Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Paid for by who ?? Me ?? What about my ability being robbed to participate fully in that economic boom you talk about ?? Oh that's right, I have to redistribute my wealth generated to the baby makers living down the road who want to lay up all day while I go to work for them. Thank you Demon-crat do gooder government reps over the past 40 years for creating this bullcrap.according to research, a UBI of 1K per month would increase GDP by 12 percent because it would enable poor folks to spend more and increase overall demand!
Yes, in a situation like that the workers need to be unionized.i'm gonna raise the dreaded word: "IQ"...you have to be pretty high on the IQ scale to have to be trainable for the jobs that are created...Amazon just automated their warehouses, for example
Amazon has developed a pretty nasty reputation in regards to how it treats its workers. They not only endure shitty wages, they're constantly harassed by management. Their every movement is electronically tracked. They're basically slaves.
$10-11 an hour and constantly harassed, isn't a pleasant way to spend your day. Meanwhile, Amazon continues to rake in $Billions. So i can understand folks' frustration about having their privacy invaded as well. No one wants to be a slave.
Well that is never going to happen thanks to GOP policy. We need the government to mandate a living wage Health Care daycare cheap college and Training and SS ID card to end illegal immigration, just like every other developed country..Yes, in a situation like that the workers need to be unionized.i'm gonna raise the dreaded word: "IQ"...you have to be pretty high on the IQ scale to have to be trainable for the jobs that are created...Amazon just automated their warehouses, for example
Amazon has developed a pretty nasty reputation in regards to how it treats its workers. They not only endure shitty wages, they're constantly harassed by management. Their every movement is electronically tracked. They're basically slaves.
$10-11 an hour and constantly harassed, isn't a pleasant way to spend your day. Meanwhile, Amazon continues to rake in $Billions. So i can understand folks' frustration about having their privacy invaded as well. No one wants to be a slave.
Exactly what the GOP has been doing the last 35 years, a giveaway to the rich and screwing the rest d u h....So according to your ridiculous brainwashed give away to the rich ideology, just watch the middle class and the non-rich go to hell along with the rest of the country, as amazingly we lose out to countries with very few natural resources, through Sheer idiocy... Great job!
You commies might not believe this, but people can do just fine without government wiping their ass every time they go to the bathroom. If you want to be rich, work at it, nobody is stopping you. If you want an advanced education, pay for it, nobody is stopping you, if you want to learn a trade, learn it, nobody is stopping you.
If you people had to live without government one day in your life you'd starve to death. Our founders would be ashamed with such a society today.
Are you rich? Do you have an advanced education? No, you drive a truck. And without government you have nothing. Where you going to drive that truck with no roads?
Government is good for some things but not most. That's why our founders listed in the Constitution what our federal government is responsible for. Government is supposed to provide good for all people--not people of a particular party or group while ignoring or taking away from others.
What exactly is being "given" to the rich? Are you referring to the income they earned? Regarding the poor, we spent a trillion dollars on them last year. What the hell happened?
Only if you make over $250,000 a year, super dupePaid for by who ?? Me ?? What about my ability being robbed to participate fully in that economic boom you talk about ?? Oh that's right, I have to redistribute my wealth generated to the baby makers living down the road who want to lay up all day while I go to work for them. Thank you Demon-crat do gooder government reps over the past 40 years for creating this bullcrap.according to research, a UBI of 1K per month would increase GDP by 12 percent because it would enable poor folks to spend more and increase overall demand!
OK. List the "oil subsidies" that are being given to rich people.Exactly what the GOP has been doing the last 35 years, a giveaway to the rich and screwing the rest d u h....You commies might not believe this, but people can do just fine without government wiping their ass every time they go to the bathroom. If you want to be rich, work at it, nobody is stopping you. If you want an advanced education, pay for it, nobody is stopping you, if you want to learn a trade, learn it, nobody is stopping you.
If you people had to live without government one day in your life you'd starve to death. Our founders would be ashamed with such a society today.
Are you rich? Do you have an advanced education? No, you drive a truck. And without government you have nothing. Where you going to drive that truck with no roads?
Government is good for some things but not most. That's why our founders listed in the Constitution what our federal government is responsible for. Government is supposed to provide good for all people--not people of a particular party or group while ignoring or taking away from others.
What exactly is being "given" to the rich? Are you referring to the income they earned? Regarding the poor, we spent a trillion dollars on them last year. What the hell happened?
Let's start with oil subsidies.
The only answer is unions, because taxing the rich exceedingly in an unfair way in order to give it to the poor is a losing concept. It discouraged investment and stops the movement of wealth freely in a merit based way into society.At this point you are correct... The rich are ridiculously bloated and the rest are going slowly to ruin for 35 years now....any transfer of wealth from a rich person to a poor person is a good thing!
Still doesn't make it right super duh.Only if you make over $250,000 a year, super dupePaid for by who ?? Me ?? What about my ability being robbed to participate fully in that economic boom you talk about ?? Oh that's right, I have to redistribute my wealth generated to the baby makers living down the road who want to lay up all day while I go to work for them. Thank you Demon-crat do gooder government reps over the past 40 years for creating this bullcrap.according to research, a UBI of 1K per month would increase GDP by 12 percent because it would enable poor folks to spend more and increase overall demand!
Greedy little fucker. Always wanting other peoples money. Go create something useful. A company, an idea, hell just get up and go to work already. Go earn your money, like the people you are envious of.any transfer of wealth from a rich person to a poor person is a good thing!
UBI would actually incentivize people to get a job.some studies say 50 percent of jobs will be lost to automation. the OECD says it will be 10 percent.
we dont have to have "universal". the affluent need not get money. but the poor and the needy need basic income!
Hmmm...how about getting a fricken job.
let me say that again to you: UBI will actually give incentive to folks to get a job
a UBI would be cheaper and more effective than what we do now, economically. If you take the total amount we spend on anti-poverty programs and divide by the number of poor people, there should be no poor people!
Poor people aren’t lazy, they’re trapped in the current system. A UBI is not contingent on staying poor, so it would both lift people out of poverty and flatten out the benefits cliff. Of course, this means that the new UBI would be instead of existing programs, rather than a supplement, and not everyone agrees with that.
Finally, there is crude "realpolitik." Plenty of very wealthy people already live in the US, and the new economy is likely to create inequality on steroids. In a democracy, the poor and middle class have many tools to “negotiate” redistribution at gunpoint.
And that's how the GOP got everybody drug testing d u h...Everything Reagan started drug testing the government workers and contractors... Where have you been?Workers elsewhere have a lot more privacy than we do, and drug and alcohol testing is prohibited. Thanks GOP.Cant say that in my industry. We are currently looking for over 30,000 drivers we can't find. Americans don't want to do that kind of work for any money. Some of them are very good paying; close to six figures in some cases.
Drugs are a huge problem in this country. A shipper at a company that we pickup from often told me they need 14 new employees, so they had a seminar for new applicants that had about 45 people. The HR person conducting the seminar told everybody right up front that they drug screen all employees. Over half of the people walked out at that point. He went on further to say that their drug screening uses hair samples, and another 15 walked out.
They hired about six people, and none of them made it past the first few weeks. They were unproductive workers, always texting instead of working, incapable of understanding basic concepts of system operations.
The job starts out at $15.50 per hour, but he told me you quickly move up to $19.50 per hour as you learn new processes in the company. It's a union job as well, so if you're willing to work, they are willing to pay you.
U.S. Drug-Testing Rules Do Not Translate Overseas
Drug testing has been going on for the last couple of decades. WTF do you mean "thanks GOP?" WTF does a political party have to do with private industry drug testing applicants and employees?
The GOP's Drug-Testing Dragnet
He didn't make it the law of the land and businesses didn't start doing it because of Reagan. You blame thunderstorms on Reagan because you know nothing about politics. Businesses get cheaper rates on Workman's Compensation insurance if they drug test. That's what it's all about. It's why teachers, police officers and firemen don't take drug tests in many cases; because government doesn't care about saving taxpayers money.
status quo? STATUS QUO?Greedy little fucker. Always wanting other peoples money. Go create something useful. A company, and idea, hell just get up and go to work already. Go earn your money, like the people you are envious of.any transfer of wealth from a rich person to a poor person is a good thing!
And tell your liberal turd friends to stop fighting paying their fair share of income tax. So greedy...
We used to have the greatest generation and unions to to protect the non rich, now we need the government.So according to your ridiculous brainwashed give away to the rich ideology, just watch the middle class and the non-rich go to hell along with the rest of the country, as amazingly we lose out to countries with very few natural resources, through Sheer idiocy... Great job!The block is in your head. The GOP never blocked anything. Anybody that wants such training can get it. Take a loan out, work for a few years and save money. But just because taxpayers won't fund it doesn't mean it's blocked except to Commies.
You commies might not believe this, but people can do just fine without government wiping their ass every time they go to the bathroom. If you want to be rich, work at it, nobody is stopping you. If you want an advanced education, pay for it, nobody is stopping you, if you want to learn a trade, learn it, nobody is stopping you.
If you people had to live without government one day in your life you'd starve to death. Our founders would be ashamed with such a society today.
Are you rich? Do you have an advanced education? No, you drive a truck. And without government you have nothing. Where you going to drive that truck with no roads?
Government is good for some things but not most. That's why our founders listed in the Constitution what our federal government is responsible for. Government is supposed to provide good for all people--not people of a particular party or group while ignoring or taking away from others.
Would have the opposite effect IMHO.UBI would actually incentivize people to get a job.some studies say 50 percent of jobs will be lost to automation. the OECD says it will be 10 percent.
we dont have to have "universal". the affluent need not get money. but the poor and the needy need basic income!
Hmmm...how about getting a fricken job.
let me say that again to you: UBI will actually give incentive to folks to get a job
What the hell, I'm game. Ok, how would UBI incentivize folks to get a job?
Income inequality is term made up by lazy greedy liberals to package socialism to the masses. Shame on you!status quo? STATUS QUO?Greedy little fucker. Always wanting other peoples money. Go create something useful. A company, and idea, hell just get up and go to work already. Go earn your money, like the people you are envious of.any transfer of wealth from a rich person to a poor person is a good thing!
And tell your liberal turd friends to stop fighting paying their fair share of income tax. So greedy...
you're happy with the way things are?! you're happy with all this income inequality? you're happy with Trump cutting taxes for the rich and cutting spending for the poor? SHAME. ON. YOU.
any transfer of wealth from a rich person to a poor person is a good thing!
Unions.... But they need to change to become credible again. The feds can't play the role of a union. It is unconstitutional.status quo? STATUS QUO?Greedy little fucker. Always wanting other peoples money. Go create something useful. A company, and idea, hell just get up and go to work already. Go earn your money, like the people you are envious of.any transfer of wealth from a rich person to a poor person is a good thing!
And tell your liberal turd friends to stop fighting paying their fair share of income tax. So greedy...
you're happy with the way things are?! you're happy with all this income inequality? you're happy with Trump cutting taxes for the rich and cutting spending for the poor? SHAME. ON. YOU.
Incentivizing people to be as unproductive as possible has never turned out well.Would have the opposite effect IMHO.UBI would actually incentivize people to get a job.some studies say 50 percent of jobs will be lost to automation. the OECD says it will be 10 percent.
we dont have to have "universal". the affluent need not get money. but the poor and the needy need basic income!
Hmmm...how about getting a fricken job.
let me say that again to you: UBI will actually give incentive to folks to get a job
What the hell, I'm game. Ok, how would UBI incentivize folks to get a job?
Exactly what the GOP has been doing the last 35 years, a giveaway to the rich and screwing the rest d u h....So according to your ridiculous brainwashed give away to the rich ideology, just watch the middle class and the non-rich go to hell along with the rest of the country, as amazingly we lose out to countries with very few natural resources, through Sheer idiocy... Great job!The block is in your head. The GOP never blocked anything. Anybody that wants such training can get it. Take a loan out, work for a few years and save money. But just because taxpayers won't fund it doesn't mean it's blocked except to Commies.
You commies might not believe this, but people can do just fine without government wiping their ass every time they go to the bathroom. If you want to be rich, work at it, nobody is stopping you. If you want an advanced education, pay for it, nobody is stopping you, if you want to learn a trade, learn it, nobody is stopping you.
If you people had to live without government one day in your life you'd starve to death. Our founders would be ashamed with such a society today.
Are you rich? Do you have an advanced education? No, you drive a truck. And without government you have nothing. Where you going to drive that truck with no roads?
Government is good for some things but not most. That's why our founders listed in the Constitution what our federal government is responsible for. Government is supposed to provide good for all people--not people of a particular party or group while ignoring or taking away from others.
