Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,337
- 80,982
Funny how he demanded Obama release his college transcripts.Where's the tax return?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Funny how he demanded Obama release his college transcripts.Where's the tax return?
Funny how he demanded Obama release his college transcripts.Where's the tax return?
He did it when he was shamed into it. That's what you get with Lyin' Don.You speculate and have no proof. When you make claims, you should be able to back them up. Now, prove the money wouldn't have been given without the media. Prove means having something to support your claim. All you have is "he didn't do it when konradv thought he should".
- Marine Vet Al Baldasaro Defends Trump! SLAMS Liberal Media Over False Reporting Donations (video)
WD Wayne Dupree ^ | 05/31/16 | Wayne Dupree
I have to applaud Al Baldasaro, a marine veteran for what he just said. Donald Trump raised $5.6M dollars for the veterans and the media continued to lie and spread negative information. Trump took care of that today and Al called out the media!
He proved he got shamed into paying the money he originally lied about paying.
He did it when he was shamed into it. That's what you get with Lyin' Don.You speculate and have no proof. When you make claims, you should be able to back them up. Now, prove the money wouldn't have been given without the media. Prove means having something to support your claim. All you have is "he didn't do it when konradv thought he should".
That's it? Only $5.6 million?Trump proved he paid $5.6 million to veteran charities and bragged publicly he raised $6 million. I guess he kept 400,000 for himself.
How much have raised and does it come close to $5.6 million?
Obama got them $1.4 billion.
Implementing the Recovery Act - American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
Where's the applause from the right?
The time line proves it. To not see it is to be willfully blind, but I guess that's a given from your handle.Prove it.He did it when he was shamed into it. That's what you get with Lyin' Don.You speculate and have no proof. When you make claims, you should be able to back them up. Now, prove the money wouldn't have been given without the media. Prove means having something to support your claim. All you have is "he didn't do it when konradv thought he should".
The time line proves it. To not see it is to be willfully blind, but I guess that's a given from your handle.Prove it.He did it when he was shamed into it. That's what you get with Lyin' Don.You speculate and have no proof. When you make claims, you should be able to back them up. Now, prove the money wouldn't have been given without the media. Prove means having something to support your claim. All you have is "he didn't do it when konradv thought he should".
The time line proves it. To not see it is to be willfully blind, but I guess that's a given from your handle.Prove it.He did it when he was shamed into it. That's what you get with Lyin' Don.You speculate and have no proof. When you make claims, you should be able to back them up. Now, prove the money wouldn't have been given without the media. Prove means having something to support your claim. All you have is "he didn't do it when konradv thought he should".
The time line proves it. To not see it is to be willfully blind, but I guess that's a given from your handle.Prove it.He did it when he was shamed into it. That's what you get with Lyin' Don.You speculate and have no proof. When you make claims, you should be able to back them up. Now, prove the money wouldn't have been given without the media. Prove means having something to support your claim. All you have is "he didn't do it when konradv thought he should".
Proves it how?
The time line proves it. To not see it is to be willfully blind, but I guess that's a given from your handle.Prove it.He did it when he was shamed into it. That's what you get with Lyin' Don.You speculate and have no proof. When you make claims, you should be able to back them up. Now, prove the money wouldn't have been given without the media. Prove means having something to support your claim. All you have is "he didn't do it when konradv thought he should".
Proves it how?
konradv doesn't seem to understand that a time linen shows WHEN something happened. To say it was why is pure speculation.
The time line proves it. To not see it is to be willfully blind, but I guess that's a given from your handle.Prove it.He did it when he was shamed into it. That's what you get with Lyin' Don.
Proves it how?
konradv doesn't seem to understand that a time linen shows WHEN something happened. To say it was why is pure speculation.
Yeah, I don't understand what he is trying to say. That Trump was involved in a charity fraud? This is the special kind of retard that liberal regressives are known for.
The order Trump followed was to claim for months he had raised six million dollars and he had made a personal donation of one million dollars. The next thing that happened was that the media began looking for the actual amount he had raised and distributed and where his personal one million went. The result of the searching exposed that he was lying and had not raised or distributed as much as he claimed and had not made a million dollar personal donation. He had been lying and got caught redhanded. When the expose hit the front page he quickly cut a bunch of checks on the day the story hit, including the one for his one million dollars personal donation.The time line proves it. To not see it is to be willfully blind, but I guess that's a given from your handle.Prove it.
Proves it how?
konradv doesn't seem to understand that a time linen shows WHEN something happened. To say it was why is pure speculation.
Yeah, I don't understand what he is trying to say. That Trump was involved in a charity fraud? This is the special kind of retard that liberal regressives are known for.
He's trying to say because things happened in a certain order it has to be for the reasons he (konradv) claims it did.
Nonsense. First of all, that "law" was his stimulus. So he gets the credit. Secondly, his stimulus got Vets $1.4 billion. That's 250 times more than the $5.6 million Trump had to be shamed into turning over after lying that he already had. Obama didn't have to; he could have allocated that $1.4 billion anywhere. And thirdly, only to the nutty right are collecting taxes to pay for military costs, stealing. Not to mention, but I will anyway, we were still operating under George Bush's tax plan at the time. According to your nuttiness, George Bush was also stealing from Americans even though he lowered taxes.That's it? Only $5.6 million?Trump proved he paid $5.6 million to veteran charities and bragged publicly he raised $6 million. I guess he kept 400,000 for himself.
How much have raised and does it come close to $5.6 million?
Obama got them $1.4 billion.
Implementing the Recovery Act - American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
Where's the applause from the right?
Obama didn't personally get them jackshit. He implemented a law that effectively stole the money from other people. The usual liberal regressive morality...
I wouldn't be surprised if Obama hasn't donated or raised the amount Trump did in his life...
You Liberals are full of shit.
[
yes he called out the liberal media as the sleaze bags they are
He is narcissist he only invest in himself...he only paid at the last minute when the media started to ask questions ...he is pissed because it cost him a million bucks he was not planning on giving to no Veterans...to see how he treats veteran look at the video of the veteran he scammed for $26,000 ..at Trump UIt is interesting the OP calls charitable giving a Trump "investment". What was he investing in?
I didn't create the timeline. Lyin' Don did and was called on it. If he can lie about already having donated to veterans, what else is he lying about? It's a matter of character and it PROVES there's not much there.The time line proves WHEN something was done. To think otherwise is the typical Liberal mindset of I believe it so it must be true.The time line proves it. To not see it is to be willfully blind, but I guess that's a given from your handle.Prove it.He did it when he was shamed into it. That's what you get with Lyin' Don.You speculate and have no proof. When you make claims, you should be able to back them up. Now, prove the money wouldn't have been given without the media. Prove means having something to support your claim. All you have is "he didn't do it when konradv thought he should".