The Truth Staring You In The Face

[PoliticalChic]

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

Well you did accidentally get one right. They are "full-blown anti-white racism".

The rest is partisan nonsense.

I can prove every single one, so that makes you either a liar or a fool.

Just between us, which one is it?

 

[alang1216]

Ocasio is an intellectual and policy leader of the Democrat Party....and a perfect one for that entity.

You may view her that way but that is wishful thinking. At best she is a vocal member of a segment of the Dems. She has been vilified by the Right and that has made her as popular among Dems as she is.

I didn't say it....those quotes are all linked and sourced.

But don't wipe the egg off your face.....it's an improvement.

So you don't view her as an intellectual and policy leader of the Democrat Party? And here I actually believed you could think for yourself. I guess I do have egg on my face.

What a stupid attempt at a come-back.

Be satisfied that you're the Michael Jordan of Chutes and Ladders.

Stupid or not, at least I'm willing to own my words.

 

[BlindBoo]

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

Well you did accidentally get one right. They are "full-blown anti-white racism".

The rest is partisan nonsense.

I can prove every single one, so that makes you either a liar or a fool.

Just between us, which one is it?

Just prove one. Infanticide. The Democrat party does not support infanticide.

Democrats are not the party of infanticide

The GOP has branded the Democrats as the party of infanticide. That's all.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Ocasio is an intellectual and policy leader of the Democrat Party....and a perfect one for that entity.

You may view her that way but that is wishful thinking. At best she is a vocal member of a segment of the Dems. She has been vilified by the Right and that has made her as popular among Dems as she is.

I didn't say it....those quotes are all linked and sourced.

But don't wipe the egg off your face.....it's an improvement.

So you don't view her as an intellectual and policy leader of the Democrat Party? And here I actually believed you could think for yourself. I guess I do have egg on my face.

What a stupid attempt at a come-back.

Be satisfied that you're the Michael Jordan of Chutes and Ladders.

Stupid or not, at least I'm willing to own my words.

Another vapid post.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

Well you did accidentally get one right. They are "full-blown anti-white racism".

The rest is partisan nonsense.

I can prove every single one, so that makes you either a liar or a fool.

Just between us, which one is it?

Just prove one. Infanticide. The Democrat party does not support infanticide.

Democrats are not the party of infanticide

The GOP has branded the Democrats as the party of infanticide. That's all.

Watch me!

1. Hussein Obama supported infanticide.

2. Obama named Peter Singer, champion of infanticide, as his 'science adviser.'

3. The Democrat administration in Virginia offered a law for...in favor of....infanticide....stopped by Republicans.

4. The Democrat governor of Virginia agreed with the bill for infanticide.

5. "New York abortion law changes allow infanticide"
New York abortion law changes allow infanticide

6. "Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats"
Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats





In your face, booooooyyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeee!!!!!!

 

[night_son]

1. And the truth is that the Democrat Party is anti-knowledge, anti-education, socialist, and simply....stooooopid.

And they could not have chosen a more representative Representative than Ocasio.




2. "AOC Downplays Luxury Apartment, Says Everyone Should Have One
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D., N.Y.) downplayed the amenities available in her expensive Washington, D.C., apartment building last week, saying her unit was comparable to apartments in a new public housing complex in New York City.

Ocasio-Cortez made the comparison during a Bronx town hall, saying people have been conditioned to view things that should be available to everyone as "luxury" amenities.

"What we have been taught that [sic] is a luxury should not be a luxury," Ocasio-Cortez said.
"Another world is possible," she said. "We can live in buildings that are not-for-profit, or tenant-owned, there are so many ways we can slice this and we can structure it in a way where all people have the right to a dignified home."
AOC Downplays Luxury Apartment, Says Everyone Should Have One




3. With metronomic regularity, we see Liberals demand whatever they can imagine.....with no connection to what it requires to create their imaginings, to bring them to fruition.
Remember Hussein claiming that what Trump promised would require a 'magic wand'?
A 'magic wand' is what Democrats have as the basis for their promises, in place of economics.



4. Almost as free from reality as her Green New Deal, this is the cost associated with her "Says Everyone Should Have One" plan:
"The building does not offer affordable units under the city's Affordable Dwelling Units program, the Washington Examiner reported.

Prices in the complex range from around $2,000 for a small studio to over $5,000 for a three-bedroom. Ocasio-Cortez says she moved there because of the 24/7 lobby security."





5. "Ocasio-Cortez Severely Burned After Accidentally Touching Book On Basic Economics
August 8th, 2018

NEW YORK, NY—Democratic candidate for Congress Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was in the middle of a run-of-the-mill interview—blankly staring at the interviewer for a minute straight after being asked how she’d pay for all the social programs she’s proposing—when disaster struck. She noticed a book on a table nearby and reached over to pick it up before anyone could stop her.

“Aieeee! It burns ussss!” Ocasio-Cortez screamed as her hand burst into flames from touching the book on rudimentary economic concepts. She claimed she had never seen one of those “dreadful things” before and wasn’t aware how much damage it could do.

She was immediately rushed to the hospital.

“As socialism has become increasingly popular, we’ve been seeing more and more of this,” said Doctor Pauline Hudson, who treated Ocasio-Cortez for third-degree burns. “Often it’s a severe-allergic reaction to math. Socialist policies are all well and good, but if you adopt them, you want to stay far away from even basic economic idea like supply and demand. It’s not pretty what happens when the two collide.”

Ocasio-Cortez is expected to make a full-recovery and seems undaunted by the incident, already proposing even more programs she thinks the government should pay for, like dog-walking. In the future, she says she’ll be more careful. Luckily, Ocasio-Cortez is expected to easily win her heavily Democratic district which means she’s headed for our nation’s Capitol, a place that’s traditionally been a safe space from economics and math."
Ocasio-Cortez Severely Burned After Accidentally Touching Book On Basic Economics




Does one have to be a fool to vote Democrat?


Pretty much.

Most all the answers one could seek regarding the senseless madness arisen as standard running platforms of the modern Democratic Party can be found in even a cursory examination of Moral Relativism both as a philosophy and neo-religion. Think about it for a moment. If any act one wishes to commit no matter how self-destructive or harmful to others can be justified away as situationally necessary, then why not apply the same (lack of) reasoning to just about every other epistemological foundational approach?

Factual Relativism

Cultural Relativism

Historical Relativism

Using the above tools, the radical American Left, fueled by the postmodern ramblings of contemporary French writers, philosophers and professors who gifted to the world Pol Pot and his crew . . . the Democrat Intelligentsia and its surrogate political candidates can not only justify any departure from reason, logic, truth and reality, but can also recreate "facts" on the fly and change history to suit their meta narrative moment to moment. Further, we ought to add what I call Legal Relativism as well, which I've come to think of as the doctrine of using the tendency of the American People to follow the law as a weapon against them, wherein such laws are passed which enforce and legalize pure evil, but which We The People feel we've no choice but to follow anyway . . . because that's what Americans are trained from young age to do.

 

[BlindBoo]

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

Well you did accidentally get one right. They are "full-blown anti-white racism".

The rest is partisan nonsense.

I can prove every single one, so that makes you either a liar or a fool.

Just between us, which one is it?

Just prove one. Infanticide. The Democrat party does not support infanticide.

Democrats are not the party of infanticide

The GOP has branded the Democrats as the party of infanticide. That's all.

Watch me!

1. Hussein Obama supported infanticide.

2. Obama named Peter Singer, champion of infanticide, as his 'science adviser.'

3. The Democrat administration in Virginia offered a law for...in favor of....infanticide....stopped by Republicans.

4. The Democrat governor of Virginia agreed with the bill for infanticide.

5. "New York abortion law changes allow infanticide"
New York abortion law changes allow infanticide

6. "Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats"
Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats





In your face, booooooyyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeee!!!!!!

Watch you lie, again.

1. No.
2. John Holdren was Obama's science adviser. You've touted this lie before too. Some people never learn do they?
3. There is no provision allowing for legal homicide of any child born alive in any bill under consideration now or in the recent past.
4. No he didn't talk about infanticide at all.
5. Neither did the law in NY.
6. Congress passed the same type bill protecting babies born alive by unanimous consent a decade or two ago.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

Well you did accidentally get one right. They are "full-blown anti-white racism".

The rest is partisan nonsense.

I can prove every single one, so that makes you either a liar or a fool.

Just between us, which one is it?

Just prove one. Infanticide. The Democrat party does not support infanticide.

Democrats are not the party of infanticide

The GOP has branded the Democrats as the party of infanticide. That's all.

I read the link you provided, and found three lies in the most superficial of views.


I guess you are one of the two categories I proposed.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

Well you did accidentally get one right. They are "full-blown anti-white racism".

The rest is partisan nonsense.

I can prove every single one, so that makes you either a liar or a fool.

Just between us, which one is it?

Just prove one. Infanticide. The Democrat party does not support infanticide.

Democrats are not the party of infanticide

The GOP has branded the Democrats as the party of infanticide. That's all.

Watch me!

1. Hussein Obama supported infanticide.

2. Obama named Peter Singer, champion of infanticide, as his 'science adviser.'

3. The Democrat administration in Virginia offered a law for...in favor of....infanticide....stopped by Republicans.

4. The Democrat governor of Virginia agreed with the bill for infanticide.

5. "New York abortion law changes allow infanticide"
New York abortion law changes allow infanticide

6. "Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats"
Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats





In your face, booooooyyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeee!!!!!!

Watch you lie, again.

1. No.
2. John Holdren was Obama's science adviser. You've touted this lie before too. Some people never learn do they?
3. There is no provision allowing for legal homicide of any child born alive in any bill under consideration now or in the recent past.
4. No he didn't talk about infanticide at all.
5. Neither did the law in NY.
6. Congress passed the same type bill protecting babies born alive by unanimous consent a decade or two ago.

1. Hussein Obama supported infanticide.


Certainly did.

If a child is 'accidentally' born alive as a result of a botched abortion attempt, Senator Obama had no problem allowing that newborn to die, sans any medical attention.


1. referencing Obama’s opposition to Illinois’ proposed version of a “born alive” law, intended to require doctors to administer immediate medical care to any infant that survived an intended abortion....FactCheck.org found holes in Obama’s explanations as to why he did not support the “born alive” legislation..."
FACT CHECK: Gingrich Claim on Obama Infanticide Vote A Stretch - Naureen Khan - NationalJournal.com

FACT CHECK: Gingrich Claim on Obama Infanticide Vote A Stretch

a. "Obama voted in committee against the 2003 state bill that was nearly identical to the federal act he says he would have supported. Both contained identical clauses saying that nothing in the bills could be construed to affect legal rights of an unborn fetus, according to an undisputed summary written immediately after the committee’s 2003 mark-up session."
FactCheck.org : Obama and ‘Infanticide’

Links to Barack Obama's votes on Illinois' Born Alive Infant Protection Act - Jill Stanek - Jill Stanek





Pay special attention to the vid @ :50

"...if a baby is born alive after a late term abortion, we can throw it away...Barack Obama approved that..."

2:01

2:40

3:55

5:28

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

Well you did accidentally get one right. They are "full-blown anti-white racism".

The rest is partisan nonsense.

I can prove every single one, so that makes you either a liar or a fool.

Just between us, which one is it?

Just prove one. Infanticide. The Democrat party does not support infanticide.

Democrats are not the party of infanticide

The GOP has branded the Democrats as the party of infanticide. That's all.

Watch me!

1. Hussein Obama supported infanticide.

2. Obama named Peter Singer, champion of infanticide, as his 'science adviser.'

3. The Democrat administration in Virginia offered a law for...in favor of....infanticide....stopped by Republicans.

4. The Democrat governor of Virginia agreed with the bill for infanticide.

5. "New York abortion law changes allow infanticide"
New York abortion law changes allow infanticide

6. "Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats"
Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats





In your face, booooooyyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeee!!!!!!

Watch you lie, again.

1. No.
2. John Holdren was Obama's science adviser. You've touted this lie before too. Some people never learn do they?
3. There is no provision allowing for legal homicide of any child born alive in any bill under consideration now or in the recent past.
4. No he didn't talk about infanticide at all.
5. Neither did the law in NY.
6. Congress passed the same type bill protecting babies born alive by unanimous consent a decade or two ago.

"John Holdren was Obama's science adviser. You've touted this lie before too. Some people never learn do they?"

You lie.


“Peter Singer Joins Obama's Health Care Administrators” http://www.experienceproject.com/stories/Am-Not-A-Fan-Of-Peter-Singer/657290



President Barack Obama yesterday appointed ten members to the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues.... Obama appointed the ethically insane Amy Gutman chairman of this Bioethics Commission..... Gutmann chose Peter Singer, bringing him in from Australia. He had become the world's most famous "bioethicist" by calling for the murder of infants whose disabilities were a burden to their elders, and by his sensational animal-rights attack on the "prejudice" of placing any special value on human life." http://archive.larouchepac.com/node/14122



"Obama's 'bio-ethics' adviser, Peter Singer is an Atheist, and he has some very interesting ideas. Do you know who that 'man' is?" Atheism Fails

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

Well you did accidentally get one right. They are "full-blown anti-white racism".

The rest is partisan nonsense.

I can prove every single one, so that makes you either a liar or a fool.

Just between us, which one is it?

Just prove one. Infanticide. The Democrat party does not support infanticide.

Democrats are not the party of infanticide

The GOP has branded the Democrats as the party of infanticide. That's all.

Watch me!

1. Hussein Obama supported infanticide.

2. Obama named Peter Singer, champion of infanticide, as his 'science adviser.'

3. The Democrat administration in Virginia offered a law for...in favor of....infanticide....stopped by Republicans.

4. The Democrat governor of Virginia agreed with the bill for infanticide.

5. "New York abortion law changes allow infanticide"
New York abortion law changes allow infanticide

6. "Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats"
Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats





In your face, booooooyyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeee!!!!!!

Watch you lie, again.

1. No.
2. John Holdren was Obama's science adviser. You've touted this lie before too. Some people never learn do they?
3. There is no provision allowing for legal homicide of any child born alive in any bill under consideration now or in the recent past.
4. No he didn't talk about infanticide at all.
5. Neither did the law in NY.
6. Congress passed the same type bill protecting babies born alive by unanimous consent a decade or two ago.

"4. No he didn't talk about infanticide at all."


You lie.


"...according to [Democrat] Gov. Northam, whether a newborn gets the chance to live or not is a matter for “discussion.” Precious moments slip by as the infant is fighting for her life on the delivery table, but the mother and doctor are discussing whether or not she should live? At this point we are no longer talking about abortion or a woman’s body. We are talking about a child who has clearly become the patient.” What Happens to a Child Born-alive? The Media Won’t Tell Us.






This is the position of the Democrat Party: a discussion after the child is born.


"...whether a newborn gets the chance to live or not is a matter for “discussion.”

"...the infant is fighting for her life on the delivery table,..."


It's called infanticide. That's the reality.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

Well you did accidentally get one right. They are "full-blown anti-white racism".

The rest is partisan nonsense.

I can prove every single one, so that makes you either a liar or a fool.

Just between us, which one is it?

Just prove one. Infanticide. The Democrat party does not support infanticide.

Democrats are not the party of infanticide

The GOP has branded the Democrats as the party of infanticide. That's all.

Watch me!

1. Hussein Obama supported infanticide.

2. Obama named Peter Singer, champion of infanticide, as his 'science adviser.'

3. The Democrat administration in Virginia offered a law for...in favor of....infanticide....stopped by Republicans.

4. The Democrat governor of Virginia agreed with the bill for infanticide.

5. "New York abortion law changes allow infanticide"
New York abortion law changes allow infanticide

6. "Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats"
Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats





In your face, booooooyyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeee!!!!!!

Watch you lie, again.

1. No.
2. John Holdren was Obama's science adviser. You've touted this lie before too. Some people never learn do they?
3. There is no provision allowing for legal homicide of any child born alive in any bill under consideration now or in the recent past.
4. No he didn't talk about infanticide at all.
5. Neither did the law in NY.
6. Congress passed the same type bill protecting babies born alive by unanimous consent a decade or two ago.

"5. Neither did the law in NY."

You lie.


“The state of New York recently passed a horrific new abortion law removing almost all previous restrictions. The law now allows abortions to be performed up to the point of natural birth by physicians and also by some non-physician health care practitioners. It also removes protections for babies who accidentally survive an abortion procedure.” New York abortion law changes allow infanticide

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

Well you did accidentally get one right. They are "full-blown anti-white racism".

The rest is partisan nonsense.

I can prove every single one, so that makes you either a liar or a fool.

Just between us, which one is it?

Just prove one. Infanticide. The Democrat party does not support infanticide.

Democrats are not the party of infanticide

The GOP has branded the Democrats as the party of infanticide. That's all.

Watch me!

1. Hussein Obama supported infanticide.

2. Obama named Peter Singer, champion of infanticide, as his 'science adviser.'

3. The Democrat administration in Virginia offered a law for...in favor of....infanticide....stopped by Republicans.

4. The Democrat governor of Virginia agreed with the bill for infanticide.

5. "New York abortion law changes allow infanticide"
New York abortion law changes allow infanticide

6. "Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats"
Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats





In your face, booooooyyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeee!!!!!!

Watch you lie, again.

1. No.
2. John Holdren was Obama's science adviser. You've touted this lie before too. Some people never learn do they?
3. There is no provision allowing for legal homicide of any child born alive in any bill under consideration now or in the recent past.
4. No he didn't talk about infanticide at all.
5. Neither did the law in NY.
6. Congress passed the same type bill protecting babies born alive by unanimous consent a decade or two ago.

"Congress passed the same type bill protecting babies born alive by unanimous consent a decade or two ago."

So?????


Today, they Democrats blocked an anti-infanticide bill.....the meaning of that block is clear: they support infanticide.


There is such a Republican bill, but this excuse for voting against it avoids the fact that Congress regularly passes redundant bills….especially if there is a moral basis for same: last week the Congress unanimously passed an anti-lynching bill…..even though lynching is against the law throughout the country.

Yet the Democrats blocked- would not allow consideration of- a bill that would prevent the murder of innocent, defenseless babies.
There is no excuse.



Democrat's official policy is for infanticide.

 

[BlindBoo]

Well you did accidentally get one right. They are "full-blown anti-white racism".

The rest is partisan nonsense.

I can prove every single one, so that makes you either a liar or a fool.

Just between us, which one is it?

Just prove one. Infanticide. The Democrat party does not support infanticide.

Democrats are not the party of infanticide

The GOP has branded the Democrats as the party of infanticide. That's all.

Watch me!

1. Hussein Obama supported infanticide.

2. Obama named Peter Singer, champion of infanticide, as his 'science adviser.'

3. The Democrat administration in Virginia offered a law for...in favor of....infanticide....stopped by Republicans.

4. The Democrat governor of Virginia agreed with the bill for infanticide.

5. "New York abortion law changes allow infanticide"
New York abortion law changes allow infanticide

6. "Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats"
Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats





In your face, booooooyyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeee!!!!!!

Watch you lie, again.

1. No.
2. John Holdren was Obama's science adviser. You've touted this lie before too. Some people never learn do they?
3. There is no provision allowing for legal homicide of any child born alive in any bill under consideration now or in the recent past.
4. No he didn't talk about infanticide at all.
5. Neither did the law in NY.
6. Congress passed the same type bill protecting babies born alive by unanimous consent a decade or two ago.

1. Hussein Obama supported infanticide.


Certainly did.

If a child is 'accidentally' born alive as a result of a botched abortion attempt, Senator Obama had no problem allowing that newborn to die, sans any medical attention.


1. referencing Obama’s opposition to Illinois’ proposed version of a “born alive” law, intended to require doctors to administer immediate medical care to any infant that survived an intended abortion....FactCheck.org found holes in Obama’s explanations as to why he did not support the “born alive” legislation..."
FACT CHECK: Gingrich Claim on Obama Infanticide Vote A Stretch - Naureen Khan - NationalJournal.com

FACT CHECK: Gingrich Claim on Obama Infanticide Vote A Stretch

a. "Obama voted in committee against the 2003 state bill that was nearly identical to the federal act he says he would have supported. Both contained identical clauses saying that nothing in the bills could be construed to affect legal rights of an unborn fetus, according to an undisputed summary written immediately after the committee’s 2003 mark-up session."
FactCheck.org : Obama and ‘Infanticide’

Links to Barack Obama's votes on Illinois' Born Alive Infant Protection Act - Jill Stanek - Jill Stanek





Pay special attention to the vid @ :50

"...if a baby is born alive after a late term abortion, we can throw it away...Barack Obama approved that..."

2:01

2:40

3:55

5:28

Yawn. There was already a law in Illinois at the time.

It stated that physicians performing abortions when the fetus is viable must use the procedure most likely to preserve the fetus’ life; must be attended by another physician who can care for a born-alive infant; and must "exercise the same degree of professional skill, care and diligence to preserve the life and health of the child as would be required of a physician providing immediate medical care to a child born alive in the course of a pregnancy termination which was not an abortion." Failure to do any of the above is considered a felony.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I can prove every single one, so that makes you either a liar or a fool.

Just between us, which one is it?

Just prove one. Infanticide. The Democrat party does not support infanticide.

Democrats are not the party of infanticide

The GOP has branded the Democrats as the party of infanticide. That's all.

Watch me!

1. Hussein Obama supported infanticide.

2. Obama named Peter Singer, champion of infanticide, as his 'science adviser.'

3. The Democrat administration in Virginia offered a law for...in favor of....infanticide....stopped by Republicans.

4. The Democrat governor of Virginia agreed with the bill for infanticide.

5. "New York abortion law changes allow infanticide"
New York abortion law changes allow infanticide

6. "Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats"
Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats





In your face, booooooyyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeee!!!!!!

Watch you lie, again.

1. No.
2. John Holdren was Obama's science adviser. You've touted this lie before too. Some people never learn do they?
3. There is no provision allowing for legal homicide of any child born alive in any bill under consideration now or in the recent past.
4. No he didn't talk about infanticide at all.
5. Neither did the law in NY.
6. Congress passed the same type bill protecting babies born alive by unanimous consent a decade or two ago.

1. Hussein Obama supported infanticide.


Certainly did.

If a child is 'accidentally' born alive as a result of a botched abortion attempt, Senator Obama had no problem allowing that newborn to die, sans any medical attention.


1. referencing Obama’s opposition to Illinois’ proposed version of a “born alive” law, intended to require doctors to administer immediate medical care to any infant that survived an intended abortion....FactCheck.org found holes in Obama’s explanations as to why he did not support the “born alive” legislation..."
FACT CHECK: Gingrich Claim on Obama Infanticide Vote A Stretch - Naureen Khan - NationalJournal.com

FACT CHECK: Gingrich Claim on Obama Infanticide Vote A Stretch

a. "Obama voted in committee against the 2003 state bill that was nearly identical to the federal act he says he would have supported. Both contained identical clauses saying that nothing in the bills could be construed to affect legal rights of an unborn fetus, according to an undisputed summary written immediately after the committee’s 2003 mark-up session."
FactCheck.org : Obama and ‘Infanticide’

Links to Barack Obama's votes on Illinois' Born Alive Infant Protection Act - Jill Stanek - Jill Stanek





Pay special attention to the vid @ :50

"...if a baby is born alive after a late term abortion, we can throw it away...Barack Obama approved that..."

2:01

2:40

3:55

5:28

Yawn. There was already a law in Illinois at the time.

It stated that physicians performing abortions when the fetus is viable must use the procedure most likely to preserve the fetus’ life; must be attended by another physician who can care for a born-alive infant; and must "exercise the same degree of professional skill, care and diligence to preserve the life and health of the child as would be required of a physician providing immediate medical care to a child born alive in the course of a pregnancy termination which was not an abortion." Failure to do any of the above is considered a felony.

It takes a certain sort of low life to yawn at the slaughter of children.
Raise your paw.

Today, they Democrats blocked an anti-infanticide bill.....the meaning of that block is clear: they support infanticide.


There is such a Republican bill, but this excuse for voting against it avoids the fact that Congress regularly passes redundant bills….especially if there is a moral basis for same: last week the Congress unanimously passed an anti-lynching bill…..even though lynching is against the law throughout the country.

Yet the Democrats blocked- would not allow consideration of- a bill that would prevent the murder of innocent, defenseless babies.
There is no excuse.



Democrat's official policy is for infanticide.




The real query is why there are so many, like you, ready to lie for the Democrat Party.

 

[BlindBoo]

"4. No he didn't talk about infanticide at all."


You lie.


"...according to [Democrat] Gov. Northam, whether a newborn gets the chance to live or not is a matter for “discussion.”

When Gov. Northam said " “I can tell you exactly what happens: If a mother is in labor…the infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and mother.”

The author of your opinion piece dramatically assumes that the discussion at this point could only be about how to kill off the child. You know, the one that grew inside the mother for 9 months. Are they pretending the Governor was talking about an abortion and not the birth of a severely deformed child? Never once do they objectively examine the situation the Gov was talking about. Wouldn't the ensuing discussion depend on the nature of the child's' deformity?

 

[PoliticalChic]

"4. No he didn't talk about infanticide at all."


You lie.


"...according to [Democrat] Gov. Northam, whether a newborn gets the chance to live or not is a matter for “discussion.”

When Gov. Northam said " “I can tell you exactly what happens: If a mother is in labor…the infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and mother.”

The author of your opinion piece dramatically assumes that the discussion at this point could only be about how to kill off the child. You know, the one that grew inside the mother for 9 months. Are they pretending the Governor was talking about an abortion and not the birth of a severely deformed child? Never once do they objectively examine the situation the Gov was talking about. Wouldn't the ensuing discussion depend on the nature of the child's' deformity?

Why are you back????

Guilt?


How many times a day must I prove you a lying low-life???


A child is born as a result of a botched abortion.....and you pretend there is any basis for a discussion as to whether the child should be allowed to live.


Please be gone, the smell is irritating.

 

[jc456]

1. And the truth is that the Democrat Party is anti-knowledge, anti-education, socialist, and simply....stooooopid.

And they could not have chosen a more representative Representative than Ocasio.




2. "AOC Downplays Luxury Apartment, Says Everyone Should Have One
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D., N.Y.) downplayed the amenities available in her expensive Washington, D.C., apartment building last week, saying her unit was comparable to apartments in a new public housing complex in New York City.

Ocasio-Cortez made the comparison during a Bronx town hall, saying people have been conditioned to view things that should be available to everyone as "luxury" amenities.

"What we have been taught that [sic] is a luxury should not be a luxury," Ocasio-Cortez said.
"Another world is possible," she said. "We can live in buildings that are not-for-profit, or tenant-owned, there are so many ways we can slice this and we can structure it in a way where all people have the right to a dignified home."
AOC Downplays Luxury Apartment, Says Everyone Should Have One




3. With metronomic regularity, we see Liberals demand whatever they can imagine.....with no connection to what it requires to create their imaginings, to bring them to fruition.
Remember Hussein claiming that what Trump promised would require a 'magic wand'?
A 'magic wand' is what Democrats have as the basis for their promises, in place of economics.



4. Almost as free from reality as her Green New Deal, this is the cost associated with her "Says Everyone Should Have One" plan:
"The building does not offer affordable units under the city's Affordable Dwelling Units program, the Washington Examiner reported.

Prices in the complex range from around $2,000 for a small studio to over $5,000 for a three-bedroom. Ocasio-Cortez says she moved there because of the 24/7 lobby security."





5. "Ocasio-Cortez Severely Burned After Accidentally Touching Book On Basic Economics
August 8th, 2018

NEW YORK, NY—Democratic candidate for Congress Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was in the middle of a run-of-the-mill interview—blankly staring at the interviewer for a minute straight after being asked how she’d pay for all the social programs she’s proposing—when disaster struck. She noticed a book on a table nearby and reached over to pick it up before anyone could stop her.

“Aieeee! It burns ussss!” Ocasio-Cortez screamed as her hand burst into flames from touching the book on rudimentary economic concepts. She claimed she had never seen one of those “dreadful things” before and wasn’t aware how much damage it could do.

She was immediately rushed to the hospital.

“As socialism has become increasingly popular, we’ve been seeing more and more of this,” said Doctor Pauline Hudson, who treated Ocasio-Cortez for third-degree burns. “Often it’s a severe-allergic reaction to math. Socialist policies are all well and good, but if you adopt them, you want to stay far away from even basic economic idea like supply and demand. It’s not pretty what happens when the two collide.”

Ocasio-Cortez is expected to make a full-recovery and seems undaunted by the incident, already proposing even more programs she thinks the government should pay for, like dog-walking. In the future, she says she’ll be more careful. Luckily, Ocasio-Cortez is expected to easily win her heavily Democratic district which means she’s headed for our nation’s Capitol, a place that’s traditionally been a safe space from economics and math."
Ocasio-Cortez Severely Burned After Accidentally Touching Book On Basic Economics




Does one have to be a fool to vote Democrat?


Pretty much.

she needed a young turk talking point.

 

[BlindBoo]

It also removes protections for babies who accidentally survive an abortion procedure

From a letter to the Herald-Whig?


We asked one of the new law’s sponsors, State Sen. Liz Krueger, if babies born alive during an abortion procedure would be left to "expire," as Long said.

Krueger’s spokesman, Justin Flagg, wrote in an email that "the RHA does not change standards of medical practice. Any baby born alive in New York State would be treated like any other live birth, and given appropriate medical care. This was the case before the RHA, and it remains the case now."

"A provider that inappropriately abandons or neglects a patient would violate professional misconduct laws and be subject to significant sanctions which include losing his/her medical license, fines, as well as potential civil and criminal liability," said Hazel Crampton-Hays, a spokeswoman for Cuomo. "The Reproductive Health Act does nothing to change that."

Federal law also protects infants in this situation. The Born Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002 states that any person born alive under any circumstance has full rights as any other person.

Abortion critics wrong on effect of NY law

Dr. Vanessa Barnabei, chair of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in the Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at the University at Buffalo, said that she understands how the law could lead some people to believe that babies who are born alive would be left to die, but said that’s not what happens in practice.

Pregnancies are sometimes terminated in order to save the life of the mother, but that doesn’t necessarily mean the baby won’t survive, Barnabei said. In her experience, the typical standard of care is to resuscitate infants born after 24 weeks, when they are considered viable, she said.

Abortions later in the second trimester or third trimester are complex and require highly trained practitioners. Because of this, they are typically done in hospitals, which employ other providers able to care for any baby born alive, she said. Babies who are delivered with severe problems would not be resuscitated, if that was the parents’ wishes, she said.

 

[BlindBoo]

"4. No he didn't talk about infanticide at all."


You lie.


"...according to [Democrat] Gov. Northam, whether a newborn gets the chance to live or not is a matter for “discussion.”

When Gov. Northam said " “I can tell you exactly what happens: If a mother is in labor…the infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and mother.”

The author of your opinion piece dramatically assumes that the discussion at this point could only be about how to kill off the child. You know, the one that grew inside the mother for 9 months. Are they pretending the Governor was talking about an abortion and not the birth of a severely deformed child? Never once do they objectively examine the situation the Gov was talking about. Wouldn't the ensuing discussion depend on the nature of the child's' deformity?

Why are you back????

Guilt?


How many times a day must I prove you a lying low-life???


A child is born as a result of a botched abortion.....and you pretend there is any basis for a discussion as to whether the child should be allowed to live.


Please be gone, the smell is irritating.

Why? Busting liars is fun. Busting stupid liars is a pleasure.

The Gov. was talking about a the birth of a severely deformed child, not a child born as the result of a induced abortion.