And I asked you questions first. As for the need of a Department of Education, to keep the nation's schools competitive and the nation educated. Has that effort failed...maybe, maybe not - it depends on how you look at it.Wait, I was asking you questions, as a Tea Party lemming. Read for comprehension, I am not advocating alphabet agencies...I am asking you teapers to offer an alternative....which of course, you guys won't offer.
I have noticed the game you teapers play...someone asks you a question and you respond with a nonsense question instead of an answer. And you guys wonder why people think the teapers are suspect.
You also said most of the agencies were created to meet a need, now answer my question, what are the three major accomplishments of the DOE?
Now are you going to answer my questions or continue to play the nonsense Teaper game.
Actually after almost 35 years and 1.5 trillion dollars, graduation rates and test scores are lower with no real improvement in sight. The DOE has proven itself to worthless time and again, yet we throw more money at it every year. One of Reagans biggest failures, in my opinion was not dismantling it like he promised, the dems wouldn't let him.