Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What you mean by "YOU PEOPLE"The polls still have Hillary winning...
The polls were right. She won the popular vote.
Thanks to Putin
I remember the RWnuts around here gleeful that the Russian hacking was hurting Clinton. You people were CERTAIN it was hurting Clinton.
How soon you forget.
I think you may once again be polling your chickens before they are hatched...are you sure they've abandoned it?...not saying they haven't, but even a weak president on their side is better for them than a strong one on the other side.A week or two ago the Republicans in Congress tried to pull off an ethics rules revision,
and a flood of public opinion knocked them back on their heels and they abandoned it.
That is the sort thing this weak president and out of touch Congress are going to be up against from now on.
Hillary invented it.....'Spawn' of Hillary's 2008 Birtherism (proven)LOL there it comes out again. The 'birtherism' of 2016.
Hillary had nothing to do with birtherism. No one has ever produced one quote of Hillary Clinton claiming Obama wasn't born in the US.
NO shit, genius. They over-sampled democrats to get their numbers.How's that working out, snowflake?The polls still have Hillary winning...
The polls were right. She won the popular vote.
They predicted an Electoral College landslide - they were wrong - you lose.
No they didn't. Pollsters don't poll electors. They poll people. They poll the popular vote. The national polls got the popular vote almost exactly right.
It's an old political trick before the election meant to discourage opposition voters to the point they believe it is pointless to go vote, believing there is no way their candidate can win.
Like rigging their Primary and feeding debate questions in advance to Hillary, this was a dirty attempt to steal the election.
It failed - Hillary lost.
You LIE, snowflake. It has been oroven her campaign spread it around in 2008 as Barry came out of nowhere to kick her ass.Hillary had nothing to do with birtherism.
I believe Trump will actually try to detroy ISIS, not arm, train, and protect them like Hillary and Barry did.
No, snowflake. After the loss articles and articles were written about the polls being SO wrong. Poor snowflake.NO shit, genius. They over-sampled democrats to get their numbers.How's that working out, snowflake?The polls still have Hillary winning...
The polls were right. She won the popular vote.
They predicted an Electoral College landslide - they were wrong - you lose.
No they didn't. Pollsters don't poll electors. They poll people. They poll the popular vote. The national polls got the popular vote almost exactly right.
It's an old political trick before the election meant to discourage opposition voters to the point they believe it is pointless to go vote, believing there is no way their candidate can win.
Like rigging their Primary and feeding debate questions in advance to Hillary, this was a dirty attempt to steal the election.
It failed - Hillary lost.
The numbers they got were right.
RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein
You LIE, snowflake. It has been oroven her campaign spread it around in 2008 as Barry came out of nowhere to kick her ass.Hillary had nothing to do with birtherism.
As Barry said in 2008:
"Hillary Clinton will DO and SAY anything to win."
No, snowflake. After the loss articles and articles were written about the polls being SO wrong. Poor snowflake.NO shit, genius. They over-sampled democrats to get their numbers.How's that working out, snowflake?The polls were right. She won the popular vote.
They predicted an Electoral College landslide - they were wrong - you lose.
No they didn't. Pollsters don't poll electors. They poll people. They poll the popular vote. The national polls got the popular vote almost exactly right.
It's an old political trick before the election meant to discourage opposition voters to the point they believe it is pointless to go vote, believing there is no way their candidate can win.
Like rigging their Primary and feeding debate questions in advance to Hillary, this was a dirty attempt to steal the election.
It failed - Hillary lost.
The numbers they got were right.
RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein
Did you know that Trumps Popularity is 25 points higher than the liberal news orgs? That it is much higher than Congress? Why is it that the lickspittle, lapdog, liberal media, didn't learn after the last election, not to give FALSE information about the polls?People generally don't trust or like him, as well, considering his on-stage performance the last two years, they should not: except in one area.
But all of that may not matter if he does come through, according to analysis, on jobs. I would also add in fighting ISIS as well.
If he gets a Single Payer system through, all the better. It won't matter if he deports or does not deport 11 million people, or if he builds or does not build a wall.
If he can get the lower working classes on the job again with good paying wages, his popularity will improve . . . dramatically.
If he fails on jobs and ISIS, his chance for a second term would seemingly dramatically decrease.
Trump to take office with dismal ratings -- except on jobs
Donald Trump's transition has hurt his popularity, not helped
Trump Transition Winning No Popularity Points
(CNN)Hillary Clinton has a 12-point lead over Donald Trump and has reached 50% support nationally among likely voters, a new ABC News tracking poll shows.
You LIE, snowflake. It has been oroven her campaign spread it around in 2008 as Barry came out of nowhere to kick her ass.Hillary had nothing to do with birtherism.
As Barry said in 2008:
"Hillary Clinton will DO and SAY anything to win."
All Mostly False statements involving Donald Trump | PolitiFact
All False statements involving Donald Trump | PolitiFact
All Pants on Fire! statements involving Donald Trump | PolitiFact
No, snowflake. After the loss articles and articles were written about the polls being SO wrong. Poor snowflake.NO shit, genius. They over-sampled democrats to get their numbers.How's that working out, snowflake?The polls were right. She won the popular vote.
They predicted an Electoral College landslide - they were wrong - you lose.
No they didn't. Pollsters don't poll electors. They poll people. They poll the popular vote. The national polls got the popular vote almost exactly right.
It's an old political trick before the election meant to discourage opposition voters to the point they believe it is pointless to go vote, believing there is no way their candidate can win.
Like rigging their Primary and feeding debate questions in advance to Hillary, this was a dirty attempt to steal the election.
It failed - Hillary lost.
The numbers they got were right.
RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein
Seth Rich gave Assange the emails, John Podesta fell for a phishing scam, Hillary used her own personal, unsecured server, there are no Russians anywhereThe polls still have Hillary winning...
The polls were right. She won the popular vote.
Thanks to Putin
I remember the RWnuts around here gleeful that the Russian hacking was hurting Clinton. You people were CERTAIN it was hurting Clinton.
How soon you forget.
2 days, snowflake.No, snowflake. After the loss articles and articles were written about the polls being SO wrong. Poor snowflake.NO shit, genius. They over-sampled democrats to get their numbers.How's that working out, snowflake?
They predicted an Electoral College landslide - they were wrong - you lose.
No they didn't. Pollsters don't poll electors. They poll people. They poll the popular vote. The national polls got the popular vote almost exactly right.
It's an old political trick before the election meant to discourage opposition voters to the point they believe it is pointless to go vote, believing there is no way their candidate can win.
Like rigging their Primary and feeding debate questions in advance to Hillary, this was a dirty attempt to steal the election.
It failed - Hillary lost.
The numbers they got were right.
RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein
The articles were wrong. I'm right. Look at the polls in that link and tell me how wrong those polls were.
You mean all the polls showing Hillary winning?No, snowflake. After the loss articles and articles were written about the polls being SO wrong. Poor snowflake.NO shit, genius. They over-sampled democrats to get their numbers.How's that working out, snowflake?
They predicted an Electoral College landslide - they were wrong - you lose.
No they didn't. Pollsters don't poll electors. They poll people. They poll the popular vote. The national polls got the popular vote almost exactly right.
It's an old political trick before the election meant to discourage opposition voters to the point they believe it is pointless to go vote, believing there is no way their candidate can win.
Like rigging their Primary and feeding debate questions in advance to Hillary, this was a dirty attempt to steal the election.
It failed - Hillary lost.
The numbers they got were right.
RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein
The articles were wrong. I'm right. Look at the polls in that link and tell me how wrong those polls were.
You mean all the polls showing Hillary winning?No, snowflake. After the loss articles and articles were written about the polls being SO wrong. Poor snowflake.NO shit, genius. They over-sampled democrats to get their numbers.No they didn't. Pollsters don't poll electors. They poll people. They poll the popular vote. The national polls got the popular vote almost exactly right.
It's an old political trick before the election meant to discourage opposition voters to the point they believe it is pointless to go vote, believing there is no way their candidate can win.
Like rigging their Primary and feeding debate questions in advance to Hillary, this was a dirty attempt to steal the election.
It failed - Hillary lost.
The numbers they got were right.
RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein
The articles were wrong. I'm right. Look at the polls in that link and tell me how wrong those polls were.
How's that 'popular vote win' working out, snowflake?Those polls only show who would win the popular vote, and they were right on.