Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
that's because they hadn't identified Arberry yet... Larry English wanted him so much that he called his contractor Diego to go over there and catch him in addition to circulating his photo all over Facebook and making multiple police reportsTravis had met him in person and seen him on video doing illegal things thus he recognized him sprinting in a panic up the street as a known and wanted criminal
He was wanted?
LIAR.
Unlike Ramirez, who was actually wanted, Arbury was not, as no warrant had been issued for his arrest.
There was, in fact, a warrant issued for the arrest of Richard Ramirez...
that's exactly how they caught Richard Ramirez you know... somebody recognized him, he panicked and ran and then they caught him
Nobody saw him commit a crime
they just recognized him from a photo and he panicked when confronted
No one needed to see him commit a crime, for the simple fact that a warrant had been issued for his arrest. There was no warrant issued for the arrest of Arbury.
I know that's a distinction you lack the capacity to comprehend, but it's a HUGE difference between the two cases...
How come AA ran directly at the truck as he was supposedly being harassed by men with guns??How did they chase a guy down when they were standing in the middle of the street and he was running directly at them?
Why did a man run 30 yards directly at people who were chasing him down?
You are so ignorant of the details of this case it’s absurd that you post anything at all.
Who do you think was recording the aggravated assault and murder?
How would an unarmed jogger being harrassed by two armed men in a pickup truck know that the guy in the car also harrassing and following him not armed as well. AA tried to avoid TM by running to the right of the truck when TM was standing on the left side of the truck, The video shows TM ran to the front of the truck, and then so far to the right side of the truck that TM and AA both disappeared - and the first shot was fired - AA was wounded but not lethally by the first shot.
shooting someone who was violently trying to disarm you is perfectly reasonable Forceif you had an ounce of tactical knowledge you would understand that pursuing a man who may be armed is a incredibly dangerous thing to do only a moron would do it unarmed ( that's why they grab their guns dummy)
Since time immemorial in English common law it's been legal for citizens to pursue and detain individuals suspected of crime and if that individual violently attacks them it's perfectly reasonable for them to defend themselves this is precisely what happened to Trayvon Martin and we saw how the law looked at that scenario in a legitimate display the American legal system... these days we see the American law being perverted by Propaganda spewed all over social media Outlets whose primary motivation is to get ad clicks by inciting outrage. We're living in a world where people like you are so confused that you're literally supporting a filthy disgusting no-good low-down dirty Street criminal who got caught in the act of burglarizing a neighborhood
As someone with over 20 years of professional Public Safety experience I am often put in a scenario where I have to use judgement in order to proceed with arrest procedures and the fact that you people are so easily confused misled and subsequently outraged makes my position more dangerous then it ever has been before... one day you may be in a situation where you could prevent a criminal from escaping Justice but your cowardly predilections to run and hide will kick in and you're hoping to change the law to facilitate legal protection for your spineless worldview
when that little girl's parents asks you why you didn't stop the rapist who was attacking her you no longer have to look inside your own cowardly heart and know that you were too much of a sissy to intercede and will be able to crawl into your own vagina protected by the law which now makes it illegal for a citizen to detain another citizen and required to act like a spineless worthless piece of garbage which apparently you are naturally
Again with this vague experience claim. Yet you have no clue what the law is or how it is applied. If you are a cop you are the worst cop in the world. Full stop. More than likely you have every episode of NCIS on constant play in Mommy’s basement.
It is not legal to tear out after someone with no evidence they are committing a crime. In history these are called lynch mobs.
The Ahmaud Arbery Killing and Georgia Law
Explaining the legal issues surrounding the incident of two white men shooting a black jogger they suspected of a crimearcdigital.media
This was not a lawful citizen’s arrest
Greg McMichael told police that he and his son believed Arbery was responsible for burglaries in their neighborhood, but Georgia does not make it easy for citizens to go around arresting each other. Citizens are entitled to use reasonable force to arrest people who have committed crimes in their presence or immediate knowledge (courts have held that these are synonymous). Here is the statute:
The most important part of this statute is the unwritten bit — you are allowed to make arrests only with “reasonable force.” You can’t burn down an orphanage to catch one child snatching extra bowls of gruel. And the Georgia Supreme Court has held, as a matter of law, that you can’t chase someone down with a weapon because you think they have committed burglary. For example, it held that there was no evidence of a “citizen’s arrest” when a man with a baseball bat chased down someone who burglarized his home.A private person may arrest an offender if the offense is committed in his presence or within his immediate knowledge. If the offense is a felony and the offender is escaping or attempting to escape, a private person may arrest him upon reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion.
Now this is the actual factual law as applied in Georgia. It is nothing new. There have been cases to set precedent. This is hardly the first time a hit head has torn off after a criminal, real or imagined. It is not the first time the Courts have considered these issues. It is not the first time the text of the law passed by the legislature has been examined.
It is not even the first time I have dealt with an individual determined to avoid learning at all costs. It merely proves yet again the truism written by Rex Stout more than eighty years ago. Nero Wolf when he is asked if there is anything he can’t do states. “Yes. I can’t pour sense into the mind of a fool. I’ve tried.”
You are no cop. You aren’t even a rent a cop. And Call of Duty does not give you tactical expertise in the real world.
how can two cars block a man who's running down a street and could simply cut through yards and jump a few fences
Why run directly at a vehicle that was chasing you if you were being threatened by two men with guns?Why did a man run 30 yards directly at people who were chasing him down?
I answered that question last year:
65#1292 24674947
"They were setting up an armed barricade."
It is amazing how you can watch the video and conclude thi
it’s not amazing to see how your white extremist gun fanaticism distorts your mind whereas you cannot see this as an armed barracade set up to hem the jogger in and stop him.
View attachment 432490
If they were going to let him pass the Gunman (yellow arrow) would have stayed put on left of the double yellow line. The jogger would be alive and the two assholes would not be arrested for aggravated assault and murder.
Do you think the shotgunner walked or ran to the location designated by the yellow arrow? Did he not “rush” the attacker.
SavannahMann do you know if the police were given this video at the time of the arrest. And if not why did it’s owner withold it from police?
This video does not help the murderers because shotgunner had to move pretty fast toward his target to initiate contact.
Everything I've posted has been 100% accurate that's why you don't quote anything I say you just vaguely reference a theoretical emotion or try to ascribe a fallacious intentionjust look at the simple facts
the dramatized news story suggests that a couple of racist Hillbillies saw an innocent unarmed black man jogging and gunned him down in the street
Why would they bother to stop their cars, call 911 and wait till he started punching them to shoot?
Why not just pull up next to him and blast him as he was unaware of your presence and intentions
They must have assumed he could be armed so why on Earth would they drive up next to him and start talking to him?
Why would they stop their truck and get out presenting themselves as a Target AFTER calling 911
They wouldn't.... they would just shoot him from the truck and keep on driving down the road and they sure as hell wouldn't have called 911 and kept the Line open during the entire incident and aftermath
What a ridiculous social justice fantasy world you have to be living in to buy this ridiculous story of a couple racist Hillbillies gunning down an innocent unarmed black jogger because he was caught in the wrong neighborhood....
So you reposted the OP that has been disproven.
Why does this bother you so much? Are you a relative?
So why did they stop the car?
why did they try to talk to him?
why didn't they just gun him down and keep on driving?
If they were just there to talk why did they rush off to get guns? Why did they as you say go into pursuit? Why did they hem him in? Why did Travis get out of the truck with the shotgun? If he was just there to talk why did he need a shotgun? Why have a round in the chamber?
Read what the lawyer says.
The Ahmaud Arbery Killing and Georgia Law
Explaining the legal issues surrounding the incident of two white men shooting a black jogger they suspected of a crime
You are wrong. And you won’t say why this case has so enraged you. I say enraged. Because you aren’t debating. Your demanding that the world change everything to align with your idea of what is right and legal. Now either you are seriously disturbed with delusions of grandeur and this notion that you should be a potentate. Or there is another reason why some school crossing guard from California is so wrapped around the axle about a pretty much open and shut case from Georgia. There are miscarriages of justice in California if that was your motivation. So what is it really?
Why did they grab guns before they engaged in an attempted citizen's arrest...???
If you take it upon yourself to chase down a potentially violent armed criminal it's a good idea that you arm yourself
View attachment 432554
why do you hate guns?
Call the local insurance company and ask them if it's okay if people "visit their construction site" in the middle of the night?Travis had met him in person and seen him on video doing illegal things thus he recognized him sprinting in a panic up the street as a known and wanted criminalYou want me to bet on the legitimacy of the American legal system???your hero rushed and attacked 2 professionals standing their groundwhy did Arberry attack the mcmichels??they lied to youHow did they chase a guy down when they were standing in the middle of the street and he was running directly at them?
You're a fucking idiot.
Seriously, you're fucking brain dead...
*its not your fault
Ok. Proof they were not just standing in the road. I am not sure of the source. Perhaps you can evaluate it for me.
The painful truth about Ahmaud Arberry
It's unlikely any other case in recent history has inspired more misinformation as media Outlets clearly have an incentive to racialize and dramatized every incident that comes their way the simple fact is arberry was a well-known local Petty Criminal who was caught casing out a house that had...www.usmessageboard.com
he ran at 2 men
he ran over 30 yards DIRECTLY at them and ATTACKED
Of course, they had to get in their truck, chase him down, stop the truck in front of him and then get out.
Your boys are going to prison, numbnuts. Dig it...
`
I don't have a "hero" in this, you cock-sucking little bitch.
Take my bet or admit to being a fucking little bitch coward...
not a chance, I WOULD wager however that you would be the kind of character that would run and hide if you saw a black man crawling out of your daughter's bedroom window covered in blood
likely the police would find you in the tool shed covered in fecal material sucking your thumb as the man who raped and murdered your family disappeared Into the Night Never to be seen again and likely to murder Rob and rape other innocent women in the neighborhood because you were too much of a pussy to man up grab a gun and pursue a person you didn't see commit the crime
Again, I don't give a flying fuck what you believe. You're nothing to me. You could not be more meaningless.
What you continue to fail to realize is that, and what has been pointed out to you repeatedly, is when you say I saw someone jumping from a window in my house, that gives me a reason to believe that he's trespassing. After all, had he been invited in he'd have used the door, you stupid, retarded fuck.
Travis McMichael witnessed only someone running down the street. Hell, in my neighborhood, people run down the street all the time. Some are white and some are black. Should I just take up station at an open bedroom window with a Remington M24 and take them out? After all... THEY'RE RUNNING!!!
Your entire premise in this discussion is that Arbury was guilty of his crime because he's black, and the McMichael twins cannot be guilty because they're white. Period.
Well, they're going to be found guilty, they're going to go to prison, and they're going to prison because the American legal system will work exactly as good, decent people expect it to...
that's exactly how they caught Richard Ramirez you know... somebody recognized him, he panicked and ran and then they caught him
Nobody saw him commit a crime
they just recognized him from a photo and he panicked when confronted
You really need to learn the laws. Or read the lawyers explanation I posted. Visiting a construction site is not illegal in Georgia. In fact the same day Arbury was killed three others visited the same construction site.
Dude. Accept it. The law does not say what you think it should.
how come Larry English kept calling the police on this guy who was "visiting his construction site" if it was no big deal?
He installed a bunch of video cameras and was calling his neighbors to go catch the person who kept visiting his construction site becomes things kept disappearing
Remember kids if you get caught visiting someone's construction site don't flee like a criminal and then attack like a criminal and then people won't think you're a criminal
how come Larry English kept calling the police on this guy who was "visiting his construction site" if it was no big deal?
Remember kids if you get caught visiting someone's construction site don't flee like a criminal and then attack like a criminal and then people won't think you're a criminal
as two experienced Hunters I would figure they had weapons available to them far more deadly than a shotgun loaded with ammunition less deadly than is available at Walmart
shooting someone who was violently trying to disarm you is perfectly reasonable Forceif you had an ounce of tactical knowledge you would understand that pursuing a man who may be armed is a incredibly dangerous thing to do only a moron would do it unarmed ( that's why they grab their guns dummy)
Since time immemorial in English common law it's been legal for citizens to pursue and detain individuals suspected of crime and if that individual violently attacks them it's perfectly reasonable for them to defend themselves this is precisely what happened to Trayvon Martin and we saw how the law looked at that scenario in a legitimate display the American legal system... these days we see the American law being perverted by Propaganda spewed all over social media Outlets whose primary motivation is to get ad clicks by inciting outrage. We're living in a world where people like you are so confused that you're literally supporting a filthy disgusting no-good low-down dirty Street criminal who got caught in the act of burglarizing a neighborhood
As someone with over 20 years of professional Public Safety experience I am often put in a scenario where I have to use judgement in order to proceed with arrest procedures and the fact that you people are so easily confused misled and subsequently outraged makes my position more dangerous then it ever has been before... one day you may be in a situation where you could prevent a criminal from escaping Justice but your cowardly predilections to run and hide will kick in and you're hoping to change the law to facilitate legal protection for your spineless worldview
when that little girl's parents asks you why you didn't stop the rapist who was attacking her you no longer have to look inside your own cowardly heart and know that you were too much of a sissy to intercede and will be able to crawl into your own vagina protected by the law which now makes it illegal for a citizen to detain another citizen and required to act like a spineless worthless piece of garbage which apparently you are naturally
Again with this vague experience claim. Yet you have no clue what the law is or how it is applied. If you are a cop you are the worst cop in the world. Full stop. More than likely you have every episode of NCIS on constant play in Mommy’s basement.
It is not legal to tear out after someone with no evidence they are committing a crime. In history these are called lynch mobs.
The Ahmaud Arbery Killing and Georgia Law
Explaining the legal issues surrounding the incident of two white men shooting a black jogger they suspected of a crime
This was not a lawful citizen’s arrest
Greg McMichael told police that he and his son believed Arbery was responsible for burglaries in their neighborhood, but Georgia does not make it easy for citizens to go around arresting each other. Citizens are entitled to use reasonable force to arrest people who have committed crimes in their presence or immediate knowledge (courts have held that these are synonymous). Here is the statute:
The most important part of this statute is the unwritten bit — you are allowed to make arrests only with “reasonable force.” You can’t burn down an orphanage to catch one child snatching extra bowls of gruel. And the Georgia Supreme Court has held, as a matter of law, that you can’t chase someone down with a weapon because you think they have committed burglary. For example, it held that there was no evidence of a “citizen’s arrest” when a man with a baseball bat chased down someone who burglarized his home.A private person may arrest an offender if the offense is committed in his presence or within his immediate knowledge. If the offense is a felony and the offender is escaping or attempting to escape, a private person may arrest him upon reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion.
Now this is the actual factual law as applied in Georgia. It is nothing new. There have been cases to set precedent. This is hardly the first time a hit head has torn off after a criminal, real or imagined. It is not the first time the Courts have considered these issues. It is not the first time the text of the law passed by the legislature has been examined.
It is not even the first time I have dealt with an individual determined to avoid learning at all costs. It merely proves yet again the truism written by Rex Stout more than eighty years ago. Nero Wolf when he is asked if there is anything he can’t do states. “Yes. I can’t pour sense into the mind of a fool. I’ve tried.”
You are no cop. You aren’t even a rent a cop. And Call of Duty does not give you tactical expertise in the real world.
he wasn't shot for trespassing, he was shot for violently attacking two men with gunshow can two cars block a man who's running down a street and could simply cut through yards and jump a few fences
and be shot for trespassing by the homeowner or in the back by the armed white assholes in the truck.
Nope. Best option was to stay on a public road and hope to get by unharmed.
But TM shot AA as he tried to get by. Then wounded AA tried to get the shotgun away from his attacker instead of risking being shot in the back.
Actually Larry English had a system on his phone that would alert him to trespasses thanks to the camera array he setup at the home because it was being repeatedly burglarizedCall the local insurance company and ask them if it's okay if people "visit their construction site" in the middle of the night?Travis had met him in person and seen him on video doing illegal things thus he recognized him sprinting in a panic up the street as a known and wanted criminalYou want me to bet on the legitimacy of the American legal system???your hero rushed and attacked 2 professionals standing their groundwhy did Arberry attack the mcmichels??they lied to youHow did they chase a guy down when they were standing in the middle of the street and he was running directly at them?
You're a fucking idiot.
Seriously, you're fucking brain dead...
*its not your fault
Ok. Proof they were not just standing in the road. I am not sure of the source. Perhaps you can evaluate it for me.
The painful truth about Ahmaud Arberry
It's unlikely any other case in recent history has inspired more misinformation as media Outlets clearly have an incentive to racialize and dramatized every incident that comes their way the simple fact is arberry was a well-known local Petty Criminal who was caught casing out a house that had...
he ran at 2 men
he ran over 30 yards DIRECTLY at them and ATTACKED
Of course, they had to get in their truck, chase him down, stop the truck in front of him and then get out.
Your boys are going to prison, numbnuts. Dig it...
`
I don't have a "hero" in this, you cock-sucking little bitch.
Take my bet or admit to being a fucking little bitch coward...
not a chance, I WOULD wager however that you would be the kind of character that would run and hide if you saw a black man crawling out of your daughter's bedroom window covered in blood
likely the police would find you in the tool shed covered in fecal material sucking your thumb as the man who raped and murdered your family disappeared Into the Night Never to be seen again and likely to murder Rob and rape other innocent women in the neighborhood because you were too much of a pussy to man up grab a gun and pursue a person you didn't see commit the crime
Again, I don't give a flying fuck what you believe. You're nothing to me. You could not be more meaningless.
What you continue to fail to realize is that, and what has been pointed out to you repeatedly, is when you say I saw someone jumping from a window in my house, that gives me a reason to believe that he's trespassing. After all, had he been invited in he'd have used the door, you stupid, retarded fuck.
Travis McMichael witnessed only someone running down the street. Hell, in my neighborhood, people run down the street all the time. Some are white and some are black. Should I just take up station at an open bedroom window with a Remington M24 and take them out? After all... THEY'RE RUNNING!!!
Your entire premise in this discussion is that Arbury was guilty of his crime because he's black, and the McMichael twins cannot be guilty because they're white. Period.
Well, they're going to be found guilty, they're going to go to prison, and they're going to prison because the American legal system will work exactly as good, decent people expect it to...
that's exactly how they caught Richard Ramirez you know... somebody recognized him, he panicked and ran and then they caught him
Nobody saw him commit a crime
they just recognized him from a photo and he panicked when confronted
You really need to learn the laws. Or read the lawyers explanation I posted. Visiting a construction site is not illegal in Georgia. In fact the same day Arbury was killed three others visited the same construction site.
Dude. Accept it. The law does not say what you think it should.
how come Larry English kept calling the police on this guy who was "visiting his construction site" if it was no big deal?
He installed a bunch of video cameras and was calling his neighbors to go catch the person who kept visiting his construction site becomes things kept disappearing
Remember kids if you get caught visiting someone's construction site don't flee like a criminal and then attack like a criminal and then people won't think you're a criminal
He didn’t call the neighbors and nothing was stolen.
that's because they hadn't identified Arberry yet
The McMichaels were also trying to identify this local Petty criminal because he was caught ducking in between houses and suspected as the thief of Travis's gun
if they planned on shooting him why didn't they do it in their previous encounter... why would they take a shotgun loaded with a less lethal ammunition...
people who plan on murdering individuals do it with a completely different type of firearm and a completely different range
How did they chase a guy down when they were standing in the middle of the street and he was running directly at them?
he doesn't understand the difference between IDENTIFYING AND RECOGNIZINGthat's because they hadn't identified Arberry yet
Wait, what??
Earlier (and often) you said that they recognized him.
Now they didn't identify him.
You're all over the map, and you're only succeeding in making yourself look stupid...
The McMichaels were also trying to identify this local Petty criminal because he was caught ducking in between houses and suspected as the thief of Travis's gun
But you just said they hadn't identified him, so how could they have suspected that he was suspected of anything??
they were pursuing a suspect and lost him so they stood their ground in the street because they expected him to run back that way because roddy had cut him offEverything I've posted has been 100% accurate that's why you don't quote anything I say you just vaguely reference a theoretical emotion or try to ascribe a fallacious intentionjust look at the simple facts
the dramatized news story suggests that a couple of racist Hillbillies saw an innocent unarmed black man jogging and gunned him down in the street
Why would they bother to stop their cars, call 911 and wait till he started punching them to shoot?
Why not just pull up next to him and blast him as he was unaware of your presence and intentions
They must have assumed he could be armed so why on Earth would they drive up next to him and start talking to him?
Why would they stop their truck and get out presenting themselves as a Target AFTER calling 911
They wouldn't.... they would just shoot him from the truck and keep on driving down the road and they sure as hell wouldn't have called 911 and kept the Line open during the entire incident and aftermath
What a ridiculous social justice fantasy world you have to be living in to buy this ridiculous story of a couple racist Hillbillies gunning down an innocent unarmed black jogger because he was caught in the wrong neighborhood....
So you reposted the OP that has been disproven.
Why does this bother you so much? Are you a relative?
So why did they stop the car?
why did they try to talk to him?
why didn't they just gun him down and keep on driving?
If they were just there to talk why did they rush off to get guns? Why did they as you say go into pursuit? Why did they hem him in? Why did Travis get out of the truck with the shotgun? If he was just there to talk why did he need a shotgun? Why have a round in the chamber?
Read what the lawyer says.
The Ahmaud Arbery Killing and Georgia Law
Explaining the legal issues surrounding the incident of two white men shooting a black jogger they suspected of a crime
You are wrong. And you won’t say why this case has so enraged you. I say enraged. Because you aren’t debating. Your demanding that the world change everything to align with your idea of what is right and legal. Now either you are seriously disturbed with delusions of grandeur and this notion that you should be a potentate. Or there is another reason why some school crossing guard from California is so wrapped around the axle about a pretty much open and shut case from Georgia. There are miscarriages of justice in California if that was your motivation. So what is it really?
Why did they grab guns before they engaged in an attempted citizen's arrest...???
If you take it upon yourself to chase down a potentially violent armed criminal it's a good idea that you arm yourself
View attachment 432554
why do you hate guns?
My God you are an idiot. In every other reply you bounce back and forth. It was an attempted arrest. It wasn’t. They were pursuing a criminal. They were just standing in the street minding their own business. They knew he was a bad guy. He was not hemmed in. He was resisting a lawful arrest. They never tried to arrest him.
Honestly. I am thankful you are not the lawyer representing these men. If you were then they would get life in the electric chair.
what would you have done if someone grabbed your gun and started punching you in the face...hand it over?if they planned on shooting him why didn't they do it in their previous encounter... why would they take a shotgun loaded with a less lethal ammunition...
Thank you for proving that, along with everything you're fucking clueless about, you know nothing about firearms.
From the distance McMichael was standing, a blast from a 12 gauge shotgun is pretty much going to be fatal...
people who plan on murdering individuals do it with a completely different type of firearm and a completely different range
You need to stop.
Seriously, arguing your indiotic, nippleheaded points is tiresome enough, but now you've seemingly engaged on a campaign of seeing how absolutely fucking ignorant you can make yourself appear. People get murdered with shotguns. People get murdered with .357 Magnums. Interestingly, both of those weapons were in Travis McMichael's truck that day...
How did they chase a guy down when they were standing in the middle of the street and he was running directly at them?
Um, did you miss the part where, after Arbury ran past their house, they armed themselves and went after him?
The "went after him" part constitutes the "chase", dipshit.
You've pretty much demonstrated that, not only do you know very little about this case, you know nothing about guns, and you know nothing about the law. That wouldn't be a horrible thing in and of itself, except you're making the conscious decision to remain ignorant of those things because those things don't fit that narrative that you're presenting. In fact, they destroy your narrative.
You conveniently ignore the arguments against you points. You said Ramirez was the subject of a citizen's arrest, and that his arrest was pretty much the same as the citizen's arrest McMichael attempted. However, when it was pointed out that Ramirez was actually a wanted man, by virtue of a warrant for his arrest and Arbury was not, you run away like a cowardly bitch from defending your point. When you said Arbury was "wanted", that wasn't true. It was a lie.
Here are some undeniable truths which exist, regardless of your refusal to accept them:
1. Arbury was not wanted. There was no warrant issued for his arrest.
2. As far as Travis McMichael knew, there was no reason to suspect Arbury committed a crime that day.
3. The owner of the property in question has stated that nothing was stolen.
4. Thanks to "Roddy", there's video evidence of the McMichael boys chasing Arbury.
5. Thanks to "Roddy", there's video evidence of Travis McMichael exiting the pick-up and aiming a shotgun at Arbury.
6. Thanks to "Roddy", there is an eye witness who says McMichael used a racial slur towards Arbury, suggesting the motivation for the shooting was actually due to Arbury's race, and nothing else. Now, that may or may not be true, but you can bet your ignorant ass that the prosecution will present that at trial, and it's going to be damned difficult for McMichael to explain it away.
Your whole thing about how McMichael was just peacefully standing in the street, oh, and he had a shotgun with him, is utterly ridiculous. He got out of the truck and leveled his shotgun at Arbury. That was an absolute misuse of force. Or do you mean to tell me that two fat, white rednecks couldn't put a skinny black guy to the ground and hold him there?
As to the nonsense you keep spewing about a citizen's arrest, here's something for you to chew on: If you are making a citizen's arrest, you're required to inform the person what you are doing, and why. If Arbury was 30 yards away from McMichael when he got out of the truck, then fat-boy certainly had the chance to do that.
Yet he did not.
You must also tell them what offense you believe they've committed. McMichael had the opportunity to do that, too.
Yet he did not.
If you have to use force when arresting a person, you must only use reasonable force. Given that there were two people chasing him, and Arbury was unarmed, only a complete fucking idiot (say, like you) would believe that deadly force was the minimum level of force deemed to be reasonable to effect a citizen's arrest of Arbury.
Now, please, continue on with your mindless, ignorant rantings. All you're doing is further demonstrating not only how stupid and ignorant you are, but also how stupid and ignorant you wish to remain...
In this photo we can clearly see Travis McMichael in the middle of the road being attacked buy AA who is now trying to gain control over a deadly weapon
View attachment 432567
