The suppressed news story that elected Biden

[Blisterfinger]

Here is a picture of Putin’s bitch and it doesn’t need to be photoshopped.

View attachment 962222

Putins bitches

 

[Moonglow]

So let's assume for the sake of argument that Biden won the 2020 election. Why did he win?

In October 2020 the New York Post broke the story of the contents of Biden's laptop.
The media and deep state and Democrats all went into full panic mode.
The Democrats put Facebook, Twitter, et al and all the media on notice to suppress the story. The alternate story put out by such as Politico, James Clapper, John Brennan et al is that the laptop was Russian disinformation and the MSM took that and ran with it.

Those of us on Facebook and Twitter had our posts removed and our accounts suspended for reporting the truth. We were even blocked from private messaging anybody re the laptop. We couldn't even discuss it in the private group rooms that Twitter provided so that we couldn't even chat 'anonymously' which obviously suddenly wasn't so anonymous.

And the November election came and went and those restrictions were never lifted while the Democrats set their sites on taking down Trump. Most Americans never saw the real laptop story.

Now because of Hunter's recent gun crime trial, the laptop is officially declared valid, untampered with, belongs to Hunter, and everything on it is admissible as evidence if pertinent to whatever charges are in play or should be in play.

Biden's DOJ of course won't touch it because they can't use the most damning information on it without screwing up whatever chances Joe Biden has for re-election, it would greatly help Trump, and they would be criticized for not investigating Biden for collusion, taking bribes, influence peddling and other illegal acts suggested or confirmed by the laptop.

And the media is still suppressing it. We of course can discuss it on X via Elon's free speech policy, but you still won't see it on Facebook or any of the other left leaning social media.

And now I will await the USMB troll brigade's 'fake news' icons and snarky denials, but the point is, if we had a free and open press in this country, Biden would not be President now and he would not be running for re-election.

The Media Buried What Was So Important About the Hunter Biden Laptop

The "so what" isn't Hunter's lurid photos. It's credible allegations of Joe's corruption.

drewholden.substack.com

You have no real evidence that the laptop would have defeated Biden just as you have no proof that being a convicted felon running for president will cause a victory.

 

[Blisterfinger]

You have no real evidence that the laptop would have defeated Biden just as you have no proof that being a convicted felon running for president will cause a victory.

You have no evidence that it did not. What happened sure looks despicable and dishonest for your side. Certainly not the first thing that makes you look bad.

 

[Foxfyre]

The Trump administration FBI task force, in a general warning ahead of the election, telling Facebook to look out for Russian disinformation, created an algorithm on Facebook to spot suspicious articles, which is what banned the Post article from Facebook for 5 to 7 days... and it wasn't completely banned, some people received it, but their algorithms did not spread it out to the masses is what Zuckerman is quoted as saying, in your article....

And doesn't your op say something different, and not true..... like the article was held back the whole month up to the election? When it was only 5 to 7 days?

Also, there are several articles discussing your contention that it kept people from reading the NY post article on Hunter, when the NYPost reports it was the most viewed article in the first 7 days of print, than any article in their history!!!

There is something called The Streisand Effect, that happens quite often in society....look it up for the full definition.... Basically in this case, because the article was banned, the hype of it being banned, promoted the banned article and readership of the article to higher levels, than if it had not been banned.

Immediately upon the FB ban, the word spread, and FB users simply went directly to the NYPOST site to read it.

Sooooo, in the end, your op is incorrect, on many levels.

Post’s exposé on Hunter Biden soars online despite social media censorship

Twitter and Facebook’s censorship of The Post’s exposé about Hunter Biden’s business dealings in Ukraine propelled the story to the top of those platforms last week, according to …

nypost.com

And lastly, here we are 4 years plus in to the laptop exposure and congress critter investigations in to hunter and daddy o, aka The Big Guy, and you still have zip, zero, nada evidence of Joe Biden corruption, that y'all have been lying about, just to smear Biden for what Trump was actually impeached for.... So the lap top netted you Nothing but a failed October surprise event, that Rudy Giuliani created by giving the laptop to the NYPOST. A failed retribution attempt!

There isn't zero evidence of Biden corruption. Just pretty much zero willingness on the part of the media to acknowledge it.

And I can assure you the suppression was not for just 5 to 7 days.

 

[JoeB131]

There isn't zero evidence of Biden corruption. Just pretty much zero willingness on the part of the media to acknowledge it.

And I can assure you the suppression was not for just 5 to 7 days.

Non=story.

A few exceprts taken out of context from emails along with some salacious personal pictures

 

[westwall]

fyi-
The fund is for all suits brought by workers/associates against congress, which are mostly discrimination suits/complaints, and not sexual abuse complaints, though they do exist as well.

Ummmmmm, that doesn't make it any better, silly person.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So let's assume for the sake of argument that Biden won the 2020 election. Why did he win?

In October 2020 the New York Post broke the story of the contents of Biden's laptop.
The media and deep state and Democrats all went into full panic mode.
The Democrats put Facebook, Twitter, et al and all the media on notice to suppress the story. The alternate story put out by such as Politico, James Clapper, John Brennan et al is that the laptop was Russian disinformation and the MSM took that and ran with it.

Those of us on Facebook and Twitter had our posts removed and our accounts suspended for reporting the truth. We were even blocked from private messaging anybody re the laptop. We couldn't even discuss it in the private group rooms that Twitter provided so that we couldn't even chat 'anonymously' which obviously suddenly wasn't so anonymous.

And the November election came and went and those restrictions were never lifted while the Democrats set their sites on taking down Trump. Most Americans never saw the real laptop story.

Now because of Hunter's recent gun crime trial, the laptop is officially declared valid, untampered with, belongs to Hunter, and everything on it is admissible as evidence if pertinent to whatever charges are in play or should be in play.

Biden's DOJ of course won't touch it because they can't use the most damning information on it without screwing up whatever chances Joe Biden has for re-election, it would greatly help Trump, and they would be criticized for not investigating Biden for collusion, taking bribes, influence peddling and other illegal acts suggested or confirmed by the laptop.

And the media is still suppressing it. We of course can discuss it on X via Elon's free speech policy, but you still won't see it on Facebook or any of the other left leaning social media.

And now I will await the USMB troll brigade's 'fake news' icons and snarky denials, but the point is, if we had a free and open press in this country, Biden would not be President now and he would not be running for re-election.

The Media Buried What Was So Important About the Hunter Biden Laptop

The "so what" isn't Hunter's lurid photos. It's credible allegations of Joe's corruption.

drewholden.substack.com

Hahaha

No the laptop story didn't give Biden 7 million votes and an EC landslide.

Come on.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There isn't zero evidence of Biden corruption

Wrong, of course.

Not a shred of evidence.

 

[BlindBoo]

Wrong, of course.

Not a shred of evidence.

The only smoke they had turned out to be from a smoke machine under Comers desk.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The only smoke they had turned out to be from a smoke machine under Comers desk.

Notice these guys like to say there is evidence.

But they never produce any.

They are mindlessly saying what they are told to say.

 

[eagle1462010]

The only smoke they had turned out to be from a smoke machine under Comers desk.

You mean that crooked FBI guy? Swamp creature Scum bag?

You guys love scum

 

[GWV5903]

Again, Jared's firm got 3 billion when he was making Middle East policy.

The Affinity Partners firm was established July 1 2021, that’s after President Trump left office. He wasn’t “making Middle East policy” as you claim at that time.

And the Saudis were certainly getting their money's worth.

I believe they invested heavily to make a return, just like their other investments. Again are we going to question Bill Gates on the Saudis investment in Microsoft as well as the other US based companies?

They were able to kill that Journalist with no repercussions and get the US to support their blockade of Qatar.

Khashoggi’s disappearance from the Turkish embassy is questionable, I agree. There is nothing solid to prove anything in this accusation though. As for the Qatar blockade Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt and Bahrain as a group distanced themselves because of their terrorist funding. Are you suggesting the blockade was wrong?

Shokin was fired because the IMF, EU, and even Republicans in Congress insisted he be fired after his two top deputies were caught with millions in uncut diamonds and foreign currency.

There are clear questions as to why Hunter Biden was on the board of a Ukrainian energy company who’s owner was under investigation from Shokin’s predecessor as well as the following General Prosecutor, to date nothing has materialized against Zlochevskiy, sounds more like Shokin got closer than anyone else.

They were unwilling to send more money if what they were sending was getting stolen.

So tell me if this is true, nothing has happened to Zlochevskiy and it’s been over 8 years, your story stinks, when are you going to admit the obvious? It’s hard to accept that you are wrong, but Hunter Biden is a terrible influence peddler, my opinion he was bought for pennies on the dollar, most individuals that will stoop to this level would cover their tracks better, the Biden’s are so cavalier it’s ridiculous.

 

[Hector12]

Hunter Biden laptop controversy​

Trump attempted to turn the story into an October surprise to hurt Joe Biden's campaign by falsely alleging that while in office Biden had acted corruptly regarding Ukraine to protect his son.[12][13][14] A joint investigation by two Republican Senate committees released in September 2020 did not find wrongdoing by Joe Biden with regards to Ukraine and his son's business dealings there.[15] Despite persistent allegations that the laptop contents indicated corruption by Joe Biden, a Republican House Oversight committee investigation in April 2024 also found no wrongdoing.[16][17][18][19] PolitiFact wrote in June 2021 that, while "over time, there has been less doubt that the laptop did in fact belong to Hunter Biden", the laptop "was real in the sense that it exists, but it didn't prove much", as "[n]othing from the laptop has revealed illegal or unethical behavior by Joe Biden as vice president with regard to his son's tenure as a director for Burisma".[20]

Hunter Biden laptop controversy - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[JoeB131]

The Affinity Partners firm was established July 1 2021, that’s after President Trump left office. He wasn’t “making Middle East policy” as you claim at that time.

You don't know a payoff when you see one. Most of the work Hunter did was after Joe left office, and oh yeah, HUNTER WAS NEVER IN OFFICE!!!

Khashoggi’s disappearance from the Turkish embassy is questionable, I agree. There is nothing solid to prove anything in this accusation though. As for the Qatar blockade Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt and Bahrain as a group distanced themselves because of their terrorist funding. Are you suggesting the blockade was wrong?

Absolutely. Qatar has been an ally in the War on Terror while the Saudis couldn't get us off their territory fast enough.

There are clear questions as to why Hunter Biden was on the board of a Ukrainian energy company who’s owner was under investigation from Shokin’s predecessor as well as the following General Prosecutor, to date nothing has materialized against Zlochevskiy, sounds more like Shokin got closer than anyone else.

Um, no. Hunter was brought on the board because Bursima wanted to comply with western standards to do business there.

So tell me if this is true, nothing has happened to Zlochevskiy and it’s been over 8 years, your story stinks, when are you going to admit the obvious? It’s hard to accept that you are wrong, but Hunter Biden is a terrible influence peddler, my opinion he was bought for pennies on the dollar, most individuals that will stoop to this level would cover their tracks better, the Biden’s are so cavalier it’s ridiculous.

Who the fuck is Zlochevsky?

Shokin was fired by the Rada because he was corrupt, and the West (not just Biden) wouldn't send more aid until he was replaced. He was never investigating Hunter's clients.

 

[berg80]

The rationale for the fabricated story about media suppression of Hunter's laptop isn't really about suppression. It's about the fact that the accusations made over claims there was evidence on the laptop implicating Joe Biden in crimes are completely false.

The complaints from President Donald Trump and his allies have been growing louder as the election approaches: Why isn’t the mainstream media covering the Hunter Biden laptop story?

Trump and his allies say there is evidence of corruption in emails and documents allegedly found on a laptop belonging to Democrat Joe Biden’s son. They say those and other documents show that Hunter Biden used his father’s influence to enrich himself through business deals in Ukraine and China, and that his father not only facilitated that, but may have benefited financially.

But the Wall Street Journal and Fox News — among the only news organizations that have been given access to key documents — found that the emails and other records don’t make that case. Leaving aside the many questions about their provenance, the materials offered no evidence that Joe Biden played any role in his son’s dealings in China, let alone profited from them, both news organizations concluded.

Here's why the media isn't reporting on the Hunter Biden emails

Analysis: Trump complains the media isn't reporting on Hunter Biden's emails. But NBC News met obstacles, including Rudy Giuliani, when it tried.

www.nbcnews.com

Ex-Twitter execs deny pressure to block Hunter Biden story​

Ex-Twitter execs deny pressure to block Hunter Biden story

Former Twitter executives conceded to Congress that they made a mistake by blocking a story about Hunter Biden, the president’s son, from the social media platform in the run-up to the 2020 election.

apnews.com

No directive: FBI agents, tech executives deny government ordered Twitter to suppress Hunter Biden story​

No directive: FBI agents, tech executives deny government ordered Twitter to suppress Hunter Biden story | CNN Politics

Internal Twitter communications released by the company's new owner and CEO, Elon Musk, are fueling intense scrutiny of the FBI's efforts alongside social media companies to thwart foreign disinformation in the run-up to the 2020 election.

www.cnn.com

 

[GWV5903]

Again, Jared's firm got 3 billion when he was making Middle East policy.

Is reading a calendar that difficult for you? He was out of office for over 5 months.

You don't know a payoff when you see one. Most of the work Hunter did was after Joe left office, and oh yeah, HUNTER WAS NEVER IN OFFICE!!!

What did they pay him off for? Do you have any proof, “unnamed sources”? You’re so weak on the subject it’s embarrassing.

Qatar has been an ally in the War on Terror while the Saudis couldn't get us off their territory fast enough.

Qatar aided Iran and admitted to aiding The Muslim Brotherhood, the blockade was irrelevant to this discussion

Um, no. Hunter was brought on the board because Bursima wanted to comply with western standards to do business there.

Sure he was, his history as a board member was on Amtrak’s as a Vice Chairman, an appointment based on his last name only. You’ll have to do better than that.

Who the fuck is Zlochevsky?

Your ability to make an ass out of yourself is second to none. He’s, was the owner of Burisma, catch up Joe….

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Is reading a calendar that difficult for you? He was out of office for over 5 months.

Wow! 5 WHOLE.MONTHS

I wonder if he even remembered meeting with the Saudis in an official capacity by then?!?!

I mean, 5 whole months! Wow!

 

[Delldude]

You have no real evidence that the laptop would have defeated Biden just as you have no proof that being a convicted felon running for president will cause a victory.

Several polls on how people would have voted if the truth was known. Something like 23-25% said they would have voted different. Would it make a difference? Hard to say.

But just remember, the gov't and media covered up the whole story and don't you even think for an instant they'd be complicit in election fraud.

 

[Moonglow]

Several polls on how people would have voted if the truth was known. Something like 23-25% said they would have voted different. Would it make a difference? Hard to say.

But just remember, the gov't and media covered up the whole story and don't you even think for an instant they'd be complicit in election fraud.

The Electoral College elects the presiden not the popular vote.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Something like 23-25% said they would have voted different.