Trayvon Martin Law in Alabama



Are they making it illegal for thugs in training to ambush random strangers and pound their head into sidewalks........is that the law they are passing...?

And it would be nice if people understood "Stand Your Ground" Laws before they demanded they be repealed.......
Again, it is not known how the two came to be struggling.
we do know that if zimmerman had not chosen to pursue marrin based on nothing there would have been no incident
 


Are they making it illegal for thugs in training to ambush random strangers and pound their head into sidewalks........is that the law they are passing...?

And it would be nice if people understood "Stand Your Ground" Laws before they demanded they be repealed.......
Again, it is not known how the two came to be struggling.
we do know that if zimmerman had not chosen to pursue marrin based on nothing there would have been no incident
There were break ins throughout the neighborhood. Zimmerman was doing his job. Martin thought he was a queer and attacked him. Why are you siding with a homophobe?
 


Are they making it illegal for thugs in training to ambush random strangers and pound their head into sidewalks........is that the law they are passing...?

And it would be nice if people understood "Stand Your Ground" Laws before they demanded they be repealed.......
Again, it is not known how the two came to be struggling.
we do know that if zimmerman had not chosen to pursue marrin based on nothing there would have been no incident

and if martin had not doubled back to find Zimmerman there would have been no incident
and if martin had merely turned around and said "why are you following me, fuck off" there probably would have been no incident
and if there had not been a spree of break ins there would have been no incident.

We can go on and on.
 


Are they making it illegal for thugs in training to ambush random strangers and pound their head into sidewalks........is that the law they are passing...?

And it would be nice if people understood "Stand Your Ground" Laws before they demanded they be repealed.......
Again, it is not known how the two came to be struggling.
we do know that if zimmerman had not chosen to pursue marrin based on nothing there would have been no incident

and if martin had not doubled back to find Zimmerman there would have been no incident
and if martin had merely turned around and said "why are you following me, fuck off" there probably would have been no incident
and if there had not been a spree of break ins there would have been no incident.

We can go on and on.
The causal chain began when Martin beat a man to the point he feared for his life. Nothing leading up to that is relevant.
 
you would feel differently if it was your child who was followed and shot down.

My child wouldn't act like Trayvon.
Doesn't matter how your child acts. Under current Alabama law, anyone who feels threatened by him can use deadly force against him.

Good law?

Maybe not.
Why do you Leftists keep lying? The jury found that indeed his life was being threatened and deadly force was justified. The defense didn't even use SYG.

Stop lying Leftists!
 
The reason why nobody wants to touch it is because it's a poorly written law based on emotion and political expediency and conceived by someone who has no background in the legal system. "If you are following someone"? What does that mean in legal terms? Following by accident or on purpose? What if someone turns and assaults you while you were "following"? Does the law say you must retreat and you can't use that fact that the person assaulted you as a defense?
 


Are they making it illegal for thugs in training to ambush random strangers and pound their head into sidewalks........is that the law they are passing...?

And it would be nice if people understood "Stand Your Ground" Laws before they demanded they be repealed.......
Again, it is not known how the two came to be struggling.
we do know that if zimmerman had not chosen to pursue marrin based on nothing there would have been no incident

and if martin had not doubled back to find Zimmerman there would have been no incident
and if martin had merely turned around and said "why are you following me, fuck off" there probably would have been no incident
and if there had not been a spree of break ins there would have been no incident.

We can go on and on.
The thing is you don't know that martin doubled back and confronted zimmerman. You dont know if martin initiated contact with zimmerman in any way.

So no, we can't go on and on. We can only say, with certainty, that if zimmerman had not been pursuing martin there would not have been an incident.
 


Are they making it illegal for thugs in training to ambush random strangers and pound their head into sidewalks........is that the law they are passing...?

And it would be nice if people understood "Stand Your Ground" Laws before they demanded they be repealed.......
Again, it is not known how the two came to be struggling.
we do know that if zimmerman had not chosen to pursue marrin based on nothing there would have been no incident

and if martin had not doubled back to find Zimmerman there would have been no incident
and if martin had merely turned around and said "why are you following me, fuck off" there probably would have been no incident
and if there had not been a spree of break ins there would have been no incident.

We can go on and on.


Trayvon's big mistake was in trying to get away from his stalker and then, even worse, defending himself.

Why was this (and other) evidence not allowed in court?

13. Three witnesses say they heard a boy cry for help before a shot was fired. “Three witnesses contacted by The Miami Herald say they saw or heard the moments before and after the Miami Gardens teenager’s killing. All three said they heard the last howl for help from a despondent boy.” [Miami Herald]

16. In a cell phone call moments before his death, Martin told a teenage girl that he was “hounded by a strange man on a cellphone who ran after him, cornered him and confronted him.” “‘He said this man was watching him, so he put his hoodie on. He said he lost the man,’ Martin’s friend said. ‘I asked Trayvon to run, and he said he was going to walk fast. I told him to run but he said he was not going to run.’ Eventually he would run, said the girl, thinking that he’d managed to escape. But suddenly the strange man was back, cornering Martin. ‘Trayvon said, ‘What, are you following me for,’ and the man said, ‘What are you doing here.'” [ABC News]



What about other facts from the same link?
 


Are they making it illegal for thugs in training to ambush random strangers and pound their head into sidewalks........is that the law they are passing...?

And it would be nice if people understood "Stand Your Ground" Laws before they demanded they be repealed.......
Again, it is not known how the two came to be struggling.
we do know that if zimmerman had not chosen to pursue marrin based on nothing there would have been no incident

and if martin had not doubled back to find Zimmerman there would have been no incident
and if martin had merely turned around and said "why are you following me, fuck off" there probably would have been no incident
and if there had not been a spree of break ins there would have been no incident.

We can go on and on.
The thing is you don't know that martin doubled back and confronted zimmerman. You dont know if martin initiated contact with zimmerman in any way.

So no, we can't go on and on. We can only say, with certainty, that if zimmerman had not been pursuing martin there would not have been an incident.

From the location of the attack and the other information given to the jury we can pretty much conclude he doubled back.

you take the first immediate event in the chain to place blame on Zimmerman, and ignore all the other decisions either one could have made along the way to make the result different.
 


Are they making it illegal for thugs in training to ambush random strangers and pound their head into sidewalks........is that the law they are passing...?

And it would be nice if people understood "Stand Your Ground" Laws before they demanded they be repealed.......
Again, it is not known how the two came to be struggling.
we do know that if zimmerman had not chosen to pursue marrin based on nothing there would have been no incident

and if martin had not doubled back to find Zimmerman there would have been no incident
and if martin had merely turned around and said "why are you following me, fuck off" there probably would have been no incident
and if there had not been a spree of break ins there would have been no incident.

We can go on and on.


Trayvon's big mistake was in trying to get away from his stalker and then, even worse, defending himself.

Why was this (and other) evidence not allowed in court?

13. Three witnesses say they heard a boy cry for help before a shot was fired. “Three witnesses contacted by The Miami Herald say they saw or heard the moments before and after the Miami Gardens teenager’s killing. All three said they heard the last howl for help from a despondent boy.” [Miami Herald]

16. In a cell phone call moments before his death, Martin told a teenage girl that he was “hounded by a strange man on a cellphone who ran after him, cornered him and confronted him.” “‘He said this man was watching him, so he put his hoodie on. He said he lost the man,’ Martin’s friend said. ‘I asked Trayvon to run, and he said he was going to walk fast. I told him to run but he said he was not going to run.’ Eventually he would run, said the girl, thinking that he’d managed to escape. But suddenly the strange man was back, cornering Martin. ‘Trayvon said, ‘What, are you following me for,’ and the man said, ‘What are you doing here.'” [ABC News]



What about other facts from the same link?

Time for your tinfoil hat, eh luddy duddy?
 
So no, we can't go on and on. We can only say, with certainty, that if zimmerman had not been pursuing martin there would not have been an in


Are they making it illegal for thugs in training to ambush random strangers and pound their head into sidewalks........is that the law they are passing...?

And it would be nice if people understood "Stand Your Ground" Laws before they demanded they be repealed.......
Again, it is not known how the two came to be struggling.
we do know that if zimmerman had not chosen to pursue marrin based on nothing there would have been no incident

and if martin had not doubled back to find Zimmerman there would have been no incident
and if martin had merely turned around and said "why are you following me, fuck off" there probably would have been no incident
and if there had not been a spree of break ins there would have been no incident.

We can go on and on.
The thing is you don't know that martin doubled back and confronted zimmerman. You dont know if martin initiated contact with zimmerman in any way.

So no, we can't go on and on. We can only say, with certainty, that if zimmerman had not been pursuing martin there would not have been an incident.

From the location of the attack and the other information given to the jury we can pretty much conclude he doubled back.

you take the first immediate event in the chain to place blame on Zimmerman, and ignore all the other decisions either one could have made along the way to make the result different.
That's because the only thing we know is that zimmerman pursued.

He may have doubled back, stopped, hid, whatever, none of which is illegal or threatening. We dont know, and we certainly don't know what happened when the two met face to face.

that part remains known for certainty to martin and zimmerman
 

Forum List

Back
Top