Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

[DiveCon]

again, dipshit, your paranoid delusions are NOT evidence

 

[Christophera]

Are you trying to say this image from 9-11

resembles this? The only official depiction of the core of any kind?

 

[DiveCon]

your paranoid delusions are not debatable

 

[Christophera]

Certainly not by agents with no evidence refusing to recognize violations of law that have never shown an image of this core structure on 9-11.

cease your support for secret methods of mass murder.

 

[Christophera]

Certainly not by agents with no evidence refusing to recognize violations of law that have never shown an image of this core structure on 9-11.

 

[DiveCon]

again, your paranoid delusions do not equal evidence

 

[Christophera]

Text is not evidence. Photos from 9-11 showing concrete is.

 

[DiveCon]

nothing you post is evidence
just your own paranoid delusions

 

[Christophera]

Your text is not even credible after the spectical of un reason you've committed.

it is reasonable that this is concrete.

And since that is reasonable, this never existed. It is a deception

 

[DiveCon]

again, your paranoid delusions are NOT evidence

 

[Christophera]

The evidence for the concrete core is subtantial.

Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992


Finniston, Monty; Williams, Trevor; Bissell, Christopher, eds (1992). "Skyscraper". Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 322. ISBN 0-19-869138-6

Then on 9-11 we see a portion of the east wall of WTC 1 toppling into the empty core area.

Confirming the information of the engineer of record published in the days after 9-11 globally by Newsweek.

 

[DiveCon]

again, your paranoid delusions are NOT evidence

 

[Rat in the Hat]

The evidence for the concrete core is subtantial.

 

[Christophera]

The false social group . . . with no evidence. Conducting treason, or attempting it.

Others have noticed there are no steel core columns and authored web sites making inquiry into the issue.

Your complete failure to post an image from 9-11 showing this core reinforces the issue.

The evidence for a concrete core is huge in comparision.

Then of course when the engineer of record identifies a concrete core in a globally published magazine days after 9-11, it is quite clear that FEMA is misrepresenting the core structure in the above diagram.

 

[DiveCon]

again, paranoid delusions are not evidence

 

[Christophera]

Text is not evidence, that is for sure, but images of the concrete core on 9-11 ARE evidence. The perpetrators would want agents to deny that.

An end view of the WTC 1 west concrete core wall after the north wall has fallen. On the right is the spire, structural steel. On the left is the broken core wall.

August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE., a structural engineer certified in 12 states identifies a concrete core in November of 2001.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Text is not evidence, that is for sure, but images of the concrete core on 9-11 ARE evidence.

And when you post a picture of the intact concrete core, without dust clouds and blurring of the image, you just might get someone to believe your drivel.

Please seek professional help. You'll feel better about yourself, and about life in general.

 

[DiveCon]

Text is not evidence, that is for sure, but images of the concrete core on 9-11 ARE evidence.

And when you post a picture of the intact concrete core, without dust clouds and blurring of the image, you just might get someone to believe your drivel.

Please seek professional help. You'll feel better about yourself, and about life in general.

yet he makes post after post of nothing but text and links to things that dont say what he claims they do
and then shows photos of STEEL CORE COLUMNS and claims(IN TEXT) they are something else

LOL

 

[Obamerican]

The false social group . . . with no evidence. Conducting treason, or attempting it.

Others have noticed there are no steel core columns and authored web sites making inquiry into the issue.

Your complete failure to post an image from 9-11 showing this core reinforces the issue.

The evidence for a concrete core is huge in comparision.

Then of course when the engineer of record identifies a concrete core in a globally published magazine days after 9-11, it is quite clear that FEMA is misrepresenting the core structure in the above diagram.

I love the way your "movement" has gone from "free fall speed" to "near free fall speed". Since there is a big difference I would call that a big FAIL!!

 

[Christophera]

The went down at free fall, but that is not the whole building and the concrete core sat there like that for maybe 5 seconds from what I've learned.

That is not a big fail, it is an approximation.

A BIG fail is not being able to show this core on 9-11.