The left is skating on THIN ICE.

well you told me to call him, I supposed you had his number.
Why would you suppose that?
cause you told me to. I stated that. what was difficult about that statement?
So, "cause" I told YOU to call him, you assumed that meant I had his phone number?

Brilliant.
well how else would I get it?
So, in your simple little mind, you thought the only way you could get it was from me. LOL.
well you offered that I should call him. you know I wouldn't have his number right? So tell me how else that would be possible.
 
All the hysterics surrounding Russia could very easily backfire on them. Makes me think of the child's story about the little boy that cried wolf.

If they continue to hype the hysteria and never produce a criminal or civil charge against a single Republican I believe they are damaging their own brand.
I have no proof (kinda like them) just a hunch. In the era of 24/7 news & instant internet they're beating the drums loudly every hour of every day.
Benghazi didn't even get this much play and people died there yet the public tired of the story.
How long can the left beat this drum before the public says enough?

Kushner was in that meeting with the Russian lawyer... He is going to be in legal trouble. So sorry Gramps but this is the jackpot Haaaa..


View attachment 138404

Why? What criminal act did he commit?

He had meetings with the Russians,and did not disclose them for his security clearance..
he met with no russian. sorry bubba. you all do have imagination in make up story land.
 
Why would you suppose that?
cause you told me to. I stated that. what was difficult about that statement?
So, "cause" I told YOU to call him, you assumed that meant I had his phone number?

Brilliant.
well how else would I get it?
So, in your simple little mind, you thought the only way you could get it was from me. LOL.
well you offered that I should call him. you know I wouldn't have his number right? So tell me how else that would be possible.
Now you are just embarrassing yourself even more. Tuck your tail between your legs and slink away.
 
All the hysterics surrounding Russia could very easily backfire on them. Makes me think of the child's story about the little boy that cried wolf.

If they continue to hype the hysteria and never produce a criminal or civil charge against a single Republican I believe they are damaging their own brand.
I have no proof (kinda like them) just a hunch. In the era of 24/7 news & instant internet they're beating the drums loudly every hour of every day.
Benghazi didn't even get this much play and people died there yet the public tired of the story.
How long can the left beat this drum before the public says enough?

How long before the public said "enough" about Benghazi? :dunno:

Americans died in Benghazi, this is a bunch of trumped up garbage you bitter clingers can't let go of.
Americans also died many times over in Bush Embassies. Now shitforbrains, you were going to tell us all the lies the media told in regard to Trumps meeting with the Kremlin. You have been strangely silent, could be that you agree that not a single lie has ever been told?

Exactly. The only difference with Benghazi is Obama was president and they cared more about creating political scandals then preventing the death's of people.
Of course by now you know that is pure bullshyte, but then again if you post a lie enough times, people will begin to believe it.
 
All the hysterics surrounding Russia could very easily backfire on them. Makes me think of the child's story about the little boy that cried wolf.

If they continue to hype the hysteria and never produce a criminal or civil charge against a single Republican I believe they are damaging their own brand. I have no proof (kinda like them) just a hunch.

You have no idea what kind of proof Mueller's investigative team may have uncovered.
In the era of 24/7 news & instant internet they're beating the drums loudly every hour of every day.
Benghazi didn't even get this much play and people died there yet the public tired of the story.
How long can the left beat this drum before the public says enough?

Oh please. The right beat the Benghazi drum right up until November, and then all of a sudden it didn't seem to matter anymore. HHHHHHHHHMMMMMMMMMMM. I wonder why?

There's that meme about all the double top secret evidence that Mewler is collecting. So far in this faux scandal, all the evidence is secret.

Isn't that strange?
No, not at all. That's how the Special Council Independent Commission is supposed to function.
ROFL! How conieenient!

That doesn't alter the fact that none of you turds can produce a smidgen of evidence to support all your idiot accusations about Trump.
 
....
well that would be true, but she deleted emails. crime. Benghazi now hers to own. And she does. believe you me she does.

4 years of investigations and 6.7 million dollars concluded with no crimes.
I know right? she should be in jail. why not? oh because the FBI dropped it after saying she committed several crimes. wow. I can't believe you partisan hacks. wow. and so far thirteen months of investigating russia you got nothing burgers coming out everyones ass.

Given what you are saying....you have no room to criticize those going after Trump :lol:
I just want something in return for all the press coverage. Is that too much to ask? I knew that one, hitlery lied about the video, I know that she deleted 33k worth of emails while under subpoena. I know her server was illegally in her refrigerator, garage or what not. I know she allowed private citizens to see classified documents and I know she had a pay for play with her foundation.

now you present one thing criminal about this trump thingy? hell even the FBI director said he wasn't under investigation, so all news agencies lied.

Isn't that what the investigation is for? It will either show there was or show there wasn't, but it's ongoing so why do you ask for evidence now?

The purpose of the investigation is to smear Trump and leave a cloud hanging over his head until the next election. It has no other purpose.
 
No, an investigation is about a crime. so tell me the crime, I'm waiting.

An investigation can be about anything - but most of the time it's uncovering the facts about an incident or about a POSSIBLE crime - to see if a crime has or has not been committed. If there is certainty, then there isn't a need for an investigation, they can simply charge the person. Like Clinton's emails. Like Benghazi.
no, an investigation is because there was a crime. sorry coyote. this is all a waste of tax payer time and money. And is taking away my vote. I'm yelling foul until this shit is stopped. I wish I knew a lawyer so I could sue these asshats.

JC, you're flat out wrong on this :lol:

U.S. Senate: A History of Notable Senate Investigations
coyote, no I am not.

Investigations are to SEE if a crime occurred.
no they aren't. Investigations are to see who committed a crime that is known to have occurred. Which hunts are to see if a crime has occured.
 
All the hysterics surrounding Russia could very easily backfire on them. Makes me think of the child's story about the little boy that cried wolf.

If they continue to hype the hysteria and never produce a criminal or civil charge against a single Republican I believe they are damaging their own brand.
I have no proof (kinda like them) just a hunch. In the era of 24/7 news & instant internet they're beating the drums loudly every hour of every day.
Benghazi didn't even get this much play and people died there yet the public tired of the story.
How long can the left beat this drum before the public says enough?

Took a couple of years to get rid of Nixon. Trump has only been fucking up now for just 6 months. Mueller didn't start his investigation until about a month ago. I'll let Mueller do his work and watch you eat crow.
 
All the hysterics surrounding Russia could very easily backfire on them. Makes me think of the child's story about the little boy that cried wolf.

If they continue to hype the hysteria and never produce a criminal or civil charge against a single Republican I believe they are damaging their own brand.
I have no proof (kinda like them) just a hunch. In the era of 24/7 news & instant internet they're beating the drums loudly every hour of every day.
Benghazi didn't even get this much play and people died there yet the public tired of the story.
How long can the left beat this drum before the public says enough?

Took a couple of years to get rid of Nixon. Trump has only been fucking up now for just 6 months. Mueller didn't start his investigation until about a month ago. I'll let Mueller do his work and watch you eat crow.
The process takes a long time to work out
With a Republican Congress it will take a level of evidence that will bring down the entire Republican Party before Republicans will act
 
An investigation can be about anything - but most of the time it's uncovering the facts about an incident or about a POSSIBLE crime - to see if a crime has or has not been committed. If there is certainty, then there isn't a need for an investigation, they can simply charge the person. Like Clinton's emails. Like Benghazi.
no, an investigation is because there was a crime. sorry coyote. this is all a waste of tax payer time and money. And is taking away my vote. I'm yelling foul until this shit is stopped. I wish I knew a lawyer so I could sue these asshats.

JC, you're flat out wrong on this :lol:

U.S. Senate: A History of Notable Senate Investigations
coyote, no I am not.

Investigations are to SEE if a crime occurred.
no they aren't. Investigations are to see who committed a crime that is known to have occurred. Which hunts are to see if a crime has occured.
A crime did occur

Russians hacked into the DNC server
 
All the hysterics surrounding Russia could very easily backfire on them. Makes me think of the child's story about the little boy that cried wolf.

If they continue to hype the hysteria and never produce a criminal or civil charge against a single Republican I believe they are damaging their own brand.
I have no proof (kinda like them) just a hunch. In the era of 24/7 news & instant internet they're beating the drums loudly every hour of every day.
Benghazi didn't even get this much play and people died there yet the public tired of the story.
How long can the left beat this drum before the public says enough?

Kushner was in that meeting with the Russian lawyer... He is going to be in legal trouble. So sorry Gramps but this is the jackpot Haaaa..


View attachment 138404

Why? What criminal act did he commit?

He had meetings with the Russians,and did not disclose them for his security clearance..
he met with no russian. sorry bubba. you all do have imagination in make up story land.

WTF? Even Donald Jr. admits Kushner was there when they met with Natalia Veselnitskaya. So you're saying Donald Jr. is lying? Well, I'd have to agree with about that, but not in this case.
And Eaglewings is correct, Kushner did not disclose his meetings when he applied for security clearance. He's a fucking piece of shit, just like you and the rest of the Trumpies.
 
All the hysterics surrounding Russia could very easily backfire on them. Makes me think of the child's story about the little boy that cried wolf.

If they continue to hype the hysteria and never produce a criminal or civil charge against a single Republican I believe they are damaging their own brand.
I have no proof (kinda like them) just a hunch. In the era of 24/7 news & instant internet they're beating the drums loudly every hour of every day.
Benghazi didn't even get this much play and people died there yet the public tired of the story.
How long can the left beat this drum before the public says enough?

Took a couple of years to get rid of Nixon. Trump has only been fucking up now for just 6 months. Mueller didn't start his investigation until about a month ago. I'll let Mueller do his work and watch you eat crow.
The process takes a long time to work out
With a Republican Congress it will take a level of evidence that will bring down the entire Republican Party before Republicans will act

Yup. You are right, rightw.
 
....
I know right? she should be in jail. why not? oh because the FBI dropped it after saying she committed several crimes. wow. I can't believe you partisan hacks. wow. and so far thirteen months of investigating russia you got nothing burgers coming out everyones ass.

Given what you are saying....you have no room to criticize those going after Trump :lol:
I just want something in return for all the press coverage. Is that too much to ask? I knew that one, hitlery lied about the video, I know that she deleted 33k worth of emails while under subpoena. I know her server was illegally in her refrigerator, garage or what not. I know she allowed private citizens to see classified documents and I know she had a pay for play with her foundation.

now you present one thing criminal about this trump thingy? hell even the FBI director said he wasn't under investigation, so all news agencies lied.

Isn't that what the investigation is for? It will either show there was or show there wasn't, but it's ongoing so why do you ask for evidence now?
No, an investigation is about a crime. so tell me the crime, I'm waiting.

An investigation can be about anything - but most of the time it's uncovering the facts about an incident or about a POSSIBLE crime - to see if a crime has or has not been committed. If there is certainty, then there isn't a need for an investigation, they can simply charge the person. Like Clinton's emails. Like Benghazi.
Hmmm, wrong. I have never heard of investigations launched when no crime can be identified. You have just admitted that no crime has been identified. Therefore, this isn't an "investigation." It's a witch hunt. This is the modern version of McCarthyism.
 
no, an investigation is because there was a crime. sorry coyote. this is all a waste of tax payer time and money. And is taking away my vote. I'm yelling foul until this shit is stopped. I wish I knew a lawyer so I could sue these asshats.

JC, you're flat out wrong on this :lol:

U.S. Senate: A History of Notable Senate Investigations
coyote, no I am not.

Investigations are to SEE if a crime occurred.
no they aren't. Investigations are to see who committed a crime that is known to have occurred. Which hunts are to see if a crime has occured.
A crime did occur

Russians hacked into the DNC server

Where's the evidence for that?
 
All the hysterics surrounding Russia could very easily backfire on them. Makes me think of the child's story about the little boy that cried wolf.

If they continue to hype the hysteria and never produce a criminal or civil charge against a single Republican I believe they are damaging their own brand.
I have no proof (kinda like them) just a hunch. In the era of 24/7 news & instant internet they're beating the drums loudly every hour of every day.
Benghazi didn't even get this much play and people died there yet the public tired of the story.
How long can the left beat this drum before the public says enough?
the R's spent 5 years on Benghazi investigations...we have about 6 months on these investigations, of which we the people have been pounded with it....
 

Investigations are to SEE if a crime occurred.
no they aren't. Investigations are to see who committed a crime that is known to have occurred. Which hunts are to see if a crime has occured.
A crime did occur

Russians hacked into the DNC server

Where's the evidence for that?
Oh please......give it up
Even Putin admits it came from Russia
 
coyote, no I am not.

Investigations are to SEE if a crime occurred.
no they aren't. Investigations are to see who committed a crime that is known to have occurred. Which hunts are to see if a crime has occured.
A crime did occur

Russians hacked into the DNC server

Where's the evidence for that?
Oh please......give it up
Even Putin admits it came from Russia
He did? Please quote. The evidence indicates it was an inside job. Since the FBI never examined the server, there's no real proof of a Russian hack on the DNC server.
 
Investigations are to SEE if a crime occurred.
no they aren't. Investigations are to see who committed a crime that is known to have occurred. Which hunts are to see if a crime has occured.
A crime did occur

Russians hacked into the DNC server

Where's the evidence for that?
Oh please......give it up
Even Putin admits it came from Russia
He did? Please quote. The evidence indicates it was an inside job. Since the FBI never examined the server, there's no real proof of a Russian hack on the DNC server.
Sorry....not playing your silly denial games
 
All the hysterics surrounding Russia could very easily backfire on them. Makes me think of the child's story about the little boy that cried wolf.

If they continue to hype the hysteria and never produce a criminal or civil charge against a single Republican I believe they are damaging their own brand.
I have no proof (kinda like them) just a hunch. In the era of 24/7 news & instant internet they're beating the drums loudly every hour of every day.
Benghazi didn't even get this much play and people died there yet the public tired of the story.
How long can the left beat this drum before the public says enough?
the R's spent 5 years on Benghazi investigations...we have about 6 months on these investigations, of which we the people have been pounded with it....
Stop pounding it
 

Forum List

Back
Top