Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cons hate any kind of regulation that might deny them the right to do whatever they want.I give liberals a hard time, but to be honest, I don't really mind people having liberal ideas. It's just that it seems like there's a heaping dose of hippy-dippy, do-your-own-thing narcissism that comes along with modern-day liberals that's off-putting.
Once upon a time, people had more fucking manners.
Once upon a time, people had more fucking manners.
Ya' got that right.
But ya know...when you propagandize people into thinking that their neighbors are the problem, instead of their leaders who are making ALL the decisions, basic human civility eventually flies out the window.
Let me give you one example...Illegal immigrants.
We're blaming the MEXICANS for coming here, but NOT the leadership (of both parties) who have enccouraged they're coming here?
The party partians blame it, depending on their particular POV, on the OTHER party when BOTH parties signed onto this policy?
If you partisans spent half as much time reading about what really going on, instead of listening to hate mongering partisan talking heads, this nation would have a decent government because you'd elect people who were not lying scumbags.
But you get off on hate, you partisans. Plus most of you are cowards, which means even if you know the guy in charge is nuts, you'll still go after whatever scapegoat you're ordered to go after, too.
This board, and every other one like it I've ever posted on, proves to me that the concept of original sin is essentially correct.
We are, generally speaking, bad monkeys.
And VERY SMART SOCIOPATHIC monkeys are in charge of the troop.
Shoot! Now I'm craving a banana
American Republicans (mostly) launched the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq that put the guns in the hands of Fatin's misery gangs."The men screamed terrible insults at the women and sometimes beat them.
"By fall, ordinary aspects of Fatin's life had become punishable by death. The 'misery gangs' as Fatin calls them, were routinely killing women for wearing pants, appearing in public without a headscarf, or shaking hands and socializing with men."
Are you asserting that the men in question were American Republicans? Or could it be that they were just garden variety Islamic Fundamentalists doing what they've been doing to women since long before this country existed?
You're as bad as Jake for using these women's plight to serve a political agenda. Seriously, what are you doing to make it better besides blaming the US? We didn't invent Islam and we don't hold guns to anyone's head to make them behave the way they do. If you want to blame someone for the situation these women find themselves in why not look to the men that are actually hurting them?
American Republicans (mostly) launched the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq that put the guns in the hands of Fatin's misery gangs."The men screamed terrible insults at the women and sometimes beat them.
"By fall, ordinary aspects of Fatin's life had become punishable by death. The 'misery gangs' as Fatin calls them, were routinely killing women for wearing pants, appearing in public without a headscarf, or shaking hands and socializing with men."
Are you asserting that the men in question were American Republicans? Or could it be that they were just garden variety Islamic Fundamentalists doing what they've been doing to women since long before this country existed?
You're as bad as Jake for using these women's plight to serve a political agenda. Seriously, what are you doing to make it better besides blaming the US? We didn't invent Islam and we don't hold guns to anyone's head to make them behave the way they do. If you want to blame someone for the situation these women find themselves in why not look to the men that are actually hurting them?
By International law, not that most American Republicans care, the US military was obligated to protect Fatin and her sisters. Instead some of the misery gangs obtained their weapons from the same political parties the US brought to power.
"While the Pentagon was arming militias bent on brutally ousting Iraqi women from public life, the US State Department was busy brokering the new Iraqi Constitution.
"Hailed as 'progressive' and 'democratic' in Washington, the new constitution designates religious law, which discriminates against women, as the basis for all legislation.
"It also restricts women's rights by upending one of the most progressive family status laws in the Middle East--a law Iraqi women fought for and won in 1959, before Saddam Hussein took power.
"For Fatin, the bitter irony is that her new constitution, courtesy of the USA, destroyed women's rights that were once guaranteed in Iraq, even under the brutal regime of Saddam Hussein."
A "politically biased commentary site" whose founder has been reporting from Iraq since the 1970s.American Republicans (mostly) launched the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq that put the guns in the hands of Fatin's misery gangs.Are you asserting that the men in question were American Republicans? Or could it be that they were just garden variety Islamic Fundamentalists doing what they've been doing to women since long before this country existed?
You're as bad as Jake for using these women's plight to serve a political agenda. Seriously, what are you doing to make it better besides blaming the US? We didn't invent Islam and we don't hold guns to anyone's head to make them behave the way they do. If you want to blame someone for the situation these women find themselves in why not look to the men that are actually hurting them?
By International law, not that most American Republicans care, the US military was obligated to protect Fatin and her sisters. Instead some of the misery gangs obtained their weapons from the same political parties the US brought to power.
"While the Pentagon was arming militias bent on brutally ousting Iraqi women from public life, the US State Department was busy brokering the new Iraqi Constitution.
"Hailed as 'progressive' and 'democratic' in Washington, the new constitution designates religious law, which discriminates against women, as the basis for all legislation.
"It also restricts women's rights by upending one of the most progressive family status laws in the Middle East--a law Iraqi women fought for and won in 1959, before Saddam Hussein took power.
"For Fatin, the bitter irony is that her new constitution, courtesy of the USA, destroyed women's rights that were once guaranteed in Iraq, even under the brutal regime of Saddam Hussein."
So you're citing a politically biased commentary site as a news source?
Nice try, but... FAIL.
Why not address that REAL source of these women's plight - Fundamentalist Islam. Oh no, you can't do that. People being responsible for their actions is just too much.
A "politically biased commentary site" whose founder has been reporting from Iraq since the 1970s.American Republicans (mostly) launched the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq that put the guns in the hands of Fatin's misery gangs.
By International law, not that most American Republicans care, the US military was obligated to protect Fatin and her sisters. Instead some of the misery gangs obtained their weapons from the same political parties the US brought to power.
"While the Pentagon was arming militias bent on brutally ousting Iraqi women from public life, the US State Department was busy brokering the new Iraqi Constitution.
"Hailed as 'progressive' and 'democratic' in Washington, the new constitution designates religious law, which discriminates against women, as the basis for all legislation.
"It also restricts women's rights by upending one of the most progressive family status laws in the Middle East--a law Iraqi women fought for and won in 1959, before Saddam Hussein took power.
"For Fatin, the bitter irony is that her new constitution, courtesy of the USA, destroyed women's rights that were once guaranteed in Iraq, even under the brutal regime of Saddam Hussein."
So you're citing a politically biased commentary site as a news source?
Nice try, but... FAIL.
Why not address that REAL source of these women's plight - Fundamentalist Islam. Oh no, you can't do that. People being responsible for their actions is just too much.
If your brother becomes one of the 126 veterans every week who commits suicide, to what extent will you hold him personally responsible?
War is a Racket.
A "politically biased commentary site" whose founder has been reporting from Iraq since the 1970s.
If your brother becomes one of the 126 veterans every week who commits suicide, to what extent will you hold him personally responsible?
Give historic examples.
Heres some on the left.
Revolution to be free from England
labor laws
ending slavery
Womens sufferage
louisaina purchase
Cumberland road
Deplomacy which Franklin used to get the frenchs help in the revolution
higher education
just off the top of my head
Give historic examples.
Heres some on the left.
Revolution to be free from England
labor laws
ending slavery
Womens sufferage
louisaina purchase
Cumberland road
Deplomacy which Franklin used to get the frenchs help in the revolution
higher education
just off the top of my head
Asinine. The Republicans freed the slaves, and a Republican Congress passed the 19th Amendment. Republicans also overwhelmingly passed the Civil Rights legislation, but apparently you don't consider that a 'step forward?'
"higher education?" seriously? Please, I don't think that was quite vague enough....
the right wing created dhs, warrantless wiretapping, the patriot act, adn free speech zones
enough said?
Kerry: We must act now to create this agency and to ensure that the United States Government is doing everything in its power to better protect its borders, coasts, cities, and towns.
Everything you are talking about was when the Republican Party was the "liberal" party. During the early civil rights, liberals left the Republican Party and moved to the Democratic Party, while Conservatives moved from the Democratic party to become the modern "Confederate Republican Party". How can you not know that?
Is it "pretend ignorance" or you really didn't know?
The more I think about it the more I realize that the progressive left hates freedom more than anything. I can't think of anything they have ever done that promotes freedom in any way but I can point out what they do for power and power over others. Most conservatives are pretty content with leading their lives the way they want to without being bothered by the forced collective thinking of the left. Its sad that a country born with a new idea in this world is slowly reverting back to the old world way of thinking.
Tell all this shit to the brown americans who have to show their paperz now here in Arizona....although, this dumb racist law wont pass.
Ask the drafters of NAFTA that, btw, was implemented long after our immigration laws.Are Mexicans Americans?
Why should capital cross borders more freely than labor?
