Trump takes the 5th 400 times...

[The5thHorseman]

/——/ I didn’t watch the Cartoon Network either.

But I bet you watch a LOT of FOX....while insisting you never do.

 

[krichton]

Are you serious? Can you f*ing read?

The articles say Obama and Clinton team members, dumbass...and Hillary refused to testify under oath during the Benghazi hearings...during her classified scandal the FBI did not put her under oath during questioning or record the inyerview, which is SOP.

Who cares about their aides pleading the fifth? Trump "team members and associates" are in jail. LOL. I'll repeat the question, when has Obama or Hillary ever pleaded the fifth once, much less over 400 times like Trump?

 

[Cellblock2429]

But I bet you watch a LOT of FOX....while insisting you never do.

/——-/ Nope. I stopped watching broadcast news years ago. I check in CNBC for the stock market and any news that filters down.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Who cares about their aides pleading the fifth? Trump "team members and associates" are in jail. LOL. I'll repeat the question, when has Obama or Hillary ever pleaded the fifth once, much less over 400 times like Trump?

/——-/ “I don’t recall.” — Hildabeast

 

[easyt65]

Who cares about their aides pleading the fifth?

What do you think they were questioned / required to testify about, genius?

Their bosses crimes, their knowledge of them, and their parts in them...

Sorta like Hillary's IT employee who had access to TS/SCI info on her unclass system yet had no security clearance.

And Hillary never pled the 5th - SHE LIED.

 

[struth]

right...nothing at all.

you're a moron.

hey you all got some parody…i guess that’s something to pay yourself on the back about

 

[The5thHorseman]

/——-/ “I don’t recall.” — Hildabeast

To every question?

 

[The5thHorseman]

hey you all got some parody…i guess that’s something to pay yourself on the back about

Do you "pay yourself on the back" for being such a credulous rube?

 

[struth]

Do you "pay yourself on the back" for being such a credulous rube?

pat yourself…you got me..just like you got trump!

 

[The5thHorseman]

What do you think they were questioned / required to testify about, genius?

Their bosses crimes, their knowledge of them, and their parts in them...

Sorta like Hillary's IT employee who had access to TS/SCI info on her unclass system yet had no security clearance.

And Hillary never pled the 5th - SHE LIED.

Vague implications.....but your facts are wrong..

Simple, basic facts.

That is how credulous you are, Usefool.

 

[The5thHorseman]

/——-/ Nope. I stopped watching broadcast news years ago. I check in CNBC for the stock market and any news that filters down.

You sing from the same hymnal as all the other idiots...whom do you think you're kidding?

 

[struth]

Vague implications.....but your facts are wrong..

Simple, basic facts.

That is how credulous you are, Usefool.

what was vague about his post? what wasn’t a fact?

 

[The5thHorseman]

what was vague about his post? what wasn’t a fact?

Scroll up, simp.

 

[hadit]

By any measure he sucked.

TRUMP! was a pretty good president in tough times. He was the Peace President, being the first in decades to start no new hostilities, for just one example, and still preferable to what we have now.

 

[struth]

Scroll up, simp.

i read the post…what was vague about it? what part was not a fact?

 

[The5thHorseman]

TRUMP! was a pretty good president in tough times. He was the Peace President, being the first in decades to start no new hostilities, for just one example, and still preferable to what we have now.

That's garbage.

In a new section of his 2020 book on Trump, as obtained by NBC News, New York Times correspondent Michael Schmidt reveals that Trump spent much of 2017 suggesting “behind closed doors in the Oval office” that he wanted to attack North Korea. The then president, Schmidt writes in the soon-to-be released afterword to Donald Trump v. The United States: Inside the Struggle to Stop a President, “cavalierly discussed the idea of using a nuclear weapon against North Korea, saying that if he took such an action, the administration could blame someone else for it to absolve itself of responsibility.”

For his part, John Kelly reportedly attempted to explain to his boss why that probably wouldn’t work, noting that “It’d be tough to not have the finger pointed at us,” but, of course, the then White House chief of staff was using reason and logic, two things that haven’t typically worked on Trump. Still, according to Schmidt, Kelly tried, bringing in “the military’s top leaders to the White House to brief Trump about how war between the US and North Korea could easily break out, as well as the enormous consequences of such a conflict. But the argument about how many people could be killed had ‘no impact on Trump.’” Nor did the threat of economic blowback; according to the book’s update, informed of why all of this would be a very bad idea, the president would still “turn back to the possibility of war, including at one point raising to Kelly the possibility of launching a preemptive military attack against North Korea.”

 

[pknopp]

That's garbage.

In a new section of his 2020 book on Trump, as obtained by NBC News, New York Times correspondent Michael Schmidt reveals that Trump spent much of 2017 suggesting “behind closed doors in the Oval office” that he wanted to attack North Korea. The then president, Schmidt writes in the soon-to-be released afterword to Donald Trump v. The United States: Inside the Struggle to Stop a President, “cavalierly discussed the idea of using a nuclear weapon against North Korea, saying that if he took such an action, the administration could blame someone else for it to absolve itself of responsibility.”

For his part, John Kelly reportedly attempted to explain to his boss why that probably wouldn’t work, noting that “It’d be tough to not have the finger pointed at us,” but, of course, the then White House chief of staff was using reason and logic, two things that haven’t typically worked on Trump. Still, according to Schmidt, Kelly tried, bringing in “the military’s top leaders to the White House to brief Trump about how war between the US and North Korea could easily break out, as well as the enormous consequences of such a conflict. But the argument about how many people could be killed had ‘no impact on Trump.’” Nor did the threat of economic blowback; according to the book’s update, informed of why all of this would be a very bad idea, the president would still “turn back to the possibility of war, including at one point raising to Kelly the possibility of launching a preemptive military attack against North Korea.”

I believe Trump wasn't allowed to start any new attacks but all the same, he did not. I am no fan of Trump BUT he didn't get us involved in anything new.

 

[The5thHorseman]

i read the post…what was vague about it? what part was not a fact?

The judgement of a moron is of no consequence.

And it doesn't oblige me in any way at all.

 

[The5thHorseman]

I believe Trump wasn't allowed to start any new attacks but all the same, he did not. I am no fan of Trump BUT he didn't get us involved in anything new.

That entire trope is crap.

 

[buckeye45_73]

2nd hand heresy? Yeah, I think you mean hearsay. Recounting what you actually heard isn't 'hearsay'. Its eye witness testimony.

You really don't know the defintion of eye witness do you?