NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2009
- 117,063
- 13,888
There you go again...being retarded.
Just because it's not IN the constitution, doesn't mean something is un-constitutional.
I really wish that would get absorbed by a bunch of simplistic morons.
Nothing you said has anything to do with what I said. Don't do that if you want to talk to me.
Of course it does. Are you on crack?
You stated a specific thing (fetal rights) that weren't in the constitution and argued that such rights, if they exist now are unconstitutional judicial additions.
I explained why they are NOT unconstitutional. What don't you get?
I never ever said they were UNCONSTITUTIONAL judicial additions. Did I?