The Irony Between Ted Cruz Eligibility To Be President And Obama's

All candidates should be properly vetted. We wouldn't be in the mess we are now if Obama had been properly vetted. Geeez!

Disagree.

There is no set criteria

Try using some common sense deduction.

Even us non-racists believe that Obama was not vetted because he was a liberal black. The conservative blacks always get vetted and reamed by the MSM. Also, if Obama had been a liberal white, he would never have been nominated.
 
Preventing the BEST person from aspiring for and attaining a position is discrimination, and it makes no difference whether it is based on color of skin, gender, sexual orientation or physical abilities.

If a cripple like Franklin Delano Roosevelt was qualified to be president, if a black man like Barack Hussain Obama was qualified to be president and if the idea that Hilary Rodham Clinton is qualified to be president (regardless if she is straight or Lesbian), then the place of birth or the citizenship of parents should not matter at all.

Who would you rather see as president - supposing that they were eligible - a person was born in America, whose parents are American citizens, Muslims and taught their child from birth on to hate and kill infidels, or a child of immigrants who was born outside of America whose parents raised their child to love America?

If there is one part of the Constitution that deserves to be repealed, it is this first and still the greatest example of affirmative action.

Let and elect the BEST person get the job!
 
Last edited:
Did the literary agency for ted cruz publish a brochure for 16 years that said ted was born in kenya?
 
All candidates should be properly vetted. We wouldn't be in the mess we are now if Obama had been properly vetted. Geeez!

Disagree.

There is no set criteria

Try using some common sense deduction.

Even us non-racists believe that Obama was not vetted because he was a liberal black. The conservative blacks always get vetted and reamed by the MSM. Also, if Obama had been a liberal white, he would never have been nominated.

If ifs and buts were candies and nuts, we'd all have a Merry Christmas.

What would be your vetting critera? Who are the vetters?
 
All candidates should be properly vetted. We wouldn't be in the mess we are now if Obama had been properly vetted. Geeez!

Disagree.

There is no set criteria

Your right cause it was proven you retarded progressives would have voted for him regardless.

Obama won 2 elections; each one easily. He'd win a 3rd and a 4th if he could run. It's not a matter of his being so great but his being better--head and shoulders above--what the GOP now stands for:

The entitled getting more entitlements
Spending more on defense
Invading countries that didn't attack us

Did I leave anything out?

Getting between a woman and her doctor
Paying women less than a man for the same job (Obama needs to improve HIS record on this by the way)
Creating an atmosphere of mis-trust in every quarter of society
Bringing the government to the brink of default every 6 months

What else?

Not admitting that 10,000+ gun deaths a year is a problem
 
Disagree.

There is no set criteria

Your right cause it was proven you retarded progressives would have voted for him regardless.

Obama won 2 elections; each one easily. He'd win a 3rd and a 4th if he could run. It's not a matter of his being so great but his being better--head and shoulders above--what the GOP now stands for:

The entitled getting more entitlements
Spending more on defense
Invading countries that didn't attack us

Did I leave anything out?

Getting between a woman and her doctor
Paying women less than a man for the same job (Obama needs to improve HIS record on this by the way)
Creating an atmosphere of mis-trust in every quarter of society
Bringing the government to the brink of default every 6 months

What else?

Not admitting that 10,000+ gun deaths a year is a problem
Thank god we haven't yet become a dictatorship like you want then.
 
Your right cause it was proven you retarded progressives would have voted for him regardless.

Obama won 2 elections; each one easily. He'd win a 3rd and a 4th if he could run. It's not a matter of his being so great but his being better--head and shoulders above--what the GOP now stands for:

The entitled getting more entitlements
Spending more on defense
Invading countries that didn't attack us

Did I leave anything out?

Getting between a woman and her doctor
Paying women less than a man for the same job (Obama needs to improve HIS record on this by the way)
Creating an atmosphere of mis-trust in every quarter of society
Bringing the government to the brink of default every 6 months

What else?

Not admitting that 10,000+ gun deaths a year is a problem
Thank god we haven't yet become a dictatorship like you want then.

Those are GOP ideas up there...I'm pretty liberal. Your post makes zero sense.
 
All candidates should be properly vetted. We wouldn't be in the mess we are now if Obama had been properly vetted. Geeez!

Disagree.

There is no set criteria

Try using some common sense deduction.

Even us non-racists believe that Obama was not vetted because he was a liberal black. The conservative blacks always get vetted and reamed by the MSM. Also, if Obama had been a liberal white, he would never have been nominated.

If you have to preface your post by proclaiming that you're not a racist, you might want to rethink what you're about to say. Because, you may claim to not be a racist (maybe you're not; maybe you're just ignorant), but saying that Obama got to where he is because of the color of his skin sure could be construed as a racist statement.
 
Disagree.

There is no set criteria

Try using some common sense deduction.

Even us non-racists believe that Obama was not vetted because he was a liberal black. The conservative blacks always get vetted and reamed by the MSM. Also, if Obama had been a liberal white, he would never have been nominated.

If ifs and buts were candies and nuts, we'd all have a Merry Christmas.

What would be your vetting critera? Who are the vetters?

Old white men of course
 
The one difference between Obama and Cruz, assuming Obama was born in Kenya and Cruz in Canada, was that technically Obama's mother did not meet a federal residency requirement that was in force at Obama's birth, but not at Cruz's birth. It's a technicality, but it would make Obama "naturalized," not "natural-born."

The one difference between Obama and Cruz is that we KNOW Obama was born in Hawaii, and we KNOW Cruz was born in Canada. Any argument over it is pointless.

How do you know Obama was born in Hawaii? He has never presented a long form BC generated from a hospital! If you don't see the phoniness of what he presented, then you are biased and close-minded, and perhaps more than a bit stupid!:cuckoo:

There are several records that clearly show that to be the case.

But doesn't stop you racist folks from sayin' it ain't so..because you are hatin' on a brother.

:lol:
 
All candidates should be properly vetted. We wouldn't be in the mess we are now if Obama had been properly vetted. Geeez!

Disagree.

There is no set criteria

Try using some common sense deduction.

Even us non-racists believe that Obama was not vetted because he was a liberal black. The conservative blacks always get vetted and reamed by the MSM. Also, if Obama had been a liberal white, he would never have been nominated.

Not vetted how? What about him didn't you know in 2008? That he had worked with William Ayres? Nope, knew that. That he had a black preacher that talked against war? Nope, knew that too. That he was born in HI to a mother who is a US citizen? Check, knew that one too.

Why would being white not have gotten him nominated? What in his past would have prevented him from being nominated if he had been white? Pot use? Not in this day and age. Stable marriage with two adorable children? Come on, tell us why he would not have been nominated if he weren't black.
 
Disagree.

There is no set criteria

Try using some common sense deduction.

Even us non-racists believe that Obama was not vetted because he was a liberal black. The conservative blacks always get vetted and reamed by the MSM. Also, if Obama had been a liberal white, he would never have been nominated.

That he was born in HI to a mother who is a US citizen? Check, knew that one too.

.
No, we don't know he was born in Hawaii. There is no proof since he posted a fraudulent birth certificate online back on April 27, 2011.
 
Try using some common sense deduction.

Even us non-racists believe that Obama was not vetted because he was a liberal black. The conservative blacks always get vetted and reamed by the MSM. Also, if Obama had been a liberal white, he would never have been nominated.

That he was born in HI to a mother who is a US citizen? Check, knew that one too.

.
No, we don't know he was born in Hawaii. There is no proof since he posted a fraudulent birth certificate online back on April 27, 2011.

:lol: at birthers...

I forgot he had the Delorean and went back in time to put that announcement in the paper too.

Are you a Cruz birther too or just the President?
 
debatible

Since Obama's mother was an American citizen, it doesn't matter where he was born, does it?

No it doesnt.

Yes it does. The law states for people born between December 23, 1952, and November 13, 1986:

"When one parent was a U.S. citizen and the other a foreign national, the U.S. citizen parent must have resided in the U.S. for a total of 10 years prior to the birth of the child, with five of the years after the age of 14"


Obama's mother was not old enough to confer U.S. citizenship to Barack. She missed giving him U.S. citizenship by 3 months.
 
That he was born in HI to a mother who is a US citizen? Check, knew that one too.

.
No, we don't know he was born in Hawaii. There is no proof since he posted a fraudulent birth certificate online back on April 27, 2011.



I forgot he had the Delorean and went back in time to put that announcement in the paper too.
The Hawaii birth announcements mean nothing. Absolutely nothing. They tell you only that a birth event took place. They do not name the baby at all OR where the baby was born. Here is lead investigator Mike Zullo of the Cold Case Posse at a press conference explaining the birth announcements mean and what they uncovered when investigating the birth indexes.


Go exactly to 116:35 in the video for your answer
 
Last edited by a moderator:
try using some common sense deduction.

Even us non-racists believe that obama was not vetted because he was a liberal black. The conservative blacks always get vetted and reamed by the msm. Also, if obama had been a liberal white, he would never have been nominated.

that he was born in hi to a mother who is a us citizen? Check, knew that one too.

.
no, we don't know he was born in hawaii. There is no proof since he posted a fraudulent birth certificate online back on april 27, 2011.

birther alert!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Forum List

Back
Top