The last time...

[otto105]

Where did they say that? Link?

Still none.

 

[EMH]

So, why has no scientific organization agreed with you?

The PARROT insists, only PARROTING matters, not DATA or TRUTH....

Those same "scientific organizations" said the Covid Vax was safe and effective. Hopefully you PARROTED that because if you did you aren't going to live long...

 

[BackAgain]

That's not the "Cliff notes".. that' just a long No Content 'No'/denial you STUPID POS.
There is Huge evidence we cause it posted here EVERY Day.

No. There isn’t. Why do you lie you scumbag retard?

Every scientific Org in the world that is relevant to it agrees. See my above.

All learned people used to agree that the world was flat, too. The fact that they were wrong and that the world isn’t flat doesn’t change the fact that there was a “consensus.”

You F****** street person little Dope-Thug.
`

Apu afuk, you rodent twat, you’re a very ignorant gullible little troll. Now, go play in traffic.

 

[abu afak]

Wrong, ya bumbling ass face. The thing you which can’t establish and which many people (far more intelligent than you are) find doubtful is the premise that humans have much of any control over planetary climate change one way or the other.
Your ignorance is astronomical. Your posts’ value is infinitesimal.

What is Low/No IQ BackAgain even doing in this Section? Tolling "libtards."
He has posted ZERO on topic content.
(Look at the last few Pages/Months)
A Cursing little ONE LINE Thug wandering the board.

About 615,000,000 results (0.30 seconds)
Search Results
Web results

How We Know Today's Climate Change Is Not Natural
https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2017/04/.../how-we-know-climate-change-is-not-natural/Apr 4, 2017 - Last week, the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, chaired by climate contrarian Lamar Smith, R-Texas, held a hearing on ...

How do we know global warming is not a natural cycle? | Climate ...
www.climatecentral.org/library/faqs/how_do_we_know_it_is_not_a_natural_cycleNov 7, 2009 - Answer. If the Earth's temperature had been steady for millions of years and only started rising in the past half century or so, the answer would ...

How do we know? - Evidence | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of ...
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/Vital Signs of the Planet: Global Climate Change and Global Warming. ...Not only was 2016 the warmest year on record, but eight of the 12 months that make up .... the Earth's natural greenhouse effect and suggested that slight changes in the ...

Human fingerprints on climate change rule out natural cycles
https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-natural-cycle.htmHowever, internal forces do not cause climate change. ... and oceanic emissions of CO2 and know that they are small compared to anthropogenic emissions, but ...
[.....]
How Do We Know Humans Are Causing Climate Change? | Climate ...
https://www.climaterealityproject.org/.../how-do-we-know-humans-are-causing-climat...Feb 1, 2019 - Yes, we know humans are responsible for the climate changewe see ... as if we're wrapping another, not-so-natural blanket around the Earth.

Global warming isn't just a natural cycle » Yale Climate Connections
https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/.../global-warming-isnt-just-a-natural-cycle/Sep 18, 2018 - Here's how we know that. ... Global warming isn't just anatural cycle. By Sara Peach on Sep ... The earth's temperature changesnaturally over time. Variations ... Earth's warming: How scientists know it'snot the sun. From Yale ...

How Do We Know that Humans Are the Major Cause of Global ...
https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/science.../human-contribution-to-gw-faq.htmlJump to Natural and human factors that influence the climate (known as ...- Natural climate drivers include the energy ... in snow and ice cover thatchange how much ... if it were not for these human-made and natural tiny particles.

[.....]
`

 

[BackAgain]

What is Low/No IQ BackAgain even doing in this Section? Tolling "libtards."

Lol. Apu can’t even spell a simple word she misuses anyway.

He has posted ZERO on topic content.

False. Why must apu afuk lie so constantly?


;

 

[otto105]

The PARROT insists, only PARROTING matters, not DATA or TRUTH....

Those same "scientific organizations" said the Covid Vax was safe and effective. Hopefully you PARROTED that because if you did you aren't going to live long...

Sure sure denier, why don’t you post the numbers per capita of death between vaccinated and UN-vaccinated then.

And a parrot is all you have over actual science used by scientific organizations to reach a conclusion.

Hilarious

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Still none.

How much wind and solar do the scientific organizations say we need?

 

[Crick]

How much wind and solar do the scientific organizations say we need?

The amount of wind and solar we have is not under our control.

Todd, you're asking stupid questions. We need to replace all fossil fuel power with non-emitting technologies. You know that. Everyone you're asking knows that. Who are you trying to impress with crap like that?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The amount of wind and solar we have is not under our control.

Neither is CO2.

 

[otto105]

How much wind and solar do the scientific organizations say we need?

A lot more.

Plus newer technology.


Your point is still that we should wreck our climate.

 

[Crick]

Neither is CO2.

We put it there. We can take it away.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

A lot more.

Plus newer technology.


Your point is still that we should wreck our climate.

A lot more.

Wow!

That's a very precise recommendation.
Why don't they think we should build more nuclear reactors?

Your point is still that we should wreck our climate.

Nuclear reactors won't wreck our climate.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

We put it there. We can take it away.

How? Over what time frame?

 

[EMH]

Sure sure denier, why don’t you post the numbers per capita of death between vaccinated and UN-vaccinated then.

And a parrot is all you have over actual science used by scientific organizations to reach a conclusion.

Hilarious

You have no actual science. You parrot fudge and fraud.

Science is not about

FUDGE
FRAUD
PARROTING

Science starts with theory, collects data to test theory.

This is the theory you parrot - increasing atmospheric Co2 cause "warming"

The DATA = two and only two measures = satellites and balloons... which both returned highly correlated data, as they should since they measure the same thing.

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.

Scientists were left with two choices: either the atmosphere wasn't warming up, or something was wrong with the data






And here is the difference between SCIENCE and what you parrot = "the science"


Science says THEORY REJECTED


The taxpayer funded conflicted liars you parrot said FUDGE THE DATA and KEEP BILKING THE TAXPAYER



Co2 does NOTHING = THE DATA

 

[otto105]

A lot more.

Wow!

That's a very precise recommendation.
Why don't they think we should build more nuclear reactors?

Your point is still that we should wreck our climate.

Nuclear reactors won't wreck our climate.

Radioactive waste

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Radioactive waste

What about it?

 

[otto105]

What about it?

Where do you dispose of it?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Where do you dispose of it?

Now that Harry Reid is gone, Yucca Mountain.

 

[otto105]

Now that Harry Reid is gone, Yucca Mountain.

So, we take all the waste and just wish it away.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So, we take all the waste and just wish it away.

Gotta save the planet, doncha know?