eots
no fly list
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What does it matter ?
If he's a good scientist, he is a good scientist.
What is the difference between believing in God or believing in martians ?
Or Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy, for that matter...
I think there is a thing called "Evidence".
Is there a question on the job application about whether or not you believe there are Quakers on the moon ? If not, then it must not seem that NASA really cares.
So who are you and why does anyone owe you an explanation.
You can't even prove you are smart.
I like this thread. It is the perfect platform to present the real "Truth About Mormans".
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Or Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy, for that matter...
I think there is a thing called "Evidence".
Is there a question on the job application about whether or not you believe there are Quakers on the moon ? If not, then it must not seem that NASA really cares.
So who are you and why does anyone owe you an explanation.
You can't even prove you are smart.
Oh, I believe I have many times. My belief in science isn't part of my job description. If I lacked a basic understanding of the things related to my job, I wouldn't have a job. Are we really still arguing the "Quakers on teh Moon" issue here? I thought you guys all claimed Smith didn't say that even though the Mormon cult for decades claimed he did.
You may be smart, but you mistake your beliefs in atheism as fact, for instance. You believe that deity does not exist. Don't whine about trying to disprove a negative, when you can't even prove a positive, kiddo.
The issue about who is an atheist, who is a Mormon, or whether Uncensored and bigreb share digs on the dark side of the moon ~~ has nothing to do with the presidency and who holds it.
just as you can not prove the opposite.Once again you demonstrate the weakness of your analytical ability.
Accept the fact what you believe about Romney is not going to affect the candidacy of the GOP and that Mormonism itself is not going to drive folks into the hands of the Dem. You can assert it, but you can't prove it.
Once again you demonstrate the weakness of your analytical ability.
Accept the fact what you believe about Romney is not going to affect the candidacy of the GOP and that Mormonism itself is not going to drive folks into the hands of the Dem. You can assert it, but you can't prove it.
Holy Smokes it's been a long time... I gotta get caught up... I Recently moved and a lot has gone on since I was up in here.. I guess this thread really isn't about me... wink... it just seems to keep on kicking with our without me. Marvelous ain't it?
The Garden of Eden was not in Missouri and anyone who thinks it was is not fit to be President
Or Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy, for that matter...
I think there is a thing called "Evidence".
Is there a question on the job application about whether or not you believe there are Quakers on the moon ? If not, then it must not seem that NASA really cares.
So who are you and why does anyone owe you an explanation.
You can't even prove you are smart.
Oh, I believe I have many times.
My belief in science isn't part of my job description. If I lacked a basic understanding of the things related to my job, I wouldn't have a job.
Are we really still arguing the "Quakers on teh Moon" issue here? I thought you guys all claimed Smith didn't say that even though the Mormon cult for decades claimed he did.
You may be smart, but you mistake your beliefs in atheism as fact, for instance. You believe that deity does not exist. Don't whine about trying to disprove a negative, when you can't even prove a positive, kiddo.
The issue about who is an atheist, who is a Mormon, or whether Uncensored and bigreb share digs on the dark side of the moon ~~ has nothing to do with the presidency and who holds it.
Guy, it's not my job to prove everything I don't think exists.
If I have to prove there isn't a God. You have to prove there isn't a Zeus, Odin, Krishna, Amaterasu, Ba'al, Marduk, Osiris, Bhudda, and every other God you obviously don't believe in. There are a bunch of Gods you don't believe in, I just believe in one less than you do.
Clearly, you should come to the table with proof all these Gods don't exist, either, you your own questionable reasoning.
Or you should come to the table with proof your God exists.
Now, leaving the issue of God alone, there's a bunch of secular stuff in the Book of Mormon that is either provable or not provable.
You have to accept that there were people called Nephites and Lamanites who precded the Native Americans, built huge towered cities that left no trace and rode on horse and elephants, grew grain and barely, rode in chariots and wagons, traded in gold coin, and so on, none of which is supported by the archeological evidence.
Romney believes that this stuff is true. Which makes me question his reasoning skills. And frankly, the mental handstands I've seen guys like Listening and Avatar go through to try to rationalize why this must all still be true despite the lack of evidence or logic, makes me wonder, if similar gymnastics are going on inside Romney's head, and whether I want that head anywhere near the button that blows up the world.