The Left's Louis Farakhan tells college audience parents should teach kids to throw molotov cocktail

Obama "denounces" Farakhan during a difficult debate in 2007 and talks about his undying 'support' for Israel.



He obviously convinced the 80% of so called Jews to vote for him. He also said, "If you want to keep your plan......"
 
Louis Farrakhan isn't a "leftist", nor is "the left" responsible for him.

But who needs facts when you've got hysterical outrage, right?
You all agree that Wilson should go to jail, therefore, your dude us responsible for him.
 
Louis Farrakhan isn't a "leftist", nor is "the left" responsible for him.

But who needs facts when you've got hysterical outrage, right?

If left to him, there would be radical changes in this country. The changes would not be of a conservative nature, they would be on the left side of the spectrum.
The Nation of Islam
Taliban
ISIS
Nazi Party
Democrat Party
^^^ All are left wing
 
Louis Farrakhan isn't a "leftist", nor is "the left" responsible for him.

But who needs facts when you've got hysterical outrage, right?
You all agree that Wilson should go to jail, therefore, your dude us responsible for him.


What does "my dude us responsible for him" mean?
Lol. Blame my iPad. It writes what it wants. The statement should say " your side is responsible for him." (Farrakhan)
 
Louis Farrakhan isn't a "leftist", nor is "the left" responsible for him.

But who needs facts when you've got hysterical outrage, right?
You all agree that Wilson should go to jail, therefore, your dude us responsible for him.


What does "my dude us responsible for him" mean?
Lol. Blame my iPad. It writes what it wants. The statement should say " your side is responsible for him." (Farrakhan)

Well, I don't have a "side", and either way, I believe in something called "personal responsibility", rather than vaguely defined "side" responsibilities.
 
Louis Farrakhan isn't a "leftist", nor is "the left" responsible for him.

But who needs facts when you've got hysterical outrage, right?

If left to him, there would be radical changes in this country. The changes would not be of a conservative nature, they would be on the left side of the spectrum.
The Nation of Islam
Taliban
ISIS
Nazi Party
Democrat Party
^^^ All are left wing

There really isn't a shark you won't jump.
 
Louis Farrakhan isn't a "leftist", nor is "the left" responsible for him.

But who needs facts when you've got hysterical outrage, right?
Nice try but you guys own that SOB.

No, I don't.
Yeah you do, just like you own Al Sharpton.

:lol:

Repeating it isn't going to magically make it true. I take zero responsibility for the actions of Louis Farrakhan or Al Sharpton, and I'm still not going to no matter how many times you tell me to.
 
Last edited:
Louis Farrakhan isn't a "leftist", nor is "the left" responsible for him.

But who needs facts when you've got hysterical outrage, right?
Nice try but you guys own that SOB.

No, I don't.
You own him because Farrakhan is a leftist.

:lol:

No, I don't. You do realize that you can't force me to take responsibility for him, no matter how many times you repeat it.

First of all, he's not a "leftist" in any sense of the definition that I use for "leftist"

Secondly, even if he was, I wouldn't "own" him. I'm not responsible for anyone other than myself, even if they agree with me politically.
 
Louis Farrakhan isn't a "leftist", nor is "the left" responsible for him.

But who needs facts when you've got hysterical outrage, right?
Nice try but you guys own that SOB.

No, I don't.
You own him because Farrakhan is a leftist.

:lol:

No, I don't. You do realize that you can't force me to take responsibility for him, no matter how many times you repeat it.

First of all, he's not a "leftist" in any sense of the definition that I use for "leftist"

Secondly, even if he was, I wouldn't "own" him. I'm not responsible for anyone other than myself, even if they agree with me politically.
The Doctor of Denial. :laugh:
 
Louis Farrakhan isn't a "leftist", nor is "the left" responsible for him.

But who needs facts when you've got hysterical outrage, right?

If left to him, there would be radical changes in this country. The changes would not be of a conservative nature, they would be on the left side of the spectrum.
The Nation of Islam
Taliban
ISIS
Nazi Party

Democrat Party
^^^ All are left wing

(My bold)

Nah, the groups in bold aren't leftist - not in any sense that I understand leftist. NOI, Taliban & ISIS would take that as a deadly insult. The Nazis - harder to tell. They're not leftists either, as far as I can tell. & they made a big to-do about being anti-Communist, anti-Socialist, anti-Marxist, & so on @ the time. What's changed, that you call any of the bolded leftist?
 
And yet, this vile man is considered a "civil rights leader" by some people. :cuckoo:
 
And yet, this vile man is considered a "civil rights leader" by some people. :cuckoo:

I don't know of anyone who considers Louis Farrakhan to be a "civil rights leader". "Cult leader" is more accurate.
 
And yet, this vile man is considered a "civil rights leader" by some people. :cuckoo:

I don't know of anyone who considers Louis Farrakhan to be a "civil rights leader". "Cult leader" is more accurate.

Unfortunately yes, some do consider the racist dirtbag a "civil rights" leader.

http://www.biography.com/people/louis-farrakhan-9291850

Religious Figure, Civil Rights Activist (1933–)

Louis Farrakhan has led the Nation of Islam, an African American movement that combined elements of Islam with black nationalism since 1978.

Synopsis

Louis Farrakhan was born Louis Eugene Walcott on May 11, 1933, in the Bronx, New York. He joined the Nation of Islam in 1955 and in 1978 led a breakaway group of the Nation of Islam that preserved the original teachings of Elijah Muhammad. In the 1980s, Farrakhan was criticized for making anti-Semitic remarks; he denies being anti-Semitic. In 1995, he led the Million Man March on Washington, D.C.

****So yes, he's considered a leader and led many movements. Many don't, but many do.
 

Forum List

Back
Top