Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am so glad the GOP held up Obama's nominee. Yes I realize turnabout may end up murking us but we needed that seat to keep some balance. Now we just need a few of those old geezers to retire while Trump is still in office.
Good times in America right now.
Hatred and envy suit you.I am so glad the GOP held up Obama's nominee. Yes I realize turnabout may end up murking us but we needed that seat to keep some balance. Now we just need a few of those old geezers to retire while Trump is still in office.
Good times in America right now.
Put all Wasps on it, then we can be an ultra religious country.
Hatred and envy suit you.Put all Wasps on it, then we can be an ultra religious country.
Sotomayor is the worst. Her decision on the travel ban was based on pure emotion and was made along party lines. She forgot her job was to interpret our laws, not base her decisions on her own personal beliefs. Sotomayor said that Trump's policy “now masquerades behind a facade of national security concerns.”. She used his previous words against him in her decision. However, she gave Obama a pass on her Obamacare mandate decision. Obama sold the mandate consistently as a "penalty". However, the mandate as a penalty would never pass the SCOTUS. So, Obama's lawyers argued it was a tax to the SCOTUS. Sotomayor of course agrees ignoring that Obama sold it to the American public as a penalty.
Sotomayor goes on to say, “As here, the exclusion was rooted in dangerous stereotypes about, inter alia, a particular group’s supposed inability to assimilate and desire to harm the United States.”
Stereotypes? The Travel Ban only includes 6 Muslim countries and about 8% of the Muslim population. 92% of the world's Muslims can come and go as they please. The numbers don't support Sotomayor's argument.
Furthermore, if those banned countries can start producing documentation for the travelers, they'll be taken of the list. Again, we just want to know who is coming here and make sure they've been vetted.
It's truly sad that half the SCOTUS is rooted deep in party lines.
Yes making a mockery of the SC worked out for republicans this time. Precedent is set. SC Justices will now only be confirmed when the Senate and President are from the same party. You opposed activist Justices, but now the only type of Justice that will ever join the SC are activist Justices.I am so glad the GOP held up Obama's nominee. Yes I realize turnabout may end up murking us but we needed that seat to keep some balance. Now we just need a few of those old geezers to retire while Trump is still in office.
Good times in America right now.
Sotomayor is the worst. Her decision on the travel ban was based on pure emotion and was made along party lines. She forgot her job was to interpret our laws, not base her decisions on her own personal beliefs. Sotomayor said that Trump's policy “now masquerades behind a facade of national security concerns.”. She used his previous words against him in her decision. However, she gave Obama a pass on her Obamacare mandate decision. Obama sold the mandate consistently as a "penalty". However, the mandate as a penalty would never pass the SCOTUS. So, Obama's lawyers argued it was a tax to the SCOTUS. Sotomayor of course agrees ignoring that Obama sold it to the American public as a penalty.
Sotomayor goes on to say, “As here, the exclusion was rooted in dangerous stereotypes about, inter alia, a particular group’s supposed inability to assimilate and desire to harm the United States.”
Stereotypes? The Travel Ban only includes 6 Muslim countries and about 8% of the Muslim population. 92% of the world's Muslims can come and go as they please. The numbers don't support Sotomayor's argument.
Furthermore, if those banned countries can start producing documentation for the travelers, they'll be taken of the list. Again, we just want to know who is coming here and make sure they've been vetted. It's not Sotomayor job to decide if the ban will work, she just needs to decide if the President has the authority to enact a policy he believes will protect the American public.
It's truly sad that half the SCOTUS is rooted deep in party lines.
Sotomayor is the worst. Her decision on the travel ban was based on pure emotion and was made along party lines. She forgot her job was to interpret our laws, not base her decisions on her own personal beliefs. Sotomayor said that Trump's policy “now masquerades behind a facade of national security concerns.”. She used his previous words against him in her decision. However, she gave Obama a pass on her Obamacare mandate decision. Obama sold the mandate consistently as a "penalty". However, the mandate as a penalty would never pass the SCOTUS. So, Obama's lawyers argued it was a tax to the SCOTUS. Sotomayor of course agrees ignoring that Obama sold it to the American public as a penalty.
Sotomayor goes on to say, “As here, the exclusion was rooted in dangerous stereotypes about, inter alia, a particular group’s supposed inability to assimilate and desire to harm the United States.”
Stereotypes? The Travel Ban only includes 6 Muslim countries and about 8% of the Muslim population. 92% of the world's Muslims can come and go as they please. The numbers don't support Sotomayor's argument.
Furthermore, if those banned countries can start producing documentation for the travelers, they'll be taken of the list. Again, we just want to know who is coming here and make sure they've been vetted. It's not Sotomayor job to decide if the ban will work, she just needs to decide if the President has the authority to enact a policy he believes will protect the American public.
It's truly sad that half the SCOTUS is rooted deep in party lines.
In 2001, Sotomayor, an appeals court judge at the time made this statement - “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life,"
...then in 2005...a video surfaced of Judge Sotomayor asserting in 2005 that a “court of appeals is where policy is made.” She then immediately adds: “And I know — I know this is on tape, and I should never say that because we don’t make law. I know. O.K. I know. I’m not promoting it. I’m not advocating it. I’m — you know.”
Sotomayor’s View of Judging Is on the Record
Not a ringing endorsement for a seat on the Supreme Court.
I am so glad the GOP held up Obama's nominee. Yes I realize turnabout may end up murking us
His middle name.I am so glad the GOP held up Obama's nominee. Yes I realize turnabout may end up murking us
What in the blue fuck is "murking"?
If you left that shack once in a while you would know.I am so glad the GOP held up Obama's nominee. Yes I realize turnabout may end up murking us
What in the blue fuck is "murking"?
If you left that shack once in a while you would know.I am so glad the GOP held up Obama's nominee. Yes I realize turnabout may end up murking us
What in the blue fuck is "murking"?
He does in sunglasses and a hoodie.If you left that shack once in a while you would know.I am so glad the GOP held up Obama's nominee. Yes I realize turnabout may end up murking us
What in the blue fuck is "murking"?
Do you know what is happening to the Losers via the SCOTUS these days?If you left that shack once in a while you would know.I am so glad the GOP held up Obama's nominee. Yes I realize turnabout may end up murking us
What in the blue fuck is "murking"?
So you have no clue either. I figured that but it doesn't answer the question. Realizing of course that such answer may not even exist.
Pogo it has only taken since 1987 when the conservative side of the isle learned what it was like to be Borked… They didn't learn diddly squat… Just in the last 8 years have they began to hold their own... Things are getting better though... You can tell by the emotional response's of the progressives...
