Brain357
Platinum Member
- Mar 30, 2013
- 37,068
- 4,189
Nobody wins a trade war. Wise countries don't use it as an economic weapon because of this. Maybe you can learn something from this:I get what you guys are trying to do. Intentionally or not
If you’re losing out on my business, you’re not sending me a widget. It’s not costing you anything except your internal production costs. It doesn’t help me pay for a wall or anything else.Import tariffs make Chinese steel more expensive. Thus the importer in Shawnee Mission looks for a supplier not located in Shanghai.
Bingo! And they end up not paying it. So who really pays for it in the end? China does. That's why China threw a fit over it.
Okay….perhaps you need a basic course in commerce.
If you’re selling me a widget, I am paying you for the widget. You’re not paying me.
The importer in Shawnee Mission, KS is wanting to buy steel from a steel company in Shanghai, China. The importer is paying the steel company; the steel company is not paying the importer.
The tariff that Trump is adding to imports is a tax that the importer is paying; China is not paying a Yuan to anyone.
Simple, don't buy the widget from me any mroe and you don't pay it. Guess who is still paying for it? Me, by losing out on your business.
I didn’t go to Wal Mart today. Wal Mart didn’t incur some sort of costs by my not going there.
I think what you’re substituting for cash is some sort of pain fantasy you are hoping to impose on Mexico.
Seriously, explain to me, because the other guy won't, why then these countries are so upset about us having Tariffs now? Surely it's good for them right?...right?
Also, why do all of these countries put huge tariffs on our goods? You'd think would want zero tariffs, but alas they don't. They aren't so ignorant as to think that the buyer is forced to purchase a good with a tariff tax on it.
Again, they impose tariffs to protect their domestic suppliers.
You guys have been arguing that Tariffs cost them not us. How is that costing their suppliers?
I don't know if this is intentional or not, but you both are completely missing my point. You're stuck on the notion that because the buyer is the one handing over the cash that they are forced to absorb the cost. This isn't true. If it were true, no country would ever use tariffs as an economic weapon.
The only way the domestic suppliers are protected is if it is cost prohibitive for us suppliers to compete. There is no other reason. That is exactly my point. It costs the exporter not the country importing. Not necessarily.
Sure prices will go up temporarily, but only until the market readjusts.
Also, the tariffs will be absorbed somehow because this isn't some perfect thought experiment. There always will be someone somewhere buying from canada or China even with the tariff, but the notion that the buyers are somehow going to eat that cost no matter what is ridiculous. The entire nature of tariffs is that they are used to divert trade value through economic friction (taxation).