Trump goes there: insinuates that Megyn Kelly was menstruating during debate

[JimH52]

Donald describes himself as a "Ratings Machine." Do you want a President or a "Ratings Machine.'' I am sure some will say Both! The RNC is in a spot. Donald says if he likes the GOP nominee, he will not run as Third Party. So who, of the 138 GOP hopefuls does he respect>

Only one that I can think of....A guy named "Donald Trump!"

Maybe he likes Teddy Cruz, but honestly, Ted has no chance. So who will the RNC anoint to make Donald step down. It should be obvious by not, if not later, that he lost the female vote and Hispanic vote. And I am sure he will alienate someone else very soon. He is an "Insult machine!"

 

[JimH52]

I have a lot or respect for Carly Firorina. I cut her a lot of slack on this because 1) She is from California and 2) She is a woman. However.... ANY Republican who wants to become mired in some silly 'liberal-concocted' banter about tabloid-gossip comments someone made or names being called... with ALL THE ISSUES FACING AMERICAN VOTERS.... is an idiot who is NOT going to win the GOP nomination, and shouldn't win.

The GOP needs you to lead their female voter outreach in 2016. You can tell them that you are giving them slack because they are women. Surely that is going to lead to a massive success for the GOP!

Bravo!

Forward march!!!

Boss is a prototypical Republican, huh? WOW! He could be Donald's running mate.....or "wherever" mate....

 

[Statistikhengst]

I have a lot or respect for Carly Firorina. I cut her a lot of slack on this because 1) She is from California and 2) She is a woman. However.... ANY Republican who wants to become mired in some silly 'liberal-concocted' banter about tabloid-gossip comments someone made or names being called... with ALL THE ISSUES FACING AMERICAN VOTERS.... is an idiot who is NOT going to win the GOP nomination, and shouldn't win.

The GOP needs you to lead their female voter outreach in 2016. You can tell them that you are giving them slack because they are women. Surely that is going to lead to a massive success for the GOP!

Bravo!

Forward march!!!

Boss is a prototypical Republican, huh? WOW! He could be Donald's running mate.....or "wherever" mate....

In 5 months, they will deny that they ever supported Trump.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[rightwinger]

Women do not menstruate out of their eyes.
It's the left who is making it about her period.

yeah, I think it is possible he was just kind of repeating his earlier statement or trying to expand it and then added whatever......
wasnt even thinking about menstruation.

If he was however....expect him to double down...so we will probably know for sure.
If so, it is so over the top, and plays into democratic line and sympathy for Hillary...that you have to wonder if he isnt a shill for the Democrats.

I don't wonder. I have been sure of it from day one. It is obvious that he is a shill. It should be obvious to the meanest intellegence.

Well but he was treated meanly by Obama at the Washington correspondents dinner.....maybe ego goaded him into a run?

or maybe he really cares about where we're heading to.

That was funny

Obama put the birther in his place and Trump just fumed

Well if he is a shill for the Democrats ......then you kind of actually have to wonder about the birther stuff. Why would he raise the issue?......as a kind of morality play? setting himself up to get shot down? I don't know.

I never claimed him to be a shill for the Democrats

I claimed his antics are helping the Democrats

 

[Statistikhengst]

Kind of wondering which neutron bomb teh Don will drop in teh next däääys. ..

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[charwin95]

Kind of wondering which neutron bomb teh Don will drop in teh next däääys. ..

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

With his bombastic style. It could be any day.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Kind of wondering which neutron bomb teh Don will drop in teh next däääys. ..

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

With his bombastic style. It could be any day.

Well, the Don just doubled down on his doubling down of the double down.

Now he wants Megyn Kelly to apologize to him.

LOL!

Donald Trump 2016 Megyn Kelly should apologize to me - POLITICO

 

[paddymurphy]

Uhm, no. 911 happened 9 months after 43 took office. Your math is faulty. Either that or you simply chose to lie.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

My gosh Obama has been president for over six years and it's still Bush's fault. Also you are saying 911 was planned in 8 months? Clinton's lack of attention on our enemies made us weak.

There is no statute of limitations on things being your fault. Iraq and Afghanistan were Bushs fault, the collapsing economy was Bush's fault, torture was Bush's fault

Hey needle dick, news flash O' but hole called the Iraq war over and al quads a Jv squad before they split apart and became the ISIS.

Our President warned Bush not to get involved in Iraq. He also pledged to get us the hell out of Bush's blunder

He did

he did? What are you smoking?

He did: In 2002. And he was right, as subsequent events have proven to most Americans.
"What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other armchair, weekend warriors in this administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.

What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income — to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression. That's what I'm opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics. Now let me be clear — I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity. He's a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.

But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history. I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaida. I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars.

So for those of us who seek a more just and secure world for our children, let us send a clear message to the president today. You want a fight, President Bush? Let's finish the fight with bin Laden and al-Qaida, through effective, coordinated intelligence, and a shutting down of the financial networks that support terrorism, and a homeland security program that involves more than color-coded warnings. You want a fight, President Bush?

Let's fight to make sure that the U.N. inspectors can do their work, and that we vigorously enforce a non-proliferation treaty, and that former enemies and current allies like Russia safeguard and ultimately eliminate their stores of nuclear material, and that nations like Pakistan and India never use the terrible weapons already in their possession, and that the arms merchants in our own country stop feeding the countless wars that rage across the globe. You want a fight, President Bush?

Let's fight to make sure our so-called allies in the Middle East, the Saudis and the Egyptians, stop oppressing their own people, and suppressing dissent, and tolerating corruption and inequality, and mismanaging their economies so that their youth grow up without education, without prospects, without hope, the ready recruits of terrorist cells. You want a fight, President Bush? Let's fight to wean ourselves off Middle East oil, through an energy policy that doesn't simply serve the interests of Exxon and Mobil.

Those are the battles that we need to fight. Those are the battles that we willingly join. The battles against ignorance and intolerance. Corruption and greed. Poverty and despair. The consequences of war are dire, the sacrifices immeasurable. We may have occasion in our lifetime to once again rise up in defense of our freedom, and pay the wages of war. But we ought not — we will not — travel down that hellish path blindly. Nor should we allow those who would march off and pay the ultimate sacrifice, who would prove the full measure of devotion with their blood, to make such an awful sacrifice in vain."

So, what were you saying about someone smoking something?

 

[paddymurphy]

What's so funny about this accusation that the Donald was insinuating Megyn was on the rag is that everybody has been insulting the shit out of Trump for saying what he wants to without political correctness.

You can't have it both ways when it comes to the Donald.

If Trump wanted to say Megyn was having hormonal issues, he would have laid it on the line.

No doubt about it. Probably would have thrown in mention of hot flashes too.



There's not a subtle bone in Trump's body.

Like the coward he is, he hides behind this nonsense of not being politically correct every time he says something stupid. And the idiots who support him lap it up.

 

[Wyatt earp]

My gosh Obama has been president for over six years and it's still Bush's fault. Also you are saying 911 was planned in 8 months? Clinton's lack of attention on our enemies made us weak.

There is no statute of limitations on things being your fault. Iraq and Afghanistan were Bushs fault, the collapsing economy was Bush's fault, torture was Bush's fault

Hey needle dick, news flash O' but hole called the Iraq war over and al quads a Jv squad before they split apart and became the ISIS.

Our President warned Bush not to get involved in Iraq. He also pledged to get us the hell out of Bush's blunder

He did

he did? What are you smoking?

He did: In 2002. And he was right, as subsequent events have proven to most Americans.
"What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other armchair, weekend warriors in this administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.

What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income — to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression. That's what I'm opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics. Now let me be clear — I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity. He's a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.

But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history. I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaida. I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars.

So for those of us who seek a more just and secure world for our children, let us send a clear message to the president today. You want a fight, President Bush? Let's finish the fight with bin Laden and al-Qaida, through effective, coordinated intelligence, and a shutting down of the financial networks that support terrorism, and a homeland security program that involves more than color-coded warnings. You want a fight, President Bush?

Let's fight to make sure that the U.N. inspectors can do their work, and that we vigorously enforce a non-proliferation treaty, and that former enemies and current allies like Russia safeguard and ultimately eliminate their stores of nuclear material, and that nations like Pakistan and India never use the terrible weapons already in their possession, and that the arms merchants in our own country stop feeding the countless wars that rage across the globe. You want a fight, President Bush?

Let's fight to make sure our so-called allies in the Middle East, the Saudis and the Egyptians, stop oppressing their own people, and suppressing dissent, and tolerating corruption and inequality, and mismanaging their economies so that their youth grow up without education, without prospects, without hope, the ready recruits of terrorist cells. You want a fight, President Bush? Let's fight to wean ourselves off Middle East oil, through an energy policy that doesn't simply serve the interests of Exxon and Mobil.

Those are the battles that we need to fight. Those are the battles that we willingly join. The battles against ignorance and intolerance. Corruption and greed. Poverty and despair. The consequences of war are dire, the sacrifices immeasurable. We may have occasion in our lifetime to once again rise up in defense of our freedom, and pay the wages of war. But we ought not — we will not — travel down that hellish path blindly. Nor should we allow those who would march off and pay the ultimate sacrifice, who would prove the full measure of devotion with their blood, to make such an awful sacrifice in vain."

So, what were you saying about someone smoking something?

look at your own highlight in your post.

Obama declared the war over, he thought it was part of his legacy

So why we still there?

Now pass the joint and don't Bogart it.

 

[dcraelin]

yeah, I think it is possible he was just kind of repeating his earlier statement or trying to expand it and then added whatever......
wasnt even thinking about menstruation.

If he was however....expect him to double down...so we will probably know for sure.
If so, it is so over the top, and plays into democratic line and sympathy for Hillary...that you have to wonder if he isnt a shill for the Democrats.

I don't wonder. I have been sure of it from day one. It is obvious that he is a shill. It should be obvious to the meanest intellegence.

Well but he was treated meanly by Obama at the Washington correspondents dinner.....maybe ego goaded him into a run?

or maybe he really cares about where we're heading to.

That was funny

Obama put the birther in his place and Trump just fumed

Well if he is a shill for the Democrats ......then you kind of actually have to wonder about the birther stuff. Why would he raise the issue?......as a kind of morality play? setting himself up to get shot down? I don't know.

No, you don't.

IF you think he is a shill for the dems......

 

[dcraelin]

yeah, I think it is possible he was just kind of repeating his earlier statement or trying to expand it and then added whatever......
wasnt even thinking about menstruation.

If he was however....expect him to double down...so we will probably know for sure.
If so, it is so over the top, and plays into democratic line and sympathy for Hillary...that you have to wonder if he isnt a shill for the Democrats.

I don't wonder. I have been sure of it from day one. It is obvious that he is a shill. It should be obvious to the meanest intellegence.

Well but he was treated meanly by Obama at the Washington correspondents dinner.....maybe ego goaded him into a run?

or maybe he really cares about where we're heading to.

That was funny

Obama put the birther in his place and Trump just fumed

Well if he is a shill for the Democrats ......then you kind of actually have to wonder about the birther stuff. Why would he raise the issue?......as a kind of morality play? setting himself up to get shot down? I don't know.

I never claimed him to be a shill for the Democrats

I claimed his antics are helping the Democrats

I see that

 

[paddymurphy]

There is no statute of limitations on things being your fault. Iraq and Afghanistan were Bushs fault, the collapsing economy was Bush's fault, torture was Bush's fault

Hey needle dick, news flash O' but hole called the Iraq war over and al quads a Jv squad before they split apart and became the ISIS.

Our President warned Bush not to get involved in Iraq. He also pledged to get us the hell out of Bush's blunder

He did

he did? What are you smoking?

He did: In 2002. And he was right, as subsequent events have proven to most Americans.
"What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other armchair, weekend warriors in this administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.

What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income — to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression. That's what I'm opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics. Now let me be clear — I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity. He's a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.

But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history. I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaida. I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars.

So for those of us who seek a more just and secure world for our children, let us send a clear message to the president today. You want a fight, President Bush? Let's finish the fight with bin Laden and al-Qaida, through effective, coordinated intelligence, and a shutting down of the financial networks that support terrorism, and a homeland security program that involves more than color-coded warnings. You want a fight, President Bush?

Let's fight to make sure that the U.N. inspectors can do their work, and that we vigorously enforce a non-proliferation treaty, and that former enemies and current allies like Russia safeguard and ultimately eliminate their stores of nuclear material, and that nations like Pakistan and India never use the terrible weapons already in their possession, and that the arms merchants in our own country stop feeding the countless wars that rage across the globe. You want a fight, President Bush?

Let's fight to make sure our so-called allies in the Middle East, the Saudis and the Egyptians, stop oppressing their own people, and suppressing dissent, and tolerating corruption and inequality, and mismanaging their economies so that their youth grow up without education, without prospects, without hope, the ready recruits of terrorist cells. You want a fight, President Bush? Let's fight to wean ourselves off Middle East oil, through an energy policy that doesn't simply serve the interests of Exxon and Mobil.

Those are the battles that we need to fight. Those are the battles that we willingly join. The battles against ignorance and intolerance. Corruption and greed. Poverty and despair. The consequences of war are dire, the sacrifices immeasurable. We may have occasion in our lifetime to once again rise up in defense of our freedom, and pay the wages of war. But we ought not — we will not — travel down that hellish path blindly. Nor should we allow those who would march off and pay the ultimate sacrifice, who would prove the full measure of devotion with their blood, to make such an awful sacrifice in vain."

So, what were you saying about someone smoking something?

look at your own highlight in your post.

Obama declared the war over, he thought it was part of his legacy

So why we still there?

Now pass the joint and don't Bogart it.

Because, according to Bush, it was over. We were required to remove our troops. We did. Would you prefer that they stayed and hundred or thousand more killed or maimed? He warned in 2002 that the war was not needed. No rational person can claim that it was. He warned it would have consequences we could not predict. He was right. The war destabilized that entire region. And were are not there, other than trainers and flight controllers. Perhaps you would be ok with abandoning a commitment to a nation we destroy, but I guess our president has a little more honor than you and those like you.

 

[danielpalos]

Just the wealthiest purchasing better privileges and better immunities than the least wealthy.

 

[Liminal]

I am predicting that this is not going to go well for Donald Trump

...Seems I've heard that before!

Stats is a rather dim bulb, okay a retard. Trump is NOT trying to rally the party. He is just as upset at the party as MILLIONS of people in BOTH parties at BOTH parties.

Trump is trying to rally the PEOPLE. People make the poll numbers go up NOT some party. I have seen Trump polls that put him at 44 to 48 at this point. Trump beat Fox.

Only a complete fucking idiot birther moron would find Trump the least bit compelling, convincing, or even interesting.

 

[Liminal]

I don't wonder. I have been sure of it from day one. It is obvious that he is a shill. It should be obvious to the meanest intellegence.

Well but he was treated meanly by Obama at the Washington correspondents dinner.....maybe ego goaded him into a run?

or maybe he really cares about where we're heading to.

That was funny

Obama put the birther in his place and Trump just fumed

Well if he is a shill for the Democrats ......then you kind of actually have to wonder about the birther stuff. Why would he raise the issue?......as a kind of morality play? setting himself up to get shot down? I don't know.

No, you don't.

IF you think he is a shill for the dems......

That's the only explanation that makes any sense....Trump is working with Clinton.

 

[turzovka]

Donald describes himself as a "Ratings Machine." Do you want a President or a "Ratings Machine.'' I am sure some will say Both! The RNC is in a spot. Donald says if he likes the GOP nominee, he will not run as Third Party. So who, of the 138 GOP hopefuls does he respect>

Only one that I can think of....A guy named "Donald Trump!"

Maybe he likes Teddy Cruz, but honestly, Ted has no chance. So who will the RNC anoint to make Donald step down. It should be obvious by not, if not later, that he lost the female vote and Hispanic vote. And I am sure he will alienate someone else very soon. He is an "Insult machine!"

>>Donald describes himself as a "Ratings Machine." Do you want a President or a "Ratings Machine.''<<

Those who voted for Barack the second time around do not seem to care what kind of president they want. Nothing could be more embarrassing for this nation, more damaging to this nation, than our current “leader” and his administration. So let us not pretend that we could do any worse than the status quo. However, Hillary is very much a joke unto herself.

I would gladly take a bombastic self promoter with guts like Donald Trump and all his foibles over some “honorable” candidate who will do nothing more than continue the Washington D.C. political “do nothing” bullshit scheme. What the world needs now is guts and truth coming from a public pulpit where the media cannot cover it up or spin it.


>>It should be obvious by now, if not later, that he lost the female vote and Hispanic vote. <<

Well if that is true, that really does not say much for women now does it?

And granted immigration is a major issue, but I would like to think most Spanish speaking American voters might have other reasons for casting their vote one way or the other? But I know, the democrats and their hand outs have already taken care of any other possible leaks.

 

[Liminal]

Maybe Hillary should use the obvious fact that she no longer menstruates as an asset in her campaign.

No one could accuse her of that.

Maybe that's Trump's problem, he's a bleeder. At least he'd have some way of relating to women.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Please provide links with quotes.

I have never heard a Leftie say even one misogynistic thing about Megyn Kelly, ever.

Please, have at it. I can wait.

Sure, no problem.

NYT attacking Kelly

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/25/magazine/the-megyn-kelly-moment.html?_r=0

Watch Megyn Kelly REFUSES To Stay Silent After Liberal Attack. They ll Wish She Had...

Liberals attacking Kelly

Liberals Attack FOX After Megyn Kelly Suffers Humiliating Wardrobe Malfunction VIDEO

More attacks on Kelly

Megyn Kelly is an evil genius How the Fox News host won America s trust by being slightly less horrible - Salon.com

 

[Faun]

"First of all, the question should have never been asked at a Presidential debate." #801

What question? Please quote it.

"Second... "Blood coming out of her eyes. or wherever..." IS NOT "she was on the rag!"" 801

Nor is it nose.
If he meant nose, he could have and should have said "nose". He didn't. He said, after a pregnant pause, to emphasize the implied meaning of: "where-ever", an orifice not to be named in polite discourse.
Denying it is naïve. The meaning was clear.

And worse than that, Trump exposed himself as a hypocrite.
Trump has already condemned politicians for this.
And now he's doing it too.
It was NOT the nose Trump was talking about.

No fucktard... the meaning WAS NOT clear. The meaning could be interpreted any number of ways and you happened to interpret it in the most disgusting way your perverted little deviant mind could think of. You're attempting to project your perverted sick thoughts into Trump's mouth and spew them out for him... that's not going to work this time, moron. You're BUSTED!

So... You want the direct quote of the question Megyn Kelly presented to a Republican Presidential candidate at the very first debate between the 10 top candidates, where time was of the utmost importance in discussing the most crucial issues our country is facing... Okay, good for you! Let's have a look at her question and analyze it a bit, shall we?

Mr. Trump, one of the things people love about you is you speak your mind and you don’t use a politician’s filter. However, that is not without its downsides, in particular, when it comes to women.

You’ve called women you don’t like “fat pigs, dogs, slobs, and disgusting animals.” Your Twitter account…[question interrupted] Trump says: "Only Rosie O'Donnell"...
Your Twitter account has several disparaging comments about women’s looks. You once told a contestant on Celebrity Apprentice it would be a pretty picture to see her on her knees. Does that sound to you like the temperament of a man we should elect as president, and how will you answer the charge from Hillary Clinton, who was likely to be the Democratic nominee, that you are part of the war on women?

Now let's dissect this... She leads off her question with a barrage of very disparaging words Trump allegedly used to describe "women" but there is absolutely NO context as to who he said this to or where, when, why... nothing. No context given, no explanation other than he said these words. That, in the lawyer's handbook (which Ms. Kelly should know) is called a "leading question" and would have been an "objection sustained" by any judge in America. That alone, disqualified the remainder of her question and is why Megyn Kelly is currently battling a petition to have her removed from any future debates. It was inappropriate to ask ANY candidate a question like that... this isn't The Kelly Files... she isn't interviewing him on her TV show.

So the words she chose seem to come in line with comments Trump made once about Rosie O'Donnell... a host on a popular "gossip hen" show called, The View. Why did Trump make the comments? Well, you have to understand that O'Donnell went on a five-minute rant on the air, mocking Trump, making fun of his hair, talking about his relationships, his ex-wives, his children... and being the typical obnoxious liberal bitch we have come to know and love. Trump was responding to that... and it may not have been how you or I would have responded, it may have been crude and over-the-top, but that is the CONTEXT his comments were made in, and it was not disclosed by Ms. Kelly.

The second "swing" at Trump was the "down on your knees" comment he made... after considerable research, they found that from Season 6 of Celebrity Apprentice. So now, Megyn or the "smarter people" at Fox, had done their research... dug up old episodes of his TV show to find SOMETHING to throw in his grill! THIS is what they came up with, and it was a totally innocent comment. During an episode of the show, the team captain of this woman was explaining something about deciding who would get to do a particular task and he told Trump that "she dropped to her knees begging me to let her do the task" ...to which Trump casually replied to her... "that must've been a pretty picture, you on your knees." And that was it... nothing further was said, the guy kept explaining what he was saying... the show went on. No one said a damn thing the next day, or all this time since. They interviewed the woman after this blew up and she said she honestly hadn't remembered the comment and when she saw the tape, was not offended and didn't think he meant it inappropriately, and further stated that he had always treated her respectfully. Again... Ms. Kelly should have done her homework... but more importantly, she should have presented some context but she didn't.... she played it like a liberal sleazebag would play it.

If Trump didn't mean menstration, then shame on him for not being clear. As a political novice, he has to know his adversaries would use this against him to their advantage.