you should ask someone who hates them.
No moron, thats exactly wrong.
If you want to know what someone really thinks and wants you watch what they DO.
Trump stood by and watched his MAGA people break into Capitol after he has fed them a constant diet of "stolen election, I won in a landslide!!!" lies. Even Republicans were begging him to interfere and call them off.
It clearly infers that he had no problem with a violent break in that his rhetoric caused.
Right, but Trump didn't do anything to support violence. You just lie and lie and lie. It's the Democrat way. Vulcans can't lie, Democrats can't tell the truth.
You claim you read minds is particularly retarded
I still find it hard to believe that Trump got more votes in 2020 then he did in 2016.
Perhaps we should reconsider who should be investigating who for election fraud!
You asked me show the exact words that Trump used to incite the insurrection. I did so.
Now you're calling me a liar for EXACTLY quoting Trump.
Apparently you can't handle the truth and choose to live in your delusional world.
Just another lie from the liar. I never asked you to show exact words as if that was the point in question.
You know that politicians saying to fight for thinks (or any other American) is figurative, not literal. So you apply that standard to Democrats, right?
Trump well showed what he wanted his supporters to do by his behavior.
He wanted the break in and for his MAGA people to halt the certification and he got exactly that. Him sitting back and watching this unfold fully revealed his intent to anyone not totaly fucking stupid.
From the mind reader! Or are you using a secret decoder ring?
What you are doing is called confirmation bias. Look it up
Dumbass, it's called using your damn head and inferring obvious intent from behavior.
This is a standard practice during investigations and prosecutions of criminals, all without any "mind readers" or "decoder rings".
You are playing stupid denial games to avoid admitting what you badly don't want to admit, but it just makes you look like a brain dead Trumpster tool.
So you're saying if you want to know what someone really thinks, then you should ask someone who hates them.
No moron, thats exactly wrong.
If you want to know what someone really thinks and wants you watch what they DO.
Trump stood by and watched his MAGA people break into Capitol after he has fed them a constant diet of "stolen election, I won in a landslide!!!" lies. Even Republicans were begging him to interfere and call them off.
It clearly infers that he had no problem with a violent break in that his rhetoric caused.
Right, but Trump didn't do anything to support violence. You just lie and lie and lie. It's the Democrat way. Vulcans can't lie, Democrats can't tell the truth.
You claim you read minds is particularly retarded
Yes he did. He fed them lies and then even stated that this is exactly what happens when people belive him:
Perps to a one calim that the break in is exactly what Trump wanted them to do.
Apparently you believe that the word 'fight' has no literal meaning? Are you that stupid?
www.dictionary.com
You asked me show the exact words that Trump used to incite the insurrection. I did so.
Now you're calling me a liar for EXACTLY quoting Trump.
Apparently you can't handle the truth and choose to live in your delusional world.
Just another lie from the liar. I never asked you to show exact words as if that was the point in question.
You know that politicians saying to fight for thinks (or any other American) is figurative, not literal. So you apply that standard to Democrats, right?
Trump well showed what he wanted his supporters to do by his behavior.
He wanted the break in and for his MAGA people to halt the certification and he got exactly that. Him sitting back and watching this unfold fully revealed his intent to anyone not totaly fucking stupid.
From the mind reader! Or are you using a secret decoder ring?
What you are doing is called confirmation bias. Look it up
Dumbass, it's called using your damn head and inferring obvious intent from behavior.
This is a standard practice during investigations and prosecutions of criminals, all without any "mind readers" or "decoder rings".
You are playing stupid denial games to avoid admitting what you badly don't want to admit, but it just makes you look like a brain dead Trumpster tool.
So you're saying if you want to know what someone really thinks, then you should ask someone who hates them.
No moron, thats exactly wrong.
If you want to know what someone really thinks and wants you watch what they DO.
Trump stood by and watched his MAGA people break into Capitol after he has fed them a constant diet of "stolen election, I won in a landslide!!!" lies. Even Republicans were begging him to interfere and call them off.
It clearly infers that he had no problem with a violent break in that his rhetoric caused.
Right, but Trump didn't do anything to support violence. You just lie and lie and lie. It's the Democrat way. Vulcans can't lie, Democrats can't tell the truth.
You claim you read minds is particularly retarded
Yes he did. He fed them lies and then even stated that this is exactly what happens when people belive him:
Perps to a one calim that the break in is exactly what Trump wanted them to do.
When Democrats protest: Lying scum tutu focuses only on the majority who were peaceful.
When Republicans protest: Lying scum tutu focuses only on the tiny percent who were not.
There was a massive protest, almost all of it peaceful and outside the capital.
You just lie, lie and lie. It's what you are, a liar
WRONG. Intent and motives are a critical component that gets established in a case. It is often evidenced by perps's behavior.
You asked me show the exact words that Trump used to incite the insurrection. I did so.
Now you're calling me a liar for EXACTLY quoting Trump.
Apparently you can't handle the truth and choose to live in your delusional world.
Just another lie from the liar. I never asked you to show exact words as if that was the point in question.
You know that politicians saying to fight for thinks (or any other American) is figurative, not literal. So you apply that standard to Democrats, right?
Trump well showed what he wanted his supporters to do by his behavior.
He wanted the break in and for his MAGA people to halt the certification and he got exactly that. Him sitting back and watching this unfold fully revealed his intent to anyone not totaly fucking stupid.
From the mind reader! Or are you using a secret decoder ring?
What you are doing is called confirmation bias. Look it up
Dumbass, it's called using your damn head and inferring obvious intent from behavior.
This is a standard practice during investigations and prosecutions of criminals, all without any "mind readers" or "decoder rings".
You are playing stupid denial games to avoid admitting what you badly don't want to admit, but it just makes you look like a brain dead Trumpster tool.
So you're saying if you want to know what someone really thinks, then you should ask someone who hates them.
No moron, thats exactly wrong.
If you want to know what someone really thinks and wants you watch what they DO.
Trump stood by and watched his MAGA people break into Capitol after he has fed them a constant diet of "stolen election, I won in a landslide!!!" lies. Even Republicans were begging him to interfere and call them off.
It clearly infers that he had no problem with a violent break in that his rhetoric caused.
Right, but Trump didn't do anything to support violence. You just lie and lie and lie. It's the Democrat way. Vulcans can't lie, Democrats can't tell the truth.
You claim you read minds is particularly retarded
Yes he did. He fed them lies and then even stated that this is exactly what happens when people belive him:
Perps to a one calim that the break in is exactly what Trump wanted them to do.
When Democrats protest: Lying scum tutu focuses only on the majority who were peaceful.
When Republicans protest: Lying scum tutu focuses only on the tiny percent who were not.
There was a massive protest, almost all of it peaceful and outside the capital.
You just lie, lie and lie. It's what you are, a liar
Yep, devert, deflect, dodge, it's all you can do when faced with undeniable proof that your dear leader is a piece of shit who spreads grotesque, danagerous lies and then giddly sits by and watches it blows up as a violent break in into the Congress.
To this day Trump is runing around shitting on American electoral system and talking about how he won in a landslide and you still support that fucking asshole.
WRONG. Intent and motives are a critical component that gets established in a case. It is often evidenced by perps's behavior.
What behavior, Tweeting things you don't like?
The term we got to fight has been used by Democrats and Republicans alike. Don't try to make this into this is something Trump invented.
Talk about lame responses!
Note you're just dancing and evading my question.
Will you take calls from the left to FIGHT literally like you are Trump? With Trump, you're saying you don't speak fluent English and you're a dumb ass and you don't know the difference between literal and figurative that an American 10 year old would easily spot. If you told your daughter to go fight for her turn with a toy, she would not go punch her brother like you claim you would.
My question again is will you take all calls for violence LITERALLY from Democrats like you do Trump????
Answer the question
I answered your dumbass question quite thoroughly. Perhaps you're just too dumb to understand.
But to be more specific. Liberals, unlike Trump supporters, aren't stupid enough to take it literally if a Democratic politician called for them to fight. Democratic politicians know that their supporters aren't idiots and wouldn't take any such call literally. Even if they meant it to be taken literally, democrats wouldn't respond.
Trump supporters are idiots that DID take Trump literally, and Trump knew very well that they would. He meant it literally and his brainless supporters took it literally.
O.K., now deny that I answered your dumbass question (twice).
Talk about useless and hack explanation attempts.
If ya got nothing intelligent to say then STFU!
Oh, sorry in that case you won't ever post anything!
Continue your blathering. We all need a few laughs!
Sheesh, I feel you bro. You admitted that you're lying scum who while you attack Republicans by taking everything literal that you would in fact not do that with Democrats. I mean admitting you're hate filled partisan garbage like that is enough, what more does he want?
I still find it hard to believe that Trump got more votes in 2020 then he did in 2016.
Perhaps we should reconsider who should be investigating who for election fraud!
And yet you believe the country overwhelmingly elected a clown who spent nearly 50 years in the federal government and accomplished nothing, who's son was under a FBI investigation in a matter he was associated with while he was running, a guy who's dementia is so bad his own party tried to strip his exclusive power over our nuclear arms?
Under Trump our border was under control, we had the best economy in 50 years, new record lows in unemployment for women and every minority group since records were kept. And it would have continued if not for Joe's buddies in China sending us their virus.
What I find amazing is that Trump only gained 12 million more supporters. But it shows how completely politically ignorant many who vote actually are, and mail-in voting draws in more of those kinds of voters which is why the Nazis want to make mail-in permanent.
Are you really going to play dumb and pretend that you didn't read Kaz's post that I was answering?Apparently you believe that the word 'fight' has no literal meaning? Are you that stupid?
a battle or combat.
any contest or struggle: a fight for recovery from an illness.
verb (used without object), fought, fight·ing.
to engage in battle or in single combat; attempt to defend oneself against or to subdue, defeat, or destroy an adversary.
to contend in any manner; strive vigorously for or against something: He fought bravely against despair.
Dictionary.com | Meanings & Definitions of English Words
The world's leading online dictionary: English definitions, synonyms, word origins, example sentences, word games, and more. A trusted authority for 25+ years!
Talk about lame responses!
Note you're just dancing and evading my question.
Will you take calls from the left to FIGHT literally like you are Trump? With Trump, you're saying you don't speak fluent English and you're a dumb ass and you don't know the difference between literal and figurative that an American 10 year old would easily spot. If you told your daughter to go fight for her turn with a toy, she would not go punch her brother like you claim you would.
My question again is will you take all calls for violence LITERALLY from Democrats like you do Trump????
Answer the question
I answered your dumbass question quite thoroughly. Perhaps you're just too dumb to understand.
But to be more specific. Liberals, unlike Trump supporters, aren't stupid enough to take it literally if a Democratic politician called for them to fight. Democratic politicians know that their supporters aren't idiots and wouldn't take any such call literally. Even if they meant it to be taken literally, democrats wouldn't respond.
Trump supporters are idiots that DID take Trump literally, and Trump knew very well that they would. He meant it literally and his brainless supporters took it literally.
O.K., now deny that I answered your dumbass question (twice).
Talk about useless and hack explanation attempts.
If ya got nothing intelligent to say then STFU!
Oh, sorry in that case you won't ever post anything!
Continue your blathering. We all need a few laughs!
Sheesh, I feel you bro. You admitted that you're lying scum who while you attack Republicans by taking everything literal that you would in fact not do that with Democrats. I mean admitting you're hate filled partisan garbage like that is enough, what more does he want?
You're a lying bag of shit that makes up absolute nonsense instead of any intelligible arguments. You're not worth any more discussion.
