Trump said Hispanics and Muslims couldn't be a federal judge. What's the big deal?

Ok, so only the Judge, who according to Sotomayor already has an ethnic bias, is a member of La Raza...

Copy - thanks.

Jesus Christ you're stupid.

Read:

The Dishonest Attempt to Associate Gonzalo Curiel with "La Raza" | RedState

So, as I correctly pointed out, the Judge belongs to La Raza - the La Raza Lawyers of California – aka the Latino Bar Association of California. A 'Latino-only', do to speak, Bar Association. That only goes to support, in part, Sotomayor's opinion that ethnicity and gender may and DOES affect Judging.

Are you saying Obama's hand-picked USSC justice is WRONG, NYC?


Ethnic bar associations aren't anything new or controversial.
List of Bar Associations in Southern California | Southern California Professional Magazine
so you consider this nothing out of the ordinary?

Curious....if you were a legislator and you pushed legislation to have the city you represent obey the law and deport any illegal immigrant...and then you were found to be possibly corrupt and put on trial.....would you accept a judge who belonged to a pro Mexican association that was pushing for legalization of illegal immigrants?

This is basic logic....you guys are all sheep of the politicians and press....cause it is easy and fun.

Grow up and face reality.

Trump isn't in court for an immigrant issue, dumbass.
You do understand Leverage don't you.
Using one issue as leverage for a totally non-related issue.
 
Mr. Trump is attacking Judge Curiel in a personal business case, not a political one, and as a candidate for President we think he should be above this kind of pettiness. His implied threat against the judge if he becomes President is more obnoxious, though we doubt he could do much about it in office. The political blowback would rightly be enormous.

What elevates Mr. Trump’s remarks to the reprehensible is his equation of ethnicity with bias. That truly is an attack on the independence of the judiciary because it means that a judge can be disqualified from a case merely for his personal background, rather than for any material conflict of interest.

The suit against Trump University is a classic civil fraud case that has nothing to do with ethnicity. Judge Curiel happens to be an American born in Indiana to immigrant parents, but that is of no legal import. He shouldn’t be judged by the ancestry of his parents any more than Chief Justice Roberts should be barred from ruling on religious liberty cases like the Little Sisters of the Poor because he is a Roman Catholic.

As a legal matter this is well established, notably in a 1998 case (MacDraw v. CIT ) in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. A litigant challenged the fairness of Judge Denny Chin due to his ethnicity. Judge Chin responded by slapping down the complaint and sanctioning the lawyers, and he was backed by the appellate judges. “Courts have repeatedly held that matters such as race or ethnicity are improper bases for challenging a judge’s impartiality,” wrote Judge Ralph Winter, a highly regarded conservative appointed by Ronald Reagan.

Apart from his racist implications, Mr. Trump is also indulging in the left’s habit of attributing the motivations of everyone and everything to race, class, gender and sexual orientation. Claiming that a person’s judgment is determined by his objective circumstances is a Marxist trope. Isn’t Mr. Trump supposed to be running against such thinking?​

Trump and the ‘Mexican’ Judge
That's not true. Republicans aren't just racists. They are greedy first.

The irony that you use your racism to feed your greed. You work to keep blacks poor and subjugated to government so you can cultivate them for votes for free shit. It would be less evil if you just hated blacks

More whites than blacks get government assistance. You idiot.
As a percentage of population?

Percentage means nothing. There are more poor white votes than black. Racist.
There are more whites than blacks. You are the racist.
Percentage of population keeps things even. when comparing them.
 
Trump said the Judge in the case against him should recuse himself because he is of Mexican heritage and that he would be bias based on his intent to build a wall and oppose illegal Mexican Immigration.

Turns out the Lawyer facing him and the Judge both belong to / are members of La Raza, and everyone knows what La Raza stands for / believes.
-- Judge, law firm bringing Trump U case both tied to La Raza

.

What did I say the other day about how many times we'd have to point this out?

The lawyer group is not the La Raza you're thinking of.
Ok, so only the Judge, who according to Sotomayor already has an ethnic bias, is a member of La Raza...

Copy - thanks.

Jesus Christ you're stupid.

Read:

The Dishonest Attempt to Associate Gonzalo Curiel with "La Raza" | RedState

Different La Raza dum-dum.

Goddam you're stupid. Read the article.
 

So, as I correctly pointed out, the Judge belongs to La Raza - the La Raza Lawyers of California – aka the Latino Bar Association of California. A 'Latino-only', do to speak, Bar Association. That only goes to support, in part, Sotomayor's opinion that ethnicity and gender may and DOES affect Judging.

Are you saying Obama's hand-picked USSC justice is WRONG, NYC?


Ethnic bar associations aren't anything new or controversial.
List of Bar Associations in Southern California | Southern California Professional Magazine
so you consider this nothing out of the ordinary?

Curious....if you were a legislator and you pushed legislation to have the city you represent obey the law and deport any illegal immigrant...and then you were found to be possibly corrupt and put on trial.....would you accept a judge who belonged to a pro Mexican association that was pushing for legalization of illegal immigrants?

This is basic logic....you guys are all sheep of the politicians and press....cause it is easy and fun.

Grow up and face reality.

Trump isn't in court for an immigrant issue, dumbass.
You do understand Leverage don't you.
Using one issue as leverage for a totally non-related issue.

Trump either committed fraud or he didn't. He can't get away with committing fraud because he claims a judge doesn't like his politics.
 
So, as I correctly pointed out, the Judge belongs to La Raza - the La Raza Lawyers of California – aka the Latino Bar Association of California. A 'Latino-only', do to speak, Bar Association. That only goes to support, in part, Sotomayor's opinion that ethnicity and gender may and DOES affect Judging.

Are you saying Obama's hand-picked USSC justice is WRONG, NYC?


Ethnic bar associations aren't anything new or controversial.
List of Bar Associations in Southern California | Southern California Professional Magazine
so you consider this nothing out of the ordinary?

Curious....if you were a legislator and you pushed legislation to have the city you represent obey the law and deport any illegal immigrant...and then you were found to be possibly corrupt and put on trial.....would you accept a judge who belonged to a pro Mexican association that was pushing for legalization of illegal immigrants?

This is basic logic....you guys are all sheep of the politicians and press....cause it is easy and fun.

Grow up and face reality.

Trump isn't in court for an immigrant issue, dumbass.
You do understand Leverage don't you.
Using one issue as leverage for a totally non-related issue.

Trump either committed fraud or he didn't. He can't get away with committing fraud because he claims a judge doesn't like his politics.
But a Judge who doesn't like his politics can falsely find Trump guilty because of that bias.
 
So, as I correctly pointed out, the Judge belongs to La Raza - the La Raza Lawyers of California – aka the Latino Bar Association of California. A 'Latino-only', do to speak, Bar Association. That only goes to support, in part, Sotomayor's opinion that ethnicity and gender may and DOES affect Judging.

Are you saying Obama's hand-picked USSC justice is WRONG, NYC?


Ethnic bar associations aren't anything new or controversial.
List of Bar Associations in Southern California | Southern California Professional Magazine
so you consider this nothing out of the ordinary?

Curious....if you were a legislator and you pushed legislation to have the city you represent obey the law and deport any illegal immigrant...and then you were found to be possibly corrupt and put on trial.....would you accept a judge who belonged to a pro Mexican association that was pushing for legalization of illegal immigrants?

This is basic logic....you guys are all sheep of the politicians and press....cause it is easy and fun.

Grow up and face reality.

Trump isn't in court for an immigrant issue, dumbass.
You do understand Leverage don't you.
Using one issue as leverage for a totally non-related issue.

Trump either committed fraud or he didn't. He can't get away with committing fraud because he claims a judge doesn't like his politics.

Why do you believe a biased judge should be allowed to persecute him?
 
so you consider this nothing out of the ordinary?

Curious....if you were a legislator and you pushed legislation to have the city you represent obey the law and deport any illegal immigrant...and then you were found to be possibly corrupt and put on trial.....would you accept a judge who belonged to a pro Mexican association that was pushing for legalization of illegal immigrants?

This is basic logic....you guys are all sheep of the politicians and press....cause it is easy and fun.

Grow up and face reality.

Trump isn't in court for an immigrant issue, dumbass.
You do understand Leverage don't you.
Using one issue as leverage for a totally non-related issue.

Trump either committed fraud or he didn't. He can't get away with committing fraud because he claims a judge doesn't like his politics.

Why do you believe a biased judge should be allowed to persecute him?

There is no evidence that either the judge is biased or that Trump is being persecuted.
Your argument is dumb.
 
so you consider this nothing out of the ordinary?

Curious....if you were a legislator and you pushed legislation to have the city you represent obey the law and deport any illegal immigrant...and then you were found to be possibly corrupt and put on trial.....would you accept a judge who belonged to a pro Mexican association that was pushing for legalization of illegal immigrants?

This is basic logic....you guys are all sheep of the politicians and press....cause it is easy and fun.

Grow up and face reality.

Trump isn't in court for an immigrant issue, dumbass.
You do understand Leverage don't you.
Using one issue as leverage for a totally non-related issue.

Trump either committed fraud or he didn't. He can't get away with committing fraud because he claims a judge doesn't like his politics.

Why do you believe a biased judge should be allowed to persecute him?

There is no evidence that either the judge is biased or that Trump is being persecuted.
Your argument is dumb.

There's abundant evidence that the judge is biased. For one thing, he's a member of a lawyer's association named "La Raza" that does pro-bono work for illegal immigrants.
 
Trump isn't in court for an immigrant issue, dumbass.
You do understand Leverage don't you.
Using one issue as leverage for a totally non-related issue.

Trump either committed fraud or he didn't. He can't get away with committing fraud because he claims a judge doesn't like his politics.

Why do you believe a biased judge should be allowed to persecute him?

There is no evidence that either the judge is biased or that Trump is being persecuted.
Your argument is dumb.

There's abundant evidence that the judge is biased. For one thing, he's a member of a lawyer's association named "La Raza" that does pro-bono work for illegal immigrants.

So what? That's not evidence of anything other than philanthropic work.
 
You do understand Leverage don't you.
Using one issue as leverage for a totally non-related issue.

Trump either committed fraud or he didn't. He can't get away with committing fraud because he claims a judge doesn't like his politics.

Why do you believe a biased judge should be allowed to persecute him?

There is no evidence that either the judge is biased or that Trump is being persecuted.
Your argument is dumb.

There's abundant evidence that the judge is biased. For one thing, he's a member of a lawyer's association named "La Raza" that does pro-bono work for illegal immigrants.

So what? That's not evidence of anything other than philanthropic work.

Only a douche bag would make such a claim.
 
Trump said "Mexico is sending us their rapists and murderers" and the press and his opposition have called him "anti Mexican" for saying it.

Trump said "We should block the passage of incoming Muslims until we figure this terrorist infiltration into the Syrian refugee thing out" and the press and his opposition have called him a bigot for saying it.

All we continue to hear is how the Muslim and the Latino population despise Trump.

And he is now a bigot for showing concern that a Judge of direct Mexican descent is sitting on a case against him?

Curious...what are the chances that a Mexican juror would be chosen for that case? A Muslim juror?

The GOP are a bunch of assholes for feeding fuel to the "outrage"...all they care about are their careers....

Get off it. He may have presented in a gruff way....but he has all the right in the world to question his chances of a fair trial.

If Hillary were to be indicted and put on trial....would she be satisfied with an ultra conservative judge? Would she not make a comment if a very conservative judge did not recluse him/herself from the trial? Would she be deemed "un American" for thinking she may not get a fair trial?

You folks are all a bunch of non thinking gullible assholes with no real understanding of how politicians manipulate your thinking.

Trump said that an American-born judge was biased because of his ethnicity.

This is 2016, not 1816.

But you keep running with that.

Make sure to blame everyone else when Trump loses in November.
and only a fool would think he meant "the son of a mexican does not have the ability to be unbiased"

Anyone with a brain understood what he meant..."because of the reputation my opposition and the press gave me due to my comments about immigration, it is not right to have a man oversee my case who belongs to a pro immigration association and the son of Mexican parents.

But I get it. Whatever the press and the opposition says.....must be fact.

Thus why you are what you are.

WTF are you on?

It's amazing what the Trumptards will believe to rationalize every shitty thing the bizarre birfer demagogue says.

He said he was biased because he's "Mexican."

Congratulations on supporting the new George Wallace.

:clap:
 
so you consider this nothing out of the ordinary?

Curious....if you were a legislator and you pushed legislation to have the city you represent obey the law and deport any illegal immigrant...and then you were found to be possibly corrupt and put on trial.....would you accept a judge who belonged to a pro Mexican association that was pushing for legalization of illegal immigrants?

This is basic logic....you guys are all sheep of the politicians and press....cause it is easy and fun.

Grow up and face reality.

Trump isn't in court for an immigrant issue, dumbass.
You do understand Leverage don't you.
Using one issue as leverage for a totally non-related issue.

Trump either committed fraud or he didn't. He can't get away with committing fraud because he claims a judge doesn't like his politics.
But a Judge who doesn't like his politics can falsely find Trump guilty because of that bias.

And if it was based on that, it would lose in appeal.

If the judges race were a problem, don't you think his lawyers would have brought it up?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Trump said "Mexico is sending us their rapists and murderers" and the press and his opposition have called him "anti Mexican" for saying it.

Trump said "We should block the passage of incoming Muslims until we figure this terrorist infiltration into the Syrian refugee thing out" and the press and his opposition have called him a bigot for saying it.

All we continue to hear is how the Muslim and the Latino population despise Trump.

And he is now a bigot for showing concern that a Judge of direct Mexican descent is sitting on a case against him?

Curious...what are the chances that a Mexican juror would be chosen for that case? A Muslim juror?

The GOP are a bunch of assholes for feeding fuel to the "outrage"...all they care about are their careers....

Get off it. He may have presented in a gruff way....but he has all the right in the world to question his chances of a fair trial.

If Hillary were to be indicted and put on trial....would she be satisfied with an ultra conservative judge? Would she not make a comment if a very conservative judge did not recluse him/herself from the trial? Would she be deemed "un American" for thinking she may not get a fair trial?

You folks are all a bunch of non thinking gullible assholes with no real understanding of how politicians manipulate your thinking.

Trump said that an American-born judge was biased because of his ethnicity.

This is 2016, not 1816.

But you keep running with that.

Make sure to blame everyone else when Trump loses in November.
and only a fool would think he meant "the son of a mexican does not have the ability to be unbiased"

Anyone with a brain understood what he meant..."because of the reputation my opposition and the press gave me due to my comments about immigration, it is not right to have a man oversee my case who belongs to a pro immigration association and the son of Mexican parents.

But I get it. Whatever the press and the opposition says.....must be fact.

Thus why you are what you are.

WTF are you on?

It's amazing what the Trumptards will believe to rationalize every shitty thing the bizarre birfer demagogue says.

He said he was biased because he's "Mexican."

Congratulations on supporting the new George Wallace.

:clap:

That's a deliberate misinterpretation of what he said because you're a lying douche bag.
 
That's a deliberate misinterpretation of what he said because you're a lying douche bag.

You're a mindless low-IQ uneducated Trumptard idiot who will believe anything your master messiah Trump tells you.

When everyone will be saying "President Hillary" next year, we'll have morons like yourself to thank.
 
so you consider this nothing out of the ordinary?

Curious....if you were a legislator and you pushed legislation to have the city you represent obey the law and deport any illegal immigrant...and then you were found to be possibly corrupt and put on trial.....would you accept a judge who belonged to a pro Mexican association that was pushing for legalization of illegal immigrants?

This is basic logic....you guys are all sheep of the politicians and press....cause it is easy and fun.

Grow up and face reality.

Trump isn't in court for an immigrant issue, dumbass.
You do understand Leverage don't you.
Using one issue as leverage for a totally non-related issue.

Trump either committed fraud or he didn't. He can't get away with committing fraud because he claims a judge doesn't like his politics.

Why do you believe a biased judge should be allowed to persecute him?

There is no evidence that either the judge is biased or that Trump is being persecuted.
Your argument is dumb.
How about the fact that he's a member of a group that's boycotting Trump?
 
Trump isn't in court for an immigrant issue, dumbass.
You do understand Leverage don't you.
Using one issue as leverage for a totally non-related issue.

Trump either committed fraud or he didn't. He can't get away with committing fraud because he claims a judge doesn't like his politics.

Why do you believe a biased judge should be allowed to persecute him?

There is no evidence that either the judge is biased or that Trump is being persecuted.
Your argument is dumb.
How about the fact that he's a member of a group that's boycotting Trump?

How about you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Trump supporters’ false claim that Trump U judge is a member of a pro-immigrant group


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
It is NOT constitutional to exclude any race, sex or religion of Americans from running or holding office.

Fourteenth Amendment. an amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1868, defining national citizenship and forbidding the states to restrict the basic rights of citizens or other persons.
 
You do understand Leverage don't you.
Using one issue as leverage for a totally non-related issue.

Trump either committed fraud or he didn't. He can't get away with committing fraud because he claims a judge doesn't like his politics.

Why do you believe a biased judge should be allowed to persecute him?

There is no evidence that either the judge is biased or that Trump is being persecuted.
Your argument is dumb.
How about the fact that he's a member of a group that's boycotting Trump?

How about you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Trump supporters’ false claim that Trump U judge is a member of a pro-immigrant group


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NEW YORK – The federal judge in the Trump University case, Gonzalo P. Curiel, is a lifetime member of the Hispanic National Bar Association, a La Raza-affiliated group that declared economic war on Donald Trump in a national campaign launched on the group’s website one year ago.
Read more at Trump U judge’s La Raza group boycotting Trump
Trump U judge’s La Raza group boycotting Trump
 
Trump either committed fraud or he didn't. He can't get away with committing fraud because he claims a judge doesn't like his politics.

Why do you believe a biased judge should be allowed to persecute him?

There is no evidence that either the judge is biased or that Trump is being persecuted.
Your argument is dumb.
How about the fact that he's a member of a group that's boycotting Trump?

How about you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Trump supporters’ false claim that Trump U judge is a member of a pro-immigrant group


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NEW YORK – The federal judge in the Trump University case, Gonzalo P. Curiel, is a lifetime member of the Hispanic National Bar Association, a La Raza-affiliated group that declared economic war on Donald Trump in a national campaign launched on the group’s website one year ago.
Read more at Trump U judge’s La Raza group boycotting Trump
Trump U judge’s La Raza group boycotting Trump

That's a six degrees of separation comedy right there.
 

Forum List

Back
Top