"This Is How They Treat Loyalty In Trump World"

And that is the kicker. Joe is pushed as morela and all of his agendas are immoral. The costs to society and civilization massive and we are in decline due to this going on for many decades. Weird, isn't it? Humans are flawed. Progs have fast tracked them.
Sorry old boy, this is not a thread about Joey.
 
No one was more loyal to Donald Trump than his Vice President. Watching Mike Pence hitch his evangelical wagon to a hellbound horse was stomach-turning.

Pence could never say a bad word about his master. He was loyal right up to January 6, 2021. Then the light came on, and he upheld his oath to the Constitution and the United States.

And for that, Trump directed the terrorists right at his Vice President. Rather than call for them to stand down, Trump aimed them like a cannon at his right-hand man.


So many others have had the same experience, and now one of Trump's most devoted followers and campaigners in New Hampshire just discovered that loyalty is only one-way.


Now check this out:

E. Jean Carroll trial paused over Trump lawyer’s COVID exposure



Airhead Alina claimed she had been exposed to Covid and was feeling ill, and convinced the judge to delay Trump's defamation trial.

Even though she tested negative for Covid, the judge paused the trial. Conveniently, this allowed Trump to go to New Hampshire for the primary and for the after party.

Well, guess who was at that celebration?

Yeah. The lying bitch lawyer.

And how do we know this?

Here's where it gets interesting.

A guy who knocked on 12,000 doors for Trump in New Hampshire got a huge boner at the sight of Trump's lawyer and asked to take a selfie with her.

That selfie was posted on Twitter for all the world to see.

This is just how fucking stupid this lying lawyer is.

And how was this loyal Mega MAGA cult member rewarded for his efforts?

He was immediately escorted off the premises.

Watch the video:




"This is how they treat loyalty in Trump World."




Another cult member has a bucket of cold water shocking him back to reality.



.

He was VP. When have you ever heard a VP criticize his boss. Stupid thread.
 
So its ALL based on her word? Do you see the problem here?
On her and the other witnesses she had, sworn testmony...

AND on Trump's sworn testimony as well!

They believed her testimony over Trump's testimony.

Try watching the Trump sworn deposition testimony.

You'll hear why they chose not to believe him.

Google Trump's Jean Carroll deposition for first trial.
 
On her and the other witnesses she had, sworn testmony...

AND on Trump's sworn testimony as well!

They believed her testimony over Trump's testimony.

Try watching the Trump sworn deposition testimony.

You'll hear why they chose not to believe him.

Google Trump's Jean Carroll deposition for first trial.
There were no first hand witnesses.
 
So what?

Rape cases are unlikely to ever have a first hand witness that was there to witness the rape or sexual abuse.
But then they have DNA evidence, and they have phone GPS data to back up the claims. They also almost always get reported immediately.

If someone wants to accuse someone of rape decades later, we need more than just their claim.
 
The problem is this doesn’t cause outrage or condemnation – there was a time in America’s political past where rape established as a fact of law would mean the end of any politician’s career, and appropriately so.

Not today – today it’s shrugged off and ignored by a majority of Republicans determined to nominate Trump for president, a treasonous insurrectionist, racist, bigot, rapist, and illiberal authoritarian despot.
Hell it is what the MAGAGATARDS actually want out of their politicians! Look at the Colorado 4th district debate when the question was asked of the GQP candidates if they had been arrested and 6 of them raised their hands. Thunderous applause from the constituents. Just incredible to most normal thinking people!
MAGA
 
But then they have DNA evidence, and they have phone GPS data to back up the claims. They also almost always get reported immediately.

If someone wants to accuse someone of rape decades later, we need more than just their claim.
Not in woke America.
 
But then they have DNA evidence, and they have phone GPS data to back up the claims. They also almost always get reported immediately.

If someone wants to accuse someone of rape decades later, we need more than just their claim.
Most rape cases are NOT reported at the time.

And this is NOT a case in criminal court where the jury has to find a defendant Guilty Beyond A Resonable Doubt.
 
But then they have DNA evidence, and they have phone GPS data to back up the claims. They also almost always get reported immediately.

If someone wants to accuse someone of rape decades later, we need more than just their claim.
Wow, so you actually do think you outsmarted the lawyers and judge and jury.

hilarious .
 
Um, yes they are. Its a VERY rare occasion that someone reports a rape decades later. When that happens, it makes headline news.
She claimed Trump defamed her.

In order for the jury to decide on whether defamation took place, they had to determine if it was likely the sexual abuse she claimed, took place.
 

Forum List

Back
Top