Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gee, you do realize that they all have large Democrat-controlled cities, don't you???
So let's do a better comparison and look at actual cities....
The 11 Most Dangerous U.S. Cities - US News
I'll see your 11 and raise you 24....24 of the most violent cities in the country are all run by democrats, and have been for decades.....
Tennessee..a red state...has 6 of it"s largest cities run by democrats and Nashville and Memphis continually make the top violent cities in the country...
Again, stupid --- Democrats run cities everywhere. Here's what that means in little bite-sized sentences.
The "most violent" cities .... run by Democrats.
The "least violent" cities... .run by Democrats.
The "most median violent cities".... run by Democrats.
The most sports-interested cities... run by Democrats.
The least sports-interested cites... run by Democrats.
The healthiest cities.... run by Democrats.
The least healthy cities.... run by Democrats.
The hottest cities... run by Democrats.
The coldest cities .... run by Democrats.
Stop me when you see some kind of pattern emerge here.
Not that a political party on a city level has jack shit to do with the weather or health or sports or socioeconomic histories.
Dumbass partisan hacknoid.
We aren't making it up.....post links...and they still run the most violent cities in the country....
Logic is a lost art...
The lower classes are, of course, established by .... the upper classes...
Gee, you do realize that they all have large Democrat-controlled cities, don't you???
So let's do a better comparison and look at actual cities....
The 11 Most Dangerous U.S. Cities - US News
I'll see your 11 and raise you 24....24 of the most violent cities in the country are all run by democrats, and have been for decades.....
Tennessee..a red state...has 6 of it"s largest cities run by democrats and Nashville and Memphis continually make the top violent cities in the country...
Again, stupid --- Democrats run cities everywhere. Here's what that means in little bite-sized sentences.
The "most violent" cities .... run by Democrats.
The "least violent" cities... .run by Democrats.
The "most median violent cities".... run by Democrats.
The most sports-interested cities... run by Democrats.
The least sports-interested cites... run by Democrats.
The healthiest cities.... run by Democrats.
The least healthy cities.... run by Democrats.
The hottest cities... run by Democrats.
The coldest cities .... run by Democrats.
Stop me when you see some kind of pattern emerge here.
Not that a political party on a city level has jack shit to do with the weather or health or sports or socioeconomic histories.
Dumbass partisan hacknoid.
We aren't making it up.....post links...and they still run the most violent cities in the country....
Your task then, like the racists in the early posts of this thread, is to demonstrate why that association is not a cum hoc fallacy. Explain how a "Democratic" way of running a city (deciding which day the garbage is picked up) leads to violence where a "Republican" way of running a city does not.
Oh wait -- you can't do that since there's no such thing.
You lose, dumb shit.
Logic is a lost art...
The lower classes are, of course, established by .... the upper classes...
Say WHAT?
Logic is a lost art...
The vast majority of violent crime is perpetrated by blacks and Latino thugs. Your article dances around it by blaming it on "unskilled young men", and other lame ass economic excuses.
If you are unwilling to address the real problem, you're not going to solve it.
The vast majority of violent crime is perpetrated by the poor/lower classes.
Fixed it for ya.
The lower classes are, of course, established by .... the upper classes.
Logic is a lost art...
The lower classes are, of course, established by .... the upper classes...
Say WHAT?
Okay... "what?"
Hope that helped.
DO NOT edit my posts. Here's what actually went down:
Logic is a lost art...
The vast majority of violent crime is perpetrated by blacks and Latino thugs. Your article dances around it by blaming it on "unskilled young men", and other lame ass economic excuses.
If you are unwilling to address the real problem, you're not going to solve it.
The vast majority of violent crime is perpetrated by the poor/lower classes.
Fixed it for ya.
The lower classes are, of course, established by .... the upper classes.
Gee, you do realize that they all have large Democrat-controlled cities, don't you???
So let's do a better comparison and look at actual cities....
The 11 Most Dangerous U.S. Cities - US News
I'll see your 11 and raise you 24....24 of the most violent cities in the country are all run by democrats, and have been for decades.....
Tennessee..a red state...has 6 of it"s largest cities run by democrats and Nashville and Memphis continually make the top violent cities in the country...
Again, stupid --- Democrats run cities everywhere. Here's what that means in little bite-sized sentences.
The "most violent" cities .... run by Democrats.
The "least violent" cities... .run by Democrats.
The "most median violent cities".... run by Democrats.
The most sports-interested cities... run by Democrats.
The least sports-interested cites... run by Democrats.
The healthiest cities.... run by Democrats.
The least healthy cities.... run by Democrats.
The hottest cities... run by Democrats.
The coldest cities .... run by Democrats.
Stop me when you see some kind of pattern emerge here.
Not that a political party on a city level has jack shit to do with the weather or health or sports or socioeconomic histories.
Dumbass partisan hacknoid.
We aren't making it up.....post links...and they still run the most violent cities in the country....
Your task then, like the racists in the early posts of this thread, is to demonstrate why that association is not a cum hoc fallacy. Explain how a "Democratic" way of running a city (deciding which day the garbage is picked up) leads to violence where a "Republican" way of running a city does not.
Oh wait -- you can't do that since there's no such thing.
You lose, dumb shit.
Well....you mean other than the fact that democrat politicians are shielding gangs from law enforcement....and that in Chicago specifically, since you want examples, is down 2000 police officers. That means everyday they are short because they spend money on everything but cops.......but they make sure that there are plenty of cops for the rich, white, democrat areas of the city....then they underfund the police, and they undermine the authority of the police like deblasio has just started doing...
So yes.....the democrat view of the police....creates the crime problem in these cities......like obama saying "the police acted stupidly" or democrat deblasio saying he tells his son to be afraid of the police....
Yes. The democrat law enforcment policies directly impact crime in these cities....not to mention their tax and spend policies driving out businesses and tax payers...and their education policies destroying inner city schools......
I'll see your 11 and raise you 24....24 of the most violent cities in the country are all run by democrats, and have been for decades.....
Tennessee..a red state...has 6 of it"s largest cities run by democrats and Nashville and Memphis continually make the top violent cities in the country...
Again, stupid --- Democrats run cities everywhere. Here's what that means in little bite-sized sentences.
The "most violent" cities .... run by Democrats.
The "least violent" cities... .run by Democrats.
The "most median violent cities".... run by Democrats.
The most sports-interested cities... run by Democrats.
The least sports-interested cites... run by Democrats.
The healthiest cities.... run by Democrats.
The least healthy cities.... run by Democrats.
The hottest cities... run by Democrats.
The coldest cities .... run by Democrats.
Stop me when you see some kind of pattern emerge here.
Not that a political party on a city level has jack shit to do with the weather or health or sports or socioeconomic histories.
Dumbass partisan hacknoid.
We aren't making it up.....post links...and they still run the most violent cities in the country....
Your task then, like the racists in the early posts of this thread, is to demonstrate why that association is not a cum hoc fallacy. Explain how a "Democratic" way of running a city (deciding which day the garbage is picked up) leads to violence where a "Republican" way of running a city does not.
Oh wait -- you can't do that since there's no such thing.
You lose, dumb shit.
Well....you mean other than the fact that democrat politicians are shielding gangs from law enforcement....and that in Chicago specifically, since you want examples, is down 2000 police officers. That means everyday they are short because they spend money on everything but cops.......but they make sure that there are plenty of cops for the rich, white, democrat areas of the city....then they underfund the police, and they undermine the authority of the police like deblasio has just started doing...
So yes.....the democrat view of the police....creates the crime problem in these cities......like obama saying "the police acted stupidly" or democrat deblasio saying he tells his son to be afraid of the police....
Yes. The democrat law enforcment policies directly impact crime in these cities....not to mention their tax and spend policies driving out businesses and tax payers...and their education policies destroying inner city schools......
Wrong, Stupid.
I asked you how a "Democratic way of running a city" makes it violent. Not how some cherrypicked people might.
Are you illiterate as well as stupid?
Do governors, govern the State or only parts of the State?
Who runs the cities??? The governor only gets a say if he puts troops on the streets (and even then, they have to work with law enforcement)......Do governors, govern the State or only parts of the State?
Logic is a lost art...
The lower classes are, of course, established by .... the upper classes...
Say WHAT?
Okay... "what?"
Hope that helped.
DO NOT edit my posts. Here's what actually went down:
Logic is a lost art...
The vast majority of violent crime is perpetrated by blacks and Latino thugs. Your article dances around it by blaming it on "unskilled young men", and other lame ass economic excuses.
If you are unwilling to address the real problem, you're not going to solve it.
The vast majority of violent crime is perpetrated by the poor/lower classes.
Fixed it for ya.
The lower classes are, of course, established by .... the upper classes.
Logic is a lost art...
The lower classes are, of course, established by .... the upper classes...
Say WHAT?
Okay... "what?"
Hope that helped.
DO NOT edit my posts. Here's what actually went down:
Logic is a lost art...
The vast majority of violent crime is perpetrated by blacks and Latino thugs. Your article dances around it by blaming it on "unskilled young men", and other lame ass economic excuses.
If you are unwilling to address the real problem, you're not going to solve it.
The vast majority of violent crime is perpetrated by the poor/lower classes.
Fixed it for ya.
The lower classes are, of course, established by .... the upper classes.
Your statement ("The lower classes are, of course, established by .... the upper classes") was so illogical I thought I'd highlight the disconnect for you but evidently it still went right over your (pin)head.
I was wondering about that, but seems wrong that a Governor would have no influence over the Mayors of his largest population of citizens within his State!!!! If that is the case, then the Governors get paid way too much, to so called, "run the State", imho. I'm not saying the Gov can change city laws or anything like that, but I would hope they could work with a mayor to come up with a plan to improve his State's inner cities....2 heads are better than 1 type of thing.... I guess I'm dreaming.....Do governors, govern the State or only parts of the State?
Mayors of these cities have incredible power and can control their cities with iron fists....Chicago for example is that way....sometimes Governors have very little ability to affect the day to day affairs of these democrat controlled cities.
Logic is a lost art...
The lower classes are, of course, established by .... the upper classes...
Say WHAT?
Okay... "what?"
Hope that helped.
DO NOT edit my posts. Here's what actually went down:
Logic is a lost art...
The vast majority of violent crime is perpetrated by blacks and Latino thugs. Your article dances around it by blaming it on "unskilled young men", and other lame ass economic excuses.
If you are unwilling to address the real problem, you're not going to solve it.
The vast majority of violent crime is perpetrated by the poor/lower classes.
Fixed it for ya.
The lower classes are, of course, established by .... the upper classes.
Your statement ("The lower classes are, of course, established by .... the upper classes") was so illogical I thought I'd highlight the disconnect for you but evidently it still went right over your (pin)head.
Pull that shit again, I'll report you.
- Editing quotes. You may selectively quote, provided that it does not change the context or meaning of the quote.
There's nothing "illogical" about it. The upper classes, by definition, have the power. If they didn't have the power ----- they wouldn't be the upper classes.
DUH.
And btw, "disconnect" is a VERB.
Logic is a lost art...
The lower classes are, of course, established by .... the upper classes...
Say WHAT?
Okay... "what?"
Hope that helped.
DO NOT edit my posts. Here's what actually went down:
Logic is a lost art...
The vast majority of violent crime is perpetrated by blacks and Latino thugs. Your article dances around it by blaming it on "unskilled young men", and other lame ass economic excuses.
If you are unwilling to address the real problem, you're not going to solve it.
The vast majority of violent crime is perpetrated by the poor/lower classes.
Fixed it for ya.
The lower classes are, of course, established by .... the upper classes.
Your statement ("The lower classes are, of course, established by .... the upper classes") was so illogical I thought I'd highlight the disconnect for you but evidently it still went right over your (pin)head.
Pull that shit again, I'll report you.
- Editing quotes. You may selectively quote, provided that it does not change the context or meaning of the quote.
There's nothing "illogical" about it. The upper classes, by definition, have the power. If they didn't have the power ----- they wouldn't be the upper classes.
DUH.
And btw, "disconnect" is a VERB.
Notice how you really don't know shit?Notice how right wingers want to explain all the violence in their states on blacks and Hispanics. Even when they are in charge, their failure is always someone else s fault.
If the Democrats run the cities, it's the Democrats' fault. Why do the Dims always have to blame their own failures on others????Notice how right wingers want to explain all the violence in their states on blacks and Hispanics. Even when they are in charge, their failure is always someone else s fault.
