Trump offers a compromise with PP

[Weatherman2020]

The GOP simply can not stop playing politics with women's private reproductive rights. Nothing new here.

Dufus thinks a private company is controlling womens reproductive rights.

 

[Vandalshandle]

Yes, as politely as possible they said "you better keep the government money coming".

On the contrary. PP knows that the GOP is going to cut off their funding. They also know that their mission is more important than that funding.

Yep, they believe black babies must be killed in order to keep darkies in control.

I think I have met you before. Did you used to run the tilt-a-whirl at the state fair?

Not my fault PP was created by a racist to reduce the black population and today kills more black babies per capita than any other race.

Love to play that race card, Dontcha? You would have made a great contribution to OJ's defense team!

 

[Vandalshandle]

The GOP simply can not stop playing politics with women's private reproductive rights. Nothing new here.

Dufus thinks a private company is controlling womens reproductive rights.

Dude, You are SERIOUSLY confused. It is the Federal government that is controlling women's reproductive rights. Try to stay up.

 

[Rustic]

The GOP simply can not stop playing politics with women's private reproductive rights. Nothing new here.

Dufus thinks a private company is controlling womens reproductive rights.

Dude, You are SERIOUSLY confused. It is the Federal government that is controlling women's reproductive rights. Try to stay up.

… And funding baby butchery in the form of Planned Parenthood

 

[Avatar4321]

“Planned Parenthood says it rejected the informal offer, noting that federal funds cannot be used for abortions anyway.”

Which is like saying people on Federal assistance do not spend their money on booze or drugs instead of food.

No, it enables them to splurge on unnecessary items.

https://www.usnews.com/news/nationa...od-keep-federal-funding-if-it-halts-abortions

Fascist.

MYOB

Um anything receiving federal funding is by definition our business...

 

[Weatherman2020]

The GOP simply can not stop playing politics with women's private reproductive rights. Nothing new here.

Dufus thinks a private company is controlling womens reproductive rights.

Dude, You are SERIOUSLY confused. It is the Federal government that is controlling women's reproductive rights. Try to stay up.

Do tell! Who has been sent to prison for using a rubber?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Yes, as politely as possible they said "you better keep the government money coming".

On the contrary. PP knows that the GOP is going to cut off their funding. They also know that their mission is more important than that funding.

Yep, they believe black babies must be killed in order to keep darkies in control.

I think I have met you before. Did you used to run the tilt-a-whirl at the state fair?

Not my fault PP was created by a racist to reduce the black population and today kills more black babies per capita than any other race.

Love to play that race card, Dontcha? You would have made a great contribution to OJ's defense team!

Not my fault you support a racist organization that was formed to keep the black population in check.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Abortion is a legal medical procedure. Tax payers don't have any business deciding which legal medical procedures they will fund and which they won't. Your side will not get away with this.

Tax payers have every right to decide how tax dollars are spent. Your days of telling Americans what they will and must do are over.

It is your side trying to tell American women what they will and must do with their bodies and their lives. It's not going to go over well. Just warning ya.

You are incorrect. WE are not telling women what to do with their bodies. They are free to do as they please and accept the consequences for their decisions. WE ARE no longer going to pay for those consequences, however.

Are you aware of the Hyde Amendment?

"In U.S. politics, the Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision barring the use of certain federal funds to pay for abortion except to save the life of the woman, or if the pregnancy arises from incest or rape.

Do you believe a women raped should be required to go full term, delivery a baby and provide for its support until it reaches maturity?

"Do you believe a women raped should be required to go full term, delivery a baby..."

Let's see how easy it is to prove you a dishonest dunce....

Let's deal with the so very overused idea of "cases of rape or incest."
The concept that there are "cases of rape or incest" is a chimera.
They really don't exist.....well, the fact is that 98.5% of abortion don't involve either abhorrent event.
The cases in which abortion is for rape, 1%; and .5% incest.
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/psrh/full/3711005.pdf


Therefore, you must be in agreement that 98.5% of all abortions should be outlawed....


....Right?

Nope. I ran an agency and wrote and managed two VAWA Grants by the DOJ; I read most if not all of the police reports on rape, incest and domestic violence in a region of over 1 million citizens. In fact the conclusion in your link reported:

"The decision to have an abortion is typically motivated by multiple, diverse and interrelated reasons. The themes of responsibility to others and resource limitations, such as financial constraints and lack of partner support, recurred throughout the study"

You simple explanations and conclusions defy reality.

 

[Avatar4321]

My best guess is that PP told Trump, as politely as possible, that they are not providing services to accommodate Trump, but rather to accommodate the needs of women. I'm not sure why they even bothered to tell him that, because the entire concept is over his head.

Yes I'm sure a violent organization like planned parenthood was worried about their manners.

Yeah those children are dead and we sold their body parts for harvesting, but we used our manners so we are classy

 

[Avatar4321]

The GOP simply can not stop playing politics with women's private reproductive rights. Nothing new here.

I'll make a deal with you, in the spirit of trump. You stop killing children and ill stop defending their right to life

 

[OldLady]

Why can't they secure grants from all their billionaire friends, that support abortions? And last I heard no abortion is free at PP, and they accept all but Medicaid insurance, which all are required to carry at the moment. Surely they could get grant funding, along with their own receipts, enough to carry on their mission.
The very simple fact they say they are for the health of women, yet they themselves do not perform mammograms, tells me all I need to know, about their real mission.
Why should I, as a tax payer, that doesn't believe in mass extermination, have to pay for others abortions? There are already provisions that if one is needed, in hospitals for the sake of the mothers health.

Trump offers Planned Parenthood funds if it halts abortions

Sounds good to me!

That's not a compromise. That's arm twisting, which PP will not succumb to.

You aren't paying for abortions. The individual having the abortion pays cash on the barrel head (or private insurance). No taxpayer is funding anyone's abortion.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Tax payers have every right to decide how tax dollars are spent. Your days of telling Americans what they will and must do are over.

It is your side trying to tell American women what they will and must do with their bodies and their lives. It's not going to go over well. Just warning ya.

You are incorrect. WE are not telling women what to do with their bodies. They are free to do as they please and accept the consequences for their decisions. WE ARE no longer going to pay for those consequences, however.

Are you aware of the Hyde Amendment?

"In U.S. politics, the Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision barring the use of certain federal funds to pay for abortion except to save the life of the woman, or if the pregnancy arises from incest or rape.

Do you believe a women raped should be required to go full term, delivery a baby and provide for its support until it reaches maturity?

"Do you believe a women raped should be required to go full term, delivery a baby..."

Let's see how easy it is to prove you a dishonest dunce....

Let's deal with the so very overused idea of "cases of rape or incest."
The concept that there are "cases of rape or incest" is a chimera.
They really don't exist.....well, the fact is that 98.5% of abortion don't involve either abhorrent event.
The cases in which abortion is for rape, 1%; and .5% incest.
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/psrh/full/3711005.pdf


Therefore, you must be in agreement that 98.5% of all abortions should be outlawed....


....Right?

Nope. I ran an agency and wrote and managed two VAWA Grants by the DOJ; I read most if not all of the police reports on rape, incest and domestic violence in a region of over 1 million citizens. In fact the conclusion in your link reported:

"The decision to have an abortion is typically motivated by multiple, diverse and interrelated reasons. The themes of responsibility to others and resource limitations, such as financial constraints and lack of partner support, recurred throughout the study"

You simple explanations and conclusions defy reality.

Interesting....a "Nope"
from a dope.....


.....while I provided data from
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/psrh/full/3711005.pdf


"The Guttmacher Institute is a research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in the United States and Globally.
The Institute was founded in 1968 as the Center for Family Planning Program Development, a semi-autonomous division of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. It was renamed in memory of Alan Guttmacher, an Ob/Gyn and former president of Planned Parenthood. The Guttmacher Institute became an independent, non-profit corporation in 1977 under the direction of Frederick S. Jaffe."
Guttmacher Institute - Wikipedia


See how simple it was to prove you a dishonest dunce.

OK....back under your rock.

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

Tax payers have every right to decide how tax dollars are spent. Your days of telling Americans what they will and must do are over.

It is your side trying to tell American women what they will and must do with their bodies and their lives. It's not going to go over well. Just warning ya.

You are incorrect. WE are not telling women what to do with their bodies. They are free to do as they please and accept the consequences for their decisions. WE ARE no longer going to pay for those consequences, however.

Are you aware of the Hyde Amendment?

"In U.S. politics, the Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision barring the use of certain federal funds to pay for abortion except to save the life of the woman, or if the pregnancy arises from incest or rape.

Do you believe a women raped should be required to go full term, delivery a baby and provide for its support until it reaches maturity?

"Do you believe a women raped should be required to go full term, delivery a baby..."

Let's see how easy it is to prove you a dishonest dunce....

Let's deal with the so very overused idea of "cases of rape or incest."
The concept that there are "cases of rape or incest" is a chimera.
They really don't exist.....well, the fact is that 98.5% of abortion don't involve either abhorrent event.
The cases in which abortion is for rape, 1%; and .5% incest.
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/psrh/full/3711005.pdf


Therefore, you must be in agreement that 98.5% of all abortions should be outlawed....


....Right?

Nope. I ran an agency and wrote and managed two VAWA Grants by the DOJ; I read most if not all of the police reports on rape, incest and domestic violence in a region of over 1 million citizens. In fact the conclusion in your link reported:

"The decision to have an abortion is typically motivated by multiple, diverse and interrelated reasons. The themes of responsibility to others and resource limitations, such as financial constraints and lack of partner support, recurred throughout the study"

You simple explanations and conclusions defy reality.

Translation - The occurrences of rape and incest total less than 2 percent.

Consequently, almost all abortions are for convenience and are a substitute for birth control. As such, the responsibility to pay for such services rests with the recipient and not the tax payer.

 

[Moonglow]

Trump offers Planned Parenthood funds if it halts abortions

Sounds good to me!

Only if they can sterilize Trumpet...

 

[PoliticalChic]

Why can't they secure grants from all their billionaire friends, that support abortions? And last I heard no abortion is free at PP, and they accept all but Medicaid insurance, which all are required to carry at the moment. Surely they could get grant funding, along with their own receipts, enough to carry on their mission.
The very simple fact they say they are for the health of women, yet they themselves do not perform mammograms, tells me all I need to know, about their real mission.
Why should I, as a tax payer, that doesn't believe in mass extermination, have to pay for others abortions? There are already provisions that if one is needed, in hospitals for the sake of the mothers health.

Trump offers Planned Parenthood funds if it halts abortions

Sounds good to me!

That's not a compromise. That's arm twisting, which PP will not succumb to.

You aren't paying for abortions. The individual having the abortion pays cash on the barrel head (or private insurance). No taxpayer is funding anyone's abortion.

"tell American women what they will and must do with their bodies"

Their bodies????

How could the victim be 'their body' since it has a different DNA, different fingerprints, often different blood type and different sex?

How?



Next vapid argument: you argue that if you don't receive a tax deduction for murder, it's just peachy keen?


Keep goin'....

 

[Preacher]

There is no place or circumstance where tax payers pay for abortions.

No one is killing "babies".

No one has the right to force women to reproduce.

MYOB

No one forced them to be sluts and open their legs. Take the risk of getting pregnant deal with the consequences. Just because you "accidentally" murder someone doesn't mean you can say OOPS and get away with it. Just because you "accidentally" rob a bank doesn't mean you can say OOPS and get away with it.

 

[Rob37]

Such bullshit. To the extent that federal funding allows PP to pay their rent and light bills it is funding abortion.

And you are guilty as well, for allowing your tax money to pave the street in front of their facility!

What bullshit.

 

[OldLady]

That's not a compromise. That's arm twisting, which PP will not succumb to.

Then lose the money. It's the taxpayers money not PPs. Elections have consequences and this is one of them. PP will fold - it's always about the money.

Abortion is a legal medical procedure. Tax payers don't have any business deciding which legal medical procedures they will fund and which they won't. Your side will not get away with this.

Tax payers have every right to decide how tax dollars are spent. Your days of telling Americans what they will and must do are over.

It is your side trying to tell American women what they will and must do with their bodies and their lives. It's not going to go over well. Just warning ya.

"tell American women what they will and must do with their bodies"

Their bodies????

How could the victim be 'their body' since it has a different DNA, different fingerprints, often different blood type and different sex?

How?


Do you realize how flaccid your alibi for murder sounds?

It's not murder. It's termination of pregnancy, in the vast majority of cases when the fetus is the size of a blood clot and has no fingerprints. Your argument is bullshit.

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

Then lose the money. It's the taxpayers money not PPs. Elections have consequences and this is one of them. PP will fold - it's always about the money.

Abortion is a legal medical procedure. Tax payers don't have any business deciding which legal medical procedures they will fund and which they won't. Your side will not get away with this.

Tax payers have every right to decide how tax dollars are spent. Your days of telling Americans what they will and must do are over.

It is your side trying to tell American women what they will and must do with their bodies and their lives. It's not going to go over well. Just warning ya.

"tell American women what they will and must do with their bodies"

Their bodies????

How could the victim be 'their body' since it has a different DNA, different fingerprints, often different blood type and different sex?

How?


Do you realize how flaccid your alibi for murder sounds?

It's not murder. It's termination of pregnancy, in the vast majority of cases when the fetus is the size of a blood clot and has no fingerprints. Your argument is bullshit.

At what stage of growth does killing of the fetus constitute death?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Such bullshit. To the extent that federal funding allows PP to pay their rent and light bills it is funding abortion.

And you are guilty as well, for allowing your tax money to pave the street in front of their facility!