francoHFW
Diamond Member
Assad gave up his chem weapons. Now you can call Obama a dictator, hater chump.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
God doesn't like racist haters. Idiot.Oh wait, Antares has already admitted he's a god-awful racist hater...enjoy hell lol...
Yesssssssss. Because you have the Authority to send someone there, right?![]()
We have seen Obama gradually morph from a leftist determined to change America to a pragmatist who has suppressed his fantasies and perhaps reluctantly embraced reality. ISIS is the straw that ended his dream. He was faced with the fact that you just can't satisfy some people and that they will kill you if you don't kill them. I've seen this happen to idealists, including myself, in the course of my 63 years. Sometimes reality, as miserable as it can often be, is irresistible.
"We will degrade and ultimately destroy, ISIL..." - Obama
No, he's still the empty-headed community organizer he's been for years.
If that's true why are all his critics and opponents so miserably ineffective?
huh? why are his followers so disconnected from reality?
I wonder why the President's political opponents haven't been more effective in their efforts to impede his agenda? Why haven't they accomplished anything they said they'd do?
Ah, because Democrats control the Senate and the Oval Office?That may be one of the more vacuous questions I've seen on here, Dis! It's the kind of nonsense the RDerp posts.
Republicans have spent the past six years promising to stop the President from doing all kinds of things. I guess they're just a bunch of full of shit liars.
But they promised......Republican politicians ran for office on the promise of stopping the Obama agenda dead in it's tracks. Are they incompetent or simply dishonest? Did they make promises they knew they couldn't keep?No, he's still the empty-headed community organizer he's been for years.
If that's true why are all his critics and opponents so miserably ineffective?
huh? why are his followers so disconnected from reality?
I wonder why the President's political opponents haven't been more effective in their efforts to impede his agenda? Why haven't they accomplished anything they said they'd do?
Ah, because Democrats control the Senate and the Oval Office?That may be one of the more vacuous questions I've seen on here, Dis! It's the kind of nonsense the RDerp posts.
Republicans have spent the past six years promising to stop the President from doing all kinds of things. I guess they're just a bunch of full of shit liars.
Well...unless someone totally changed the way our system of government functions and I didn't get the memo...you can't pass much in the way of legislation if you only control the House and someone else controls the Senate and the Presidency.
What's amusing is that it wasn't Republicans who stopped Obama's plans but moderate Democrats who stopped much of Barry's progressive agenda when Democrats controlled the House, Senate and the Oval Office.
Pubs have stopped so many good things- like a full recovery, the Schumer/Lindsay Graham SOLUTION for illegal workers not paying taxes, and now the living wage this economy needs, and higher taxes on the bloated rich and giant corporations to fund training and cheaper college loans, lower taxes on the struggling EVERYONE ELSE. etc etc etc. Pub a-holes and their chumps...
Pubs have stopped so many good things- like a full recovery, the Schumer/Lindsay Graham SOLUTION for illegal workers not paying taxes, and now the living wage this economy needs, and higher taxes on the bloated rich and giant corporations to fund training and cheaper college loans, lower taxes on the struggling EVERYONE ELSE. etc etc etc. Pub a-holes and their chumps...
Oh wait, Antares has already admitted he's a god-awful racist hater...enjoy hell lol...
seven deadly sharts said:Yesssssssss. Because you have the Authority to send someone there, right?![]()
francohfw said:God doesn't like racist haters. Idiot.
They did.But they promised......Republican politicians ran for office on the promise of stopping the Obama agenda dead in it's tracks. Are they incompetent or simply dishonest? Did they make promises they knew they couldn't keep?No, he's still the empty-headed community organizer he's been for years.
If that's true why are all his critics and opponents so miserably ineffective?
huh? why are his followers so disconnected from reality?
I wonder why the President's political opponents haven't been more effective in their efforts to impede his agenda? Why haven't they accomplished anything they said they'd do?
Ah, because Democrats control the Senate and the Oval Office?That may be one of the more vacuous questions I've seen on here, Dis! It's the kind of nonsense the RDerp posts.
Republicans have spent the past six years promising to stop the President from doing all kinds of things. I guess they're just a bunch of full of shit liars.
Well...unless someone totally changed the way our system of government functions and I didn't get the memo...you can't pass much in the way of legislation if you only control the House and someone else controls the Senate and the Presidency.
What's amusing is that it wasn't Republicans who stopped Obama's plans but moderate Democrats who stopped much of Barry's progressive agenda when Democrats controlled the House, Senate and the Oval Office.
We have seen Obama gradually morph from a leftist determined to change America to a pragmatist who has suppressed his fantasies and perhaps reluctantly embraced reality. ISIS is the straw that ended his dream. He was faced with the fact that you just can't satisfy some people and that they will kill you if you don't kill them. I've seen this happen to idealists, including myself, in the course of my 63 years. Sometimes reality, as miserable as it can often be, is irresistible.
"We will degrade and ultimately destroy, ISIL..." - Obama
No, what you're seeing is the all too common ailment that afflicts one president after another - the affliction of feeling the need to involve the US in another needless military adventure while the nations who really ought to be doing the fighting and dying sit in the grandstands.
Our observations do not necessarily conflict - a first for us - nor are they mutually exclusive. An American president - even one committed to changing America's course - can find that circumstances (reality) may require the sort of action that appears to repeat the past. In this case Obama recognizes the scope of the IS threat and seems determined to nip it in the bud.
yeah ok, they SAY better late than NEVER
for crying out loud. he should've done this a hell of lot SOONER. Instead he gives a speech after one our citizens is BEHEADED then goes back to playing his golf game. so really we're sorry if some us don't fall on our knees and see him as "maturing"
Did you throw a tantrum every time Bush played a round of golf, or whatever recreational activity you want to include,
the day after an American got killed in Iraq?
Bush had the common decency to QUIT playing golf because he didn't want to be on the golf course when American troops were being killed. Obama doesn't care.
Let's get Bush's REAL opinion, as opposed to an asshole's like you:
"I see our president criticized for playing golf. I don't. I think he ought to play golf," Bush told the Golf Channel. "Because I know what it's like to be in the bubble. I know the pressures of the job, and to be able to get outside and play golf with some of your pals is important for the president. It does give you an outlet."
Now fuck off you racist piece of human garbage.
George W. Bush defends Obama 8217 s frequent golf outings - The Washington Post
From the same article you posted from
Mr. Bush quit playing golf in the public eye shortly after invading Iraq.
“I don’t want some mom, whose son may have recently died, to see the commander in chief playing golf,” he said in an interview at the time.
Perhaps you will explain what is racist about that.
Your racism is common knowledge. Bush pursued other forms of recreation, which the article acknowledges and which I alluded to in my post, fuckwit.
To the great damage of the country because the two parties would not agree to constitutionally do their job, govern the country.They did.
How much major legislation passed after 2010?
Dolt.
BS- it's 39%, still within margin of error of what it's been for years, hater chump.BREAKING for Spoon: Obama is a politician lol...unlike Pubs, he also does what's best for the country...Everything Obama does is carefully crafted to his political advantageFunny, but I got the feeling and the distinct impression that Obama has had so little time to politicize the preferred outcome that he is taking this action with as pure a set of motives as I've seen.
Usually he gives off a sense of having an ulterior motive behind every seemingly good thing he does. It's like he does nothing until he has considered how, by tweaking this or that in just the right way, he can turn most every event into one which provides him some unexpected political opportunities or political advantages for him or the Dems.
His attitude in the speech tonite reminded me just a little bit, of a time early in my sales career when I felt I needed a sale so much that I decided to just be as honest and candid with this one particular customer as I could possibly be.
I told her the invoice price so she would know i was taking everything I could off of the price and I was going against the unwrit rules of the game by telling her my bottom line without any dickering.
I was GIVING her the deal of the month and not only did I break the rules to share this info with her, she didn't believe my sincerity!
That's the memory that came to my mind while watching Obama tonite.
He was being straight with us for once and now no one will believe or trust him!
LOLOL
But I shouldn't be laughing.
America needs to get this one right.
There's no fooling around possible.
well evidently almost 70% who disapproves of the job your hero is doing don't see it your way
so sorry
I'll concede that asshole , 61% of American thinks Bammy is an ill prepared asshole.
Unlike with RW chickenhawk morons in the past, we're coming to the aid of people without entering the country and pissing the whole area off...just like before America became a RW ASSHOLE.The whole point is to get Iraqi, Kurds, moderate Syrian rebels, and othe ME allies fighting fundie terrorists...and now that Booosh's a-hole buddy Maliki is gone, things are looking up....it's much better than the Booosh/RW/chickenhawk/hater dupe jingoism/send in the 82 Airborne idiocy. Thank god no drama Obama is in charge, not you fools...The biggest problem I see is this: People think ISIS is just camping out in the desert so a couple of daisy cutters dropped judiciously will solve the problem.And here are 5 things that could go wrong with his 4-point plan:We have seen Obama gradually morph from a leftist determined to change America to a pragmatist who has suppressed his fantasies and perhaps reluctantly embraced reality. ISIS is the straw that ended his dream. He was faced with the fact that you just can't satisfy some people and that they will kill you if you don't kill them. I've seen this happen to idealists, including myself, in the course of my 63 years. Sometimes reality, as miserable as it can often be, is irresistible.
"We will degrade and ultimately destroy, ISIL..." - Obama
Five things that could go horribly wrong with Obama s action in Iraq WashingtonExaminer.com
It isnt so.
They are in charge of some major cities. All they need to do is retreat to those cities, use the population is shields, as Hamas did in Gaza, and the problem goes away. America is not going to start bombing civilians.
Then we will have to send ground troops.
ISIS must be laughing their asses off.
Most absurd.
Both W and BO are warmongering interventionists.
What we should do is stop intervening and bring all our forces home. Intervening got us where we are today. Continuing a failed policy only results in more death, destruction, and debt....but it does empower the state.
The Iraq War was a fine idea and remained so. Too bad Dems scattered when it began to be unpopular.BS- it's 39%, still within margin of error of what it's been for years, hater chump.BREAKING for Spoon: Obama is a politician lol...unlike Pubs, he also does what's best for the country...Everything Obama does is carefully crafted to his political advantageFunny, but I got the feeling and the distinct impression that Obama has had so little time to politicize the preferred outcome that he is taking this action with as pure a set of motives as I've seen.
Usually he gives off a sense of having an ulterior motive behind every seemingly good thing he does. It's like he does nothing until he has considered how, by tweaking this or that in just the right way, he can turn most every event into one which provides him some unexpected political opportunities or political advantages for him or the Dems.
His attitude in the speech tonite reminded me just a little bit, of a time early in my sales career when I felt I needed a sale so much that I decided to just be as honest and candid with this one particular customer as I could possibly be.
I told her the invoice price so she would know i was taking everything I could off of the price and I was going against the unwrit rules of the game by telling her my bottom line without any dickering.
I was GIVING her the deal of the month and not only did I break the rules to share this info with her, she didn't believe my sincerity!
That's the memory that came to my mind while watching Obama tonite.
He was being straight with us for once and now no one will believe or trust him!
LOLOL
But I shouldn't be laughing.
America needs to get this one right.
There's no fooling around possible.
well evidently almost 70% who disapproves of the job your hero is doing don't see it your way
so sorry
I'll concede that asshole , 61% of American thinks Bammy is an ill prepared asshole.
70% of Americans thought invading Iraq was a good idea. Every once in awhile the People get it wrong for awhile.
Widespread disapproval of Obama's foreign policy, for sure, but no one has any better ideas.
The president's disapproval rating on foreign policy is mostly based on the delusion that presidents have magical powers to fix anything that goes wrong anywhere in the world.
The Iraq War was a fine idea and remained so. Too bad Dems scattered when it began to be unpopular.BS- it's 39%, still within margin of error of what it's been for years, hater chump.BREAKING for Spoon: Obama is a politician lol...unlike Pubs, he also does what's best for the country...Everything Obama does is carefully crafted to his political advantageFunny, but I got the feeling and the distinct impression that Obama has had so little time to politicize the preferred outcome that he is taking this action with as pure a set of motives as I've seen.
Usually he gives off a sense of having an ulterior motive behind every seemingly good thing he does. It's like he does nothing until he has considered how, by tweaking this or that in just the right way, he can turn most every event into one which provides him some unexpected political opportunities or political advantages for him or the Dems.
His attitude in the speech tonite reminded me just a little bit, of a time early in my sales career when I felt I needed a sale so much that I decided to just be as honest and candid with this one particular customer as I could possibly be.
I told her the invoice price so she would know i was taking everything I could off of the price and I was going against the unwrit rules of the game by telling her my bottom line without any dickering.
I was GIVING her the deal of the month and not only did I break the rules to share this info with her, she didn't believe my sincerity!
That's the memory that came to my mind while watching Obama tonite.
He was being straight with us for once and now no one will believe or trust him!
LOLOL
But I shouldn't be laughing.
America needs to get this one right.
There's no fooling around possible.
well evidently almost 70% who disapproves of the job your hero is doing don't see it your way
so sorry
I'll concede that asshole , 61% of American thinks Bammy is an ill prepared asshole.
70% of Americans thought invading Iraq was a good idea. Every once in awhile the People get it wrong for awhile.
Widespread disapproval of Obama's foreign policy, for sure, but no one has any better ideas.
The president's disapproval rating on foreign policy is mostly based on the delusion that presidents have magical powers to fix anything that goes wrong anywhere in the world.
Disapproval of Obama's foreign policy is based on the fact that he has fucked up more situations more times than anyone else probably in history.
And yes, virtually everyone has better ideas.
They did.But they promised......Republican politicians ran for office on the promise of stopping the Obama agenda dead in it's tracks. Are they incompetent or simply dishonest? Did they make promises they knew they couldn't keep?No, he's still the empty-headed community organizer he's been for years.
If that's true why are all his critics and opponents so miserably ineffective?
huh? why are his followers so disconnected from reality?
I wonder why the President's political opponents haven't been more effective in their efforts to impede his agenda? Why haven't they accomplished anything they said they'd do?
Ah, because Democrats control the Senate and the Oval Office?That may be one of the more vacuous questions I've seen on here, Dis! It's the kind of nonsense the RDerp posts.
Republicans have spent the past six years promising to stop the President from doing all kinds of things. I guess they're just a bunch of full of shit liars.
Well...unless someone totally changed the way our system of government functions and I didn't get the memo...you can't pass much in the way of legislation if you only control the House and someone else controls the Senate and the Presidency.
What's amusing is that it wasn't Republicans who stopped Obama's plans but moderate Democrats who stopped much of Barry's progressive agenda when Democrats controlled the House, Senate and the Oval Office.
How much major legislation passed after 2010?
Dolt.