meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 21,909
- 18,116
Then why didn't Trumps lawyer ask for the affidavit to be unsealed?Warrants can be falsified you know.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then why didn't Trumps lawyer ask for the affidavit to be unsealed?Warrants can be falsified you know.
Maybe he didThen why didn't Trumps lawyer ask for the affidavit to be unsealed?
GOD Bless him~ Wish him the very best!
“A major motion pertaining to the Fourth Amendment will soon be filed concerning the illegal Break-In of my home, Mar-a-Lago, right before the ever important Mid-Term Elections. “My rights, together with the rights of all Americans, have been violated at a level rarely seen before in our Country. Remember, they even spied on my campaign. The greatest Witch Hunt in USA history has been going on for six years, with no consequences to the scammers. It should not be allowed to continue!” –
Published August 19, 2022
![]()
Trump Says He Will Be Filing a "Major Motion" Soon in Response to FBI Raid on Mar-a-Lago | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
President Trump on Friday said he will be filing a “major motion” soon in response to the “illegal” FBI raid of his Florida residence.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Under the Fourth Amendment, Americans are protected against unreasonable searches and seizures.
There was no need for the criminal FBI raid on Trumps home.
It was all political and it was all illegal!
The scum who did this to Trump will pay.
"My Rights, Together With The Rights Of All Americans, Have Been Violated" said Trump
He is absolutely right!![]()
She, and NO !!!Maybe he did
Actually, when you lie to do so, it is illegal.Hilarious.
It's not illegal to get a warrant and search for things.
1) Trump's team has claimed they were going to file things in this whole affair and didn't.
You dopes keep forgetting the word “allegedly.” If the stuff had previously been declassified, then your theory goes “poof.”2) The 4A says "against unreasonable searches and seizures,". They literally FOUND STUFF that they can't tell people what it is because it's a national security issue.
What was the alleged “probable cause?” You don’t know because it’s sealed. And just because a questionable magistrate judge said, “ok. This here suffices as ‘probable cause’” doesn’t mean his decision was proper or correct. This is particularly true of the FBI made false claims to obtain the warrant or if they deliberately omitted facts that would have changed the analysis.3) The 4A says "and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized"
They described it, and then FOUND IT.
Trump has a separate private living quarters within Mar a Lago, Simp.
That makes it his home, not public and open to all members and their invitees, you raving lunatic.
Try just one post without lying. Just one.
Hilarious.
It's not illegal to get a warrant and search for things.
1) Trump's team has claimed they were going to file things in this whole affair and didn't.
2) The 4A says "against unreasonable searches and seizures,". They literally FOUND STUFF that they can't tell people what it is because it's a national security issue.
3) The 4A says "and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized"
They described it, and then FOUND IT.
Actually, when you lie to do so, it is illegal.
What? Try to be a little more murky when you post.
You dopes keep forgetting the word “allegedly.” If the stuff had previously been declassified, then your theory goes “poof.”
What was the alleged “probable cause?” You don’t know because it’s sealed. And just because a questionable magistrate judge said, “ok. This here suffices as ‘probable cause’” doesn’t mean his decision was proper or correct. This is particularly true of the FBI made false claims to obtain the warrant or if they deliberately omitted facts that would have changed the analysis.
Additionally, you don’t actually know precisely what they “found.”So
That still doesn't make it a private residence. It's a building that's open to the public.
Well we do know what they found because it's in the inventory.
Trump was not allowed to have Top Secret and SDI Top Secret documents.
He stole them
No. In fact he was in the process of negotiating with the National Archives. Not unusual at all.and he refused to return them.
So cut with the "allegedly" crap.
He hasn’t denied having what he had. That much is true. The “shouldn’t have”’part is just more of your blather.Trump hasn't even tried to deny that they found stuff he shouldn't have.
His residence isn't open to the public any more than his apartment in NY is, even though there's businesses on the first few floors.
.
But still on his private property.The area where these Top Secret document were being stored was NOT in his residence. It was in the "Club House" public areas of the club. Not his private residence.
The area where these Top Secret document were being stored was NOT in his residence. It was in the "Club House" public areas of the club. Not his private residence.
NO. The warrant excluded the "guest" areas.Well that's just another one of your lies. It was his private secured storage area. If you bothered to read the warrant, the public areas were off limits for the search.
.
We don't cheat, you do, while pointing the finger at everyone else!Hes not runnng but those he supports are winning primaries all over the country uncluding Blue States. Hes doing norhing other Presidents havent done before, but when you have a shit economy and a Biden you no other option but to try We HATE Trump again. If you cant cheat in rhis next election you are going to get Steam rolled and you know it.
Your desperation can be smelt all the way to China.
Not related, at all, to this search.... Even GUMBY can't twist himself in to that one! Try again!"Under the statutory scheme established by the PRA, the decision to segregate personal materials from Presidential records is made by the President, during the President's term and in his sole discretion," Jackson wrote in her March 2012 decision, which was never appealed.
![]()
Old case over audio tapes in Bill Clinton's sock drawer could impact Mar-a-Lago search dispute
Judge ruled in 2012 that a president's discretion to declare records "personal" is far-reaching and mostly unchallengeable.justthenews.com
.
I can't disagree! Sure feels like it!Many people are confused about good and evil. Proof that we're in the last days.