Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. I oppose taxation so yeah gonna not support anything taxation pays for... I might be willing to get over that for a national defense but not if it's an labor based tax.
You prefer non-labor based taxation?
So you support taxing capital gains income as much or higher than ordinary income?
And are opposed to the federal government issuing patents or setting standards of measurement or exercising legislative control over the District of Columbia?
Reading is hard.
I oppose all taxes. I said I might agree to a non labor based tax (an excise tax perhaps) to pay for the military. But really I'd prefer zero taxes.
Opposed to patents yes. Im not sure I get your legislative question? I don't want government "controlling" almost anything.
You prefer non-labor based taxation?
So you support taxing capital gains income as much or higher than ordinary income?
And are opposed to the federal government issuing patents or setting standards of measurement or exercising legislative control over the District of Columbia?
Reading is hard.
I'm so sorry to hear that.
I oppose all taxes. I said I might agree to a non labor based tax (an excise tax perhaps) to pay for the military. But really I'd prefer zero taxes.
Opposed to patents yes. Im not sure I get your legislative question? I don't want government "controlling" almost anything.
How exactly is government supposed to pay the people who are defending your freedom without taxation?
And
1) And are opposed to the federal government issuing patents?
Yes or No?
2) or setting standards of measurement ?
Yes or No/?
3) or exercising legislative control over the District of Columbia?
Yes or NO?
And if those voluntary contributions aren't enough to protect your freedom, you're A-OK with losing it?Reading is hard.
I'm so sorry to hear that.
I oppose all taxes. I said I might agree to a non labor based tax (an excise tax perhaps) to pay for the military. But really I'd prefer zero taxes.
Opposed to patents yes. Im not sure I get your legislative question? I don't want government "controlling" almost anything.
How exactly is government supposed to pay the people who are defending your freedom without taxation?
And
1) And are opposed to the federal government issuing patents?
Yes or No?
2) or setting standards of measurement ?
Yes or No/?
3) or exercising legislative control over the District of Columbia?
Yes or NO?
Voluntary contributions.
No
No
I mean exactly what I said. Do you not understand the meaning of "legislative authority" ? Haven't had civics yet?Maybe depends exactly what you mean
Anyone who opposes taxation imposed by the legislature of the We the People is deranged.
He or she has already or certainly will commit criminal acts. Identify them ahead of time in order to deal with them in the short, summary fashion they deserve.
And if those voluntary contributions aren't enough to protect your freedom, you're A-OK with losing it?I'm so sorry to hear that.
How exactly is government supposed to pay the people who are defending your freedom without taxation?
And
1) And are opposed to the federal government issuing patents?
Yes or No?
2) or setting standards of measurement ?
Yes or No/?
3) or exercising legislative control over the District of Columbia?
Yes or NO?
Voluntary contributions.
No
No
Did you say the government should ONLY be engaged in protecting freedom?
How does setting standards and measures protect freedom?
I mean exactly what I said. Do you not understand the meaning of "legislative authority" ? Haven't had civics yet?Maybe depends exactly what you mean
Anyone who opposes taxation imposed by the legislature of the We the People is deranged.
He or she has already or certainly will commit criminal acts. Identify them ahead of time in order to deal with them in the short, summary fashion they deserve.
We are already aware of your devotion to Statism. No need to keep spouting off about it.
I blamed the republicans.
Why you lying asbout that?
Now who wrote it and promoted the law and what was the final vote tally?
Jul 26th On passage Passed by recorded vote: 410 - 20 (Roll no. 430).
Jul 26th Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 176.
Feb 8th Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
H.R.22: Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act - U.S. Congress - OpenCongress
You're welcome.
Keep posting, loon.
If you want go live around a camp fire, go buy an unoccupied island.
But you are part of the social compact, and you will support it until you renounce your citizenship and immigrate.
Anyone who opposes taxation imposed by the legislature of the We the People is deranged.
He or she has already or certainly will commit criminal acts. Identify them ahead of time in order to deal with them in the short, summary fashion they deserve.
We are already aware of your devotion to Statism. No need to keep spouting off about it.
A cigar aficionado and amigo of mine named Irwin penned a note to the Republican Congress the night after Obama got elected for four more years of this slop, and I thought Id pass it on to you. Check it out
And if those voluntary contributions aren't enough to protect your freedom, you're A-OK with losing it?Voluntary contributions.
Did you say the government should ONLY be engaged in protecting freedom?
How does setting standards and measures protect freedom?
I mean exactly what I said. Do you not understand the meaning of "legislative authority" ? Haven't had civics yet?Maybe depends exactly what you mean
Well, the answer is no. If Legislative Authority "is approval given by the legislature to the executive branch to spend state or federal funds" the answer is obviously no because there should be no state or federal funds
Not sure what part of me saying "no" to setting standards and measurements you didn't comprehend.
I'm not going to bother responding to your hypothetical situation regarding the defense.
I blamed the republicans.
Why you lying asbout that?
Now who wrote it and promoted the law and what was the final vote tally?
Jul 26th On passage Passed by recorded vote: 410 - 20 (Roll no. 430).
Jul 26th Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 176.
Feb 8th Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
H.R.22: Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act - U.S. Congress - OpenCongress
You're welcome.
the numbers you claim are not on that page
Keep posting, loon.
If you want go live around a camp fire, go buy an unoccupied island.
But you are part of the social compact, and you will support it until you renounce your citizenship and immigrate.
We are already aware of your devotion to Statism. No need to keep spouting off about it.
Emigrate is the word you wanted.
Again, you seem to think that I have to agree with every single thing the government does.
I blamed the republicans.
Why you lying asbout that?
Now who wrote it and promoted the law and what was the final vote tally?
Jul 26th On passage Passed by recorded vote: 410 - 20 (Roll no. 430).
Jul 26th Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 176.
Feb 8th Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
H.R.22: Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act - U.S. Congress - OpenCongress
You're welcome.
the numbers you claim are not on that page
And if those voluntary contributions aren't enough to protect your freedom, you're A-OK with losing it?
Did you say the government should ONLY be engaged in protecting freedom?
How does setting standards and measures protect freedom?
I mean exactly what I said. Do you not understand the meaning of "legislative authority" ? Haven't had civics yet?
Well, the answer is no. If Legislative Authority "is approval given by the legislature to the executive branch to spend state or federal funds" the answer is obviously no because there should be no state or federal funds
Not sure what part of me saying "no" to setting standards and measurements you didn't comprehend.
I'm not going to bother responding to your hypothetical situation regarding the defense.
The question was whether or not you opposed the federal government setting standards. You answered "no". Do you know what the word "opposed" means?
Have you ever actually read the U.S. Constitution? You should go straight to Article I Section 8, read it, then come back and tell us why you oppose the Congress exercising its Constitutionally delegated authority.
The word is acceptable, and, yes, you have to support government decisions until you can repeal them.
Keep posting, loon.
If you want go live around a camp fire, go buy an unoccupied island.
But you are part of the social compact, and you will support it until you renounce your citizenship and immigrate.
Emigrate is the word you wanted.
Again, you seem to think that I have to agree with every single thing the government does.
Well, the answer is no. If Legislative Authority "is approval given by the legislature to the executive branch to spend state or federal funds" the answer is obviously no because there should be no state or federal funds
Not sure what part of me saying "no" to setting standards and measurements you didn't comprehend.
I'm not going to bother responding to your hypothetical situation regarding the defense.
The question was whether or not you opposed the federal government setting standards. You answered "no". Do you know what the word "opposed" means?
Have you ever actually read the U.S. Constitution? You should go straight to Article I Section 8, read it, then come back and tell us why you oppose the Congress exercising its Constitutionally delegated authority.
No. The first question asked if I was opposed. The second one didn't.
Again, I understand the Constitution just fine. I don't get why people like you and JakeStarkey seem to think that I can't disagree with things.
