eagle1462010
Diamond Member
- May 17, 2013
- 69,100
- 34,039
Google Image Result for https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/768x768/public/d8/images/methode/2019/09/26/c9fc07cc-dffe-11e9-94c8-f27aa1da2f45_image_hires_104857.JPG?itok=nbvLl9Nf&v=1569466143
This is its promotional page. This is directly backed by the Saudi Government. Trump was very friendly to Saudi-Arabia. Trump suggests 'rogue killers' possibly involved with Khashoggi, says Saudi King denies involvement
And now he's doing business with them. Who's to say this isn't a reward for his friendliness?
How do you know this is true?
Just because you don't accept it doesn't mean it might not be true right. It's the same logic. I'm not trying to serve up a whataboutism. What I am trying to do is show how many assumptions you're making in the Biden case, by pointing out that you would NEVER apply this reasoning for Trump.
In my opinion this has an actual possible quid quo pro identified. If you're willing to make assumptions.
Feel free to site what quid quo pro (government action) you identify in the Biden case personally helpful to Hunters very much private Chinese business partner.