Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If the Democrats run the cities, it's the Democrats' fault. Why do the Dims always have to blame their own failures on others????Notice how right wingers want to explain all the violence in their states on blacks and Hispanics. Even when they are in charge, their failure is always someone else s fault.
I just find it bizarre that anyone would be willing, even anonymously, to look this degree of stupid.
Cities weren't invented by Democrats or Republicans. They predate all parties.
I just find it bizarre that anyone would be willing, even anonymously, to look this degree of stupid.
You did.
And I must say the ad hominem is quite...glaring...
Cities weren't invented by Democrats or Republicans. They predate all parties.
That fact does not cover for the fact that Democrats run some of the most violent cities in the US. Whether they predate American politicians is irrelevant.
You didn't know Daily Sr. Then, when he was mayor of Chicago or his son also, remember how he closed an airport, Meigs in the middle of the night and destroyed the runway?I was wondering about that, but seems wrong that a Governor would have no influence over the Mayors of his largest population of citizens within his State!!!! If that is the case, then the Governors get paid way too much, to so called, "run the State", imho. I'm not saying the Gov can change city laws or anything like that, but I would hope they could work with a mayor to come up with a plan to improve his State's inner cities....2 heads are better than 1 type of thing.... I guess I'm dreaming.....Do governors, govern the State or only parts of the State?
Mayors of these cities have incredible power and can control their cities with iron fists....Chicago for example is that way....sometimes Governors have very little ability to affect the day to day affairs of these democrat controlled cities.
The vast majority of violent crime is perpetrated by blacks and Latino thugs. Your article dances around it by blaming it on "unskilled young men", and other lame ass economic excuses.
If you are unwilling to address the real problem, you're not going to solve it.
So.... deflecting off to bigoted bullshit about ethnicities is "addressing the real problem", is it?
It’s doing what most conservatives do best.The vast majority of violent crime is perpetrated by blacks and Latino thugs. Your article dances around it by blaming it on "unskilled young men", and other lame ass economic excuses.
If you are unwilling to address the real problem, you're not going to solve it.
So.... deflecting off to bigoted bullshit about ethnicities is "addressing the real problem", is it?
What cities run by "right wingers" are more violent than those run by so-called liberals?Notice how right wingers want to explain all the violence in their states on blacks and Hispanics. Even when they are in charge, their failure is always someone else s fault.
Statistics aren't subject to bias.The vast majority of violent crime is perpetrated by blacks and Latino thugs. Your article dances around it by blaming it on "unskilled young men", and other lame ass economic excuses.
If you are unwilling to address the real problem, you're not going to solve it.
So.... deflecting off to bigoted bullshit about ethnicities is "addressing the real problem", is it?
You're nothing more than an amateur class warfare fan.The vast majority of violent crime is perpetrated by the poor/lower classes.
Fixed it for ya.
The lower classes are, of course, established by .... the upper classes...
Cities weren't invented by Democrats or Republicans. They predate all parties. This cum hoc bullshit is the most baldly pathetic logical train wreck on this message board. And it keeps loading up on ignorance and coming back, over and over.
I just find it bizarre that anyone would be willing, even anonymously, to look this degree of stupid.
Bull SHIT. The sociocultural background of cities is what determines their character -- not the political party machine of who runs it
For most of our history city officials didn't even HAVE policital parties.
As already noted, MOST cities in the US are run by Democrats, regardless what issues they have or don't have. That's simply a function of how that particular party machine organized itself --- just as the Republican machine organizes itself at the state level.
For most of our history city officials didn't even HAVE policital parties.
They do now. So, that argument of your provides no escape for your fallacious use of fallacies in an attempt to spin away from the actual truth of the matter.
As already noted, MOST cities in the US are run by Democrats, regardless what issues they have or don't have. That's simply a function of how that particular party machine organized itself --- just as the Republican machine organizes itself at the state level.
Non Sequitur. Cars don't drive themselves, and cities don't run themselves. Drivers, LEADERS do. Just as a car goes in the direction you steer it, so too does a city with a Democratic mayor towards high crime and violence. Democrats run cities with high crime rates. Their approach to the violence is already on display in places like Chicago, Detroit, and Baltimore.
For most of our history city officials didn't even HAVE policital parties.
They do now. So, that argument of your provides no escape for your fallacious use of fallacies in an attempt to spin away from the actual truth of the matter.
As already noted, MOST cities in the US are run by Democrats, regardless what issues they have or don't have. That's simply a function of how that particular party machine organized itself --- just as the Republican machine organizes itself at the state level.
Non Sequitur. Cars don't drive themselves, and cities don't run themselves. Drivers, LEADERS do. Just as a car goes in the direction you steer it, so too does a city with a Democratic mayor towards high crime and violence. Democrats run cities with high crime rates. Their approach to the violence is already on display in places like Chicago, Detroit, and Baltimore.
All the safest and most prosperous cities in the country are run by Democrats, too.
My family owns 5 homes in Brooklyn, and has since the 60s. That makes us multi-millionaires now.
If that's what "Democrat-controlled cities" look like, I won't argue.
For most of our history city officials didn't even HAVE policital parties.
They do now. So, that argument of your provides no escape for your fallacious use of fallacies in an attempt to spin away from the actual truth of the matter.
As already noted, MOST cities in the US are run by Democrats, regardless what issues they have or don't have. That's simply a function of how that particular party machine organized itself --- just as the Republican machine organizes itself at the state level.
Non Sequitur. Cars don't drive themselves, and cities don't run themselves. Drivers, LEADERS do. Just as a car goes in the direction you steer it, so too does a city with a Democratic mayor towards high crime and violence. Democrats run cities with high crime rates. Their approach to the violence is already on display in places like Chicago, Detroit, and Baltimore.
All the safest and most prosperous cities in the country are run by Democrats, too.
My family owns 5 homes in Brooklyn, and has since the 60s. That makes us multi-millionaires now.
If that's what "Democrat-controlled cities" look like, I won't argue.
I'm happy for you. But...
Brooklyn NY crime rates and statistics - NeighborhoodScout
Brooklyn is currently enjoying essentially it's lowest crime rate in almost 50 years.
