Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Perhaps the closest thing to truth from the Lefturd delusion land yet.I see an IF and a MOST LIKELY, which are two ways to display that you don’t really know about either of those things. Correct?
People celebrating the indictment have every right to do so if they don’t like Trump and want to see him go down
Awww, but going after Clinton for 15 years isn't enough?Yet you don’t believe 7 years of constantly trying to destroy Trump is ENOUGH! He’s out of office and it’s still not ENOUGH.
Then, in court, it will be proven, "tainted" or not, depending on lawyers.Not the same at all.
There is no rebuttal evidence given, the prosecutor can use any evidence , even tainted evidence that will never be allowed in court
WTF?Why does a prosecutor who is supposed to be an expert in the law need the opinion of people who know nothing about the law to decide if he has enough evidence to bring charges?
Of course, but just this one time because they indicted Trump.This secret court proceeding bullshit should not be tolerated in this country
Normal people don't like criminals.Perhaps the closest thing to truth from the Lefturd delusion land yet.
It's all just a personality thing and if you don't like someone, they need to go down.
That's why Trump and his cult tried ...........and failed.What if we said that about the Clinton's, Obama's, and Biden's? We don't like them and they need to go down, be locked up, etc.
It is.This should be a matter of legal or illegal, and applied objectively to all.
Really? Hillary Clinton is a habitual liar AND criminal:You don’t know what crimes are what yet so that’s a BS statement on your part and is also a deflection. You either believe in law and order or you don’t and if trump gets busted for breaking the law that isn’t weaponization that’s just law enforcement
stillnessinthestorm.com
nypost.com
Oh I don’t know, if we take your approach I’m sure a creative DA can invent something…What would that be?
Awww, but going after Clinton for 15 years isn't enough?
Going after Obama for 10 years isn't enough, for teabaggers?
NO one was even charged with a crime, besides FOX and the GQP, just like they are doing with Biden, now.
I've never sent money to a politician, but I'm probably gonna send Trump some. To make sure he will be your next president, you loons messed up on this one. I despise Democrats now, I will do anything to destroy your party.You’re just showing off how stupid his supporters are. Why are you sending a billionaire money?!
So you think the opinion of people with absolutely no expertise in the laws of evidence are capable of evaluating this evidence better than a panel of lawyers?Then, in court, it will be proven, "tainted" or not, depending on lawyers.
WTF?
Because, it prevents frivolous court proceedings.
Would you just like the prosecutor's opinion?
Then, there is that pesky 5th amendment.
The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads, "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury ..."
Of course, but just this one time because they indicted Trump.
Like I stated...............Crimes according to FOX.Not even comparable groomed one.
That's the way it's been since 1635.So you think the opinion of people with absolutely no expertise in the laws of evidence are capable of evaluating this evidence better than a panel of lawyers?
WTF?No the GJ is a prosecutor's tool to manipulate a jury with one sided, and often illegal evidence so as to put the decision to indict on someone else's shoulders and to protect himself from criticism. Maybe we should end this veil of secrecy and make all these GJ hearings 100% transparent.
Of course it's one sided, but so is a person's arrest.And this has nothing to do with Trump as I have said at least 3 times in this thread. Personally I think Trump is a fucking idiot.
And FYI not every single felony indictment is decided by a GJ and it has been proven too many times that prosecutors rig these GJ hearings
HOW do you know this?And in this case it' the crimes alleged are not even felonies.
Michael Cohen wasn’t convicted of perjury to congress.You mean like that last time he said something under oath and was convicted of perjury or when he lied to Congress? Apparently oaths mean nothing to this guy which is why he's not a credible witness.
Yes, he was.Michael Cohen wasn’t convicted of perjury to congress.
You’re probably thinking of Roger Stone?
Tell it to the juryAnd Trump trusted his lawyer.
His INTENT was to keep the payment from the media...which would nullify the purpose of paying for the NDA...not commit a crime.
Do you have evidence other than the testimony of the convicted attorney?
Fraudulently recorded as legal expenses?the purpose of a hush payment is to prevent the public from knowing.
One of Cohen crimes is that the hush payment was an illegal campaign contribution, because its an in-kind contribution. But Trump got into trouble because his reimbursement was fraudulently recorded.
Doesn't make it right.That's the way it's been since 1635.
WTF?
You then run into what Trump and his cult are doing now, threatening.
Of course it's one sided, but so is a person's arrest.
HOW do you know this?
That's the way it's been since 1635.
WTF?
You then run into what Trump and his cult are doing now, threatening.
Of course it's one sided, but so is a person's arrest.
HOW do you know this?
www.rutherford.org
Sure............."Transparency"The Game Is Rigged: Why Americans Keep Losing to the Police State
The Rutherford Institute, a nonprofit civil liberties organization based in Charlottesville, Va.
These grand juries embody everything that’s wrong with America today. In an age of secret meetings, secret surveillance, secret laws, secret tribunals and secret courts, the grand jury—which meets secretly, hears secret testimony, and is exposed to only what a prosecutor deems appropriate—has become yet another bureaucratic appendage to a government utterly lacking in transparency, accountability and adherence to the rule of law.
IDGAF about Trump Are you utterly incapable of talking about the larger issue of the rigged corrupt Grand Jury system?Sure............."Transparency"
So...........Like the Trump regime?
Mnuchin is Keeping $500 Billion in Bailout Funds Secret
View attachment 771887
Public Citizen
https://www.citizen.org › news › keeping-500-billion-i...
Jun 11, 2020 — Note: U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin told Congress Wednesday that the Trump administration intends to keep secret the names of the ...
George Floyd didnt even get a trial.The Game Is Rigged: Why Americans Keep Losing to the Police State
The Rutherford Institute, a nonprofit civil liberties organization based in Charlottesville, Va.
These grand juries embody everything that’s wrong with America today. In an age of secret meetings, secret surveillance, secret laws, secret tribunals and secret courts, the grand jury—which meets secretly, hears secret testimony, and is exposed to only what a prosecutor deems appropriate—has become yet another bureaucratic appendage to a government utterly lacking in transparency, accountability and adherence to the rule of law.
As for grand juries, which were intended to serve as a check on the powers of the police and prosecutors, they have gone from being the citizen’s shield against injustice to a weapon in the hands of government agents. A far cry from a people’s court, today’s grand jury system is so blatantly rigged in favor of the government as to be laughable
