The Sham Trial Against Trump

You do understand that this is a bench trial, right? That means the judge can issue rulings anytime they want to.
These hearings are to determine that amount of damages to be collected. Trump can appeal afterwards but these cases are rarely overturned on appeal.

The judge is not a TDS anti-Trump judge. If he were, Trump would have already had bench warrants issued against him and had his fat ass sat in a cell overnight until his legal team could convince him to keep his fucking mouth shut.
The judge did not want to be disqualified for outright lying about a defendant in his court room. Even this TDS judge wouldn't go as far as you TDS funtional moronic loons.
 
how many times was Trump indicted BEFORE becoming POTUS? All those years as a businessman and it NEVER HAPPENED until now.

anyone who cant see this shit show for what it is is being willfully ignorant.
The same can be said of George Santos.

The lesson is, if you're going to grift people, tell thousands of lies, and break laws big and small, is to stay out of the limelight.
 
His last bankruptcy was 2009, that was only 6 years before his run for president in the 2016 election..... Not something long in the past Foxy Lady.

Trump has had plenty of trouble getting loans in the U.S. Do a little research....
So, somehow Trump is 'Orange Man Bad' because he had trouble getting loans but NOW he's 'Orange Man Bad' because he easily got a loan. :cuckoo:
 
The judge did not want to be disqualified for outright lying about a defendant in his court room. Even this TDS judge wouldn't go as far as you TDS funtional moronic loons.
The judge is actually showing great restraint against an unruly defendant. Trump thinks he's putting on a show. When the only person his outrageous acts has any official effect on, is the judge.
 
And that's the whole thing isn't it. Whether the judge knows more about real estate or financial statement than does a 50 year veteran in high value real estate and

Welcome to the way Judicial system has worked for 247 years.

whether a judge who declared the defendant guilty before the trial even began

Because the claimant (NY AG) and respondent (FPOTUS#45 and the other respondents) BOTH asked for summary judgement based on the agreed to material facts. And again, there were 7 original claims and the Judge issued the requested ruling on only 1 of the 7, the other 6 are being addressed at trail.

and said just this week he wasn't there to hear anything the defendant had to say is to be trusted in any ruling he puts out.

And an reasonable person looks at the context of what the Judge was talking about instead of "snipping" something out of context. He was on the verge of dismissing him from the stand because he was not responding to questions asked and instead was going off on comments about the prosecution, the Judge, how he's a victim , and political speeches. The Judges comment is clearly related to the irrelevant remarks made by the witness who was refusing to answer questions.

After the morning break and a deep breath the Judge decided to let Trump rant away and get him on record as being unresponsive so that when Trump files an appeal for a mistrial his (Trump's) ramblings will be documented in the trial record.

In my opinion the judge should be ousted from the bench and disbarred.

Of course it is. And you are free to have the opinion. Luckily it ain't going to happen.

WW
 
Last edited:
And that's the whole thing isn't it. Whether the judge knows more about real estate or financial statement than does a 50 year veteran in high value real estate and whether a judge who declared the defendant guilty before the trial even began and said just this week he wasn't there to hear anything the defendant had to say is to be trusted in any ruling he puts out. In my opinion the judge should be ousted from the bench and disbarred.
You don’t have to be a real expert to know that inflating the size of his apartment by 300% to jack up the value is fraud.

You’re also mischaracterizing what the judge said about hearing Trump’s testimony. I think you not be very objective on this matter.
 
The judge is actually showing great restraint against an unruly defendant. Trump thinks he's putting on a show. When the only person his outrageous acts has any official effect on, is the judge.
The judge is the one putting on a show mugging for the camera. This guy is a joke along with the trial.
 
The same can be said of George Santos.

The lesson is, if you're going to grift people, tell thousands of lies, and break laws big and small, is to stay out of the limelight.
The lesson is, politicians will DO ANYTHING to protect their criminal enterprise!!!
 
You don’t have to be a real expert to know that inflating the size of his apartment by 300% to jack up the value is fraud.

You’re also mischaracterizing what the judge said about hearing Trump’s testimony. I think you not be very objective on this matter.
I have 25+ years doing RE appraisal and am licensed to do so. I get hired by banks to value properties and I can tell you NO bank is going to accept a borrower's estimate of the size of their RE collateral. They may give a loan based on many things such as the borrower's ability to pay back the loan, loan to value ratio, etc. If Trump said his apt. was 3,000 sq. ft. and it isn't and the bank loaned him money it's on the bank not the borrower. The bank should have hired an objective valuer who would personally measure the dwelling and give the bank their unbiased assessment. You guys are ignorant buffoons.
 
So, somehow Trump is 'Orange Man Bad' because he had trouble getting loans but NOW he's 'Orange Man Bad' because he easily got a loan. :cuckoo:
Actually his bankruptcy's hurt American banks. His legal games cost them money, and one by one they shut their doors to him.


Deutsche Bank has been Trump’s most important lender. The Trump Organization, fronted by his two older sons, owes the bank about $340m in outstanding loans. After a series of bankruptcies in the 1990s, it was the only bank willing to give Trump money.

In 2008, Trump sued the bank’s real estate division after he defaulted on a $40m repayment, used to fund the construction of the Trump International Hotel and Tower in Chicago.
 
I get hired by banks to value properties and I can tell you NO bank is going to accept a borrower's estimate of the size of their RE collateral.
The statement of financial condition details all them properties, not just the ones used as collateral.
If Trump said his apt. was 3,000 sq. ft. and it isn't and the bank loaned him money it's on the bank not the borrower.
The law says it’s on Trump.
None of that comes close to fraud.
It’s exactly what fraud is. Fraud is lying to get something. That’s exactly what he did. He lied to get the load. Whether you blame the banks for believing the lie is irrelevant. You don’t get to tell the lie in the first place.
 
Actually his bankruptcy's hurt American banks. His legal games cost them money, and one by one they shut their doors to him.


Deutsche Bank has been Trump’s most important lender. The Trump Organization, fronted by his two older sons, owes the bank about $340m in outstanding loans. After a series of bankruptcies in the 1990s, it was the only bank willing to give Trump money.

In 2008, Trump sued the bank’s real estate division after he defaulted on a $40m repayment, used to fund the construction of the Trump International Hotel and Tower in Chicago.
So what? The bank didn't want to be politically targeted by the drooling lying, asshole, TDSers. Give it up, you are way out of your depth here.
 
You don’t have to be a real expert to know that inflating the size of his apartment by 300% to jack up the value is fraud.

You’re also mischaracterizing what the judge said about hearing Trump’s testimony. I think you not be very objective on this matter.
And you don't know what was included in that "300%" all the TDS people spout here because that's what you heard or read.
 

Forum List

Back
Top