The value of slavery?

[Indeependent]

And there aren’t that many cases.

 

[Asclepias]

That would be based on precedent. The precedent has been set that reparations are due. There are too many examples of it. Whites cant change it just because they dont want to pay Blacks reparations for slavery.

Are the examples on the Internet?

Yes. Just google "reparations paid by the us"

Precedents concern land theft.

Show us in the definition of precedent where it only applies to land theft.

Did you bother reading the cases?

Did you bother reading the dictionary?

 

[Indeependent]

What determines law?

Here we go with the stupid white game of 20 questions.

We are talking about human rights violations. Committed by whites against blacks. Sanctioned by US government law.

So, in what year were you human rights violated?

What does that have to do with topic?

Everything, do try and keep up. You said this:

"We are talking about human rights violations."

No I didnt say that but again I ask what did your question have to do with the topic?

There’s no precedent yet for slavery.

 

[Asclepias]

That would be based on precedent. The precedent has been set that reparations are due. There are too many examples of it. Whites cant change it just because they dont want to pay Blacks reparations for slavery.

Are the examples on the Internet?

Yes. Just google "reparations paid by the us"

Precedents concern land theft.

Show us in the definition of "precedent" where it only applies to land theft.

Are you now claiming you had your land stolen?

Where did you see me make any claim regarding stolen land?

 

[Indeependent]

Are the examples on the Internet?

Yes. Just google "reparations paid by the us"

Precedents concern land theft.

Show us in the definition of precedent where it only applies to land theft.

Did you bother reading the cases?

Did you bother reading the dictionary?

Ad hominem.
Have you ever had a conversation with an attorney.

 

[Asclepias]

Here we go with the stupid white game of 20 questions.

We are talking about human rights violations. Committed by whites against blacks. Sanctioned by US government law.

So, in what year were you human rights violated?

What does that have to do with topic?

Everything, do try and keep up. You said this:

"We are talking about human rights violations."

No I didnt say that but again I ask what did your question have to do with the topic?

There’s no precedent yet for slavery.

There is a precedent for reparations. Keep up. Thats the topic.

 

[IM2]

The law determines what matters in this case. Not what people think.

What determines law?

Here we go with the stupid white game of 20 questions.

We are talking about human rights violations. Committed by whites against blacks. Sanctioned by US government law.

So, in what year were your human rights violated?

Another stupid pointless question.

 

[Asclepias]

Yes. Just google "reparations paid by the us"

Precedents concern land theft.

Show us in the definition of precedent where it only applies to land theft.

Did you bother reading the cases?

Did you bother reading the dictionary?

Ad hominem.
Have you ever had a conversation with an attorney.

Ad hominem.
Have you ever had a conversation with with a dictionary?

 

[Indeependent]

So, in what year were you human rights violated?

What does that have to do with topic?

Everything, do try and keep up. You said this:

"We are talking about human rights violations."

No I didnt say that but again I ask what did your question have to do with the topic?

There’s no precedent yet for slavery.

There is a precedent for reparations. Keep up. Thats the topic.

Based on?
You wouldn’t even get to a court room.
Precedent based on what wrong?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

What determines law?

Here we go with the stupid white game of 20 questions.

We are talking about human rights violations. Committed by whites against blacks. Sanctioned by US government law.

So, in what year were you human rights violated?

What does that have to do with topic?

Everything, do try and keep up. You said this:

"We are talking about human rights violations."

No I didnt say that but again I ask what did your question have to do with the topic?

Nope, sure enough.. it was IM2. My bad.

 

[Asclepias]

What does that have to do with topic?

Everything, do try and keep up. You said this:

"We are talking about human rights violations."

No I didnt say that but again I ask what did your question have to do with the topic?

There’s no precedent yet for slavery.

There is a precedent for reparations. Keep up. Thats the topic.

Based on?
You wouldn’t even get to a court room.
Precedent based on what wrong?

Based on reparations.
If you say so.
slavery.

 

[Indeependent]

Precedents concern land theft.

Show us in the definition of precedent where it only applies to land theft.

Did you bother reading the cases?

Did you bother reading the dictionary?

Ad hominem.
Have you ever had a conversation with an attorney.

Ad hominem.
Have you ever had a conversation with with a dictionary?

For such a successful business person you seem to have a poor grasp of legal concepts.

 

[Indeependent]

Everything, do try and keep up. You said this:

"We are talking about human rights violations."

No I didnt say that but again I ask what did your question have to do with the topic?

There’s no precedent yet for slavery.

There is a precedent for reparations. Keep up. Thats the topic.

Based on?
You wouldn’t even get to a court room.
Precedent based on what wrong?

Based on reparations.
If you say so.
slavery.

No precedent exists.

 

[Asclepias]

Show us in the definition of precedent where it only applies to land theft.

Did you bother reading the cases?

Did you bother reading the dictionary?

Ad hominem.
Have you ever had a conversation with an attorney.

Ad hominem.
Have you ever had a conversation with with a dictionary?

For such a successful business person you seem to have a poor grasp of legal concepts.

It only seems like that because youre white and easily confused.

 

[Indeependent]

Everything, do try and keep up. You said this:

"We are talking about human rights violations."

No I didnt say that but again I ask what did your question have to do with the topic?

There’s no precedent yet for slavery.

There is a precedent for reparations. Keep up. Thats the topic.

Based on?
You wouldn’t even get to a court room.
Precedent based on what wrong?

Based on reparations.
If you say so.
slavery.

There’s no precedent for Reparations based on Slavery of a non-US citizen.

 

[Asclepias]

No I didnt say that but again I ask what did your question have to do with the topic?

There’s no precedent yet for slavery.

There is a precedent for reparations. Keep up. Thats the topic.

Based on?
You wouldn’t even get to a court room.
Precedent based on what wrong?

Based on reparations.
If you say so.
slavery.

No precedent exists.

Of course it does. I even told you how to look it up.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

The law determines what matters in this case. Not what people think.

What determines law?

Here we go with the stupid white game of 20 questions.

We are talking about human rights violations. Committed by whites against blacks. Sanctioned by US government law.

So, in what year were your human rights violated?

Another stupid pointless question.

IM2's asserted that this about human rights violations. I asked when were his rights violated.

 

[Asclepias]

The law determines what matters in this case. Not what people think.

What determines law?

Here we go with the stupid white game of 20 questions.

We are talking about human rights violations. Committed by whites against blacks. Sanctioned by US government law.

So, in what year were your human rights violated?

Another stupid pointless question.

IM2's asserted that this about human rights violations. I asked when were his rights violated.

Why would you ask such an irrelevant question?

 

[Indeependent]

There’s no precedent yet for slavery.

There is a precedent for reparations. Keep up. Thats the topic.

Based on?
You wouldn’t even get to a court room.
Precedent based on what wrong?

Based on reparations.
If you say so.
slavery.

No precedent exists.

Of course it does. I even told you how to look it up.

I did and I posted the basis of the precedents.
You would have to create a new precedent.

 

[IM2]

The law determines what matters in this case. Not what people think.

What determines law?

Here we go with the stupid white game of 20 questions.

We are talking about human rights violations. Committed by whites against blacks. Sanctioned by US government law.

So, in what year were your human rights violated?

Another stupid pointless question.

IM2's asserted that this about human rights violations. I asked when were his rights violated.

And that was a dumb pointless question.