Trump "people" tell me again.

[AsianTrumpSupporter]

This is like asking why Don Corleone wouldn't make a good President.

 

[Siete]

Because in all likelihood she was going to continue the policies of Obama which for the most part were unpopular. Trump much like Obama in 2008 was an unknown on political issues but people were willing to roll the dice on Obama because they didn't want a Bush third term with MCCain in 2008 or an Obama third term with Hillary in 2016.

Threw craps with Trump, didn't they?

I don't judge a Presidency after only five months.

horseshit ^^^^^^^^^

you judged Obama the day he began his campaign.

 

[blackhawk]

Because in all likelihood she was going to continue the policies of Obama which for the most part were unpopular. Trump much like Obama in 2008 was an unknown on political issues but people were willing to roll the dice on Obama because they didn't want a Bush third term with MCCain in 2008 or an Obama third term with Hillary in 2016.

Threw craps with Trump, didn't they?

I don't judge a Presidency after only five months.

horseshit ^^^^^^^^^

you judged Obama the day he began his campaign.

I'm sure you have proof to backup your horsehit claim. As shocking as this is for you to comprehend some of us will see what someone does before passing judgment.

 

[pismoe]

I'm a very slow learner. I often have to be told the same thing over and over again. I need things basic and simple and sarcasm and emotionalism tend to confuse me.

Thrump "people", tell me one more time, why would Hillary be so much worse as president than Trump?

A. He's far more honest.
B. Hillary was an extension of Obama.
C. Trump is a doer. Hillary talks.
D. Trump detests PC. I like that. Hillary lies when her lips move.
E. Trump is pro traditional USA. Hillary is a socialist.
F. Trump wants to control borders. Hillary wants them open.
G. Trump isn't a politician. He's a business man.
H. Hillary only desires power and one-world order.
I. Hillary's voice is nasty.
J. Trump is refreshing, and we needed him to undue the damage caused by liberalism.
K. Hillary ran on inciting racism and feminism.
L. Modern liberalism is a determent.

------------------------------------------------------- very nicely said Dude !!

 

[pismoe]

Because in all likelihood she was going to continue the policies of Obama which for the most part were unpopular. Trump much like Obama in 2008 was an unknown on political issues but people were willing to roll the dice on Obama because they didn't want a Bush third term with MCCain in 2008 or an Obama third term with Hillary in 2016.

Threw craps with Trump, didn't they?

I don't judge a Presidency after only five months.

horseshit ^^^^^^^^^

you judged Obama the day he began his campaign.

------------------------------------------ mrobama , you bet , i sure knew that hip hopping choomganger the moment i first laid eyes on him Siete !! ----------- just a quick comment !!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Her Supreme Court pick would have been a far left activist judge. That alone would have put the country into grave danger.

Can someone explain to me how we'd be in grave danger due to a SC pick? Would North Korea nuke us? Would Russia try to hack our elections? What is the disaster that would befall us?

Liberalism would be unchecked in its desire to legislate from the bench!

 

[Siete]

Because in all likelihood she was going to continue the policies of Obama which for the most part were unpopular. Trump much like Obama in 2008 was an unknown on political issues but people were willing to roll the dice on Obama because they didn't want a Bush third term with MCCain in 2008 or an Obama third term with Hillary in 2016.

Threw craps with Trump, didn't they?

I don't judge a Presidency after only five months.

horseshit ^^^^^^^^^

you judged Obama the day he began his campaign.

I'm sure you have proof to backup your horsehit claim. As shocking as this is for you to comprehend some of us will see what someone does before passing judgment.

DERPIE DO ... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


how a president picks his cabinet, outlines his policies, appoints SC judges etc etc in the first 6 months in office IS EXACTLY HOW HE/SHE IS JUDGED ... anyone who say otherwise is a damn idiot.

hell, judging candidates is how we elect presidents, then we judge the president.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Why would one of the most corrupt politicians in modern history who had repeatedly sold the influence of her office to the highest bidder by worse than a loud mouth businessman who is appointing far superior judges?

It's not self evident?

Course you could have listened to me and voted third party but can't think outside the box can we?

It's too bad a third party could not find a strong candidate to run last election. With Clinton and Trump having the most negative ratings in recent history, this should of been the election a third party candidate could have won.

Third parties tend to be the extremes. The Greens, Communists, and other even more liberal groups that no Republican would ever vote for and Libertarians that no Democrat would ever vote for.

Try to find a centrist third party. Good luck with that!

 

[sartre play]

Political party's don't play fair, Mc Connell was on Fox 4 days after Obama became president, & said words to the effect he will be a bad president, and we will make him a 4 year one. Trump did not even get 4 days. don't' think every thing can be fair, but we could try.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I'm a very slow learner. I often have to be told the same thing over and over again. I need things basic and simple and sarcasm and emotionalism tend to confuse me.

Thrump "people", tell me one more time, why would Hillary be so much worse as president than Trump?

Fuck that corrupt bitch.





Simple enough? I suspect not as you appear to lean left. As a result you should just give up trying to understand since most of you are unfamiliar with the concept of common sense & reasoning.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Why would one of the most corrupt politicians in modern history who had repeatedly sold the influence of her office to the highest bidder be worse than a loud mouth businessman who is appointing far superior judges?

It's not self evident?

Course you could have listened to me and voted third party but can't think outside the box can we?

How many opinions of the current SC have you read in order to come to the conclusion that Gorsuch is far superior to, for example, Judge Garland. Please state your reasoning.

Since Garland is not on the court, you are making a false premise.

 

[Dim Bulb]

Why would one of the most corrupt politicians in modern history who had repeatedly sold the influence of her office to the highest bidder by worse than a loud mouth businessman who is appointing far superior judges?

It's not self evident?

Course you could have listened to me and voted third party but can't think outside the box can we?

It's too bad a third party could not find a strong candidate to run last election. With Clinton and Trump having the most negative ratings in recent history, this should of been the election a third party candidate could have won.

Third parties tend to be the extremes. The Greens, Communists, and other even more liberal groups that no Republican would ever vote for and Libertarians that no Democrat would ever vote for.

Try to find a centrist third party. Good luck with that!

John Anderson. Michael Bloomberg. Even George Washington was a moderate.

 

[jc456]

I'm a very slow learner. I often have to be told the same thing over and over again. I need things basic and simple and sarcasm and emotionalism tend to confuse me.

Thrump "people", tell me one more time, why would Hillary be so much worse as president than Trump?

she isn't and that is comforting as all fk.

 

[iceberg]

I'm a very slow learner. I often have to be told the same thing over and over again. I need things basic and simple and sarcasm and emotionalism tend to confuse me.

Thrump "people", tell me one more time, why would Hillary be so much worse as president than Trump?

seriously?

give it up. people made their vote and have moved on. you wanna wallow around in all this crap put it on some post it notes and roll around on 'em and pick one off when you ask yourself this again.

 

[Dim Bulb]

Why would one of the most corrupt politicians in modern history who had repeatedly sold the influence of her office to the highest bidder be worse than a loud mouth businessman who is appointing far superior judges?

It's not self evident?

Course you could have listened to me and voted third party but can't think outside the box can we?

How many opinions of the current SC have you read in order to come to the conclusion that Gorsuch is far superior to, for example, Judge Garland. Please state your reasoning.

Since Garland is not on the court, you are making a false premise.

I said "for example" but okay. Tell me about the opinions you would cite indicating that Gorsuch is far superior to any of the current Justices. Your other point about "liberal activism" was interesting. What about "conservative activism?" I myself am a Hugo Black conservative. Aliti and Thomas are conservative activists. As deleterious to constitutional law as any liberal.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

I'm a very slow learner. I often have to be told the same thing over and over again. I need things basic and simple and sarcasm and emotionalism tend to confuse me.

Thrump "people", tell me one more time, why would Hillary be so much worse as president than Trump?

You certainly are a slow learner.

This thread belongs in the Badlands or the Rubber Room.

You're welcome.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Why would one of the most corrupt politicians in modern history who had repeatedly sold the influence of her office to the highest bidder by worse than a loud mouth businessman who is appointing far superior judges?

It's not self evident?

Course you could have listened to me and voted third party but can't think outside the box can we?

It's too bad a third party could not find a strong candidate to run last election. With Clinton and Trump having the most negative ratings in recent history, this should of been the election a third party candidate could have won.

Third parties tend to be the extremes. The Greens, Communists, and other even more liberal groups that no Republican would ever vote for and Libertarians that no Democrat would ever vote for.

Try to find a centrist third party. Good luck with that!

John Anderson. Michael Bloomberg. Even George Washington was a moderate.

Bloomberg? Oh, my! Have you been out in the sun too long?

John Anderson? Why didn't he win? Ancient history.

George Washington? Using that logic, Dems should have nominated Mad Dog Maddis!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Why would one of the most corrupt politicians in modern history who had repeatedly sold the influence of her office to the highest bidder be worse than a loud mouth businessman who is appointing far superior judges?

It's not self evident?

Course you could have listened to me and voted third party but can't think outside the box can we?

How many opinions of the current SC have you read in order to come to the conclusion that Gorsuch is far superior to, for example, Judge Garland. Please state your reasoning.

Since Garland is not on the court, you are making a false premise.

I said "for example" but okay. Tell me about the opinions you would cite indicating that Gorsuch is far superior to any of the current Justices. Your other point about "liberal activism" was interesting. What about "conservative activism?" I myself am a Hugo Black conservative. Aliti and Thomas are conservative activists. As deleterious to constitutional law as any liberal.

You apparently do not know what judicial activism is. Please go read up on it so we can have an intelligent conversation.

 

[Dim Bulb]

Why would one of the most corrupt politicians in modern history who had repeatedly sold the influence of her office to the highest bidder be worse than a loud mouth businessman who is appointing far superior judges?

It's not self evident?

Course you could have listened to me and voted third party but can't think outside the box can we?

How many opinions of the current SC have you read in order to come to the conclusion that Gorsuch is far superior to, for example, Judge Garland. Please state your reasoning.

Since Garland is not on the court, you are making a false premise.

I said "for example" but okay. Tell me about the opinions you would cite indicating that Gorsuch is far superior to any of the current Justices. Your other point about "liberal activism" was interesting. What about "conservative activism?" I myself am a Hugo Black conservative. Aliti and Thomas are conservative activists. As deleterious to constitutional law as any liberal.

You apparently do not know what judicial activism is. Please go read up on it so we can have an intelligent conversation.

You are incapable of having civil discourse. You resort to personal insults that are so wrong that they are hysterical. I'm guessing only one of us worked at the SC. But by all means keep talking.

 

[Dim Bulb]

Why would one of the most corrupt politicians in modern history who had repeatedly sold the influence of her office to the highest bidder by worse than a loud mouth businessman who is appointing far superior judges?

It's not self evident?

Course you could have listened to me and voted third party but can't think outside the box can we?

It's too bad a third party could not find a strong candidate to run last election. With Clinton and Trump having the most negative ratings in recent history, this should of been the election a third party candidate could have won.

Third parties tend to be the extremes. The Greens, Communists, and other even more liberal groups that no Republican would ever vote for and Libertarians that no Democrat would ever vote for.

Try to find a centrist third party. Good luck with that!

John Anderson. Michael Bloomberg. Even George Washington was a moderate.

Bloomberg? Oh, my! Have you been out in the sun too long?

John Anderson? Why didn't he win? Ancient history.

George Washington? Using that logic, Dems should have nominated Mad Dog Maddis!

You asked a question and I answered it. Your basic premise is still correct however.